← Back to the Bel and the Dragon index

On the Greek text. The Greek follows the standard critical text of the Septuagint (Rahlfs-Hanhart in its main wording, itself an ancient, public-domain text); the distinctively copyrighted critical apparatus is not reproduced. Versification follows the LXX.

Bel and the Dragon (LXX) — Interlinear: Themes, Outlines & Translation Notes

A consolidated companion to the Bel and the Dragon data set: every chapter of LXX Bel and the Dragon (1-1) rendered as a six-tier Greek reverse-interlinear (Greek · gloss · parsing/case · syntax · semantic force · lexical note), with per-verse discourse analysis and a chapter argument-outline.

This document gathers the theme, the argument outline (the outline movements authored into each data file), and the translation / textual / exegetical notes (the text_note of each file, reproduced verbatim). Major translation and interpretive cruxes are handled within those notes rather than silently resolved. Bel and the Dragon is the Greek Danielic anti-idolatry narrative in which Daniel exposes fraudulent cult, destroys the living dragon, survives another descent into the lions' den, and shows the impotence of pagan worship before the living God. The Greek follows the standard critical text of the Septuagint (Rahlfs–Hanhart in its main wording, itself an ancient public-domain text); the distinctively copyrighted apparatus is not reproduced, and versification follows the LXX.

Scope

Chapter Verses Words annotated Outline movements
Bel and the Dragon 1 42 871 4
Total 42 871 4

Each annotated word carries Greek, a working gloss, color-coded grammatical case, parsing (Tense·Voice·Mood·Person·Number + lemma), a Wallace-style syntactic-function label, an aspectual semantic-force label (verbal forms), and a condensed lexical note. As translation Greek, the annotation additionally flags Hebraisms and the underlying Hebrew idiom where it illuminates the rendering.

The argument of the book

The macro-structure of this single-chapter book — its major movements — under which the chapter detail below unfolds. Bel and the Dragon first uncovers priestly deceit around Bel, then turns to the dragon cult, and finally repeats the pattern of unjust punishment and miraculous deliverance that confirms Daniel's God over royal power and idols alike.

Chapter-by-chapter

Bel and the Dragon 1 — ΒΗΛ ΚΑΙ ΔΡΑΚΩΝ Α′

Theme. A composite anti-idolatry narrative joined to Daniel's cycle: first Bel's priests are exposed by forensic ingenuity, then the living dragon is destroyed without conventional weapons, and finally Daniel survives another descent into the lions' den until the pagan king confesses the living God.

Outline.

Translation & textual notes. The Greek text of Bel and the Dragon here follows the Theodotionic Daniel tradition preserved in CCAT's 60.BelTh.mlxx; the critical apparatus is not reproduced. Bel and the Dragon 1 is a composite anti-idolatry narrative joined to Daniel's cycle: first Bel's priests are exposed by forensic ingenuity, then the living dragon is destroyed without conventional weapons, and finally Daniel survives another descent into the lions' den until the pagan king confesses the living God. The opening Bel episode is deliberately procedural, much like Susanna: sealed doors, hidden access, ash on the temple floor, and exposed footprints all make the fraud visible through testable evidence rather than private intuition. The dragon scene then shifts from fraud to power, mocking the claim that a visibly living creature is therefore divine; Daniel kills it with cakes of pitch, fat, and hair, a gesture both comic and polemical. The closing lions'-den episode, with Habakkuk miraculously transported to feed Daniel, binds the tale back into the larger Danielic theology of faithful endurance under imperial pressure. Throughout, the repeated contrast is between χειροποίητα or creaturely objects of worship and the living God who creates heaven and earth, remembers his servant, and judges false religion. Versification follows the LXX.

How the data set is organized

The interpretive tiers (syntactic function, semantic force, discourse structure, and the proposed argument outlines) are interpretive by nature; where readings legitimately differ, the more common analysis was generally chosen, and the lexical notes are condensed orientation rather than a substitute for a lexicon (e.g. LEH / Muraoka) or a full commentary.