← Back to the Genesis index

On the Greek text. The Greek follows the standard critical text of the Septuagint (Rahlfs-Hanhart in its main wording, itself an ancient, public-domain text); the distinctively copyrighted critical apparatus is not reproduced. Versification follows the LXX.

The Book of Genesis (LXX) — Interlinear: Themes, Outlines & Translation Notes

A consolidated companion to the Genesis data set: every chapter of LXX Genesis (1–50) rendered as a six-tier Greek reverse-interlinear (Greek · gloss · parsing/case · syntax · semantic force · lexical note), with per-verse discourse analysis and a chapter argument-outline.

This document gathers the theme, the argument outline (the outline movements authored into each data file), and the translation / textual / exegetical notes (the text_note of each file, reproduced verbatim) — followed by a summary of the major translation and interpretive cruxes that were deliberately annotated rather than silently resolved. Genesis, the opening volume of the Greek Bible, runs from creation to the coffin in Egypt — the primeval history, the call and covenant of Abraham, the wrestling of Jacob, and the providence of the Joseph story; its LXX form gave the church its founding vocabulary (παράδεισος, διαθήκη, the ἀγαπητός son, the σπέρμα of promise) and the wording behind dozens of New Testament citations. The Greek follows the standard critical text of the Septuagint (Rahlfs–Hanhart in its main wording, itself an ancient public-domain text); the distinctively copyrighted apparatus is not reproduced, and versification follows the LXX.

Scope

Chapter Verses Words annotated Outline movements
Genesis 1 31 741 7
Genesis 2 25 531 5
Genesis 3 24 582 4
Genesis 4 26 529 5
Genesis 5 32 494 5
Genesis 6 22 506 5
Genesis 7 24 525 4
Genesis 8 22 519 4
Genesis 9 29 570 5
Genesis 10 32 469 5
Genesis 11 32 579 3
Genesis 12 20 432 5
Genesis 13 18 387 5
Genesis 14 24 520 4
Genesis 15 21 363 4
Genesis 16 16 353 3
Genesis 17 27 578 4
Genesis 18 33 640 4
Genesis 19 38 913 5
Genesis 20 18 427 5
Genesis 21 34 641 5
Genesis 22 24 542 4
Genesis 23 20 429 4
Genesis 24 67 1530 6
Genesis 25 34 342 6
Genesis 26 35 742 7
Genesis 27 46 1048 5
Genesis 28 22 526 6
Genesis 29 35 707 5
Genesis 30 43 901 6
Genesis 31 54 1186 5
Genesis 32 33 716 6
Genesis 33 20 417 5
Genesis 34 31 681 6
Genesis 35 29 603 6
Genesis 36 43 686 6
Genesis 37 36 773 6
Genesis 38 30 672 5
Genesis 39 23 539 5
Genesis 40 23 480 5
Genesis 41 57 1148 7
Genesis 42 38 801 6
Genesis 43 34 798 4
Genesis 44 34 745 3
Genesis 45 28 615 6
Genesis 46 34 674 3
Genesis 47 31 819 5
Genesis 48 22 561 5
Genesis 49 33 567 8
Genesis 50 26 551 4
Total 1533 32,098 251

Each annotated word carries Greek, a working gloss, color-coded grammatical case, parsing (Tense·Voice·Mood·Person·Number + lemma), a Wallace-style syntactic-function label, an aspectual semantic-force label (verbal forms), and a condensed lexical note. As translation Greek, the annotation additionally flags Hebraisms and the underlying Hebrew idiom where it illuminates the rendering.


The argument of the book

The macro-structure of the whole book — its major movements — under which the chapter-by-chapter detail below unfolds. LXX Genesis is a careful, generally literal translation whose interpretive choices (translated place-names, the +100-year chronology, the second Kainan, the messianic 49:10) the annotation flags throughout. (Section divisions are interpretive; the more common analysis is generally followed.)


Chapter-by-chapter

Genesis 1 — ΓΕΝΕΣΙΣ Α′

Theme. The cosmological prologue of Scripture: by sovereign speech alone, the God of Israel brings the invisible and unformed (ἀόρατος καὶ ἀκατασκεύαστος) into a six-day structure of ordered goodness — light and dark, sky and sea, dry land and vegetation, luminaries, sea creatures and birds, land animals and humanity — pronouncing each act καλόν and the whole καλὰ λίαν, so that the completed heaven and earth with all their κόσμος stand as the permanent witness to divine creative power and the fitting stage for the human image-bearers commissioned to rule it.

Outline.

Translation & textual notes. The Greek text of Genesis 1 follows the standard critical text of the Septuagint as established in the Rahlfs–Hanhart edition (Septuaginta, rev. ed. 2006), an ancient and public-domain text; the critical apparatus is not reproduced. Genesis is the first book of the LXX Pentateuch, translated in Alexandria probably in the third century BCE; its Greek is notably fluent — less woodenly literal than the kaige-style books — while still reflecting the Hebrew Vorlage closely. The opening verse (1:1) reads Ἐν ἀρχῇ ἐποίησεν ὁ θεὸς τὸν οὐρανὸν καὶ τὴν γῆν, which became the template for John 1:1 (Ἐν ἀρχῇ ἦν ὁ λόγος) and is echoed in 2 Cor 4:6. The celebrated rendering of the formless void (Hebrew תֹּהוּ וָבֹהוּ, tōhû wābōhû) as ἀόρατος καὶ ἀκατασκεύαστος ('invisible and unformed', 1:2) departs from a strictly literalistic approach and opens an afterlife in Platonic and patristic cosmology: Theophilus of Antioch and Origen both read the phrase in dialogue with Plato's Timaeus. At 1:2 the spirit of God over the waters is ἐπεφέρετο (imperfect of ἐπιφέρω, 'was being borne / carried upon') — a more dynamic rendering than the MT's מְרַחֶפֶת ('hovering'), and one that Justin Martyr and Basil the Great found suggestive. The refrain of divine approval — καὶ εἶδεν ὁ θεὸς ὅτι καλόν — appears on days one (1:4), three (1:10, 12), four (1:18), five (1:21), and six (1:25), with the climactic expansion καλὰ λίαν ('very good') at 1:31. Notably, the LXX also supplies the refrain at the end of day two (v.8, absent in the MT), making day two the exception that the MT preserves and that a number of ancient witnesses and patristic commentators reflect; this is one of the most discussed LXX–MT divergences in the chapter. At 1:26 the LXX renders the divine self-address as ποιήσωμεν ἄνθρωπον κατ᾿ εἰκόνα ἡμετέραν καὶ καθ᾿ ὁμοίωσιν, preserving both the cohortative plural ('let us make') and the full image-likeness pair (εἰκών / ὁμοίωσις) that became central in patristic theology of the imago Dei; Irenaeus distinguished the two terms as a key move in his theology of recapitulation. The LXX reads ἐν εἰκόνι θεοῦ ἐποίησεν αὐτόν at 1:27 (against MT's בְּצֶלֶם אֱלֹהִים, which LXX renders identically). The word θεός (without article in the LXX convention for אֱלֹהִים in Gen 1) occurs thirty-two times in the chapter. The translation throughout this data file renders the Greek LXX text; English equivalents sometimes differ from translations of the MT.

Genesis 2 — ΓΕΝΕΣΙΣ Β′

Theme. The second creation account: the LORD God forms the human from dust and breathes into him the breath of life, plants a παράδεισος in Eden watered by four rivers, assigns the human the vocation of working and guarding it, pronounces a single prohibition on the tree of knowing, diagnoses the first 'not good' in all creation (aloneness), surveys every creature fruitlessly, casts a divine trance upon the human, builds one rib into a woman, and receives from Adam the first human speech — the bone-and-flesh kinship formula — from which the narrator draws the ἓν σάρξ μία institution of marriage, closing the chapter with the couple naked and unashamed.

Outline.

Translation & textual notes. The Greek text of Genesis 2 follows the standard critical text of the Septuagint as established in the Rahlfs–Hanhart edition (Septuaginta, rev. ed. 2006), an ancient and public-domain text; the critical apparatus is not reproduced. Genesis in the LXX is one of the most closely studied books in the whole Septuagint, and chapter 2 — the second account of creation and the planting of the garden — presents several features of exceptional exegetical importance. The most famous LXX–MT divergence in the entire chapter is at 2:2: the LXX (and also the Samaritan Pentateuch) reads ἐν τῇ ἡμέρᾳ τῇ ἕκτῃ, 'on the sixth day,' where the MT reads בַּיּוֹם הַשְּׁבִיעִי, 'on the seventh day.' The MT reading is almost certainly original; the LXX (and SP) appear to have harmonised the text to avoid the implication that God was still working on the Sabbath day that he immediately goes on to hallow (2:3). The change is a single letter in Hebrew (the numeral differing in the consonantal text between שִׁשִּׁי and שְׁבִיעִי), but it is exegetically consequential and has been debated since antiquity. At 2:4 the LXX introduces the famous phrase αὕτη ἡ βίβλος γενέσεως οὐρανοῦ καὶ γῆς ('this is the book of the genesis of heaven and earth'), which rendered the Hebrew סֵפֶר תּוֹלְדֹת and gave the entire book its LXX title ΓΕΝΕΣΙΣ. Matthew 1:1 (βίβλος γενέσεως Ἰησοῦ Χριστοῦ) deliberately echoes this phrase, and the echo has been recognised since the patristic period. At 2:7 the LXX renders the creation of the human as καὶ ἐγένετο ὁ ἄνθρωπος εἰς ψυχὴν ζῶσαν ('and the man became a living soul'), which Paul quotes directly in 1 Corinthians 15:45 in his contrast between the 'living soul' Adam and the 'life-giving spirit' Christ. The word ψυχή renders Hebrew נֶפֶשׁ; the LXX formulation is used by Paul precisely because it separates the living-soul principle from a more 'spiritual' existence — an important piece of his Adam-Christ typology. At 2:8 the LXX introduces the word παράδεισος for the garden: the Hebrew גַּן ('garden') is rendered by παράδεισος, a loanword from Old Persian pairi-daēza ('enclosure, walled garden'), which entered Greek via Xenophon's Anabasis for the royal parks of Persia. The LXX's use of παράδεισος in Genesis 2–3 is the direct origin of the English word 'paradise,' and the term's theological journey — from a Persian royal park to a cosmic garden of the divine presence — is entirely the work of the LXX translators. At 2:18 the phrase βοηθὸν κατ᾿ αὐτόν renders עֵזֶר כְּנֶגְדּוֹ ('a helper corresponding to him'); the preposition κατά with the accusative in this sense ('corresponding to, matching') is a Hebraism, and βοηθός ('helper') is a strong word used in the Psalms of God as Israel's helper. At 2:23–24 the one-flesh saying — ἔσονται οἱ δύο εἰς σάρκα μίαν ('they shall be the two into one flesh') — is quoted by Jesus (Matt 19:5; Mark 10:8) and Paul (1 Cor 6:16; Eph 5:31), always from the LXX form. The LXX adds the numeral 'two' (οἱ δύο) not explicit in the MT's consonantal text, making the saying slightly more emphatic. Proper names in this chapter are transliterated or rendered as indeclinables: Εδεμ (Eden, indeclinable transliteration of עֵדֶן), Αδαμ (used as a personal name in vv.16ff.; indeclinable), and Ευα is not yet used — 2:23 identifies her as γυνή ('woman'). The four rivers of 2:10–14 include Φισων, Γηων, Τίγρης, and Εὐφράτης (the last two declinable Greek forms). The LXX translator of Genesis used a smooth, readable Greek — notably less wooden than the kaige revisers or Aquila — and the result is a literary text capable of carrying the weight of the theological interpretation the early church placed on it.

Genesis 3 — ΓΕΝΕΣΙΣ Γ′

Theme. In a tightly coiled narrative of temptation, transgression, interrogation, and judgment, the most shrewd of the creatures uses the ambiguities of divine speech to engineer humanity's fall from paradise into mortality and toil — yet the same divine voice that pronounces curse also decrees enmity between the serpent and the woman's seed, names the woman 'Life,' clothes the exiles in skin, and seals rather than destroys the tree of life, leaving the chapter ending on the very word — ζωή — that frames the whole story's unfinished hope.

Outline.

Translation & textual notes. The Greek text of Genesis 3 follows the standard critical text of the Septuagint as established in the Rahlfs–Hanhart edition (Septuaginta, rev. ed. 2006), an ancient and public-domain text; the critical apparatus is not reproduced. The LXX of Genesis belongs to the 'Old Greek' tradition; its translation technique is substantially literal, with some paraphrastic expansions and occasional divergences from the proto-MT Vorlage. Several features of this chapter are of premier exegetical importance. (1) At 3:1 the serpent is described as φρονιμώτατος πάντων τῶν θηρίων — 'most prudent / shrewd of all the wild beasts' — rendering the Hebrew עָרוּם; the superlative adjective is cognate with the noun φρόνησις ('practical wisdom'), giving the creature an ironic cast: its cunning mimics wisdom. (2) At 3:6 the tree is described as ὡραῖον … εἰς κατανόησιν, 'beautiful … for contemplating,' where the Hebrew תַּאֲוָה is usually rendered 'desire'; the LXX sharpens the intellectual temptation. (3) At 3:8 the man and woman hear God walking ἐν τῷ παραδείσῳ τὸ δειλινόν — 'in the garden in the cool of the evening,' translating לְרוּחַ הַיּוֹם as 'in the evening breeze' (δειλινόν = 'afternoon / evening time'); the LXX rendering is closer to the Aramaic tradition. (4) At 3:14–15, the divine oracle to the serpent culminates in the famous protevangelium (3:15): αὐτός σου τηρήσει κεφαλήν ('he will watch / bruise your head'). The Hebrew אֲשֶׁר הוּא with a neuter antecedent (זֶרַע, 'seed/offspring') is rendered by the masculine αὐτός in the LXX — a deliberate or early-interpretive choice that allows the Greek text to be read as pointing to an individual male deliverer; the church fathers (Justin Martyr, Irenaeus, Tertullian) exploited αὐτός messianically. The verb τηρήσει (fut. of τηρέω, 'watch, guard, bruise') renders Hebrew יְשׁוּפֶנּוּ (from שׁוּף, 'to strike / crush'); the same verb is used for both the seed crushing the serpent's head and the serpent striking the heel, producing an exact verbal symmetry. Some LXX witnesses read τειρήσει ('wear down, bruise') rather than τηρήσει; the uncertainty between these near-homophonous forms was already debated in patristic exegesis. (5) At 3:16 ἡ ἀποστροφή σου ('your turning') renders Hebrew תְּשׁוּקָה ('desire / longing'), where the LXX preserves a different tradition — perhaps from a root שׁוּב ('turn, return') rather than שׁוּק ('desire'); this rendering influenced the Vetus Latina and became theologically significant in discussions of the relationship between husband and wife. (6) At 3:20 the man names his wife Ζωή — 'Life' — a full Greek translation of the Hebrew חַוָּה (Ḥawwāh), itself derived from חַי ('living'); the LXX translates rather than transliterates here, making the naming theologically transparent, unlike the later transliteration Ευα which appears in the NT (2 Cor 11:3; 1 Tim 2:13) and the Vetus Latina. (7) At 3:21 God makes χιτῶνας δερματίνους, 'tunics of skin' — the same term χιτών used of the high-priestly inner garment, a detail noted by patristic interpreters. (8) At 3:22 the divine plural ὡς εἷς ἐξ ἡμῶν ('as one of us') is identical to the Hebrew כְּאַחַד מִמֶּנּוּ and has been read both as a reference to the divine council and, in Christian exegesis, as an early witness to the Trinity. (9) At 3:24 the cherubim (Χερουβίμ, an indeclinable transliteration of Hebrew כְּרוּבִים) and a φλογίνη ῥομφαία στρεφομένη ('flaming, revolving sword') guard the way to the tree of life — ῥομφαία being the large broad-sword of the LXX and NT (cf. Rev 1:16; 2:12), distinct from the shorter μάχαιρα; the participial στρεφομένη ('turning, revolving') renders the Hebrew הַמִּתְהַפֶּכֶת and evokes ceaseless, omnidirectional motion.

Genesis 4 — ΓΕΝΕΣΙΣ Δ′

Theme. From the first birth (Cain, with Eve's confession of divine gift) through the first murder, the first exile, and the escalating violence of the Cainite genealogy, the chapter traces what the Fall of Genesis 3 means for human community; it closes, in sharp antithesis, with the birth of Seth and the first recorded act of hopeful invocation of the Lord God through his son Enos — the Sethite line positioned as the carrier of eschatological longing against the backdrop of Cainite self-assertion.

Outline.

Translation & textual notes. The Greek text of Genesis 4 follows the standard critical text of the Septuagint as established in the Rahlfs–Hanhart edition (Septuaginta, rev. ed. 2006), an ancient and public-domain text; the critical apparatus is not reproduced. Genesis in the LXX belongs to the oldest stratum of the translation (the Pentateuch, produced in Alexandria in the third century BC), and its text is relatively stable across the main witnesses; the Codex Alexandrinus (A), Codex Vaticanus (B), and Codex Sinaiticus (א) agree closely in this chapter. The translation technique here is moderately free by Pentateuchal standards: the translator renders idiomatically rather than word-for-word, yet preserves the narrative sequence of the Hebrew faithfully. The divine name יהוה is rendered κύριος throughout (vv.1, 3, 4, 6, 9, 13, 15, 16, 26), consistent with the LXX convention. The personal names are transliterated: Αδαμ, Ευα (Eve), Καιν (Cain), Αβελ (Abel), Σηθ (Seth), Ενως (Enosh), Λαμεχ (Lamech), Αδα (Adah), Σελλα (Zillah), Ιωβηλ (Jabal), Ιουβαλ (Jubal), Θοβελ (Tubal-cain); all are indeclinable in Greek. The four major LXX divergences from the MT that require notice are: (1) At 4:1 the LXX reads ἐκτησάμην ἄνθρωπον διὰ τοῦ θεοῦ ('I have acquired a man through God') where MT has קָנִיתִי אִישׁ אֶת־יְהוָה; the preposition διά rather than παρά shifts the nuance slightly — God as the instrumental agent rather than the source-party — though both express divine gift. (2) At 4:7 the LXX departs radically from the MT: in place of the MT's 'sin crouching at the door' (a famous crux), the LXX reads οὐκ, ἐὰν ὀρθῶς προσενέγκῃς, ὀρθῶς δὲ μὴ διέλῃς, ἥμαρτες; ἡσύχασον· πρὸς σὲ ἡ ἀποστροφὴ αὐτοῦ, καὶ σὺ ἄρξεις αὐτοῦ ('Is it not so — if you offer rightly but do not divide rightly, have you not sinned? Be still; his turning is toward you, and you shall rule over him'). The LXX evidently read a different Hebrew Vorlage or interpreted תַּחְטָא differently; the reference to 'dividing rightly' (διέλῃς) may reflect a reading connected to sacrificial procedure; the whole verse becomes an ethical challenge about proper offering rather than a warning about personified sin. (3) At 4:8 the LXX supplies Cain's words to Abel — διέλθωμεν εἰς τὸ πεδίον ('let us go out into the field') — which are absent from the MT (making the MT's 'and Cain spoke to Abel his brother' abruptly incomplete); the LXX (along with the Samaritan Pentateuch, Peshitta, and Vulgate) represents an early tradition that felt the gap and filled it. (4) At 4:26 the LXX reads οὗτος ἤλπισεν ἐπικαλεῖσθαι τὸ ὄνομα κυρίου τοῦ θεοῦ ('this one hoped to call upon the name of the Lord God'), rendering the Hebrew הוּחַל with ἤλπισεν ('he hoped'); where the MT says 'then it was begun [to call upon the name of YHWH],' the LXX personalises the act in Enos and introduces the notable eschatological coloring of ἐλπίζω — an echo picked up by later NT theology. The Lamech song (4:23–24), the oldest poetry in the Primeval History, is preserved in the LXX as heightened prose; the sevenfold / seventy-sevenfold vengeance formula (ἑπτάκις … ἑβδομηκοντάκις ἑπτά, v.24) resounds in Jesus's counter-word at Matt 18:22, where unlimited forgiveness supersedes unlimited vengeance.

Genesis 5 — ΓΕΝΕΣΙΣ Ε′

Theme. The first great antediluvian genealogy of the Bible: ten patriarchs from Adam to Noah march in relentless tripartite formula — ἔζησεν … καὶ ἐγέννησεν … καὶ ἀπέθανεν — the death-notice tolling like a bell through each entry until the seventh patriarch Enoch breaks the sequence by being translated alive (5:24), and the tenth, Noah, closes the chapter not with death but with the three named sons who will carry humanity through the Flood, the whole register framed by the image-of-God theology of 5:1–2 and Lamech's forward-pointing name-etymology at 5:29.

Outline.

Translation & textual notes. The Greek text of Genesis 5 follows the standard critical text of the Septuagint as established in the Rahlfs–Hanhart edition (Septuaginta, rev. ed. 2006), an ancient and public-domain text; the critical apparatus is not reproduced. Genesis 5 is the first great genealogical toledoth of the primeval history: it opens with the resumptive formula αὕτη ἡ βίβλος γενέσεως ἀνθρώπων (5:1), echoing 2:4, and then unfolds ten generations from Adam to Noah in a strict tripartite formula — ἔζησεν … καὶ ἐγέννησεν … ἔζησεν δὲ … καὶ ἐγέννησεν … καὶ ἀπέθανεν ('X lived … and begat … and X lived … and begat sons and daughters … and he died'). The formulaic repetition gives the chapter a liturgical, counting-down quality, each death notice (καὶ ἀπέθανεν) tolling like a bell through the primeval age. A textual crux of first importance is the systematic chronological divergence between the LXX, the Masoretic Text (MT), and the Samaritan Pentateuch (SP). The LXX consistently assigns higher begetting ages to most antediluvian patriarchs than the MT does — roughly 100 years higher on the 'age at begetting' figure for the first six patriarchs (Adam, Seth, Enosh, Kenan, Mahalalel, Jared), yielding a substantially longer primeval chronology. For example: Adam begets Seth at 230 in the LXX but at 130 in the MT; Seth begets Enosh at 205 in the LXX but at 105 in the MT; Enosh begets Kenan at 190 in the LXX but at 90 in the MT. The effect is to push creation some 1,300–1,400 years further back than the MT calculation, a discrepancy that has exercised chronologers and textual critics since antiquity. This data file reproduces the Rahlfs LXX numbers throughout; where they diverge from the MT the discrepancy is flagged in the word-level notes. The authorship of the divergence — whether the LXX translator inherited a divergent Hebrew Vorlage, or whether the Greek numbers were deliberately adjusted (perhaps to avoid placing the birth of Methuselah after the Flood in strict computation), or whether the MT has been secondarily shortened — remains an unresolved crux in textual criticism of the Pentateuch. Two verses call for special comment. At 5:24 the chapter's formulaic cycle is broken for Enoch alone: καὶ εὐηρέστησεν Ενωχ τῷ θεῷ, καὶ οὐχ ηὑρίσκετο, ὅτι μετέθηκεν αὐτὸν ὁ θεός ('and Enoch was well-pleasing to God, and was not found, because God translated him'). The verb εὐαρεστέω renders the Hebrew הִתְהַלֵּךְ ('walked with'), domesticating the idiom into Greek piety-language; the divine 'translation' (μετατίθημι) bypasses the universal death-notice, and the phrase is directly quoted in the Greek at Heb 11:5, where the author reads Enoch's translation as a paradigm of faith. At 5:29 Lamech gives his son a name-etymology: διαναπαύσει ἡμᾶς οὗτος ἀπὸ τῶν ἔργων ἡμῶν ('this one will give us rest from our works'), a forward-pointing etymology associating Νωε (Noah) with the verb ναπαύω / νάπαυσις, echoing the creation-rest of Gen 2 and anticipating the post-flood re-creation.

Genesis 6 — ΓΕΝΕΣΙΣ Ϛ′

Theme. The moral collapse of the antediluvian world — the transgression of divine-human boundaries by the sons of God, the universal spread of wickedness catalogued in God's own judicial gaze, and the divine grief that resolves into a decree of flood-destruction — is arrested by a single pivot-verse: Noah found grace (χάριν) before the Lord God; and from that pivot the chapter builds its counter-narrative of covenant, command, and total obedience, culminating in the first occurrence of διαθήκη in the entire LXX and closing with the Pentateuchal obedience-formula οὕτως ἐποίησεν.

Outline.

Translation & textual notes. The Greek text of Genesis 6 follows the standard critical text of the Septuagint as established in the Rahlfs–Hanhart edition (Septuaginta, rev. ed. 2006), an ancient and public-domain text; the critical apparatus is not reproduced. Genesis in the LXX is widely regarded as a relatively free, idiomatic translation — considerably less mechanical than the later kaige or Aquila revisions — and chapter 6 exhibits that character: the translator renders the Hebrew with good Greek sense while remaining close to the consonantal Vorlage. Several translation decisions in this chapter became momentous for the history of biblical interpretation. At 6:2 the phrase οἱ υἱοὶ τοῦ θεοῦ ('the sons of God') renders בְּנֵי הָאֱלֹהִים; a significant body of manuscripts and early patristic witnesses read instead ἄγγελοι τοῦ θεοῦ ('angels of God') — the angelic interpretation that underpins 1 Enoch 6–16, is presupposed by Jude 6 and 2 Peter 2:4, and exercised enormous influence on early Jewish and Christian exegesis of the Watcher myth; the Rahlfs–Hanhart main text follows the Alexandrinus/Vaticanus tradition with υἱοί, but the variant must be flagged as exegetically decisive. At 6:3 the LXX renders the notoriously obscure Hebrew verb יָדוֹן with οὐ μὴ καταμείνῃ ('shall by no means remain'), taking the verb as related to דּוּן or דָּן ('to abide / contend'); the resulting promise — 'my spirit shall by no means remain in these humans' — differs from many modern translations ('my spirit shall not strive with man') and from Targum interpretations; the Greek limits human life to 120 years (εἰ δὲ μή, ἔσονται αἱ ἡμέραι αὐτῶν ἑκατὸν εἴκοσι ἔτη). At 6:4 the LXX renders נְפִילִים as οἱ γίγαντες ('the giants') — a momentous choice that identifies the pre-diluvian warriors with the mythological race of Titans/giants and profoundly shapes the LXX's cosmological imagination; the same rendering appears in Numbers 13:33 (the spies' report). At 6:9 Νωε ἄνθρωπος δίκαιος, τέλειος ὢν ἐν τῇ γενεᾷ αὐτοῦ renders the Hebrew עַל-כֵּן תָּמִים הָיָה בְּדֹרֹתָיו; the LXX adds τέλειος ('perfect, blameless') alongside δίκαιος ('righteous'), and the verb εὐηρέστησεν (from εὐαρεστέω) renders הִתְהַלֶּךְ ('walked with') — the same verb used of Enoch at 5:22, 24; this becomes a key term for pleasing God (cf. Heb 11:5–7, which quotes this tradition of Noah). The ark is rendered κιβωτός — the same Greek word used in the NT at Heb 11:7 and 1 Pet 3:20, and also for the ark of the covenant (Exod 25:10 LXX); the LXX's measurements (6:15–16) follow the Hebrew cubits. At 6:18 the word διαθήκη appears for the first time in the entire LXX — this is the covenant's first occurrence in biblical Greek, rendering בְּרִית; the theological significance can hardly be overstated: the whole vocabulary of covenant that runs through the Prophets, the Psalms, and ultimately into the NT (διαθήκη in Luke 22:20; 1 Cor 11:25; Heb 8–9) is coined here in this verse, in the context of God's promise to preserve Noah through the waters.

Genesis 7 — ΓΕΝΕΣΙΣ Ζ′

Theme. The flood chapter of Genesis is the pivot of the primeval narrative: God commands Noah to enter the ark with his household and all living creatures (v.1), the cosmic machinery of destruction is set in motion (v.11), every breath-of-life creature on dry land is annihilated (vv.21–22), and yet Noah alone — sealed inside the ark by God's own hand (v.16) — survives, as the waters stand raised over the earth for one hundred and fifty days (v.24).

Outline.

Translation & textual notes. The Greek text of Genesis 7 follows the standard critical text of the Septuagint as established in the Rahlfs–Hanhart edition (Septuaginta, rev. ed. 2006), an ancient and public-domain text; the critical apparatus is not reproduced. The LXX of Genesis belongs to a translation tradition that is moderately free in its renderings while remaining close to a Hebrew Vorlage broadly consonant with the MT; chapter 7 is largely in agreement with the MT, though several chronological divergences and lexical choices are of special interest. The chapter opens with the divine command to Noah to enter the κιβωτός ('ark') with his whole household (7:1), the first use in the LXX of κιβωτός in its technical sense for the ark — a word the NT inherits directly (Matt 24:38; Luke 17:27; Heb 11:7; 1 Pet 3:20). The distributive doubling ἑπτὰ ἑπτά (7:2–3) — seven by seven of every clean animal and bird — is a calque of the Hebrew שִׁבְעָה שִׁבְעָה, a Hebraism whose distributive force Greek normally expresses through reduplication of the numeral; the LXX preserves the idiom without a Greek gloss. The key term for the flood event, κατακλυσμός (7:6, 10, 17), renders Hebrew מַבּוּל and is the word the NT and patristic tradition inherit; Matt 24:38–39, Luke 17:27, and 2 Pet 2:5 all use κατακλυσμός, and it becomes the standard Greek for Noah's flood. The chapter's most visually dramatic verse is 7:11, where the heavens and the depths burst open simultaneously: ἐρράγησαν πᾶσαι αἱ πηγαὶ τῆς ἀβύσσου, καὶ οἱ καταρράκται τοῦ οὐρανοῦ ἠνεῴχθησαν ('all the fountains of the great deep burst open and the floodgates of heaven were opened'). The verb ἐρράγη is from ῥήγνυμι ('burst, rupture'), expressing violent cosmic rupture; καταρράκτης ('floodgate, cataract') renders Hebrew אֲרֻבֹּת and conveys both a physical sluice and cosmic collapse. A significant LXX–MT divergence occurs at the date formula in 7:11: the LXX reads ἑβδόμῃ καὶ εἰκάδι (the twenty-seventh day) of the second month, whereas the MT reads בְּשִׁבְעָה עָשָׂר (the seventeenth day). The LXX translator appears to have read כז (twenty-seven) where the MT has יז (seventeen), a graphically similar confusion in the Hebrew script; the discrepancy is noted in the critical tradition and affects the chronological harmonisation attempted by readers of both traditions. At 7:16 the divine sealing of the ark is expressed by the striking phrase ἔκλεισεν κύριος ὁ θεὸς τὴν κιβωτὸν ἔξωθεν αὐτοῦ — 'the LORD God shut the ark from outside him (Noah)' — which LXX renders with the pronoun αὐτοῦ where MT simply says God shut it behind him; the pronoun underscores God's sovereign enclosure of Noah while Noah is within. The chapter's rhetorical climax is the fourfold rising of the waters in vv.17–20: ηὐξήθη (increased), ἐπεκράτει (prevailed), ὑψώθη (was raised, vv.18, 20), with the waters rising fifteen cubits above the mountains (v.20) — the verb ὑψόω giving the Hebrew נִשְׂאוּ a distinctly exaltation-register colouring in Greek. The chapter closes with the summary statement that the waters prevailed upon the earth one hundred and fifty days (v.24), using ὑψώθη again as a frame.

Genesis 8 — ΓΕΝΕΣΙΣ Η′

Theme. The resolution of the flood: God's covenant-faithful remembering of Noah (ἐμνήσθη, v.1) sets in motion the reversal of the deluge — wind, abating waters, the grounding of the ark on Αραρατ, the raven-and-dove reconnaissance sequence crowned by the olive-leaf sign of renewed life — until Noah disembarks by divine command, builds the first altar in Scripture, offers burnt offerings whose ὀσμὴ εὐωδίας ('odor of sweet savor') elicits a divine resolve of mercy and patience, and receives the unconditional promise that seedtime and harvest, cold and heat, summer and spring, day and night shall not cease (οὐ καταπαύσουσιν, v.22) — a new-creation charter for the post-diluvian world.

Outline.

Translation & textual notes. The Greek text of Genesis 8 follows the standard critical text of the Septuagint as established in the Rahlfs–Hanhart edition (Septuaginta, rev. ed. 2006), an ancient and public-domain text; the critical apparatus is not reproduced. Chapter 8 brings the flood narrative to its resolution through a careful sequence of divine remembrance, receding waters, the testing of the earth by birds, Noah's disembarkation, the first post-diluvian altar and sacrifice, and the divine promise of cosmic order. The chapter's opening verb, ἐμνήσθη (8:1), is the theological hinge of the entire flood account: 'God remembered Noah.' The verb μιμνῄσκομαι in the LXX renders זָכַר and almost always denotes not mere mental recall but active, covenant-faithful intervention — the same verb appears at Exod 2:24 (God remembers his covenant with Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, launching the Exodus), at Ps 104(105):8 LXX (God remembers his covenant forever), and at Luke 1:54 (God has remembered his servant Israel). The 'remembering' of Noah is thus an act of covenant faithfulness, not a forgetfulness overcome. Simultaneously at 8:1 God sends a πνεῦμα ('wind / spirit') over the earth: the LXX uses the same word as Gen 1:2, where πνεῦμα θεοῦ 'hovered over the face of the waters' at creation — the wind that drives back the flood thus consciously echoes the creative breath of God at the world's first ordering, announcing a new creation. The restraining of the sources of the deep and of the heavenly floodgates in 8:2 reverses 7:11's cosmic opening, and the waters decrease by the formula ὑφίζανεν (8:3, 5, 'abated') over a measured chronological sequence: the ark rests on the mountains of Αραρατ on the seventeenth day of the seventh month (8:4), a date that the LXX shares with the MT. The chapter contains one notable LXX/MT date divergence: at 8:4 the LXX reads that the ark rested on the twenty-seventh day of the seventh month, whereas the MT reads the seventeenth (בְּשִׁבְעָה עָשָׂר); the LXX translator appears to have read כז (twenty-seven) where the MT has יז (seventeen), a graphically similar confusion in the Hebrew script; the discrepancy is noted in the critical tradition and affects the chronological harmonisation attempted by readers of both traditions. The bird-sequence — a κόραξ (raven) sent first (8:7), then a περιστερά (dove) on three successive missions (8:8, 10, 12) — is narrated in precise incremental stages; the dove's return with a φύλλον ἐλαίας κάρφος ('olive leaf, a cutting/twig') at 8:11 is the chapter's first sign of renewed life and the ancient symbol of peace that Jewish and Christian tradition inherits. The LXX phrase φύλλον ἐλαίας κάρφος renders Hebrew עֲלֵה זַיִת טָרָף; κάρφος means a small piece or chip, here used of a freshly-plucked shoot. At 8:20 Noah builds an altar (θυσιαστήριον) — the first altar in Scripture — and offers burnt offerings (ὁλοκαυτώματα) from every clean bird and beast; the resulting ὀσμὴν εὐωδίας ('odor of sweet savor,' 8:21) is the cultic formula that the NT reuses at Eph 5:2 (Christ's self-offering as ὀσμὴν εὐωδίας) and Phil 4:18 (the Philippians' gift as ὀσμὴν εὐωδίας). The divine response in 8:21 introduces a further translation crux: the LXX renders the Hebrew idiom 'said in his heart' (וַיֹּאמֶר אֶל־לִבּוֹ) as καὶ διανοηθεὶς ὁ θεός, 'and God, having reflected / having considered' — a participle of διανοέομαι rather than a speech formula, and a notably interior rendering that softens the anthropomorphism. God's resolve in 8:21b not to curse the ground again is grounded in an anthropology that acknowledges human sin ('the disposition of the human mind is intent upon evil from youth') yet resolves toward mercy rather than judgment. The chapter closes with the cosmic-order promise of 8:22: so long as the earth endures, seedtime and harvest, cold and heat, summer and spring, day and night shall not cease — οὐ καταπαύσουσιν. This is an unconditional guarantee of natural regularity, undergirding the created order as the framework within which covenant history continues.

Genesis 9 — ΓΕΝΕΣΙΣ Θ′

Theme. The covenant chapter of the primeval history: God re-commissions Noah as a second Adam with the Adamic fertility mandate (Αὐξάνεσθε καὶ πληθύνεσθε, vv.1, 7), grants all animate life as food while prohibiting blood (the Noachic baseline for Acts 15:20), grounds the lex talionis on the divine image (εἰκόνι θεοῦ, v.6), establishes the first explicitly eternal covenant (διαθήκη αἰώνιος) with all flesh and sets his war-bow (τόξον) in the cloud as its sign — then closes with the vineyard episode, the curse of Canaan (παῖς οἰκέτης), the blessing of Shem whose God is κύριος, the blessing of Japheth whose Hebrew name-pun is irretrievably lost in the Greek (πλατύναι … τῷ Ιαφεθ), and Noah's death notice, καὶ ἀπέθανεν.

Outline.

Translation & textual notes. The Greek text of Genesis 9 follows the standard critical text of the Septuagint as established in the Rahlfs–Hanhart edition (Septuaginta, rev. ed. 2006), an ancient and public-domain text; the critical apparatus is not reproduced. Genesis 9 is one of the densest theological chapters in the primeval history, encompassing the Noachic covenant, the establishment of its visible sign, the prohibition of blood, the lex talionis on homicide, the episode of Noah's drunkenness and the curse and blessings on his sons, and finally Noah's death notice. The LXX translation is broadly faithful to the Hebrew Vorlage, with a few notable divergences. The chapter opens with a renewal of the Adamic blessing: εὐλόγησεν ὁ θεὸς τὸν Νωε, and the imperative pair Αὐξάνεσθε καὶ πληθύνεσθε (9:1) directly echoes Gen 1:28 LXX, creating a deliberate new-creation frame after the flood — Noah as a second Adam, humanity re-commissioned to fill the earth. The grant of all moving things for food (9:3), with the single exception of flesh in its blood (κρέας ἐν αἵματι ψυχῆς, 9:4), inaugurates the Noachic dietary code; the LXX renders the blood-prohibition idiom κρέας ἐν αἵματι ψυχῆς ('flesh in the blood of its life'), making ψυχή the seat of life lodged in the blood — a formulation that echoes into Acts 15:20 and 15:29 (the Apostolic Decree), where abstention from blood (αἵματος) is among the four requirements placed on Gentile believers, almost certainly derived from this Noachic baseline rather than from the Levitical purity code. At 9:6 the lex talionis on bloodshed — ὅτι ἐν εἰκόνι θεοῦ ἐποίησα τὸν ἄνθρωπον — grounds the prohibition of murder in the divine image (εἰκών): the LXX renders the Hebrew בְּצֶלֶם אֱלֹהִים with ἐν εἰκόνι θεοῦ, introducing εἰκών into the Greek vocabulary of imago Dei (cf. 1 Cor 11:7; Col 1:15; 3:10). The covenant (διαθήκη) is the dominant theological category of vv.8–17; the word occurs seven times and the LXX uses διαθήκη throughout as the standard rendering of Hebrew בְּרִית — a significant lexical choice, since διαθήκη in Greek normally denotes a 'testament / last will,' importing a legal-dispensing frame that Paul exploits in Gal 3:15–17. The sign of the covenant is τόξον (9:13, 14, 16) — the bow. Crucially, τόξον is the standard Greek word for a war-bow; the image evokes a warrior hanging up his weapon, the bow set in the cloud as a declaration of ceasefire between heaven and earth. The LXX has no separate word for 'rainbow'; τόξον alone carries both meanings, and the reader must supply the 'in the cloud' context from v.13's τὸ τόξον μου τίθημι ἐν τῇ νεφέλῃ ('I am placing my bow in the cloud'). The verb τίθημι (present: 'I am placing') rather than a perfect gives the action an immediate, solemn, declarative character. At 9:20 Noah is called ἄνθρωπος γεωργὸς γῆς ('a man, tiller of the ground'), echoing the Adam of Gen 3:23 (ἐργάζεσθαι τὴν γῆν); the resumption of agriculture after the flood parallels and contrasts with the post-Eden expulsion. The nakedness episode (9:21–23) uses γυμνόω / γυμνός in deliberate echo of the Eden nakedness narrative (Gen 2:25; 3:7, 10, 11). At 9:25 the curse falls on Χανααν (not on Χαμ himself — the LXX is precise here: παῖς οἰκέτης, 'a household slave,' echoing a more servile status than simple 'servant'); the LXX curses Canaan explicitly, three times (vv.25, 26, 27), a pattern that shaped later interpretive traditions. The double blessing on Σημ and Ιαφεθ (9:26–27) has a significant wordplay in the Hebrew — the verb פָּרַה ('enlarge') in the blessing of Japheth (יַפְתְּ אֱלֹהִים לְיֶפֶת) puns on the name יֶפֶת (Japheth): 'may God enlarge Japheth.' The LXX renders this as πλατύναι ὁ θεὸς τῷ Ιαφεθ ('may God make wide/broad for Japheth'), using πλατύνω where the Hebrew pun on Japheth's name (יֶפֶת / יַפְתְּ) is entirely lost in Greek — there is no phonological connection between πλατύνω and Ιαφεθ; the wordplay is a Hebrew-only feature and vanishes in translation. The chapter closes with Noah's death notice at 9:29: all the days of Noah were nine hundred and fifty years, καὶ ἀπέθανεν — the formulaic close used for antediluvian patriarchs in Gen 5.

Genesis 10 — ΓΕΝΕΣΙΣ Ι′

Theme. The Table of Nations: from the single post-flood family of Noah the seventy peoples of the world are generated and mapped — three genealogical movements (Japheth 2–5, Ham 6–20, Shem 21–31) framed by the toledoth-formula of v.1 and the diaspora-close of v.32, with the Nimrod pericope (vv.8–10) and the Peleg etymology (v.25) as the chapter's two narrative digressions, pointing forward to the tower of Babel in ch.11.

Outline.

Translation & textual notes. The Greek text of Genesis 10 follows the standard critical text of the Septuagint as established in the Rahlfs–Hanhart edition (Septuaginta, rev. ed. 2006), an ancient and public-domain text; the critical apparatus is not reproduced. Chapter 10 is the 'Table of Nations' (Völkertafel), the LXX's equivalent of the Hebrew toledoth-frame that organises the descendants of Shem, Ham, and Japheth into seventy peoples corresponding to the seventy nations of Jewish tradition. The chapter opens with the toledoth formula Αὗται δὲ αἱ γενέσεις τῶν υἱῶν Νωε (v.1), the LXX rendering of אֵלֶּה תּוֹלְדֹת, which recurs throughout Genesis as a structural marker. The three genealogical lines — Japheth (vv.2–5), Ham (vv.6–20), and Shem (vv.21–31) — are punctuated by the refrain ἀπὸ τούτων διεσπάρησαν αἱ νῆσοι / ἔθνη τῶν ἐθνῶν ('from these the nations/islands of the peoples were scattered'), a Leitwort sounding ahead to the tower of Babel narrative (ch.11). The LXX transliterates the Hebrew names into Greek with varying fidelity: Japheth-line nations include Γαμερ (Gomer), Μαγωγ (Magog), Μαδαι (Madai/Medes), Ιαυαν (Javan/Ionians = Greeks), Ελισα (Elishah), Θαρσις (Tarshish), Κιττιειμ (Kittim), and Ροδιειμ (Rodanim); Ham's line includes Χους (Cush/Ethiopia), Μεσραιμ (Mizraim = Egypt, a specifically LXX hellenization of the dual מִצְרַיִם), Φουδ (Put/Libya), and Χανααν (Canaan). The most theologically charged entry is Nimrod (LXX Νεβρωδ, vv.8–10): the LXX describes him as γίγας κυνηγὸς ἐναντίον κυρίου ('a giant hunter before the LORD'), making Nimrod explicitly a giant (γίγας), thereby linking him to the γίγαντες of 6:4 (the Nephilim narrative) and implying a post-flood continuity of the antediluvian giant-tradition — a reading not forced by the Hebrew גִּבֹּר alone but natural given the LXX's prior use of γίγας at 6:4. At v.10 Βαβυλών appears as the Greek rendering of בָּבֶל, anticipating the tower narrative of ch.11 whose climax is the naming of that city. Εβερ (v.21, 24–25) is the eponymous ancestor of the 'Hebrews' (Ἑβραῖοι); the name carries the sense of 'crossing over' (עֵבֶר). His son Φαλεκ (Peleg, v.25) triggers the chapter's only explicit etymology: ὅτι ἐν ταῖς ἡμέραις αὐτοῦ διεμερίσθη ἡ γῆ ('because in his days the earth was divided'), a wordplay on the Hebrew פֶּלֶג / פָּלַג that the LXX renders accurately with διαμερίζω. The closing verse (v.32) rehearses the chapter's structuring idea — αὗται αἱ φυλαὶ υἱῶν Νωε … ἀπὸ τούτων διεσπάρησαν ἔθνη ('these are the tribes of Noah's sons; from these the nations were scattered upon the earth after the flood') — providing the genealogical and theological basis for the universal scope of the flood narrative and for the Babel story that immediately follows.

Genesis 11 — ΓΕΝΕΣΙΣ ΙΑ′

Theme. The chapter moves from the last moment of primordial human unity — πᾶσα ἡ γῆ χεῖλος ἕν, 'all the earth was one lip' (11:1) — through the Babel crisis and its divine judgment, then traces ten genealogical generations from Shem through the flood's second year to Abram in Haran, bracketing the entire sweep with the theological insight that human self-glorification (the tower, the name) is answered by divine dispersal, while the genealogy insists that history's direction runs through a single family line toward the patriarch whose call in chapter 12 will be God's answer to the fragmentation of the nations.

Outline.

Translation & textual notes. The Greek text of Genesis 11 follows the standard critical text of the Septuagint as established in the Rahlfs–Hanhart edition (Septuaginta, rev. ed. 2006), an ancient and public-domain text; the critical apparatus is not reproduced. The chapter divides into two distinct movements: the Tower of Babel episode (11:1–9) and the Shem genealogy from Arphaxad to Abram (11:10–32). The Babel narrative opens with a distinctive Hebraism: χεῖλος ἕν ('one lip') renders the Hebrew שָׂפָה אֶחָת, retaining the physiological idiom 'lip' for 'language' rather than using the natural Greek γλῶσσα ('tongue') or διάλεκτος ('dialect'). The city-building project (11:3–4) employs πλίνθους ('bricks') and ἄσφαλτος ('bitumen/asphalt') — matching the Mesopotamian building material exactly, an accurate cultural-historical detail. The divine plural of 11:7, δεῦτε καταβάντες συγχέωμεν ('come, let us go down and confound'), directly echoes the builders' own δεῦτε πλινθεύσωμεν of 11:3 — the LXX preserves this structural irony whereby God's council answers the human council with a counter-programme. The name Σύγχυσις for the city (11:9) is a significant divergence from the MT: where Hebrew has בָּבֶל (Babel), the LXX translates rather than transliterates, rendering the folk-etymology of the root בָּלַל ('confuse, mix') as Σύγχυσις ('Confusion'). In doing so the LXX loses the Babel/Babylon pun that Hebrew exploits elsewhere (cf. the place's relation to Babylon) but creates its own Greek etymology: the city is called Confusion because there God confused (συνέχεεν) the languages of all the earth. The Shem genealogy (11:10–26) follows the LXX's characteristic +100-year chronology: in each generation the LXX adds approximately 100 years to the age at which the father begets his son compared with the MT (e.g., Arphaxad: LXX 135, MT 35; Sala: LXX 130, MT 30; Eber: LXX 134, MT 34; etc.), reflecting a systematic chronological expansion found in the Alexandrian text tradition (paralleled in the Samaritan Pentateuch for some generations) that pushes the total elapsed time from the flood to Abraham substantially higher than the MT. Most significantly, the LXX inserts a second Kainan (Καιναν) between Arphaxad and Sala (11:12–13): Arphaxad begets Kainan at 135, Kainan lives 130 years and begets Sala, Kainan then lives a further 330 years — this figure, absent from the MT and from the proto-Samaritan tradition, is the Kainan that Luke 3:36 inherits directly from the LXX when tracing the genealogy of Jesus through Sala's father. The 'second Kainan' is a major text-critical crux: it is not secondary harmonization from Genesis 5 (where Kenan/Kainan is a pre-flood patriarch) but appears to be a genuine variant in the Hebrew or Aramaic Vorlage of the Greek translators or a very early scribal addition to the Greek tradition. The chapter closes with Terah's genealogy (11:26–32): his three sons Abram, Nahor, and Haran; Haran's death in Ur while his father Terah was still alive; the marriages; and the departure of Terah's household from Ur toward the land of Canaan. The LXX renders 'Ur of the Chaldees' as ἐκ τῆς χώρας τῶν Χαλδαίων — 'from the LAND of the Chaldeans' — omitting the city-name Ur entirely and rendering it as a regional designation, a notable softening of the MT's precise toponym. The family halts at Χαρραν (Haran) where Terah dies at the age of 205 years (LXX; MT also 205).

Genesis 12 — ΓΕΝΕΣΙΣ ΙΒ′

Theme. The inaugurating chapter of the Abrahamic cycle: a triple call to departure (land, kin, father's house) is met by instant faith-obedience, anchored by a five-fold promise whose climax — ἐνευλογηθήσονται ἐν σοὶ πᾶσαι αἱ φυλαὶ τῆς γῆς — becomes the LXX's most consequential single lexical decision in Genesis, and whose Egypt episode foreshadows the Exodus in miniature.

Outline.

Translation & textual notes. The Greek text of Genesis 12 follows the standard critical text of the Septuagint as established in the Rahlfs–Hanhart edition (Septuaginta, rev. ed. 2006), an ancient and public-domain text; the critical apparatus is not reproduced. Genesis in the LXX is part of the Old Greek Pentateuch, one of the earliest and most theologically significant translation achievements of the Second Temple period; the Genesis translator works with relative freedom, rendering the Hebrew into idiomatic Greek rather than pursuing the word-for-word literalism characteristic of kaige-revised books. Chapter 12 opens the Abrahamic cycle and is among the most theologically consequential passages in the Hebrew scriptures, touching directly on the NT's argument in Galatians 3 and Hebrews 11. The chapter's opening command is rendered by an aorist imperative Ἔξελθε (12:1), translating the Hebrew לֶךְ-לְךָ ('go for yourself'); the LXX omits the reflexive nuance of לְךָ and produces a straightforward departure command — a simplification noted by Hebrews 11:8, which cites the obedience as exemplary precisely because Ἀβραὰμ ὑπήκουσεν ἐξελθεῖν εἰς τόπον ὃν ἤμελλεν λαμβάνειν, 'he obeyed to go out to a place he was about to receive.' The three-fold promise structure of 12:2–3 — I will make you a great nation (ποιήσω σε εἰς ἔθνος μέγα), I will bless you (εὐλογήσω σε), I will magnify your name (μεγαλυνῶ τὸ ὄνομά σου) — is matched by a three-fold blessing/curse disposition followed by the climactic universal blessing formula. The chapter's chief crux is 12:3b: καὶ ἐνευλογηθήσονται ἐν σοὶ πᾶσαι αἱ φυλαὶ τῆς γῆς, 'and in you shall ALL THE TRIBES of the earth be blessed.' The Greek passive/reflexive ἐνευλογηθήσονται renders Hebrew וְנִבְרְכוּ, a niphal which admits either a passive sense ('be blessed') or a reflexive-reciprocal sense ('bless themselves'). Paul's citation in Galatians 3:8 and Peter's in Acts 3:25 both employ the passive reading as the definitive sense, anchoring the Gentile mission theologically in this verse; the LXX's choice of the passive future of ἐνευλογέω (rather than the middle εὐλογήσονται ἑαυτούς) effectively decided the exegetical debate. At 12:7 the LORD appears to Abram and promises τῷ σπέρματί σου δώσω τὴν γῆν ταύτην, 'to your SEED I will give this land'; the singular σπέρμα (= Hebrew זֶרַע) rather than a plural form is Paul's hook in Galatians 3:16 for a christological reading of the promise. The Egypt episode (12:10–20) introduces Sarai's beauty as a narrative danger and God's protection through ἐτασμοῖς μεγάλοις (12:17, 'great plagues' — the same root as the Exodus plagues, a deliberate verbal echo). The σύν-compounds in the closing verse highlight the orchestrated escort of expulsion: συμπροπέμψαι (12:20). The altar-building refrain ᾠκοδόμησεν θυσιαστήριον (12:7, 8) marks each divine encounter as a cult-founding moment, establishing the pattern of Abram's journey as a series of worship events.

Genesis 13 — ΓΕΝΕΣΙΣ ΙΓ′

Theme. After the Egypt episode Abram returns to the Bethel altar and renews covenant worship, only to face a crisis of shared pasture that resolves in his magnanimous offer to Lot — whose fateful choice of the paradise-like Jordan plain echoes the Edenic temptation and lands him beside Sodom, while God's renewed promise of land and innumerable seed (vv.14–16) confirms that Abram's generosity, not Lot's strategy, is the posture of faith.

Outline.

Translation & textual notes. The Greek text of Genesis 13 follows the standard critical text of the Septuagint as established in the Rahlfs–Hanhart edition (Septuaginta, rev. ed. 2006), an ancient and public-domain text; the critical apparatus is not reproduced. The LXX of Genesis belongs to the Old Greek translation tradition and is widely regarded as the earliest and most significant Greek version of the Pentateuch, produced in Alexandria likely in the third century BCE. The translator of Genesis works with moderate freedom — closer to the Hebrew than paraphrase yet not mechanically word-for-word — and Genesis 13 illustrates both the faithfulness and the distinctive choices of that rendering. Chapter 13 narrates the parting of Abram and Lot after their return from Egypt: strife between the herdsmen (13:7), Abram's generous offer of choice to Lot (13:9), Lot's fateful choice of the Jordan plain, and the renewed divine promise to Abram of land and innumerable seed, culminating in Abram's settlement at Mamre and the building of an altar (13:18). The opening verb Ἀνέβη (13:1) — 'went up' — renders the Hebrew עָלָה (ʿālâ) and reflects the conventional idiom of 'going up' from Egypt toward Canaan, a geographical and theological ascent. The LXX of 13:10 renders the Jordan valley as ὡς ὁ παράδεισος τοῦ θεοῦ — 'like the paradise of God' — where the key word παράδεισος is borrowed from Old Persian via Aramaic (pardēs, 'enclosed park/garden') and had already been used by the LXX in Gen 2–3 to render the Garden of Eden; the echo is deliberate and ominous, since Lot's attractive choice of a 'paradise' mirrors humanity's original wrong turn. The phrase ὡς κῆπος τοῦ θεοῦ (Garden of God) appears as a secondary clause in the same verse in some witnesses, but Rahlfs' main text gives only ὡς ὁ παράδεισος τοῦ θεοῦ. The LXX of 13:13 renders the Sodomites as sinners 'greatly' (σφόδρα) against God — a stronger moral condemnation than is explicit in the Hebrew — signalling the theological freight that Sodom will bear in subsequent chapters. At 13:15 the promise formula πᾶσαν τὴν γῆν ἣν σὺ ὁρᾷς, σοὶ δώσω αὐτὴν καὶ τῷ σπέρματί σου ἕως τοῦ αἰῶνος ('all the land that you see, to you I will give it and to your seed forever') closely follows the Hebrew and introduces the key covenantal term σπέρμα ('seed/offspring') that Paul will interpret as singular in Gal 3:16. At 13:16 the seed-promise is extended: τὸ σπέρμα σου ὡς τὴν ἄμμον τῆς γῆς ('your seed as the sand of the earth'). A notable LXX–MT divergence falls at 13:18: the Hebrew בְּאֵלֹנֵי מַמְרֵא uses the plural construct (often read 'oaks/terebinths of Mamre'), while the LXX reads ἐπὶ τῇ δρυΐ τῇ Μαμβρη — the singular definite article with δρῦς ('oak'), a distinctive editorial or text-critical choice by the Greek translator that makes the landmark a single notable tree rather than a grove; this reading is consistent across the main LXX witnesses.

Genesis 14 — ΓΕΝΕΣΙΣ ΙΔ′

Theme. A coalition war in the cities of the plain forces Abram from his encampment to mount a lightning rescue of the captive Lot — and the return from that victory produces the chapter's theological crown: the encounter with Μελχισεδεκ βασιλεὺς Σαλήμ, ἱερεὺς τοῦ θεοῦ τοῦ ὑψίστου, who brings bread and wine, blesses Abram in the name of the God who made heaven and earth, and receives a tithe of everything — the meeting that founds a priesthood antecedent to and superior to Aaron's and on which Hebrews 5–7 will build its entire christological argument.

Outline.

Translation & textual notes. The Greek text of Genesis 14 follows the standard critical text of the Septuagint as established in the Rahlfs–Hanhart edition (Septuaginta, rev. ed. 2006), an ancient and public-domain text; the critical apparatus is not reproduced. Genesis 14 is a unique chapter in the Pentateuch: its literary character is more like an ancient Near Eastern battle report than a patriarchal narrative, and its theological content — the Melchizedek episode — is foundational for NT christology. The LXX renders the chapter's royal names as transliterations rather than translations: Αμαρφαλ (Amraphel), Αριοχ (Arioch), Χοδολλογομορ (Chedorlaomer), Θαργαλ (Tidal), Βαλα (Bela), Βαρσα (Birsha), and the rest — preserving the foreign character of the names for the Greek reader. The chapter is remarkable for its repeated explanatory glosses: αὕτη ἐστίν is used four times (vv.2, 3, 7, 17) to identify archaic place-names with sites known to later readers, and ἥ ἐστιν twice (vv.6, 15), constituting one of the densest concentrations of this identifying formula in the Pentateuch. A crucial rendering stands apart from the transliterations: at 14:13 the LXX translates 'Abram the Hebrew' not as Αβραμ τῷ Εβραίῳ but as Αβραμ τῷ περάτῃ — 'Abram the one-who-crossed-over.' This is an etymological translation of the Hebrew עִבְרִי (ʿibrî), derived from the root עָבַר (ʿābar, 'to cross / pass over'), unique in the LXX Pentateuch; the translator has replaced a transliteration with an interpretation, signalling that the name denotes Abram's status as a river-crosser — presumably of the Euphrates (cf. Josh 24:2–3) — and perhaps also his status as one who has 'crossed over' into covenant relationship. The central theological event is the appearance of Μελχισεδεκ βασιλεὺς Σαλήμ at 14:18–20. The LXX renders this passage exactly: he is ἱερεὺς τοῦ θεοῦ τοῦ ὑψίστου ('priest of God Most High') and brings ἄρτους καὶ οἶνον ('bread and wine'). The divine title θεὸς ὕψιστος (El Elyon, rendering Hebrew אֵל עֶלְיוֹן) occurs here for the first time in the LXX and is adopted by Abram himself at 14:22 with the addition of κύριος — thus κύριος ὁ θεὸς ὁ ὕψιστος — theologically identifying the God of the covenant with the God whom Melchizedek serves. The LXX's rendering of Hebrew קֹנֵה שָׁמַיִם וָאָרֶץ as ὃς ἔκτισεν τὸν οὐρανὸν καὶ τὴν γῆν ('who created heaven and earth') interprets the Hebrew root קנה as 'create' rather than 'possess/acquire,' an interpretive choice that makes this a foundational creation-theology statement. The tithe formula δεκάτην ἀπὸ πάντων ('a tithe of all things') is cited verbatim at Heb 7:2; Ps 109:4 LXX (σὺ ἱερεὺς εἰς τὸν αἰῶνα κατὰ τὴν τάξιν Μελχισεδεκ) is quoted at Heb 5:6, 10; 6:20; 7:11, 17, 21, and the whole argument of Heb 7 depends on this chapter. At 14:14 ἠρίθμησεν τοὺς ἰδίους οἰκογενεῖς 318 attracted patristic numerological attention: Barnabas 9:7–8 reads ΤΙΗ as τ (= cross, 300) + ΙΗ (= first two letters of Ἰησοῦς, 18). Abram's oath formula ἀρῶ τὴν χεῖρά μου πρὸς κύριον at 14:22 is the first raised-hand oath in the LXX, establishing the pattern for the patriarchal and legal oath-formulas that follow.

Genesis 15 — ΓΕΝΕΣΙΣ ΙΕ′

Theme. The theological summit of the Abram cycle: God speaks in a vision, declares himself Abram's shield, and answers Abram's protest of childlessness by leading him outside to count the uncountable stars — and Abram believed God, and it was reckoned to him as righteousness (15:6); the chapter culminates in the covenant between the pieces, in which God alone passes through the divided sacrificial halves in the form of a smoking furnace and lamps of fire, sealing a unilateral divine grant of the land from the river of Egypt to the Euphrates for Abram's innumerable seed.

Outline.

Translation & textual notes. The Greek text of Genesis 15 follows the standard critical text of the Septuagint as established in the Rahlfs–Hanhart edition (Septuaginta, rev. ed. 2006), an ancient and public-domain text; the critical apparatus is not reproduced. Genesis 15 is the theological summit of the Abram cycle: the divine word comes to Abram ἐν ὁράματι ('in a vision'), God declares himself his shield (ὑπερασπίζω σου, 15:1), and the chapter culminates in the first formal covenant ratification in the patriarchal narrative — the covenant between the pieces (διέθετο κύριος τῷ Αβραμ διαθήκην, 15:18). The chapter's theological crown — one of the most consequential sentences in the entire Bible — is 15:6: καὶ ἐπίστευσεν Αβραμ τῷ θεῷ, καὶ ἐλογίσθη αὐτῷ εἰς δικαιοσύνην. The LXX passive ἐλογίσθη ('it was reckoned') renders the Hebrew Qal active וַיַּחְשְׁבֶהָ ('[YHWH] reckoned it'), shifting grammatical agency into a divine passive and foregrounding the gracious character of the imputation; τῷ θεῷ renders Hebrew בַּיהוָה ('in YHWH / to God'); εἰς δικαιοσύνην renders לִצְדָקָה ('as / for righteousness'). This verse is quoted verbatim at Romans 4:3, Galatians 3:6, and James 2:23 — the LXX text form is the direct source for all three NT citations and the engine of Paul's justification-by-faith argument. At 15:2 the LXX offers one of its most notoriously difficult renderings: ὁ δὲ υἱὸς Μασεκ τῆς οἰκογενοῦς μου, οὗτος Δαμασκὸς Ελιεζερ ('the son of Masek, of my home-born servants — this Damascene Eliezer'). The Hebrew וּבֶן־מֶשֶׁק בֵּיתִי הוּא דַּמֶּשֶׂק אֱלִיעֶזֶר is itself obscure; the LXX reads the hapax מֶשֶׁק as a proper name Μασεκ, a rendering without parallel elsewhere in the Greek Bible. At 15:13 the prediction of 400 years of sojourn and affliction is quoted at Acts 7:6. The covenant ceremony of 15:17 is narrated with the Hebraizing phrase κλίβανος καπνιζόμενος καὶ λαμπάδες πυρός ('a smoking furnace and lamps of fire') — the fiery divine theophany that prefigures the Sinai smoke and the pillar of fire in the wilderness (Exod 13:21; 19:18). The land-grant of 15:18–21 names ten nations, from the river of Egypt to the Euphrates; the covenant closes with τοὺς Γεργεσαίους καὶ τοὺς Ιεβουσαίους ('the Girgashites and the Jebusites'), anchoring the promise to the boundaries that will define the later Davidic kingdom.

Genesis 16 — ΓΕΝΕΣΙΣ ΙϚ′

Theme. The crisis of the unfulfilled promise: Sarai's barrenness drives the surrogate-wife arrangement that produces Hagar's contempt, her flight, and the pivotal theophany at the wilderness spring — the first appearance of the ἄγγελος κυρίου in the LXX — where a slave woman names God, receives the Abrahamic multiplication promise, and hears the birth oracle of Ishmael, 'God has heard,' before the chapter closes with Abram at eighty-six and the narrative poised for the covenant of Isaac thirteen years hence.

Outline.

Translation & textual notes. The Greek text of Genesis 16 follows the standard critical text of the Septuagint as established in the Rahlfs-Hanhart edition (Septuaginta, rev. ed. 2006), an ancient and public-domain text; the critical apparatus is not reproduced. Genesis 16 marks the first appearance in the LXX of the ἄγγελος κυρίου ('the angel of the LORD') — a figure of enormous theological weight who speaks with the divine first person and promises what only God can grant (16:10), so that Hagar names God himself (16:13). The debut of this figure at 16:7 inaugurates the pattern of theophanic encounter that runs through the Pentateuch and into the NT christophany traditions. The cognate-participle idiom Πληθύνων πληθυνῶ at 16:10 is a direct Hebraism calquing the Hebrew infinitive-absolute construction רַבָּה אַרְבֶּה; the LXX preserves the idiom rather than rendering it idiomatically. At 16:11 the name Ισμαηλ is glossed by ἐπήκουσεν κύριος τῇ ταπεινώσει σου — 'the LORD heard your humiliation'; ταπείνωσις renders Hebrew עֳנִי ('affliction / subjugation'), focusing on Hagar's social degradation. At 16:12 the oracle renders Hebrew פֶּרֶא אָדָם ('wild-ass of a man') as ἄγροικος ἄνθρωπος — a 'wild / rustic man' — replacing the animal metaphor with a social one, a significant LXX interpretive shift. The double naming of 16:13–14 is the chapter's theological crux: Hagar's name for God — Σύ ὁ θεὸς ὁ ἐπιδών με, 'You are the God who looked upon me' — and the well named Φρέαρ οὗ ἐνώπιον εἶδον are the LXX's interpretive rendering of Beer-lahai-roi. This chapter is the narrative base for Paul's Hagar-Sarah allegory in Gal 4:21–31, where Hagar (the slave, Sinai, present Jerusalem) stands over against Sarah (the free woman, the Jerusalem above), and the language of ταπείνωσις and slavery in this chapter underpins the typological argument.

Genesis 17 — ΓΕΝΕΣΙΣ ΙΖ′

Theme. The covenant of circumcision: at ninety-nine years old Abram receives the longest single divine speech in Genesis, which renames him Abraham ('father of many nations'), introduces the sign of περιτομή as the permanent mark of the covenant on every male body, renames Sarai as Sarah and promises her a son (Isaac, named in this chapter), blesses Ishmael with twelve nations while reserving the everlasting covenant exclusively for Isaac, and closes with Abraham's same-day, comprehensive obedience — the entire household circumcised — creating the covenantal vocabulary (ἀκροβυστία, σπέρμα, διαθήκη αἰώνιος) that the NT circumcision debates will inherit wholesale.

Outline.

Translation & textual notes. The Greek text of Genesis 17 follows the standard critical text of the Septuagint as established in the Rahlfs–Hanhart edition (Septuaginta, rev. ed. 2006), an ancient and public-domain text; the critical apparatus is not reproduced. Chapter 17 is the covenant of circumcision — the longest sustained divine speech in Genesis — whose distinctive vocabulary (περιτομή, ἀκροβυστία, ἀπερίτμητος, σπέρμα, διαθήκη) the NT debates will inherit wholesale (Rom 2:25–29; 4:9–12; Gal 5:2–6; Phil 3:3–5; Acts 7:8). The LXX renders the opening divine command at v.1 as εὐαρέστει ἐναντίον ἐμοῦ — 'be well-pleasing before me' — where the MT reads 'walk before me' (הִתְהַלֵּךְ לְפָנַי), suppressing the divine title El Shaddai (שַׁדַּי) and replacing the spatial idiom with the relational-moral εὐαρεστέω, the same verb used of Enoch (5:22, 24) and Noah (6:9), placing Abram in the lineage of antediluvian exemplars; Heb 11:5–6 exploits this connection. The two name changes are: Αβραμ → Αβρααμ at v.5, glossed by the promise πατέρα πολλῶν ἐθνῶν τέθεικά σε ('father of many nations I have set you') — quoted verbatim in Rom 4:17 and alluded to in Gal 3:8 as the scriptural charter of Gentile inclusion; and Σαρα → Σαρρα at v.15, the doubled rho being the LXX's graphical marker of the covenant form. The eighth-day circumcision rule (v.12: παιδίον ὀκτὼ ἡμερῶν) is cited at Luke 2:21 and Phil 3:5. At v.17 Abraham's interior laughter (ἐγέλασεν ... ἐν τῇ καρδίᾳ αὐτοῦ) etymologically founds the name Ισαακ (v.19); unlike Sarah's laughter at 18:15, this laughter is not rebuked. The covenant is declared αἰώνιος at v.19 and reserved for Isaac (v.21), while Ishmael receives a separate twelve-nations blessing (v.20). The cognate-figure περιτομῇ περιτμηθήσεται at v.13 (Hebraism of the infinitive absolute) and the excision formula ἐξολεθρευθήσεται ἡ ψυχὴ ἐκείνη at v.14 became touchstones of Second Temple halakah on covenant membership.

Genesis 18 — ΓΕΝΕΣΙΣ ΙΗ′

Theme. In one afternoon at the oak of Mamre, three divine visitors share a meal with Abraam, reaffirm the impossible promise of a son to the laughing Sarrha with the declaration μὴ ἀδυνατεῖ παρὰ τῷ θεῷ ῥῆμα (v.14), and then draw Abraam into the greatest act of intercessory boldness in the patriarchal narratives — a step-by-step negotiation for the righteous remnant of Sodom that descends from fifty to ten and establishes the enduring theological principle that even the smallest company of the just can avert divine judgment on the many.

Outline.

Translation & textual notes. The Greek text of Genesis 18 follows the standard critical text of the Septuagint as established in the Rahlfs–Hanhart edition (Septuaginta, rev. ed. 2006), an ancient and public-domain text; the critical apparatus is not reproduced. Genesis 18 is among the most theologically charged chapters of the patriarchal narrative, generating centuries of patristic, rabbinic, and artistic reflection on three interlocking topics. First, the three men (τρεῖς ἄνδρες, v.2): the narrative introduces them as three but addresses them collectively and individually as κύριος (vv.1, 10, 13, 17, 22), alternating singular and plural verbs and pronouns without explanation — a grammatical singularity that made the scene the foundational patristic icon of the Trinity. Justin Martyr (Dial. 56), Origen (Hom. Gen. 4), Ambrose (De Abr. 1.5), and Augustine (De Trin. 2.10–11) all read the three as a Trinity-prefiguration; Andrei Rublev's 'Trinity' icon (c.1425) depicts the three angels of Mamre as the canonical visual theology of the triune God in Eastern Christianity. Second, the hospitality scene (vv.1–8) is the proof-text for Heb 13:2 — 'do not neglect to show hospitality to strangers, for thereby some have entertained angels unawares.' Third, the divine rhetorical question at v.14 — μὴ ἀδυνατεῖ παρὰ τῷ θεῷ ῥῆμα; — is echoed nearly verbatim at Luke 1:37 (οὐκ ἀδυνατήσει παρὰ τοῦ θεοῦ πᾶν ῥῆμα), creating a deliberate typological link between Sarah's miraculous conception and the Incarnation. The universalist blessing ἐνευλογηθήσονται ἐν αὐτῷ πάντα τὰ ἔθνη τῆς γῆς (v.18) reiterates 12:3 and underpins Gal 3:8; the election theology of v.19 echoes through Rom 9:6–18. The great intercession (vv.23–33) — the countdown from 50 to 10 righteous — is the locus classicus for intercessory boldness before God and the theology of the righteous remnant; the judicial declaration of v.25 (ὁ κρίνων πᾶσαν τὴν γῆν, οὐ ποιήσεις κρίσιν;) became a standard text for theodicy. The LXX renders the chapter closely to the Hebrew, though the divine name alternates between ὁ θεός (v.1) and κύριος (vv.13ff.), reflecting the Hebrew Elohim/YHWH pattern of the underlying text.

Genesis 19 — ΓΕΝΕΣΙΣ ΙΘ′

Theme. The destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah — from the angelic visitation, the siege of Lot's house, the urgent flight, and the annihilation of the plain, to the Lot's-wife warning and the cave episode whose aetiological naming speeches embed the scandal of incestuous origin permanently in the names of Moab and Ammon.

Outline.

Translation & textual notes. The Greek text of Genesis 19 follows the standard critical text of the Septuagint as established in the Rahlfs–Hanhart edition (Septuaginta, rev. ed. 2006), an ancient and public-domain text; the critical apparatus is not reproduced. Genesis 19 is the destruction narrative of the cities of the plain: the arrival of the two angels at Sodom at evening (19:1), Lot's hospitality and the assault by the Sodomites (19:2–11), the angels' urgent summons to flight (19:12–22), the rain of sulfur and fire, the desolation of the plain and Lot's wife (19:23–26), Abraham's morning vigil (19:27–28), a theological summary (19:29), and the strange cave epilogue producing the ancestors of Moab and Amman (19:30–38). The LXX follows the Hebrew closely, rendering Σοδομα, Γομορρα, and Σηγωρ by transliteration; Λωτ is indeclinable throughout. Three features of the chapter command sustained exegetical attention. First, at 19:24 the LXX reads καὶ κύριος ἔβρεξεν ἐπὶ Σοδομα καὶ Γομορρα θεῖον καὶ πῦρ παρὰ κυρίου ἐκ τοῦ οὐρανοῦ — 'the LORD rained … from the LORD out of heaven': one κύριος rains, and the source is a second κύριος. The church fathers read this double divine subject as evidence of two distinct divine persons and as the locus classicus of pre-incarnate christophany (Justin, Dial. 56; Irenaeus, A.H. 3.6; Tertullian, Prax. 13; Origen, Hom. Gen. 4.5); the reading is flagged as a major crux. Second, at 19:26 Lot's wife turns and becomes a στήλη ἁλός ('pillar of salt'), a detail Jesus invokes explicitly: μνημονεύετε τῆς γυναικὸς Λώτ (Luke 17:32). Third, the σπεύδω/σῴζω vocabulary of angelic urgency — σῴζου τὴν σεαυτοῦ ψυχήν (19:17); σπεῦσον (19:22) — establishes the eschatological-rescue register that Luke 17:28–32 will deploy directly. The Σηγωρ/μικρά wordplay (19:20–22) is preserved: the city is μικρά, and the angel confirms it — 'is she not small?' The cave episode (19:30–38) produces aetiological etymologies embedded in naming-speech: Μωαβ = ἐκ τοῦ πατρός μου ('from my father', 19:37); Αμμαν = υἱὸς τοῦ γένους μου ('son of my people', 19:38). NT echoes: Luke 17:28–32 (the day Lot left Sodom); 2 Pet 2:6–8 (Lot saved as a righteous man); Jude 7 (Sodom and Gomorrah as an example of eternal fire).

Genesis 20 — ΓΕΝΕΣΙΣ Κ′

Theme. The second sister-wife episode — Abraham's premeditated deception in Gerar — becomes the surprising occasion for the Bible's first naming of a prophet (προφήτης, 20:7), defined at its inaugural appearance as an intercessor whose prayer reverses divine judgment, while the Philistine king Abimelech, whom Abraham assumed to be godless, proves to possess a finer moral conscience than the patriarch himself.

Outline.

Translation & textual notes. The Greek text of Genesis 20 follows the standard critical text of the Septuagint as established in the Rahlfs–Hanhart edition (Septuaginta, rev. ed. 2006), an ancient and public-domain text; the critical apparatus is not reproduced. Genesis in the LXX is part of the Old Greek Pentateuch, one of the earliest and most theologically significant translation achievements of the Second Temple period; the Genesis translator renders the Hebrew into idiomatic Greek rather than pursuing the word-for-word literalism characteristic of kaige-revised books. Chapter 20 is the second of the three sister-wife episodes (cf. Gen 12:10–20 with Pharaoh; Gen 26:1–11 with a later Abimelech of Gerar). The divine address ἐν ὕπνῳ τὴν νύκτα (20:3) is the standard LXX formula for nocturnal theophany, calquing Hebrew בַּחֲלוֹם הַלָּיְלָה. The chapter's chief lexical landmark is 20:7: the LXX renders נָבִיא with προφήτης — the first occurrence of that word in the entire Septuagint. This debut simultaneously defines the prophetic office intercessorily: 'he is a prophet and will pray for you' (καὶ προσεύξεται περὶ σοῦ). Abimelech's plea ἔθνος ἀγνοοῦν καὶ δίκαιον ('an unknowing and righteous nation,' 20:4) frames a claim to objective moral standing before God — an early biblical appeal to conscience-based accountability. At 20:12 Abraham's disclosure ἐκ πατρός, ἀλλ᾿ οὐκ ἐκ μητρός identifies Sarah as a half-sister, raising ethical questions that later Jewish tradition (cf. Jubilees 12) sought to resolve. At 20:16 the LXX renders the Hebrew אֶלֶף כֶּסֶף ('a thousand silver') as χίλια δίδραχμα, substituting the Greek didrachm for the Semitic shekel — a transparent coinage modernization for the Hellenistic audience. The chapter closes (20:18) with the intensive compound συνέκλεισεν κύριος ἔξωθεν πᾶσαν μήτραν: συνέκλεισεν ('shut completely together') plus ἔξωθεν ('from outside') conveys the totality and divine externality of the closure — undone only through Abraham's intercession in his prophetic role.

Genesis 21 — ΓΕΝΕΣΙΣ ΚΑ′

Theme. The chapter of fulfillment and fracture: the LORD visits Sarah as he had promised and Isaac is born into Abraham's laughter-saturated household; the same laughter-root that names the child triggers the expulsion of Hagar and Ishmael into the wilderness, where God hears the dying boy's voice and vindicates his name ('God hears'), opens a well of living water, and promises him a nation; the chapter closes with a covenant sealed at Beersheba — whose name the LXX translates as Φρέαρ ὁρκισμοῦ, 'Well of the Oath' — as Abraham plants a tamarisk and calls on the Everlasting God, then sojourns in the land of the Philistines many days.

Outline.

Translation & textual notes. The Greek text of Genesis 21 follows the standard critical text of the Septuagint as established in the Rahlfs–Hanhart edition (Septuaginta, rev. ed. 2006), an ancient and public-domain text; the critical apparatus is not reproduced. The chapter falls into three movements: Isaac's birth and weaning (21:1–8), the expulsion of Hagar and Ishmael (21:9–21), and the covenant with Abimelech at Beersheba (21:22–34). The chapter opens with the verb ἐπεσκέψατο — 'the LORD visited Sarah' (21:1) — carrying the full theological weight of the divine visitation formula: the same root governs Luke 1:68 (εὐλόγητος κύριος ὁ θεὸς τοῦ Ἰσραήλ, ὅτι ἐπεσκέψατο) and Luke 7:16 (ἐπεσκέψατο ὁ θεὸς τὸν λαὸν αὐτοῦ), making Gen 21:1 LXX the direct scriptural antecedent of the Lucan visitation theology. The Isaac birth-narrative turns on etymology: γέλωτά μοι ἐποίησεν κύριος (21:6) renders Hebrew צחק עשה לי, and both Hebrew יצחק (Yiṣḥāq) and LXX Ισαακ encode the laughter-root. At 21:10 Sarah's command Ἔκβαλε τὴν παιδίσκην ταύτην καὶ τὸν υἱὸν αὐτῆς is quoted verbatim at Gal 4:30 (λέγει γὰρ ἡ γραφή) in Paul's allegory of the two covenants; the words ἐν Ισαακ κληθήσεταί σοι σπέρμα (21:12) are cited at Rom 9:7 and Heb 11:18. The divine hearing of the boy (εἰσήκουσεν ὁ θεὸς τῆς φωνῆς τοῦ παιδίου, 21:17) plays on the name ישמעאל (Yišmāʿēʾl = 'God hears'), given at 16:11. At 21:31 the LXX renders Beersheba (Hebrew באר שבע = 'well of the oath / seven') as Φρέαρ ὁρκισμοῦ ('well of the oath'), translating rather than transliterating — an unusual choice that makes the place-name's oath-etymology explicit for Greek readers. At 21:33 ἄρουραν renders Hebrew אשל (ʾēšel, a tamarisk tree), and θεὸς αἰώνιος renders El Olam (אל עולם, 'the Everlasting God'), its only occurrence in Genesis LXX.

Genesis 22 — ΓΕΝΕΣΙΣ ΚΒ′

Theme. The theological summit of the Abraham cycle and of the Septuagint's Pentateuch: God tests Abraham with the command to offer his beloved son Isaac as a whole burnt offering in the high land; Abraham obeys without a word of protest, rising early, journeying three days, binding his son, and stretching out the knife — until the angel of the LORD calls twice from heaven, stays his hand, provides a ram caught in a sabek-bush as substitute, and seals the rescue with a divine self-oath that the seed of Abraham shall multiply and bless all nations; the chapter closes with the genealogy of Nahor, which introduces Rebekah — the future bride of the son who was nearly sacrificed.

Outline.

Translation & textual notes. The Greek text of Genesis 22 follows the standard critical text of the Septuagint as established in the Rahlfs–Hanhart edition (Septuaginta, rev. ed. 2006), an ancient and public-domain text; the critical apparatus is not reproduced. The Akedah — the Binding of Isaac — is one of the theological summits of the Septuagint and of biblical literature. The chapter opens with the formula μετὰ τὰ ῥήματα ταῦτα, resuming after the Beersheba covenant of 21:31–34; ὁ θεὸς ἐπείραζεν uses θεός rather than κύριος throughout the narrative frame, reflecting the Hebrew Elohistic designation אֱלֹהִים. The LXX's most celebrated departure from the Hebrew falls at 22:2: the Hebrew יְחִידְךָ ('your only son') is rendered not as μονογενής but as τὸν υἱόν σου τὸν ἀγαπητόν, ὃν ἠγάπησας — 'your beloved son, whom you have loved.' The adjective ἀγαπητός is the precise word of the heavenly voice at Jesus' baptism (Mark 1:11 par.: σὺ εἶ ὁ υἱός μου ὁ ἀγαπητός) and Transfiguration (Matt 17:5), making the LXX Akedah the direct scriptural background for the baptismal voice — Heb 11:17 reverts to μονογενής, but the synoptic tradition draws on the LXX ἀγαπητός. At the same verse, the LXX renders the obscure Hebrew toponym מֹרִיָּה (Moriah) as εἰς τὴν γῆν τὴν ὑψηλήν ('into the high land'), interpreting or etymologising the name rather than transliterating; the MT link to 2 Chr 3:1 (Moriah = the temple mount) is suppressed for Greek readers. At 22:13 the ram is caught ἐν φυτῷ σαβεκ — the LXX transliterates the Hebrew סְבַךְ (śᵉḇaḵ, a thicket) as the semi-proper noun 'sabeq,' a famous oddity exploited by patristic exegetes: Theodoret and Cyril read 'sabeq' as Syriac for 'forgiveness,' allegorising the trapped ram as a type of Christ caught in the thicket of human sin for humanity's redemption. At 22:14 the place-name YHWH-Yireh is rendered Κύριος εἶδεν and the etiological formula reads Ἐν τῷ ὄρει κύριος ὤφθη ('In the mountain the LORD was seen'), using the theological passive ὤφθη — the standard LXX theophany verb (cf. Gen 17:1; 18:1). At 22:16 κατ᾿ ἐμαυτοῦ ὤμοσα is quoted verbatim at Heb 6:13 to establish the oath's absolute guaranty; at 22:18 ἐνευλογηθήσονται ἐν τῷ σπέρματί σου πάντα τὰ ἔθνη τῆς γῆς is cited at Acts 3:25 and underlies Gal 3:8, 16 — Paul's argument that the singular σπέρμα refers to Christ turns on this LXX wording. NT resonances of the whole chapter: Rom 8:32 (οὐκ ἐφείσατο τοῦ ἰδίου υἱοῦ) alludes directly to 22:12 (οὐκ ἐφείσω τοῦ υἱοῦ σου); Jas 2:21 cites the offering of Isaac as justification by works; Heb 11:17–19 reads the Akedah as resurrection faith. The chapter closes at 22:20–24 with the genealogy of Nahor, introducing Rebekah (v.23) and the concubine (παλλακή) Ρεημα (v.24), preparing the scene for Genesis 24.

Genesis 23 — ΓΕΝΕΣΙΣ ΚΓ′

Theme. The legal acquisition of the Machpelah cave — Sarah's tomb — through an elaborate, courtly Hittite negotiation in which Abraham the self-declared sojourner-and-stranger purchases with full legal title the only land he will ever own in Canaan, setting the word-pair πάροικος καὶ παρεπίδημος at the chapter's heart where the NT will find it, and ratifying the deed with the seal ἐκυρώθη — the field and cave confirmed to Abraham as a possession for burial from the sons of Heth.

Outline.

Translation & textual notes. The Greek text of Genesis 23 follows the standard critical text of the Septuagint as established in the Rahlfs–Hanhart edition (Septuaginta, rev. ed. 2006), an ancient and public-domain text; the critical apparatus is not reproduced. This chapter records the first land Abraham permanently acquires in Canaan — the purchase of the cave from Ephron the Hittite as a burial ground for Sarah — and is notable for its formal legal vocabulary and the elaborately courtly register of the negotiation. The cave name poses the chapter's key translational crux: the LXX renders τὸ σπήλαιον τὸ διπλοῦν ('the double cave,' 23:9, 17) rather than transliterating the Hebrew proper name Machpelah (מַּכְפֵּלָה, from the root כָּפַל, 'to double / fold'); the translator interpreted the name as a descriptive adjective and rendered its sense, making the cave's etymology transparent in Greek while dissolving the place-name itself. At 23:4 Abraham's self-designation πάροικος καὶ παρεπίδημος ἐγώ εἰμι μεθ᾽ ὑμῶν is the chapter's theological crux and its most consequential phrase for the NT: the exact word-pair πάροικος–παρεπίδημος (resident alien + stranger-passing-through) is inherited verbatim at 1 Pet 2:11 (παρεπιδήμους καὶ παροίκους παρακαλῶ) and governs the pilgrim theology of Heb 11:13 (ξένοι καὶ παρεπίδημοί εἰσιν ἐπὶ τῆς γῆς); Acts 7:16 alludes to this purchase in Stephen's speech, though with a conflation placing it at Shechem. The price agreed is τετρακόσια δίδραχμα ἀργυρίου δόκιμον ἐμπόρῳ (23:16): the LXX renders the Hebrew שֶׁקֶל with δίδραχμον, a coin of two drachmas familiar to Ptolemaic readers — a deliberate modernization; δόκιμον ἐμπόρῳ ('acceptable to / current with the merchant') is a commercial certification formula attested in papyri. The legal ratification vocabulary ἐκυρώθη (23:17, 20) is the aorist passive of κυρόω, 'to ratify / confirm legally,' the standard term for binding a property conveyance. The elaborate bowing formulae (προσεκύνησεν, 23:7, 12) and the repeated public-hearing markers (ἐν ἐπηκόῳ … εἰς τὰ ὦτα) reflect the courtly etiquette of formal Near Eastern land transactions preserved faithfully by the LXX.

Genesis 24 — ΓΕΝΕΣΙΣ ΚΔ′

Theme. The longest chapter in Genesis — a supreme example of Hebrew narrative art — in which Abraham's unnamed servant travels to Mesopotamia to secure a wife for Isaac, guided at every step by a Providence whose instrument is the verb εὐοδόω ('prosper the way'), spoken seven times across the chapter; the mission culminates in the mirrored gaze of Isaac and Rebekah in the Negeb field at evening, her veiling with the θέριστρον, and the declaration ἠγάπησεν αὐτήν — first conjugal love in Genesis LXX — consoling Isaac after Sarah's death.

Outline.

Translation & textual notes. The Greek text of Genesis 24 follows the standard critical text of the Septuagint as established in the Rahlfs–Hanhart edition (Septuaginta, rev. ed. 2006), an ancient and public-domain text; the critical apparatus is not reproduced. Genesis 24 is the longest chapter in Genesis (67 verses) and the most sustained narrative in the patriarchal cycle, recounting the mission of Abraham's unnamed servant to secure a wife for Isaac from among Abraham's own kindred in Mesopotamia. The chapter opens with a double framing: Abraham is old and advanced in days (πρεσβύτερος προβεβηκὼς ἡμερῶν, 24:1 — a formula echoed at Luke 1:7 of Zechariah and Elizabeth), and the LORD has blessed him κατὰ πάντα ('in all things'), grounding the whole mission in prior divine favor. The patriarchal oath sworn by placing the hand ὑπὸ τὸν μηρόν ('under the thigh', 24:2, 9) is the most solemn gesture in the ancestral narratives, invoking the generative power of the patriarch as guarantor; the same formula appears at Gen 47:29 when Jacob charges Joseph. The servant's prayer-test at the well is structured around the verb εὐοδόω ('prosper the way'), which recurs seven times across the chapter (24:12 εὐόδωσόν μοι; 24:21 εἰ εὐώδωκεν κύριος; 24:27 εὐώδωκεν κύριος; 24:40 εὐοδώσει; 24:42 εὐοδοῖς; 24:48 εὐώδωσεν; 24:56 εὐόδωσεν), creating a providential leitmotif; the same verb appears at Rom 1:10 and 3 John 2. The most exegetically significant lexical choice is παρθένος: at 24:16 the narrator describes Rebekah as παρθένος with the explanatory gloss ἀνὴρ οὐκ ἔγνω αὐτήν; but at 24:43 in the servant's retelling, παρθένος renders the Hebrew עַלְמָה (almah, 'young woman') — the same word the LXX renders παρθένος at Isa 7:14. Genesis 24:43 is therefore a direct lexical precedent for the LXX Isa 7:14 rendering, showing that the translator(s) understood almah as compatible with παρθένος. The chapter's long retelling (vv. 34–49), in which the servant rehearses his mission almost verbatim before Laban's household, follows the classic Hebrew technique of narrative repetition as confirmation; annotation in that section focuses on variations rather than duplicating first-telling notes. At 24:63 the LXX renders the obscure Hebrew לָשׂוּחַ with ἀδολεσχῆσαι ('to converse at length / meditate'), a philosophically colored verb giving Isaac's evening field-walk a contemplative cast. Rebekah's self-veiling with the θέριστρον (24:65) marks her transition from eligible maiden to promised bride. The chapter closes (24:67) with Sarah's tent re-entered after its emptiness since her death (23:2), and with the first use of ἠγάπησεν ('he loved her') for conjugal love in Genesis LXX.

Genesis 25 — ΓΕΝΕΣΙΣ ΚΕ′

Theme. Abraham's twilight and the opening of the Jacob–Esau narrative: the patriarch distributes his estate, dies in covenantal completeness πρεσβύτης καὶ πλήρης ἡμερῶν and is buried by both estranged sons in the double cave; the Ishmaelite line closes with twelve princes; Rebekah conceives twins whose pre-natal struggle drives her to seek a divine oracle, which declares that the elder shall serve the younger — a decree quoted verbatim by Paul as the foundation of sovereign election (Rom 9:12) — and the chapter ends when Esau, the firstborn, sells his πρωτοτόκια for a bowl of lentil stew and the narrator delivers the one-word verdict ἐφαύλισεν.

Outline.

Translation & textual notes. The Greek text of Genesis 25 follows the standard critical text of the Septuagint as established in the Rahlfs–Hanhart edition (Septuaginta, rev. ed. 2006), an ancient and public-domain text; the critical apparatus is not reproduced. The chapter spans three major movements: Abraham's twilight and the Keturah genealogy (25:1–11), the Ishmaelite list of twelve princes (25:12–18), and the opening of the Jacob–Esau narrative culminating in the birthright sale (25:19–34). The opening verb Προσθέμενος (25:1) is a Hebraizing circumstantial participle calquing Hebrew וַיֹּסֶף ('and he again / proceeded to'), the LXX's standard rendering of the resumptive idiom. Abraham's death formula at 25:8 — πρεσβύτης καὶ πλήρης ἡμερῶν ('old and full of days') — is the classical toledoth obituary echoed at Job 42:17 LXX. At 25:9 both Ισαακ and Ισμαηλ bury their father in the σπήλαιον τὸ διπλοῦν ('the double cave'), the only post-expulsion scene reuniting the two sons over their father's body. The twelve Ishmaelite princes (25:13–16) parallel the twelve tribes of Israel: two complete nations, both of Abrahamic descent. At 25:22 ἐσκίρτων ('the children were leaping within her') employs σκιρτάω — the same verb at Luke 1:41 of the infant John leaping in Elizabeth's womb at Mary's greeting; Luke deliberately recalls this LXX motif of the prophetic child in the womb. At 25:23 the divine oracle δύο ἔθνη ἐν τῇ γαστρί σού εἰσιν … καὶ ὁ μείζων δουλεύσει τῷ ἐλάσσονι ('the greater shall serve the lesser') is cited verbatim at Romans 9:12 — the exegetical foundation of Paul's argument for sovereign election apart from works (Rom 9:10–13). The πτέρνα etymology of Ιακωβ (25:26) and the Εδωμ / πυρρός wordplay (25:30) are preserved as narrative name-anchors. The chapter closes with the narrator's lapidary verdict ἐφαύλισεν ('he despised / treated as worthless', 25:34), rendering Hebrew וַיִּבֶז; the same semantic field governs the NT portrait of Esau as βέβηλος ('profane') at Hebrews 12:16, who sold the πρωτοτόκια for a single meal.

Genesis 26 — ΓΕΝΕΣΙΣ ΚϚ′

Theme. The Isaanic covenant: the Abrahamic promise is formally re-grounded in a second generation through a divine reappearance at Gerar and Beersheba, a contested well-sequence that maps grace against hostility, and a covenant meal with Abimelech — the chapter ending not in peace but in the ominous shadow of Esau's foreign marriages and the domestic strife (ἦσαν ἐρίζουσαι) that will ignite the deception of chapter 27.

Outline.

Translation & textual notes. The Greek text of Genesis 26 follows the standard critical text of the Septuagint as established in the Rahlfs–Hanhart edition (Septuaginta, rev. ed. 2006), an ancient and public-domain text; the critical apparatus is not reproduced. The chapter transfers the Abrahamic promise-cycle to Isaac through three interlocking movements: the divine appearance and promise-renewal at Gerar (26:1–5), the sister-wife ruse and its resolution (26:6–11), and the contested well-digging sequence culminating in Abimelech's covenant (26:12–33). The promise-renewal in 26:3–5 closely models the Abrahamic covenant passages of ch.12, 15, and 17, adding the remarkable warrant of 26:5: 'because Abraham obeyed my voice and kept my ordinances and my commandments and my statutes and my laws' — four legal terms (προστάγματα, ἐντολαί, δικαιώματα, νόμοι) reading distinctively Mosaic Torah vocabulary back onto the pre-Mosaic patriarch; the fourfold list has no parallel in the patriarchal narratives and is noted by rabbinic and patristic interpreters as anticipating Sinai. The blessing formula ἐνευλογηθήσονται ἐν τῷ σπέρματί σου πάντα τὰ ἔθνη τῆς γῆς (26:4) echoes 12:3 and 22:18 LXX and is cited at Acts 3:25 and Galatians 3:8. The sister-wife ruse of 26:7–11 is the third iteration of this type-scene (cf. 12:10–20; 20:1–18); the episode's pivot is Isaac παίζοντα μετὰ Ρεβεκκας ('sporting with Rebekah', 26:8), where παίζω puns on the name Ισαακ (from Hebrew יִצְחַק, 'he laughs'). The translated well-names are a distinctive LXX rendering strategy: rather than transliterating, the translator renders Hebrew Esek, Sitnah, and Rehoboth as Ἀδικία ('Injustice'), Ἐχθρία ('Enmity'), and Εὐρυχωρία ('Broad-place') at 26:20–22, making the theology of the names transparent to Greek readers. At 26:33 the well-name Ὅρκος ('Oath') likewise renders Hebrew שֶׁבַע, producing the Greek Beersheba etymology φρέαρ ὅρκου ('well of oath'). The chapter closes with Esau's Hittite marriages and the ominous note that his wives ἦσαν ἐρίζουσαι ('were contentious') with Isaac and Rebekah, anticipating the family strife of ch.27.

Genesis 27 — ΓΕΝΕΣΙΣ ΚΖ′

Theme. The chapter of the stolen blessing: a dying patriarch's deathbed commission is hijacked by a mother's counter-plan, and the elder-serves-younger reversal ordained before the twins' birth (25:23) is ratified through deception. The narrative turns on blindness — literal (Isaac, v.1) and moral (everyone, in different directions): Isaac cannot distinguish son from son; Rebekah and Jacob exploit the gap; Esau arrives to find the irreversible already accomplished. The stolen blessing is not merely a family drama but the hinge on which the entire patriarchal election pivots: the dew-and-fatness oracle (vv.28–29) is the Abrahamic blessing misallocated by human cunning, yet the text's silence — God never appears, never corrects — leaves open the disturbing question whether divine providence is riding the deception. The chapter's five movements run from aged commission (A) through prepared disguise (B) and the blessing scene itself (C) into Esau's anguished return (D) and the flight set in motion by grudge and maternal stratagem (E), closing with Rebekah's double-voiced plea to Isaac (v.46) — honest about her Hittite-daughter grief, silent about Esau's murder-plan.

Outline.

Translation & textual notes. The Greek text of Genesis 27 follows the critical text of the Septuagint as established in the Rahlfs–Hanhart edition (Septuaginta, rev. ed. 2006), an ancient and public-domain text; the critical apparatus is not reproduced. The chapter's controlling noun εὐλογία ('blessing') appears more than a dozen times, turning the chapter into a meditation on the spoken word's irrevocable power: once uttered by the patriarch, a blessing cannot be recalled (ἀνατρέψαι αὐτήν, v.37). The vocabulary of deception clusters at the structural core: the disguise garments are Esau's στολὴ ἡ καλή (v.15) and the sensory test in vv.22–23 turns on φωνή vs. χεῖρες — the voice/hand antithesis that the whole chapter has been building toward. The blessing formula of vv.28–29 (ἀπὸ τῆς δρόσου τοῦ οὐρανοῦ καὶ ἀπὸ τῆς πιότητος τῆς γῆς) is the standard ancient Near Eastern prosperity-blessing, echoed in Isaac's lesser oracle to Esau (vv.39–40) with the same preposition reversed into privation. NT resonances are dense: the blessing is cited at Heb 11:20 (πίστει καὶ περὶ μελλόντων εὐλόγησεν Ισαακ τοὺς υἱούς); Esau's failed search for repentance and great bitter cry are the exegetical anchor of Heb 12:16–17; Jacob and Esau as elect and rejected are Paul's paradigm in Rom 9:11–13 (quoting the oracle of 25:23 and Mal 1:2–3). The πτερνίζω pun in v.36 activates the etymology of both the Hebrew name יַעֲקֹב (from עָקֵב, 'heel') and the LXX transliteration Ιακωβ, making the chapter the definitive interpretation of the patriarch's name before it is changed to Ισραηλ at Gen 32:28.

Genesis 28 — ΓΕΝΕΣΙΣ ΚΗ′

Theme. At Bethel, Jacob the supplanter receives the first direct divine theophany of the patriarchal saga — a ladder grounded on earth with its head touching heaven, carrying angelic traffic (28:12), a LORD who stands ἐπ' αὐτῆς (upon it — or over him?) and renews the Abrahamic covenant in its fullest form: land, sand-like seed, four-directional expansion, and universal blessing ἐνευλογηθήσονται (28:14, cited by Paul in Gal 3:8); a frightened fugitive who awakes to anoint the sleeping-stone as the first anointed pillar in Scripture (28:18), names the site Οἶκος θεοῦ (LXX translating, not transliterating, Bethel), and seals his response with the first conditional vow and tithe-pledge in Scripture (28:20–22).

Outline.

Translation & textual notes. The Greek text of Genesis 28 follows the standard critical text of the Septuagint as established in the Rahlfs–Hanhart edition (Septuaginta, rev. ed. 2006), an ancient and public-domain text; the critical apparatus is not reproduced. The chapter's theological apex is the vision of Jacob's ladder (κλίμαξ ἐστηριγμένη ἐν τῇ γῇ, 28:12) — a stairway set upon the earth with its head reaching heaven and the angels of God ascending and descending ἐπ' αὐτῆς; the christological echo is explicit at John 1:51 (ὄψεσθε τοὺς ἀγγέλους τοῦ θεοῦ ἀναβαίνοντας καὶ καταβαίνοντας ἐπὶ τὸν υἱὸν τοῦ ἀνθρώπου), where Jesus names himself the ladder and shares the Greek preposition ἐπί with the LXX; the phrase ἐπ' αὐτῆς at 28:12 ('upon it' — feminine κλίμαξ) recurs at 28:13 where the LORD stands ἐπ' αὐτῆς — ambiguously 'upon it' (the ladder) or 'over him' (Jacob), an ambiguity the Fourth Gospel's christological use of ἐπί exploits. The divine speech of 28:13–15 renews the Abrahamic covenant in its fullest Genesis formulation: self-identification as the God of Abraham and Isaac, land promised to Jacob and his seed, seed as the sand of the earth expanding in four directions, and the universal blessing ἐνευλογηθήσονται ἐν σοὶ πᾶσαι αἱ φυλαὶ τῆς γῆς καὶ ἐν τῷ σπέρματί σου (28:14b) — a passive of divine agency cited by Paul at Gal 3:8 (ἐνευλογηθήσονται ἐν σοὶ πάντα τὰ ἔθνη). At 28:17 Jacob's exclamation Ὡς φοβερὸς ὁ τόπος οὗτος identifies the site as both οἶκος θεοῦ and πύλη τοῦ οὐρανοῦ. At 28:19 the LXX renders Hebrew בֵּית אֵל (Bethel = 'house of God') as Οἶκος θεοῦ rather than transliterating as Βαιθηλ, making the etymology transparent to Greek readers, while the prior name לוּז (Luz) is transliterated as Λουζα. The anointing of the pillar (στήλη) at 28:18 is the earliest anointing act in the LXX. The vow of 28:20–22 closes with the double-compounded ἀποδεκατώσω (28:22), rendering the emphatic Hebrew infinitive-absolute construction עַשֵּׂר אֲעַשְּׂרֶנּוּ — the first tithing-vow in Scripture.

Genesis 29 — ΓΕΝΕΣΙΣ ΚΘ′

Theme. In a chapter that moves from the comedy of eros — Jacob lifting his feet with theophanic energy toward the east, rolling a great stone single-handed for the woman he loves, and counting seven years of servitude as a few days (ὡς ἡμέραι ὀλίγαι, 29:20) — to the dark comedy of deception (the man who wore goat-skins to fool his blind father is handed the wrong wife under cover of darkness by his father-in-law), and finally to the theology of the womb (the LORD opens the hated wife's womb and closes the loved wife's, then draws Leah from petition to pure praise, so that from her doxology — ἐξομολογήσομαι κυρίῳ ('I will praise the LORD', 29:35) — the name Judah is born, the tribal name of the royal and messianic line, and the root of all 'Judaism').

Outline.

Translation & textual notes. The Greek text of Genesis 29 follows the standard critical text of the Septuagint as established in the Rahlfs–Hanhart edition (Septuaginta, rev. ed. 2006), an ancient and public-domain text; the critical apparatus is not reproduced. The chapter opens with the unique Hebraism ἐξάρας τοὺς πόδας (29:1) — 'lifting his feet' — a phrase found nowhere else in the LXX, calquing the Hebrew וַיִּשָּׂא יַעֲקֹב רַגְלָיו; it conveys the energized purpose of a man sent out by a fresh theophany. The well and its great stone (λίθος μέγας, 29:2–3) form the typological and dramatic center of the arrival scene: three flocks wait because the communal watering convention requires the stone to be moved together, but Jacob rolls it alone for Rachel (29:10) — an acted parable of heroic love. The historical present ὁρᾷ ('he sees,' 29:2) interrupts the aorist-dominated narrative with cinematic immediacy. Rachel (Ραχηλ) is introduced as a shepherdess — ἔβοσκεν τὰ πρόβατα τοῦ πατρὸς αὐτῆς (29:9) — an active figure rather than a passive object. Jacob's kiss and weeping (ἐφίλησεν … ἔκλαυσεν, 29:11) are the chapter's first explicitly emotional acts. Laban's welcome formula at 29:14 — ἐκ τῶν ὀστέων μου καὶ ἐκ τῆς σαρκός μου εἶ σύ — echoes the covenant-bonding language of Gen 2:23; its warmth is retrospectively ironic given the deception that follows. The lyrical center is 29:20: ὡς ἡμέραι ὀλίγαι παρὰ τὸ ἀγαπᾶν αὐτὸν αὐτήν — 'as a few days, because of his love for her' — one of Scripture's most celebrated sentences. Leah's eyes (ἀσθενεῖς, 29:17) render the ambiguous Hebrew רַכּוֹת (rakkot, 'tender' or 'weak'); the LXX takes the less flattering sense. The theological crux is the deception of 29:23–25: the man who wore goat-skins to deceive his blind father (Gen 27) is deceived under darkness by his father-in-law with a different daughter — the deceiver is deceived, measure for measure. The four birth-etymologies of 29:32–35 root the tribal system in Leah's prayer: Ρουβην (εἶδεν κύριος τὴν ταπείνωσίν μου, 29:32), Συμεων (ἤκουσεν κύριος, 29:33), Λευι (πρὸς ἐμοῦ ἔσται ὁ ἀνήρ μου from the root לוה 'to be joined,' 29:34), and Ιουδα (ἐξομολογήσομαι κυρίῳ, 29:35) — the verb ἐξομολογέω is the great Psalter-word of praise and confession; from Judah's name all of 'Judaism' derives, and 'the Lion of the tribe of Judah' is the NT's messianic title (Rev 5:5).

Genesis 30 — ΓΕΝΕΣΙΣ Λ′

Theme. The birth-contest between Leah and Rachel — prosecuted through their handmaids Βαλλα and Ζελφα and sealed by the mandrake bargain (30:14–16) — fills the first half of the chapter with the cries of maternal theology: six sons and a daughter are born to Jacob, each naming a divine act; the second half pivots to the economic contest between Jacob and Laban, in which Jacob's God-superintended rod-breeding scheme (ῥάβδοι, 30:37–43) overturns Laban's manipulation and makes Jacob ἐπλούτησεν σφόδρα σφόδρα ('exceedingly exceedingly rich', 30:43), fulfilling the covenant promise of multiplication that the chapter's opening envied but could not yet see.

Outline.

Translation & textual notes. The Greek text of Genesis 30 follows the standard critical text of the Septuagint as established in the Rahlfs–Hanhart edition (Septuaginta, rev. ed. 2006), an ancient and public-domain text; the critical apparatus is not reproduced. The chapter's narrative is organized around two contests — one reproductive (the birth-contest, vv.1–21), one economic (the flock-contest, vv.22–43) — with the pivot of divine remembrance (ἐμνήσθη, v.22) between them. The birth-contest is driven by ζηλόω ('envy/be zealous for', v.1), an emotion the LXX shares with the divine zealousness of Exod 20:5 and Paul's boast of God's jealousy in 2 Cor 11:2. The naming speeches of vv.6–24 embed theology in etymology: each name is a speech-act that assigns divine agency to the birth — Δαν (ἔκρινέν μοι ὁ θεός, v.6), Νεφθαλι (συνελάβετό μοι ὁ θεός, v.8), Γαδ (Ἐν τύχῃ, v.11 — τύχη as the Greek goddess of luck, a stark translation of Hebrew גָּד), Ασηρ (μακαρία ἐγώ, v.13 — the μακαρ- Beatitude-root), Ισσαχαρ (μισθός, v.18), Ζαβουλων (v.20), and Ιωσηφ (Προσθέτω κύριος, v.24). The mandrakes (μανδραγόραι, vv.14–16) are the episode's external plot-driver; the word μανδραγόρας renders Hebrew דּוּדָאִים, a plant associated with fertility and love (cf. Song 7:13). The wage-negotiations of vv.25–33 establish the economic vocabulary (μισθός, δεδούλευκα, εὐλόγησεν) that frames the flock-breeding of vv.37–43; Jacob's δικαιοσύνη ('integrity / righteousness', v.33) is personified as a legal witness — an early LXX instance of the later biblical δικαιοσύνη theology. The flock-color vocabulary of vv.32–43 deploys four technical terms: φαιός ('dark/dusky'), ῥαντός ('speckled/sprinkled'), ποικίλος ('variegated/spotted'), and σποδοειδής ('ash-colored') — the last appearing only here in the LXX. The final verse's σφόδρα σφόδρα ('exceedingly exceedingly') is the LXX's double-adverb superlative, Hebraizing מְאֹד מְאֹד, echoing the Abrahamic multiplication-promises of Gen 17:2, 20.

Genesis 31 — Jacob's Flight, Laban's Pursuit, and the Covenant at Galeed

Theme. Jacob's clandestine departure from Paddan-Aram, triggered by divine command and Laban's waning favour, sets in motion a pursuit drama resolved not by force but by God's nocturnal intervention; the chapter's centre of gravity is the covenant sealed by a heap of stones, a standing pillar, and a communal meal on the mountain — a boundary-treaty that both separates two households and preserves the promise by bringing Jacob safely toward Canaan and Isaac.

Outline

A · 31:1–16 · The divine summons and Rachel and Leah's consent to flee. The chapter opens with a double trigger: Jacob overhears Laban's sons accusing him of theft (31:1), and he observes Laban's changed demeanour (31:2). God's command to return (31:3) authorises the flight. Jacob summons Rachel and Leah to the field and makes his case in three parts: Laban's bad faith in changing the wage-terms ten times (31:4–7), God's compensatory control of the flocks (31:8–9), and the dream at Bethel in which the angel of God confirmed the divine command to leave (31:10–13). Rachel and Leah's unified response (31:14–16) — 'all the wealth God has taken from our father belongs to us' — both consents to the flight and expresses alienation from their father's household, removing any moral ambiguity from Jacob's departure.

B · 31:17–21 · The flight: departure from Paddan-Aram and Rachel's theft of the idols. In rapid paratactic narration Jacob loads wives and children onto the camels, drives all his livestock and possessions acquired in Mesopotamia, and sets his face toward Canaan to return to Isaac his father (31:17–18). The structural irony falls at 31:19: Laban is absent shearing sheep precisely when Rachel steals τὰ εἴδωλα — the guardian of the household gods is not guarding them. Rachel's motive is left unstated (inheritance claim? insurance against Laban pursuing?). Jacob 'concealed' the matter from Laban the Syrian (31:20), crossed the River Euphrates, and headed for the mountain of Gilead (31:21), the flight's geographical endpoint and the coming confrontation's stage.

C · 31:22–35 · Laban pursues; God warns him; the fruitless tent-search for the stolen idols. On the third day Laban hears of the flight and pursues for seven days (31:22–23). God's nocturnal warning (31:24: μὴ εἴπῃς πρὸς Ιακωβ ἀπὸ καλοῦ ἕως κακοῦ — 'speak neither good nor bad against Jacob') prevents any violent intervention. The confrontation on the mountain (31:25–32) moves from Laban's grievance about the flight and his missing 'gods' (θεούς, 31:30) to Jacob's confident counter-challenge: search everything; whoever has your gods shall die. The tent-search (31:33–35) is the episode's suspense-climax: four tents searched, nothing found; Rachel's ruse (sitting on the saddle-bags, pleading τὰ κατὰ τὰς γυναῖκας) finally ends the search with the fourth and definitive οὐχ εὗρεν.

D · 31:36–42 · Jacob's self-defence: twenty years of faithful service and the Fear of Isaac. Jacob's anger triggers a formal self-defence speech structured as a legal address: the challenge to arbitration (31:37), the flock-fidelity record (31:38–39), the physical suffering of twenty years (31:40: the merism of καύσων and πάγος), the arithmetic of service (14 + 6 years, 31:41), and the theological climax — if the φόβος Ισαακ had not been for me, you would have sent me away empty; God saw my affliction and reproved you last night (31:42). The speech's legal vocabulary (ἐλέγχω, κρίνω, ἀδίκημα, ἁμάρτημα, παραλογίζομαι) gives it a quasi-juridical character throughout.

E · 31:43–54 · The covenant at the heap: Galeed, Mizpah, and the covenant meal on the mountain. Laban responds with a territorial claim-staking (all of this is mine, 31:43) but concedes the practical impasse and proposes a covenant (31:44). Jacob erects a standing stone (31:45), the men gather a heap (31:46), and the heap receives dual names (31:47: Βουνὸς τοῦ μάρτυρος in Laban's Aramaic; Βουνὸς μάρτυς in Jacob's Hebrew). The covenant's terms are stated: the heap and pillar witness against any hostile crossing (31:48–52); Laban invokes both family gods as judges (31:53a) but Jacob swears only by the Fear of his father Isaac (31:53b). The chapter closes with the covenant meal: ἔφαγον καὶ ἔπιον καὶ ἐκοιμήθησαν ἐν τῷ ὄρει (31:54).

Translation and Textual Notes

The Greek text of Genesis 31 follows the standard critical text of the Septuagint as established in the Rahlfs–Hanhart edition (Septuaginta, rev. ed. 2006), an ancient and public-domain text; the critical apparatus is not reproduced. The chapter is a single sustained episode: Jacob's clandestine flight from Paddan-Aram, Laban's seven-day pursuit, the confrontation on Mount Gilead, and the covenant sealed by a heap of stones and a shared meal on the mountain. Versification note: LXX Genesis 31 ends at v.54 — the covenant meal and the night on the mountain (ἔφαγον καὶ ἔπιον καὶ ἐκοιμήθησαν ἐν τῷ ὄρει); what English Bibles number as 31:55 (Laban rising early, kissing his grandchildren, and returning home) is LXX 32:1 and belongs to chapter 32. The most consequential translation choice is the rendering of Hebrew תְּרָפִים (teraphim, household cult-figurines) as τὰ εἴδωλα ('the idols,' 31:19, 34, 35) — the standard LXX term for pagan idols (cf. Hos 3:4 LXX; 1 Kgdms 15:23), a polemical decision that turns the ancestors' ambiguous practice into straightforward idolatry. Rachel hides the idols in the camel's saddle-bag (σαγμοί, 31:34) and pleads τὰ κατὰ τὰς γυναῖκας ('the things of women,' 31:35), a Hebraism for menstruation rendering Hebrew דֶּרֶךְ נָשִׁים. God's double dream-intervention — to Jacob at Bethel (31:10–13) and to Laban by night (31:24) — frames the entire narrative as divinely superintended. Jacob's self-defence speech (31:36–42) is the rhetorical climax: the famous merism of heat by day (καύσων) and frost by night (παγετός, 31:40), rendering Hebrew חֹרֶב and קֶרַח, became a locus classicus for rhetoric of endurance. The divine epithet ὁ φόβος Ισαακ ('the Fear of Isaac,' 31:42, 53) preserves the unusual Hebrew פַּחַד יִצְחָק verbatim — unique in the patriarchal narratives as a divine name derived from Isaac's experiential dread rather than a covenantal self-declaration. At 31:47–48 both the Aramaic heap-name Yegar-sahadutha and the Hebrew Galeed are translated rather than transliterated: Laban's form becomes Βουνὸς τοῦ μάρτυρος and Jacob's Βουνὸς μάρτυς ('Hill of the Witness / Witness-Heap') — the LXX renders both source languages transparently into Greek. At 31:49, the site-name Mizpah is not transliterated but interpreted as ἡ Ὅρασις ('the Watch-Vision'), and the Mizpah benediction follows: ἐπίδοι κύριος ἀνὰ μέσον ἐμοῦ καὶ σοῦ ('may the Lord watch between me and you') — less a blessing than a mutual surveillance oath, the optative ἐπίδοι playing on the name-etymology of Mizpah (Hebrew מִצְפָּה, 'watch-post').

Cruxes

| 31:19 | τὰ εἴδωλα | The LXX renders Hebrew תְּרָפִים (teraphim, household cult-figurines of ambiguous status) as τὰ εἴδωλα ('the idols') — the standard LXX polemic term for pagan cult-objects (cf. Hos 3:4 LXX). This is a deliberate theological reframing: the narrator uses εἴδωλα consistently (vv.19, 34, 35) while Laban calls them θεούς ('gods,' v.30), preserving his perspective without endorsing it. Rachel's theft is thus narratively cast as theft of idols, not of household gods with a legitimate claim to reverence. | | 31:34–35 | τὰ κατὰ τὰς γυναῖκας | The phrase ('the things of women') is a Hebraism rendering Hebrew דֶּרֶךְ נָשִׁים ('the way of women') — a euphemism for menstruation. The LXX renders circumspectly with τὰ κατὰ τὰς γυναῖκας. The idiom appears at Gen 18:11 LXX for the cessation of Sarah's menses. Rachel's claim invokes a menstrual-purity taboo that would render her and anything she sat on ritually impure — making the search of the saddle-bags socially impossible. The preposition κατά ('according to / of') gives the construction a generalising, almost clinical distance appropriate for the taboo topic. | | 31:42 | ὁ φόβος Ισαακ | The divine epithet 'the Fear of Isaac' (φόβος Ισαακ) renders Hebrew פַּחַד יִצְחָק verbatim and is unique in the patriarchal narratives. Unlike covenantal divine self-declarations ('I am the God of Abraham'), this name is derived from Isaac's own experiential terror of God — most plausibly at the Aqedah (Gen 22). The LXX preserves the strangeness of the Hebrew rather than paraphrasing. Jacob invokes this name to ground his claim in the God who has witnessed his suffering; the epithet recurs at v.53 where Jacob swears by it and not by Laban's broader invocation of 'the God of Abraham and the God of Nahor.' | | 31:47–48 | Βουνὸς τοῦ μάρτυρος / Βουνὸς μάρτυς | The MT presents a bilingual naming: Laban names the heap יְגַר שָׂהֲדוּתָא (Aramaic: 'Heap of Witness') and Jacob names it גַּלְעֵד (Hebrew Galeed: 'Witness-Heap'). The LXX translates both rather than transliterating either. Laban's Aramaic form becomes Βουνὸς τοῦ μάρτυρος ('Hill of the Witness' — genitive with article, reflecting the Aramaic construct chain); Jacob's Hebrew form becomes Βουνὸς μάρτυς ('Witness-Hill' — nominative appositive, without article). The result preserves the bilingual name-giving in transparent Greek but loses the linguistic distinction between Aramaic and Hebrew — both collapse into Greek heap + witness variants. The μάρτυς root then governs the Mizpah-oath of vv.48–50 and the covenant-enforcement clauses of v.52, threading the witness-theme through the entire covenant ceremony. | | 31:49 | ἡ Ὅρασις | Where the MT reads הַמִּצְפָּה (ha-Mizpah, 'the Watch-post'), the LXX renders as ἡ Ὅρασις ('the Watch-Vision / the Seeing-Place'), deriving the site-name from ὁράω ('see') rather than from Hebrew צָפָה ('keep watch'). The choice makes the Mizpah-oath's optative ἐπίδοι ('may the Lord watch/look upon') play etymologically on the site's name: Mizpah is the place named 'Seeing' because the Lord will see (ἐπίδοι) when the parties cannot see each other. The commonly quoted 'Mizpah benediction' ('may the Lord watch between me and you') was originally a mutual surveillance oath invoked precisely because of physical separation and mutual distrust — the LXX's ἡ Ὅρασις sharpens the sight-theme that the MT's 'watch-post' imagery only implies. | | 31:53 | ὁ φόβος Ισαακ (oath) | When Laban invokes 'the God of Abraham and the God of Nahor' as covenant-enforcer (31:53a), he frames the treaty as equally grounded in both ancestral lines. Jacob's response — swearing κατὰ τοῦ φόβου τοῦ πατρὸς αὐτοῦ Ισαακ ('by the Fear of his father Isaac') and not by Nahor's god — is a silent but theologically decisive act. It refuses the syncretic double-invocation and asserts exclusive commitment to the God of his own line. The choice to swear by this particular epithet (experiential dread-name rather than the more common 'God of Abraham') connects Jacob's twenty-year suffering to Isaac's Aqedah-dread, suggesting that the same terrifying God who 'appeared' to Isaac now vindicates Jacob. |

Genesis 32 — ΓΕΝΕΣΙΣ ΛΒ′

Theme. The chapter that transforms Jacob into Israel: beginning with Laban's farewell kiss and the theophanic double-camp of Mahanaim, moving through the embassy to Esau, the prayer of unworthiness, and the massive gift-convoy, it reaches its theological centre in Jacob's night-long wrestling at the Jabbok — alone, hip-numbed, yet unconquered — from which he emerges renamed Israel, confessing that he has seen God face to face and lived, and closing with the aetiological sinew prohibition that embeds the theophany permanently in the body-practices of the nation bearing his new name.

Outline.

Translation & textual notes. The Greek text of Genesis 32 follows the standard critical text of the Septuagint as established in the Rahlfs–Hanhart edition (Septuaginta, rev. ed. 2006), an ancient and public-domain text; the critical apparatus is not reproduced. Versification note: LXX Genesis 32 contains 33 verses and begins one verse earlier than English Bibles. LXX 32:1 = English 31:55 (Laban rising early, kissing his grandchildren, and returning home); thereafter the offset is +1 throughout — LXX 32:2 = English 32:1, through LXX 32:33 = English 32:32 (the sinew prohibition). At 32:3 the site-name Mahanaim (Hebrew מַחֲנַיִם, 'two camps') is rendered not as a transliteration but as Παρεμβολαί ('CAMPS') — the LXX makes the etymology transparent, and the word ties forward to Jacob's strategic division of his company into two παρεμβολαί (32:8). The embassy to Esau (32:4–6) frames Jacob as 'your servant' (ὁ παῖς σου) addressing 'my lord Esau' (τῷ κυρίῳ μου Ησαυ), a posture of deliberate submission that reverses the stolen blessing dynamic of Gen 27. Jacob's prayer (32:10–13) is a model of covenantal self-abasement — ἱκανοῦμαί σοι ('I am unworthy of') framing all his prosperity as undeserved grace. The chapter's narrative centre is the night-wrestling at the Jabbok (Ιαβοκ): ὑπελείφθη δὲ Ιακωβ μόνος· καὶ ἐπάλαιεν ἄνθρωπος μετ' αὐτοῦ ἕως τοῦ πρωΐ ('a MAN wrestled with him until dawn,' 32:25) — the combatant is called ἄνθρωπος throughout; his divine identity is confirmed only by Jacob's naming of the site and by Hos 12:4–5, which glosses the episode as an encounter ἐνίσχυσεν πρὸς ἄγγελον ('he prevailed against an angel'). At 32:29 the new name ΙΣΡΑΗΛ receives the LXX's distinctive etymology: ὅτι ἐνίσχυσας μετὰ θεοῦ καὶ μετὰ ἀνθρώπων δυνατός ('because you have prevailed with God and are mighty with men') — ἐνίσχυσας ('you were strong / prevailed') gives the name an active-triumphant sense. At 32:31 Peniel is rendered Εἶδος θεοῦ ('FORM of God'): εἶδον γὰρ θεὸν πρόσωπον πρὸς πρόσωπον ('for I saw God face to face') — a theophanic claim of extraordinary weight that the LXX renders directly. The chapter closes with the aetiological note at 32:33: the sons of Israel do not eat τὸ νεῦρον ὃ ἐνάρκησεν ('the sinew which was numbed') because the man touched the hollow of Jacob's thigh and it was numbed (ἐνάρκησεν) — a body-memory grounding dietary law in the encounter with the divine.

Genesis 33 — ΓΕΝΕΣΙΣ ΛΓ′

Theme. The return of Jacob to Canaan becomes an encounter with unexpected grace — Esau's running embrace and five-verb flood of mercy at 33:4 (the LXX text Luke 15:20 echoes verbatim) inverting Jacob's terror into a Peniel-like awe (33:10: seeing Esau's face as the face of God), while the chapter closes with Jacob settled at Shechem, his altar raised, and the God of the promised land named for the first time as 'the God of Israel' — the covenant identity of the patriarch now the defining name of the deity (33:20).

Outline.

Translation & textual notes. The Greek text of Genesis 33 follows the standard critical text of the Septuagint as established in the Rahlfs–Hanhart edition (Septuaginta, rev. ed. 2006), an ancient and public-domain text; the critical apparatus is not reproduced. The chapter is the narrative resolution of the Jacob–Esau cycle: the reunion after twenty years' estrangement (cf. Gen 27–28). Its most arresting formal feature is the sevenfold prostration at 33:3 — προσεκύνησεν ἐπὶ τὴν γῆν ἑπτάκις — drawn from ancient Near Eastern court protocol requiring seven bows before a superior. The theological centre is 33:4, where five compressed verbs render the cascade of Esau's grace: he ran (προσέδραμεν), embraced (περιελάβεν), fell upon his neck (ἐπέπεσεν ἐπὶ τὸν τράχηλον αὐτοῦ), kissed (ἐφίλησεν), and they wept together (ἔκλαυσαν ἀμφότεροι). The phrase ἐπέπεσεν ἐπὶ τὸν τράχηλον is the exact wording echoed at Luke 15:20 in the parable of the prodigal son, making Gen 33:4 the OT type-scene for that parable. At 33:10 Jacob's extraordinary declaration — εἶδον τὸ πρόσωπόν σου, ὡς ἄν τις ἴδοι πρόσωπον θεοῦ — deliberately recalls 32:30 (Peniel); Esau's merciful face becomes, for the trembling Jacob, a second theophanic encounter. At 33:11 Jacob presses his gift on Esau as τὰς εὐλογίας μου ('my blessings') — the charged covenantal term of Gen 27, now ironically returned to the one from whom it was stolen. At 33:14 the imagery of κατὰ σχολὴν τῆς ἀγωγῆς ('at the leisure of the drove') and κατὰ πόδα τοῦ παιδαρίου ('at the pace of the little ones') is the chapter's pastoral masterpiece. At 33:17 the LXX renders the Hebrew toponym סֻכּוֹת as Σκηναί ('Booths'), making the etymology transparent rather than transliterating; the same word denotes the festival of Σκηνοπηγία. At 33:19 the obscure Hebrew price-term קְשִׂיטָה (qesitah — a coin or weight of uncertain value, found only at Gen 33:19, Josh 24:32, Job 42:11) is rendered as ἑκατὸν ἀμνάδων ('a hundred she-lambs'); Acts 7:16 refers to a Shechem purchase, generating textual-critical interest about whether Abraham or Jacob made it. At 33:20 the LXX converts the MT's altar-name אֵל אֱלֹהֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל into a verbal phrase — ἐπεκαλέσατο τὸν θεὸν Ισραηλ ('he called upon the God of Israel') — substituting a cultic act for a name-inscription, and for the first time defining the divine under the name Ισραηλ first given to Jacob at 32:28.

Genesis 34 — ΓΕΝΕΣΙΣ ΛΔ′

Theme. In terse, paratactic narrative of devastating economy, Genesis 34 moves from the sexual violation of Dinah — rendered by the LXX's ταπεινόω-euphemism ('he humbled her', 34:2) and immediately complicated by Shechem's genuine if unlawful soul-attachment (34:3) — through Simeon and Levi's deceitful circumcision-stratagem (μετὰ δόλου, 34:13), to a third-day massacre and comprehensive plunder that Jacob can only lament as politically catastrophic and that the brothers can only defend with an unanswerable question about their sister's honour (34:31), leaving the moral verdict suspended until the deathbed curse of Gen 49:5–7.

Outline.

Translation & textual notes. The Greek text of Genesis 34 follows the standard critical text of the Septuagint as established in the Rahlfs–Hanhart edition (Septuaginta, rev. ed. 2006), an ancient and public-domain text; the critical apparatus is not reproduced. The chapter narrates the violation of Dinah (Δινα), daughter of Leah and Jacob, by Shechem the Hivite prince, and the lethal reprisal of her full brothers Simeon and Levi. The LXX's key rendering at 34:2 is ἐταπείνωσεν αὐτήν — 'he humbled her' — the standard LXX idiom for sexual violation (ταπεινόω, rendering Hebrew עִנָּה pi'el; cf. 2 Sam 13:12–14 LXX; Deut 22:24, 29 LXX); it names the injury with deliberate sobriety rather than clinical precision. Shechem's subsequent attachment — προσέσχεν τῇ ψυχῇ Δινας (34:3), 'he clung with his soul to Dinah' — employs the vocabulary of covenantal bonding (cf. κολλάω at Ruth 1:14 and Gen 2:24), creating a disturbing juxtaposition: violation followed immediately by genuine, if unlawful, love. At 34:7 the expression ἄσχημον ἐποίησεν ἐν Ισραηλ, 'he wrought an unseemly thing in Israel,' is the first LXX attestation of the formula that will recur as a legal-ethical marker of communal outrage (cf. 2 Sam 13:12; Judg 20:6, 10 LXX); the anachronistic name Ισραηλ is theologically programmatic, identifying the violation as an assault on the people God is constituting. The brothers' reply is framed μετὰ δόλου (34:13), 'with deceit' — a qualification the narrator does not suppress; the δόλος places the sons in the tradition of their father Jacob (the ὁ πτερνιστής who deceived) but gives the reprisal a morally ambiguous cast the text refuses to resolve. Jacob's closing speech (34:30) uses the perfect μισητόν με πεποιήκατε, 'you have made me odious,' a state-of-affairs perfect marking the lasting damage to his standing among the Canaanites and Perizzites. The brothers' unanswerable question (34:31) employs the deliberative subjunctive χρήσωνται — 'shall they treat our sister as a harlot?' — shifting moral weight back toward the initial perpetrators and leaving the reader suspended between Jacob's pragmatic fear and the brothers' wounded honour. The chapter casts a long shadow over the deathbed blessing of Gen 49:5–7, where Jacob curses the anger of Simeon and Levi, explicitly recalling their instruments of violence here.

Genesis 35 — ΓΕΝΕΣΙΣ ΛΕ′

Theme. A chapter of returns and renewals — Jacob returns to Bethel (vv.1–15) and God renews the covenant there in its fullest form; Jacob then journeys south through loss (Rachel's death in labor, vv.16–20) and scandal (Reuben's violation, v.22), arriving at last at his father Isaac's side in time to bury him with Esau (vv.27–29) — and the chapter closes the entire Bethel-Haran-Canaan arc opened at Genesis 28, now sealed with pillar, libation, and a dying patriarch laid to rest by reconciled sons.

Outline.

Translation & textual notes. The Greek text of Genesis 35 follows the standard critical text of the Septuagint as established in the Rahlfs–Hanhart edition (Septuaginta, rev. ed. 2006), an ancient and public-domain text; the critical apparatus is not reproduced. Chapter 35 is a dense theological crossroads: the purge of τοὺς θεοὺς τοὺς ἀλλοτρίους ('the foreign gods') buried under the terebinth at Shechem (35:4) ritually closes the Dinah-Shechem crisis of Gen 34 before the Bethel renewal; the φόβος θεοῦ ('terror of God,' 35:5) protecting the journey is a divine-warfare idiom paralleled at Exod 23:27. The Bethel theophany (35:9–15) repeats the name-conferral of Gen 32:28 — the LXX reads Ισραηλ ἔσται τὸ ὄνομά σου — and at 35:11 the divine self-identification ἐγὼ ὁ θεός σου replaces El Shaddai (שַׁדַּי), the LXX's regular functional substitution for the divine name; the command αὐξάνου καὶ πληθύνου echoes the creation-blessing of Gen 1:28. At 35:8 the death of Deborah (Δεββωρα), Rebekah's nurse, beneath the Βάλανος πένθους ('oak of weeping') is one of the LXX's most striking renderings: Hebrew אַלּוֹן בָּכוּת is translated rather than transliterated, making the etymology explicit for Greek readers. At 35:18 the dying Rachel names her son Υἱὸς ὀδύνης μου ('son of my pain') — translating Hebrew בֶּן-אוֹנִי — while Jacob calls him Βενιαμιν (transliterating בִּנְיָמִין, 'son of the right hand'); the LXX translates the mother's name and transliterates the father's, a pointed contrast. At 35:19 the gloss αὕτη ἐστὶν Βηθλεεμ ('this is Bethlehem') furnishes the geographic basis for Matt 2:18's Rachel-weeping citation. The terse notice of Reuben and Bilhah (35:22: καὶ ἤκουσεν Ισραηλ) prepares Reuben's disinheritance (Gen 49:4). Isaac's death at 180 closes the patriarchal triptych (Abraham 175, Isaac 180, Jacob 147).

Genesis 36 — ΓΕΝΕΣΙΣ ΛϚ′

Theme. The toledoth of Esau — he is Edom: a five-register genealogical document tracing Esau's wives and sons (vv.1–8), grandsons by mother (vv.9–14), three waves of tribal chiefs (vv.15–19, 29–30, 40–43), the pre-Edomite Horite inhabitants of Seir (vv.20–28), and eight non-dynastic kings who ruled Edom before any king reigned in Israel — the chapter that gives the nation behind the prophetic name its full genealogical and political depth, bracketed four times by the identifying equation 'he is Edom' / 'this is Esau, father of Edom.'

Outline.

Translation & textual notes. The Greek text of Genesis 36 follows the standard critical text of the Septuagint as established in the Rahlfs–Hanhart edition (Septuaginta, rev. ed. 2006), an ancient and public-domain text; the critical apparatus is not reproduced. Chapter 36 is the toledoth of Esau (36:1, 9) and consists of five distinct sub-registers: (A) Esau's Canaanite wives and sons, and his migration from Canaan (36:1–8); (B) a second toledoth heading for 'Esau father of Edom in Mount Seir,' listing sons and grandsons (36:9–14); (C) the ἡγεμόνες ('chiefs') from Esau's sons by each wife (36:15–19); (D) the Horite inhabitants of Seir and their chiefs (36:20–30); (E) eight kings who reigned in Edom before Israel had a king (36:31–39); (F) a final territorial list of Edomite chiefs (36:40–43). The LXX renders the Hebrew אַלּוּף ('chief / clan-leader') consistently with ἡγεμών ('leader / commander'), a term used across vv.15–19, 29–30, and 40–43 that elevates tribal heads into the Greek register of civil-military leadership. Proper names throughout the chapter are transliterated and largely indeclinable in Greek; the LXX spellings show instabilities in the manuscript tradition (e.g., Ελιβεμα / Ολιβεμα; Βασεμμαθ / Βασεμαθ; Γεθθαιμ / Γεθθε) which this data file does not detail. At 36:24 the LXX reads εὗρεν τὸν Ιαμιν ἐν τῇ ἐρήμῳ ('he found IAMIN in the desert'), treating the obscure Hebrew הַיֵּמִם — a hapax whose sense is unresolved, rendered 'hot springs' or 'mules' by modern translations — as an indeclinable personal name Ιαμιν; this is a marked divergence from the MT and a significant exegetical crux. At 36:31 the formula πρὸ τοῦ βασιλεῦσαι βασιλέα ἐν Ισραηλ ('before any king reigned in Israel') is a famous anachronism-flag: the list presupposes the existence of Israelite monarchy and so dates its present form to after Saul or David, while placing the genealogy itself in Mosaic antiquity. Edom carries immense prophetic weight: the book of Obadiah is entirely devoted to its judgment; Malachi 1:2–3 ('Jacob I loved, but Esau I hated') cites this very genealogical polarity, and Paul quotes it at Romans 9:13 as the foundation of his argument for sovereign election apart from works.

Genesis 37 — ΓΕΝΕΣΙΣ ΛΖ′

Theme. The opening chapter of the Joseph narrative — fraternal envy kindled by Jacob's preferential love and Joseph's two dreams escalates from speechless hatred (v.4) to a death-plot (v.20) that Reuben partially deflects into a sale: Joseph is stripped of his variegated tunic, thrown into an empty pit, and traded to Midianite merchants for twenty pieces of gold, while Jacob is deceived by a blood-stained garment and mourns inconsolably, vowing to descend grieving into Hades (εἰς ᾅδου) until he reaches his son in death.

Outline.

Translation & textual notes. The Greek text of Genesis 37 follows the standard critical text of the Septuagint as established in the Rahlfs–Hanhart edition (Septuaginta, rev. ed. 2006), an ancient and public-domain text; the critical apparatus is not reproduced. The Joseph narrative (chs. 37–50) is among the most polished sections of the LXX Pentateuch in its Greek style, suggesting a translator or revisor with greater literary facility than the earlier patriarchal chapters. The chapter opens with a deliberate lexical contrast: Ιακωβ κατῴκει ('settled,' permanent residence) in the same land where his father παρῴκησεν ('sojourned,' temporary alien residence) — a single verse crystallising the generational transition from wandering ancestor to rooted patriarch. At 37:3 the phrase χιτὼν ποικίλος ('variegated tunic') renders Hebrew כְּתֹנֶת פַּסִּים, whose exact nuance is debated (a long-sleeved robe? an ornamented garment?); the LXX adjective ποικίλος ('variegated, of varied colour') is the same word used for the speckled animals of Gen 30, creating an intertextual echo across the Jacob-Joseph cycle; the traditional English 'coat of many colours' follows this LXX rendering. The hatred-escalation refrain at 37:4 and 37:8 (ἐμίσησαν … προσέθεντο ἔτι μισεῖν) uses the idiom προστίθημι + infinitive to render the Hebrew infinitive absolute for intensification — a classic LXX Hebraism. At 37:9 the imagery of the sun, moon, and eleven stars bowing to Joseph (ὁ ἥλιος καὶ ἡ σελήνη καὶ ἕνδεκα ἀστέρες) has been read in Christian tradition alongside Rev 12:1, where the woman crowned with twelve stars evokes the same astral sovereignty language. At 37:28 a famous LXX–MT divergence occurs: the sale price is εἴκοσι χρυσῶν ('twenty pieces of gold') where the MT has כֶּסֶף ('silver'); the LXX's gold raises the transaction's prestige and distinguishes it from the thirty silver pieces of Zech 11:12 and Matt 26:15. At 37:35 the LXX renders שְׁאֹלָה ('to Sheol') as εἰς ᾅδου ('into Hades'), its standard substitution for the Hebrew shadowy realm (cf. Jonah 2:3 LXX; Ps 87:4 LXX). At 37:36 ἀρχιμάγειρος ('chief cook/butcher') translates Hebrew רַב-טַבָּחִים, literally 'chief of slaughterers'; the LXX preserves the culinary register where later interpreters harmonize toward 'captain of the guard.' Acts 7:9 echoes this chapter: the patriarchs, jealous of Joseph, sold him — naming fraternal ζῆλος as the narrative's theological motor.

Genesis 38 — ΓΕΝΕΣΙΣ ΛΗ′

Theme. A chapter of descent, deception, and reversal — Judah goes down from his brothers into a Canaanite entanglement, allows his twice-widowed daughter-in-law to remain in legal limbo, and is then forced by his own pledge-tokens to declare the woman he had condemned the righteous party: Δεδικαίωται Θαμαρ ἢ ἐγώ ('Tamar stands in the right rather than I'), a verdict pronounced in the perfect passive of δικαιόω, the justification verb of Romans and Galatians, applied here to a Gentile woman who secured by stratagem the levirate right her father-in-law had withheld.

Outline.

Translation & textual notes. The Greek text of Genesis 38 follows the standard critical text of the Septuagint as established in the Rahlfs–Hanhart edition (Septuaginta, rev. ed. 2006), an ancient and public-domain text; the critical apparatus is not reproduced. Genesis 38 interrupts the Joseph narrative (Gen 37; 39) and recounts Judah's marriage into a Canaanite family and Tamar's courageous act of levirate-right recovery. The LXX translates the levirate obligation with γαμβρεύω ('act as brother-in-law / fulfill the levirate duty,' 38:8), a rare term rendering Hebrew יָבַם — the specialized vocabulary later codified at Deut 25:5–10. Er's death is noted with the judgment-formula πονηρὸς ἐναντίον κυρίου (38:7); Onan's offense receives the parallel πονηρὸν ἐναντίον τοῦ θεοῦ (38:10), with the significant variation κυρίου / τοῦ θεοῦ. The widow's veil Tamar dons at 38:14 is θέριστρον, the same word used for Rebekah's veil at Gen 24:65 — a deliberate verbal echo. The pledge-tokens demanded at 38:18 — ὁ δακτύλιός σου καὶ ὁ ὁρμίσκος καὶ ἡ ῥάβδος ('your signet-ring, your cord, and your staff') — become irrefutable identifying evidence. A major LXX–MT divergence occurs at 38:21–22: the MT distinguishes זוֹנָה (zonah, 'prostitute') and קְדֵשָׁה (qedeshah, 'consecrated/cult woman'), but the LXX flattens both with πόρνη, erasing the MT's possible cultic dimension. The theological crux is 38:26: Δεδικαίωται Θαμαρ ἢ ἐγώ — the perfect passive of δικαιόω, the justification verb of Rom 3:24 and Gal 2:16, here applied by the patriarch to the woman he had wronged; 'Tamar stands in the right rather than I.' The twins Φαρες and Ζαρα are listed at Matt 1:3; Tamar is one of only four women named in the Matthean genealogy, her inclusion signaling that God's redemptive line runs through the scandalous and overlooked.

Genesis 39 — ΓΕΝΕΣΙΣ ΛΘ′

Theme. The chapter is architecturally governed by a fourfold divine-presence refrain (ἦν κύριος μετὰ Ιωσηφ, vv.2, 3, 21, 23) that frames the entire descent-and-recovery arc — from Joseph's acquisition by Potiphar (v.1) through total delegation (vv.4–6), temptation and refusal (vv.7–10), false accusation and the garment-as-false-witness (vv.11–15), the master's anger and imprisonment in the royal stronghold (vv.16–20), to the LORD's covenantal mercy in the prison and Joseph's restored administrative authority (vv.21–23) — demonstrating that divine accompaniment is not suspended by injustice but operates through it, a pattern Acts 7:9 reads as a type of Christ.

Outline.

Translation & textual notes. The Greek text of Genesis 39 follows the standard critical text of the Septuagint as established in the Rahlfs–Hanhart edition (Septuaginta, rev. ed. 2006), an ancient and public-domain text; the critical apparatus is not reproduced. The chapter is architecturally framed by the fourfold refrain ἦν κύριος μετὰ Ιωσηφ (39:2, 3, 21, 23), which functions as the chapter's theological spine — an Immanuel-pattern that Acts 7:9 explicitly cites (ὁ θεὸς ἦν μετ᾿ αὐτοῦ), reading Joseph's story as a type of divine accompaniment in unjust suffering. The prosperity vocabulary centers on εὐοδόω ('prosper, give success', 39:3, 23) and the participial phrase ἀνὴρ ἐπιτυγχάνων (39:2, 'a man who succeeds'), rendering Hebrew אִישׁ מַצְלִיחַ — a LXX hapax in this combination. At 39:6 Joseph's beauty is described in the exact phrasing used of Rachel in 29:17: καλὸς τῷ εἴδει καὶ ὡραῖος τῇ ὄψει σφόδρα — a deliberate narratological echo linking mother and son by the same beauty formula. The advance of Potiphar's wife is marked by the Hebraistic temporal idiom ἡμέραν ἐξ ἡμέρας (39:10, 'day from day'), calquing Hebrew יוֹם יוֹם. Joseph's refusal peaks at 39:9 with ἁμαρτήσομαι ἐναντίον τοῦ θεοῦ — 'I shall sin before God' — where the future indicative carries deliberative-moral force. The seized ἱμάτιον ('cloak', 39:12–18) is the second garment-deception against a son of Jacob: the ornamented coat of Gen 37:31–33 was the first; now the cloak becomes false evidence, binding chs 37 and 39 by the motif of clothing-as-false-witness. The prison is rendered ὀχύρωμα ('stronghold, fortress', 39:20) — the LXX's striking rendering of Hebrew מִשְׁמָר, flagging a militarized confinement. Ps 104(103):18 LXX retrospects on the imprisonment: 'the iron went through his soul' (ἦλθεν ἐν σιδήρῳ ἡ ψυχὴ αὐτοῦ), a suffering-text the early church read as a type of Christ's passion.

Genesis 40 — ΓΕΝΕΣΙΣ Μ′

Theme. Two court officials, imprisoned alongside Joseph in Pharaoh's own dungeon, each dream a dream on the same night; Joseph — who attributes interpretive authority not to himself but to God (Οὐχὶ διὰ τοῦ θεοῦ ἡ διασάφησις αὐτῶν ἐστιν;) — reads the vine-dream as three days to the cupbearer's restoration and the basket-dream as three days to the baker's execution, appending to the favorable oracle his personal plea for intercession (μνήσθητί μου); on Pharaoh's birthday both oracles are fulfilled to the letter, but the chapter ends in bitter shadow: the chief cupbearer, restored to Pharaoh's hand, did not remember Joseph — he forgot him (ἐπελάθετο αὐτοῦ).

Outline.

Translation & textual notes. The Greek text of Genesis 40 follows the standard critical text of the Septuagint as established in the Rahlfs–Hanhart edition (Septuaginta, rev. ed. 2006), an ancient and public-domain text; the critical apparatus is not reproduced. The chapter is dominated by the LXX's distinctive ἀρχι- compound-title series: ἀρχιοινοχόος ('chief cupbearer'), ἀρχισιτοποιός ('chief baker'), ἀρχιμάγειρος ('chief guard/cook'), and ἀρχιδεσμοφύλαξ ('chief jailer') — Ptolemaic court vocabulary in which the ἀρχι- prefix marks the head of each royal household department, rendering Hebrew שַׂר-compounds with single Greek compound nouns that read naturally in the Egyptian administrative milieu familiar to the LXX translators. At 40:7 Joseph's pastoral question uses the rare adjective σκυθρωπός ('downcast-faced,' literally 'Scythian-faced') — the same word Luke 24:17 applies to the Emmaus disciples. At 40:8 the key word is διασάφησις — 'clear explanation / making plain,' a compound of διά and σαφής ('clear'), rare in the LXX and chosen for Hebrew פִּתְרוֹן; Joseph's counter-question Οὐχὶ διὰ τοῦ θεοῦ ἡ διασάφησις αὐτῶν ἐστιν; ('Do not interpretations belong to God?') attributes all hermeneutical authority to the divine, setting Joseph firmly as channel rather than source. The 'lift your head' formula splits into two senses: restoration for the cupbearer (40:13, μνησθήσεται Φαραω τῆς ἀρχῆς σου) and decapitation for the baker (40:19, ἀφελεῖ Φαραω τὴν κεφαλήν σου ἀπὸ σοῦ) — the same idiom bearing life or death, a grim wordplay the LXX preserves precisely. At 40:14 Joseph's plea μνήσθητί μου ('remember me') is the aorist imperative of μιμνῄσκομαι; the identical form appears in Luke 23:42 on the lips of the dying thief, making Joseph's forgotten intercession a typological anticipation of the prayer that is answered. At 40:15 the cognate dative κλοπῇ ἐκλάπην ('I was stolen by stealing') renders the Hebrew infinitive-absolute גָּנֹב גֻּנַּבְתִּי — a Hebraism of emphatic assertion that the LXX captures with figura etymologica. The chapter closes with two memory-verbs (40:23): οὐκ ἐμνήσθη ('did not remember') and ἐπελάθετο ('forgot'), from ἐπιλανθάνομαι, marking a more complete and deliberate forgetting — the shadow of divine delay that frames Joseph's entire prison sojourn.

Genesis 41 — ΓΕΝΕΣΙΣ ΜΑ′

Theme. The chapter of reversal — Joseph moves from the pit of the prison to the palace of Pharaoh in a single day, and the man whom God exalted through dreams now interprets the dreams of a king, administers the abundance of a nation, and becomes the universal provider to whom all the lands come when famine prevails over all the earth.

Outline.

Translation & textual notes. The Greek text of Genesis 41 follows the standard critical text of the Septuagint as established in the Rahlfs–Hanhart edition (Septuaginta, rev. ed. 2006), an ancient and public-domain text; the critical apparatus is not reproduced. Chapter 41 is the Joseph narrative's theological pivot — from pit to palace — and the LXX renders its Egyptian colour with characteristic precision. The Nile vocabulary at 41:1–3 uses ἐπὶ τοῦ ποταμοῦ ('by the river') and παρὰ τὸ χεῖλος τοῦ ποταμοῦ ('on the bank of the river'); at 41:2 and 41:18 ἐν τῷ ἄχει ('in the reed-grass') retains an Egyptian loanword — ἄχι / ἄχει renders Egyptian 3ḫ.t ('reed-swamp / marshy meadow'), a term the LXX carries across rather than replacing with a standard Greek equivalent [FLAGGED: Egyptian loanword]. The failed court interpreters are called ἐξηγηταί ('expounders') at 41:8, 24 — the LXX's rendering of Hebrew הַחַרְטֻמִּים (ḥarṭummîm, priestly dream-scribes); ἐξηγέομαι connotes intellectual exposition rather than magical art [FLAGGED]. At 41:16 Joseph's disclaimer reads ἄνευ τοῦ θεοῦ οὐκ ἀποκριθήσεται τὸ σωτήριον Φαραω — 'without God an answer of salvation shall not be given to Pharaoh' — a phrasing more explicitly theological than the Hebrew [FLAGGED]. The interpretation (41:25–32) twice affirms τὸ ἐνύπνιον Φαραω ἕν ἐστιν ('the dream of Pharaoh is one') and closes with ἀληθὲς ἔσται τὸ ῥῆμα τὸ παρὰ τοῦ θεοῦ at 41:32. The investiture (41:42–43) confers the signet ring, a fine-linen robe (στολὴν βυσσίνην — βύσσινος = fine Egyptian linen), a gold collar (κλοιὸν χρυσοῦν), and the second chariot. At 41:45 Pharaoh bestows the Egyptian name Ψονθομφανηχ (transliterating Egyptian Dd-p3-nTr-iw.f-ʿnḫ, 'God speaks and he lives') and gives Joseph Ασεννεθ daughter of Πετεφρης priest of Ἡλίου πόλεως — the LXX translates Hebrew אֹן (On) as 'City of the Sun,' making the solar cult-site explicit for Greek readers [FLAGGED: Ψονθομφανηχ; Ἡλίου πόλεως]. At 41:38 Pharaoh asks εὑρήσομεν ἄνθρωπον ὃς ἔχει πνεῦμα θεοῦ ἐν αὐτῷ ('a man who has the spirit of God in him') — a phrase that became a key pneumatological proof-text in early Christian exegesis [FLAGGED]. The sons Μανασση and Εφραιμ carry etymological glosses at 41:51–52: ἐπελάθετό μου ὁ θεός ('God has caused me to forget') and ηὔξησέν με ὁ θεός ('God has made me fruitful') — the latter using the creation-blessing verb αὐξάνω (Gen 1:28; 35:11). Acts 7:10–11 summarises this chapter using LXX vocabulary.

Genesis 42 — ΓΕΝΕΣΙΣ ΜΒ′

Theme. A chapter of seeing and not-seeing, knowing and not-knowing: Jacob sees grain in Egypt and sends his sons down; the brothers prostrate before their unrecognized brother; Joseph recognizes them while they cannot recognize him; guilt surfaces in remembered speech; and the chapter closes with a father's refusal to see any more loss — his old age already descending toward Hades in grief.

Outline.

Translation & textual notes. The Greek text of Genesis 42 follows the standard critical text of the Septuagint as established in the Rahlfs–Hanhart edition (Septuaginta, rev. ed. 2006), an ancient and public-domain text; the critical apparatus is not reproduced. Chapter 42 initiates the Joseph story's recognition arc: the ten brothers descend while Benjamin is withheld (42:1–5), and the chapter's central irony is crystallized in 42:8 — ἐπέγνω δὲ Ιωσηφ τοὺς ἀδελφοὺς αὐτοῦ, αὐτοὶ δὲ οὐκ ἐπέγνωσαν αὐτόν — where ἐπιγινώσκω appears twice with opposite subjects and outcomes, stating the recognition asymmetry that drives the narrative through Gen 43–45. At 42:1 the LXX renders MT הִתְרָאוּ ('you look at one another') with ῥᾳθυμεῖτε ('you are idle'), a functional substitution charging inaction rather than depicting mutual paralysis. The spy-accusation κατάσκοποί ἐστε (42:9) is maintained as a structural refrain through multiple recurrences. The Egyptian oath νὴ τὴν ὑγίειαν Φαραω (42:15, 16) renders MT בְּחֵי פַרְעֹה with ὑγίεια ('health') rather than ζωή ('life'), a distinctive LXX lexical choice that softens the oath's idiomatic force. Joseph's recollection of his dreams (ἐμνήσθη, 42:9) links to Gen 37:5–11 and marks the beginning of their fulfilment. The brothers' guilt-speech (42:21) and Reuben's blood-requital formula τὸ αἷμα αὐτοῦ ἐκζητεῖται (42:22) deploy the Hebrew דרשׁ idiom in its forensic-covenantal sense; ἐκζητέω is the standard LXX rendering. The ἑρμηνευτής (42:23) — unique in the Joseph narrative — makes the overheard guilt-confession narratologically possible. The chapter closes with Jacob's ᾅδης-clause (42:38), a near-verbatim echo of 37:35, framing the Joseph cycle with persistent paternal grief.

Genesis 43 — ΓΕΝΕΣΙΣ ΜΓ′

Theme. A chapter of concealed reunion and mounting pressure: the famine's renewed intensity forces Jacob's hand, Judah's honourable surety pledge replaces Reuben's crude collateral, the steward's double word at the gate — theological confession and commercial receipt in a single breath — dissolves the brothers' terror about the silver, and the chapter closes on a segregated meal at which Benjamin receives a fivefold portion and all drink freely with the unrecognized Joseph, the first moment of shared ease in the entire disguise narrative.

Outline.

Translation & textual notes. The Greek text of Genesis 43 follows the standard critical text of the Septuagint as established in the Rahlfs–Hanhart edition (Septuaginta, rev. ed. 2006), an ancient and public-domain text; the critical apparatus is not reproduced. Chapter 43 resumes the famine-driven second descent to Egypt: the famine's intensification (v.1 ἐνίσχυσεν — same verb as Gen 41:56–57) creates irresistible necessity that finally overcomes Jacob's resistance. The chapter's theological and linguistic cruxes are unusually dense. Judah's surety speech (43:8–9) culminates in ἐγὼ δὲ ἐκδέχομαι αὐτόν — 'I myself will be surety for him' — where ἐκδέχομαι carries the commercial-legal force of a personal guarantee (rendering Hebrew עָרַב); Judah's pledge is more honourable than Reuben's crude offer of his sons' lives (42:37) and inaugurates his emergence as the family's true spokesman. Israel's resigned formula at 43:14 — ἐγὼ δέ, καθάπερ ἠτέκνωμαι, ἠτέκνωμαι ('as for me, if I am bereaved, I am bereaved') — echoes Esther's formulaic resignation (Esth 4:16 LXX) and signals Jacob's surrender of control to divine providence. The steward's theology at 43:23 is the chapter's most striking theological moment: ὁ θεὸς ὑμῶν καὶ ὁ θεὸς τοῦ πατρὸς ὑμῶν ἔδωκεν ὑμῖν θησαυρούς ('your God and the God of your father gave you treasure in your sacks'), followed immediately by the commercial receipt formula τὸ δὲ ἀργύριον ὑμῶν εὐδοκιμοῦν ἀπέχω ('your silver I have received in full') — ἀπέχω is the technical papyrus term for a completed commercial receipt (cf. Matt 6:2 ἀπέχουσιν τὸν μισθὸν αὐτῶν, 'they have their reward in full'), here deployed to dissolve the brothers' anxiety while the steward simultaneously confesses divine generosity. Joseph's visceral emotion at 43:30 — συνεστρέφετο τὰ ἔντερα αὐτοῦ ἐπὶ τῷ ἀδελφῷ αὐτοῦ ('his bowels churned for his brother') — renders Hebrew הִכְמְרוּ רַחֲמָיו in physiological terms that resonate with NT σπλαγχνίζομαι (Matt 9:36; Luke 15:20; 'his heart went out to them'). The βδέλυγμα notice at 43:32 ('it is an abomination to the Egyptians') uses a term otherwise reserved for idolatry and cult violation as a social-ethnic marker — the first occurrence of βδέλυγμα in Genesis. Finally, ἐμεθύσθησαν at 43:34 ('they drank freely / were made drunk') renders Hebrew וַיִּשְׁכְּרוּ; the verb ranges from festive abundance to actual inebriation, and the narrator records the festivity without apology.

Genesis 44 — ΓΕΝΕΣΙΣ ΜΔ′

Theme. The pivot of the Joseph cycle: the planted cup (τὸ κόνδυ τὸ ἀργυροῦν) becomes the instrument of Joseph's final test of his brothers, culminating in Judah's speech — the longest in Genesis — where a man who sold his brother into slavery now offers himself as a slave instead of his youngest brother, performing the substitution (ἀντὶ τοῦ παιδίου) that retrospectively inverts the transaction of chapter 37 and grounds the typological reading of the entire Joseph cycle.

Outline.

Translation & textual notes. The Greek text of Genesis 44 follows the standard critical text of the Septuagint as established in the Rahlfs-Hanhart edition (Septuaginta, rev. ed. 2006), an ancient and public-domain text; the critical apparatus is not reproduced. Chapter 44 is the dramatic pivot of the Joseph story: the planted cup (τὸ κόνδυ τὸ ἀργυροῦν) — κόνδυ being a Persian loanword for a large handled goblet, rare in Greek and occurring only in this chapter of the LXX — is the narrative instrument of Joseph's final test of his brothers (44:2, 5, 12, 16, 17). At 44:5 and 44:15 the phrase οἰωνισμῷ οἰωνίζεται ('he surely divines') is a cognate-dative construction calquing the Hebrew absolute-infinitive intensifier נַחֵשׁ יְנַחֵשׁ: the Hebraism produces an emphatic claim that Joseph divines with the cup, raising a theological question — is this Joseph maintaining his Egyptian persona as a fiction of the test, or an authentic claim? The LXX reproduces the Hebrew without softening. At 44:16 Judah's declaration ὁ θεὸς εὗρεν τὴν ἀδικίαν τῶν παίδων σου ('God has found out the iniquity of your servants') does not specify what iniquity: the reader hears behind it the sale of Joseph in Gen 37, even as Judah technically confesses only the cup charge. The garment-tearing (διέρρηξαν τὰ ἱμάτια αὐτῶν, 44:13) echoes 37:29 and 37:34, forming a deliberate ring-structure of grief around the Joseph cycle. The centrepiece of the chapter is Judah's speech (44:18–34), the longest and most rhetorically sophisticated speech in Genesis: its formal petition (Δέομαί σου, κύριε), its systematic retelling, the soul-metaphor (ἡ ψυχὴ αὐτοῦ ἐκκρέμαται ἐκ τῆς ψυχῆς τούτου, 44:30), and the substitution offer (μεινάτω δὴ ὁ παῖς σου ἀντὶ τοῦ παιδίου, 44:33) are the moral and typological climax of the Joseph cycle. The preposition ἀντί ('instead of') at 44:33 carries substitutionary force; its NT resonance at Mark 10:45 (λύτρον ἀντὶ πολλῶν) has been noted in patristic tradition (Origen, Chrysostom), who read Judah's offer as a type of Christ's self-giving.

Genesis 45 — ΓΕΝΕΣΙΣ ΜΕ′

Theme. The theological crown of the Joseph cycle: Joseph's private self-disclosure to his brothers — Ἐγώ εἰμι Ιωσηφ — reframes their decades-old act of sale as a triple divine sending εἰς ζωήν, preserves the remnant-vocabulary of OT prophecy (κατάλειμμα / κατάλειψις), and closes with the rekindling of Jacob's spirit at the sight of Egyptian wagons, the chapter's material proof of a resurrection-news too large for grief-conditioned belief to receive unaided.

Outline.

Translation & textual notes. The Greek text of Genesis 45 follows the standard critical text of the Septuagint as established in the Rahlfs–Hanhart edition (Septuaginta, rev. ed. 2006), an ancient and public-domain text; the critical apparatus is not reproduced. Genesis 45 is the theological crown of the Joseph cycle, resolving the recognition asymmetry sustained across chapters 42–44. The chapter's central disclosure — Ἐγώ εἰμι Ιωσηφ (45:3), repeated at 45:4 with ὁ ἀδελφὸς ὑμῶν, ὃν ἀπέδοσθε — uses the disclosure formula Ἐγώ εἰμι with the full weight of identity-revelation; LXX readers alert to Exod 3:14 and Isa 43:10–11 hear in it an echo of divine self-disclosure. The chapter's governing theological claim is stated three times — ἀπέστειλέν με ὁ θεὸς ἔμπροσθεν ὑμῶν (45:5, 7, 8) — 'God sent me before you' — with the purpose elaborated as εἰς ζωήν ('for life,' 45:5) and ὥστε ὑπολείπεσθαι ὑμῶν κατάλειμμα ('to preserve for you a remnant,' 45:7); the remnant vocabulary (κατάλειμμα, κατάλειψις) is OT-prophetic, and Stephen deploys this chapter in Acts 7:13–14 (ἀνεγνωρίσθη Ιωσηφ) as a type of providential redemption. At 45:8 the counter-claim sharpens: 'not you sent me here but God' (οὐχ ὑμεῖς με ἀπεστάλκατε). At 45:22 Benjamin receives five changes of clothing (πέντε στολὰς ἐξαλλάσσουσας) and 300 gold pieces (τριακοσίους χρυσοῦς, where MT has silver — a distinctive LXX variant). At 45:24 the parting word μὴ ὀργίζεσθε ἐν τῇ ὁδῷ ('do not be angry on the road') renders Hebrew אַל-תִּרְגְּזוּ, a verb signifying trembling agitation as well as anger; whether Joseph fears the brothers will quarrel over their guilt or be anxious on the journey is deliberately ambiguous. At 45:27, ἀνεζωπύρησεν τὸ πνεῦμα Ιακωβ ('the spirit of Jacob was rekindled') deploys ἀναζωπυρέω, which appears in the NT only at 2 Tim 1:6 (ἀναζωπυρεῖν τὸ χάρισμα τοῦ θεοῦ), making Jacob's revived spirit a resonant image of grace relit from embers.

Genesis 46 — ΓΕΝΕΣΙΣ ΜϚ′

Theme. The last theophany of the Jacob narrative marks the threshold between Canaan and Egypt: Israel sacrifices at the Well of the Oath, receives God's threefold pledge of accompaniment, growth, and return, then leads his entire seventy-five-soul household into Egypt — meeting Joseph at Gesem in a reunion narrated with the precise LXX formula that Luke will later deploy for both the returning prodigal and Paul's farewell; the chapter closes with Joseph's careful settlement strategy, turning the Egyptian shepherd-abomination to Israel's advantage.

Outline.

Translation & textual notes. The Greek text of Genesis 46 follows the standard critical text of the Septuagint as established in the Rahlfs–Hanhart edition (Septuaginta, rev. ed. 2006), an ancient and public-domain text; the critical apparatus is not reproduced. The chapter opens with Israel halting at the Well of the Oath (φρέαρ τοῦ ὅρκου — LXX name for Beer-sheba, recalling the patriarchal oaths of Gen 21:31 and 26:33 and Jacob's vow at 28:22) to sacrifice to the God of his father Isaac (46:1); the night-vision that follows (46:2–4) is the last theophany in the Jacob narrative. The divine self-identification Ἐγώ εἰμι ὁ θεός σου ὁ θεὸς τῶν πατέρων σου (46:3) echoes the burning-bush formula of Exod 3:6, quoted verbatim at Acts 7:32. The promise of 46:4 is structurally threefold: God will go down with Jacob (καταβήσομαι μετά σου), will bring him up at the end (ἀναβιβάσω σε εἰς τέλος — εἰς τέλος renders the Hebrew cognate-infinitive absolute עָלֹה יַעַלְךָ and adds a temporal-comprehensive nuance: 'finally' or 'all the way through', anticipating both the Exodus and the repatriation of Jacob's bones in Josh 24:32), and Joseph will close his eyes (the funerary laying-of-hands). At 46:27 the LXX records the total as ἑβδομήκοντα πέντε — seventy-five persons of Jacob's house who entered Egypt — against the MT's seventy. The LXX achieves the higher count by appending in v.20 additional descendants of Joseph: children of Manasseh by his Syrian concubine (Makir, and Makir's son Gilead) and further descendants of Ephraim (Shuthelah, Taam, and Edom). Stephen quotes this number verbatim at Acts 7:14, aligning the NT directly with the LXX against the MT at a numerically specific point. At 46:29 Joseph falls on Israel's neck — ἐπέπεσεν ἐπὶ τὸν τράχηλον αὐτοῦ — the identical formula deployed at Luke 15:20 (the father running to the prodigal) and Acts 20:37 (the Ephesian elders weeping over Paul's departure). At 46:30 Israel's ἀποθανοῦμαι ἀπὸ τοῦ νῦν ('I can die now, since I have seen your face') is the Genesis antecedent of the Nunc Dimittis: Simeon's νῦν ἀπολύεις τὸν δοῦλόν σου (Luke 2:29–30) deliberately echoes this structure — the old man sees the face of the promised one and judges his life complete. At 46:34 the settlement strategy turns on βδέλυγμά ἐστιν Αἰγυπτίοις πᾶς ποιμὴν προβάτων: βδέλυγμα is the standard LXX term for cultic abomination (תּוֹעֵבָה), used throughout Deuteronomy, Proverbs, Ezekiel, and Revelation (e.g. Rev 17:4–5).

Genesis 47 — ΓΕΝΕΣΙΣ ΜΖ′

Theme. In the chapter that carries the covenant family from sojourning to settlement, Joseph engineers the economic transformation of Egypt through four stages of famine-crisis acquisition — money, livestock, land, persons — while Israel multiplies greatly in Gesem; and the chapter closes with its theological crown: the dying patriarch Jacob invokes the ancient thigh-oath, secures from Joseph the promise of Canaan-burial, and then bows upon the top of his staff in an act of dying faith that the author of Hebrews quotes verbatim as proof-text for the LXX's authority over the Hebrew tradition.

Outline.

Translation & textual notes. The Greek text of Genesis 47 follows the standard critical text of the Septuagint as established in the Rahlfs–Hanhart edition (Septuaginta, rev. ed. 2006), an ancient and public-domain text; the critical apparatus is not reproduced. The chapter's crown is 47:31: after swearing the burial oath, Israel προσεκύνησεν ἐπὶ τὸ ἄκρον τῆς ῥάβδου αὐτοῦ — 'bowed upon the top of his staff.' The LXX read the unpointed Hebrew מטה as maṭṭeh ('staff'), where the Masoretes vocalized miṭṭāh ('bed'). Hebrews 11:21 quotes this LXX phrase verbatim — one of the clearest demonstrations that a NT author explicitly cites the LXX against the Hebrew tradition. At 47:7 and 47:10 Jacob ηὐλόγησεν τὸν Φαραω: the patriarch of the covenant people pronounced blessing upon the most powerful ruler of the ancient world. The axiom of Heb 7:7 — 'the lesser is blessed by the greater' — is here operative in pointed reversal: the covenant heir blesses the emperor. Joseph's diplomatic presentation of five selected brothers (47:2) enables them to identify as ποιμένες προβάτων and request settlement in Gesem (47:3–4); Pharaoh grants the best land and the opportunity for capable men to serve as livestock-overseers (47:5–6). Jacob's autobiographical summary (47:8–9) is among the most poignant in the patriarchal narratives: μικραὶ καὶ πονηραὶ γεγόνασιν αἱ ἡμέραι τῶν ἐτῶν τῆς ζωῆς μου — 'few and evil have been the days of my life.' The famine administration of 47:13–26 moves through four stages: money (47:13–15), livestock (47:16–17), land and persons (47:18–21), with the priests' holdings exempt throughout (47:22, 26). The fifth part (τὸ πέμπτον) becomes a statutory grain-tithe to Pharaoh (47:24, 26). The settlement in Ραμεσση (47:11) anticipates the store-city of Exod 1:11. Jacob lives seventeen years in Egypt and one hundred and forty-seven in total (47:28); the chapter closes with the patriarch's thigh-oath (47:29–30, cf. Gen 24:2) sealed by Israel's bow upon his staff (47:31).

Genesis 48 — ΓΕΝΕΣΙΣ ΜΗ′

Theme. The dying Jacob elevates Joseph's two sons to full co-heirs of the Abrahamic covenant, deliberately crossing his hands to set the younger Ephraim above the firstborn Manasseh; he pronounces the most theologically dense blessing in Genesis, bequeaths Shechem to Joseph as a special portion, and leaves his sons with the Immanuel-promise and a prophetic word of return to the Promised Land.

Outline. - A · 48:1–2 — Joseph comes to the dying Jacob with his two sons. - B · 48:3–7 — Jacob's retrospect: the Luza theophany and the death of Rachel. - C · 48:8–12 — The adoption scene: Jacob asks, embraces, and is prostrated before. - D · 48:13–16 — The crossing of hands and the triple blessing. - E · 48:17–22 — Joseph's protest overruled; the Israel-blessing formula; the Shechem bequest.

Translation & textual notes. The Greek text of Genesis 48 follows the standard critical text of the Septuagint as established in the Rahlfs-Hanhart edition (Septuaginta, rev. ed. 2006), an ancient and public-domain text; the critical apparatus is not reproduced. Chapter 48 is the adoption-and-blessing scene in which the dying Jacob elevates Joseph's two sons Ephraim and Manasseh to tribal-patriarch rank, founding the double tribe of Joseph. At 48:1 ἐνοχλεῖται ('is troubled / in distress') renders MT חֹלֶה ('is ill'), a slight softening of the clinical term. The Bethel theophany recalled in 48:3 is located at Λουζα, the pre-Israelite Canaanite name of Bethel (cf. Gen 28:19; 35:6), which the LXX preserves as a toponym alongside Βαιθηλ elsewhere. At 48:7 the recalled death of Rachel carries the Bethlehem gloss αὕτη ἐστὶν Βαιθλεεμ (cf. Gen 35:19), anchoring the site in the reader's geography. The dim eyes of 48:10 (οἱ ὀφθαλμοὶ Ισραηλ ἐβαρύνθησαν ἀπὸ τοῦ γήρους) echo Isaac's failing sight at Gen 27:1, typologically linking both deathbed scenes as younger-over-elder reversals consummated. At 48:14 ἐναλλὰξ τὰς χεῖρας ('crossing the hands') physically enacts the inversion of primogeniture that runs through Genesis from Abel through Perez. The triple blessing of 48:15–16 is unique in the Pentateuch: (1) ὁ θεὸς ᾧ εὐηρέστησαν οἱ πατέρες μου (the God before whom the fathers were well-pleasing; εὐαρεστέω renders the 'walk with God' formula of Gen 5:22, 24; 6:9); (2) ὁ θεὸς ὁ τρέφων με ἐκ νεότητός μου (the God who feeds/shepherds me from my youth); (3) ὁ ἄγγελος ὁ ῥυόμενός με ἐκ πάντων τῶν κακῶν (the angel who delivers me from all evils). The third clause is the earliest attested 'redeeming angel' text in Scripture; ῥύομαι is the deliverance verb of the Lord's Prayer (Matt 6:13, ῥῦσαι ἡμᾶς ἀπὸ τοῦ πονηροῦ), and patristic writers read the angel-clause as a Christophany. Heb 11:21 cites this deathbed scene (τῇ πίστει Ιακωβ ἀποθνῄσκων εὐλόγησεν ἑκάστους τῶν υἱῶν Ιωσηφ). At 48:19 πλῆθος ἐθνῶν ('fullness/multitude of nations') grounds later universalist exegesis of Ephraim's blessing (cf. Rom 4:17–18). The Israel-blessing formula of 48:20 (Ποιήσαι σε ὁ θεὸς ὡς Εφραιμ καὶ ὡς Μανασση) survives in Shabbat liturgy. The chapter closes with Jacob's bequest of Σικιμα (Shechem) as ἐξαίρετον ('chosen/special portion') above Joseph's brothers (48:22), recalling the Shechem episode of Gen 34 and anticipating the burial of Joseph's bones at Shechem in Josh 24:32.

Genesis 49 — ΓΕΝΕΣΙΣ ΜΘ′

Theme. Jacob's deathbed Blessing of the Twelve is the theological apex of Genesis: framed by the eschatological formula ἐπ᾿ ἐσχάτων τῶν ἡμερῶν and sealed by Jacob's quiet expiration (ἐξέλιπεν), it moves from curses of forfeited birthright through the scepter-bearing lion of Judah and the broken bows of Joseph to the predatory yet providential wolf of Benjamin, making the whole poem a prophetic charter for Israel's tribal destiny.

Outline. - A · 49:1–2 — The summons: Jacob calls his sons to hear the oracles of the end of days. Jacob summons his sons with the formal verb συγκαλέω (49:1) and states his purpose: to announce what will befall them ἐπ᾿ ἐσχάτων τῶν ἡμερῶν, framing the entire poem as eschatological prophecy. The introductory couplet (49:2) doubles the summons (Ἀθροίσθητε / ἀκούσατε ... ἀκούσατε) and names the speaker both as 'Jacob' and as 'Israel your father,' giving the oracles simultaneously genealogical and covenantal authority. - B · 49:3–4 — Reuben: the forfeited birthright. Reuben is greeted with his titles — πρωτότοκος, ἰσχύς, ἀρχή τέκνων — only to have them implicitly stripped (49:3). The charge (49:4) is ἐξύβρισας ὡς ὕδωρ ('you were insolent as water'): his violation of Bilhah (Gen 35:22) cost him the leadership role that would transfer to Judah and the double portion that would go to Joseph (1 Chr 5:1–2). The unit is a compressed tragedy — greatest honor lost to one act of wantonness. - C · 49:5–7 — Simeon and Levi: instruments of violence, scattered in Israel. Simeon and Levi are bracketed as a unit (ἀδελφοί, 49:5) whose shared crime — the Shechem massacre of Gen 34 — draws a double curse. Jacob disavows their βουλή ('counsel') and συστάσει ('assembly,' 49:6), invoking the language of deliberate collusion. The curse (49:7) — ἐπικατάρατος ὁ θυμὸς αὐτῶν — prophesies their dispersion in Israel; historically Simeon was absorbed into Judah and Levi scattered as a landless priestly tribe, their violence sublimated into priestly zeal (cf. Num 25:7–13). - D · 49:8–12 — Judah: the lion, the scepter, and the expectation of the nations. The Judah oracle is the longest and most theologically charged in the poem. It opens with the name-play Ιουδα/αἰνέσαισαν ('Judah' / 'they shall praise you'), then escalates through lion imagery from cub to reclining king (49:8–9). The messianic crux of 49:10 — the ruler who shall not fail until τὰ ἀποκείμενα αὐτῷ ('the things stored up for him') arrive, and who himself is the προσδοκία ἐθνῶν ('expectation of the nations') — was read messianically by Qumran, the Targums, and every major Church Father (see Cruxes). The oracle closes (49:11–12) with images of vine-bound foal and wine-washed garment so abundant that the coming ruler's eyes gleam with wine and his teeth are white with milk. - E · 49:13–15 — Zebulun and Issachar: seashore and soil. Zebulun is assigned the seacoast beside ships' harbors reaching to Sidon (49:13) — a prophetic territorial allocation echoed at Isa 9:1 and cited at Matt 4:13–15. Issachar 'desired the good thing' and reclined between the lots (49:14): seeing that rest was good and the land was rich (πίων), he submitted his shoulder to toil and became a farming man (49:15). The contrast of sea-commerce (Zebulun) and agrarian service (Issachar) gives each tribe a sharply defined economic character. - F · 49:16–21 — Dan, Gad, Asher, and Naphtali, with the cry of salvation. Dan will judge his people like one tribe among Israel (49:16), then becomes the hidden serpent biting the horse's heel (49:17). The snake-image interrupts the poem and triggers its only first-person prayer: τὴν σωτηρίαν περιμένω κυρίου (49:18), a cry that stands alone as its own verse and functions as a liturgical anchor in the flow of tribal oracles. Gad faces raiders and counterraids (49:19); Asher's bread is rich, giving delicacies to rulers (49:20); Naphtali is an unfurling branch yielding beautiful fruit (49:21). - G · 49:22–26 — Joseph: the glorified son and the cascade of blessing. The Joseph oracle is the poem's longest individual blessing. Joseph is υἱὸς ηὐξημένος — 'a son who has grown greatly' (49:22); enemies assailed him but their bows were shattered by the Mighty One of Jacob (49:23–24). Three divine titles converge: δυνάστης Ιακωβ, ὁ κατισχύσας Ισραηλ, ὁ θεὸς τοῦ πατρός σου (49:24–25). The blessing itself is a torrent: heaven above, earth possessing all things, breast and womb, the blessings of the lasting mountains — all poured onto Joseph's head as the one who led his brothers (49:25–26). - H · 49:27–33 — Benjamin the wolf; the charge of Machpelah; Jacob's death. Benjamin receives the fiercest epithet in the poem: λύκος ἅρπαξ ('a ravening wolf'), devouring in the morning and distributing in the evening (49:27). After the brief oracle the narrator brackets the twelve (49:28) and Jacob issues his final charge: burial at Machpelah, the double cave opposite Mambre, purchased by Abraham from Ephron the Hittite (49:29–32). The burials there are enumerated — Abraham and Sarah, Isaac and Rebekah, and Leah (whom Jacob personally buried, 49:31) — making the cave the resting place of all three patriarchal couples except Rachel. The chapter closes with Jacob's death in three steps: he lifted his feet onto the bed, ἐξέλιπεν ('he failed / gave out'), and was gathered to his people (49:33).

Translation & textual notes. The Greek text of Genesis 49 follows the standard critical text of the Septuagint as established in the Rahlfs–Hanhart edition (Septuaginta, rev. ed. 2006), an ancient and public-domain text; the critical apparatus is not reproduced. Genesis 49 — the Blessing of Jacob — is the theological apex of the book: Jacob summons his twelve sons and pronounces oracular prophecy on each tribe's destiny, framed from the first verse with the eschatological formula ἐπ᾿ ἐσχάτων τῶν ἡμερῶν ('at the end of the days'), which drove Jewish and Christian messianic interpretation from Qumran through the Church Fathers. The LXX diverges from the MT throughout this poem — partly because the underlying Hebrew is exceptionally difficult archaic verse, partly because the translator rendered key terms interpretively. At 49:4 ἐξύβρισας ὡς ὕδωρ ('you were insolent as water') sharpens the moral charge against Reuben via ὕβρις-vocabulary. At 49:5–6 συνετέλεσαν ἀδικίαν ἐξ αἱρέσεως ('they completed injustice by deliberate choice') and συστάσει ('assembly') for סֹד ('secret council') point to the Shechem massacre. The Judah oracle (49:8–12) is the chapter's crux: the name-play Ιουδα/αἰνέσαισαν reproduces the Hebrew Judah/praise pun; σκύμνος λέοντος (49:9) — the 'lion cub of Judah' — is cited in Rev 5:5; and 49:10 is the premier LXX messianic text (see Cruxes). The foal-binding and wine-robe washing of 49:11 attracted patristic eucharistic and passion readings (Zech 9:9; Matt 21:5). The Dan oracle embeds the lone prayer of the poem (49:18): τὴν σωτηρίαν περιμένω κυρίου ('I wait for the salvation of the Lord'). The Joseph oracle (49:22–26) renders בֵּן פֹּרָת ('fruitful son') as υἱὸς ηὐξημένος ('a son who has grown greatly'), cascading into images of divine protection and blessing. Benjamin (49:27) — λύκος ἅρπαξ ('a ravening wolf') — receives the fiercest epithet in the poem. The chapter closes with Jacob's charge to bury him at Machpelah with Abraham, Sarah, Isaac, Rebekah, and Leah (49:29–32), and his death: ἐξέλιπεν ('he failed / gave out'), gathered to his people (49:33).

Genesis 50 — ΓΕΝΕΣΙΣ Ν′

Theme. The final chapter of Genesis moves from tears on a dead father's face (50:1) to a coffin in Egypt (50:26), carrying along the way a state funeral of extraordinary splendour, the naming of a place as 'Mourning of Egypt,' the brothers' fearful petition and Joseph's providential forgiveness — articulated in the chapter's theological summit (50:20: 'you planned evil against me, but God planned concerning me for good') — and closing with the bones-oath that binds all Israel to carry Joseph home when God 'surely visits' them, leaving Genesis on the deliberately arrested note of ἡ σορός, the waiting coffin.

Outline.

Translation & textual notes. The Greek text of Genesis 50 follows the standard critical text of the Septuagint as established in the Rahlfs–Hanhart edition (Septuaginta, rev. ed. 2006), an ancient and public-domain text; the critical apparatus is not reproduced. Genesis 50 closes the book: Jacob's death triggers embalming over forty days and a national mourning of seventy days in Egypt (50:2–3) — a near-Pharaonic honour signalling the patriarch's status within Egyptian culture. The embalming vocabulary ἐνταφιάζω and the substantival noun οἱ ἐνταφιασταί ('the embalmers', 50:2) belong to the same word-group the Gospels deploy for Jesus' burial-preparation (Matt 26:12 εἰς τὸ ἐνταφιάσαι με; John 19:40 ἐνταφιάζειν) — a lexical bridge of considerable theological freight. The great procession from Egypt to Machpelah passes the threshing floor of Atad east of the Jordan, where Canaanite observers name the site Πένθος Αἰγύπτου ('Mourning of Egypt', 50:11) — the LXX's interpretive rendering of Hebrew Abel-mizraim (אָבֵל מִצְרַיִם) rather than a mere transliteration. At 50:19 the LXX diverges sharply from the MT: where the Hebrew poses the rhetorical question 'am I in the place of God?' (הֲתַחַת אֱלֹהִים אָנֹכִי), the LXX offers the positive theological declaration τοῦ γὰρ θεοῦ εἰμι ἐγώ ('for I belong to God'), shifting Joseph's self-understanding from a disclaimer to an affiliation. At 50:20 the chapter's theological summit: ὑμεῖς ἐβουλεύσασθε κατ' ἐμοῦ εἰς πονηρά, ὁ δὲ θεὸς ἐβουλεύσατο περὶ ἐμοῦ εἰς ἀγαθά — the antithesis of human malice and divine providence that resonates deeply with Rom 8:28 (πάντα συνεργεῖ εἰς ἀγαθόν). Joseph's comfort-speech (50:21) deploys the Hebraism εἰς τὴν καρδίαν ('spoke to their heart', calquing עַל־לֵב), a tender idiom of consolation. The bones-oath (50:24–25) uses the cognate construction ἐπισκοπῇ ἐπισκέψεται, calquing Hebrew פָּקֹד יִפְקֹד; Heb 11:22 cites Joseph's faith in the exodus and his instructions concerning his bones as the model of patriarchal hope. The book's final word ἡ σορός ('the coffin', 50:26) closes Genesis as a symbol of deferred homecoming — Joseph embalmed and waiting.


Major translation & exegetical cruxes

Where the Greek legitimately admits more than one rendering or reading — or where the LXX diverges from the Hebrew — the point was flagged in the lexical notes and chapter text_notes rather than decided silently; the more common analysis was generally taken and the alternative noted. The principal cruxes in LXX Genesis:

Reference Crux Discussion
1:2 ἀόρατος καὶ ἀκατασκεύαστος The LXX translates the Hebrew תֹּהוּ וָבֹהוּ (tōhû wābōhû, the primordial formless void) with ἀόρατος ('invisible') + ἀκατασκεύαστος ('unformed / unprepared'), a rendering that departs from lexical equivalence. תֹּהוּ is not naturally 'invisible' but 'waste / formlessness'; the LXX interprets the condition of the pre-ordered earth through the lens of visibility and preparation rather than the Hebrew's vocabulary of emptiness. The resulting phrase became a technical cosmological term in patristic writers (Theophilus of Antioch, Ad Autolycum 2.10; Origen, De Principiis 2.1.4) who used it alongside Plato's Timaeus 52d to describe primordial matter. The rendering opens a philosophical afterlife far beyond any strictly lexical translation would have done.
1:2 ἐπεφέρετο ἐπάνω τοῦ ὕδατος The LXX translates the Hebrew רוּחַ אֱלֹהִים מְרַחֶפֶת עַל הַמָּיִם ('the Spirit/wind of God was hovering over the water') with πνεῦμα θεοῦ ἐπεφέρετο ἐπάνω τοῦ ὕδατος ('the Spirit of God was being borne upon the water'). The Hebrew participle מְרַחֶפֶת (piel of רָחַף) means 'hover / brood / flutter' (cognate with the eagle hovering over young in Deut 32:11), but the LXX's ἐπιφέρω ('carry upon / bring to bear upon') is a more forceful verb, implying active impulsion rather than gentle hovering. Basil the Great (Hexaemeron 2.6) built his pneumatology partly on the LXX rendering, and Justin Martyr (Apol. 1.60) saw in ἐπεφέρετο the Spirit's active preparation of the waters for creation.
1:8 καὶ εἶδεν ὁ θεὸς ὅτι καλόν (day two) The MT lacks the approval refrain for day two — the only day without it — while the LXX includes it after the naming of the firmament. This divergence was noted by ancient commentators: Origen (Selecta in Genesin) asked why day two alone lacked the refrain in the Hebrew and proposed that the division of waters (incomplete until the sea appears on day three) rendered day two not yet fully 'good.' The LXX's supply of the refrain harmonizes the chapter, but raises the question of whether the MT represents an intentional lacuna or a textual loss; the manuscript tradition is divided. Modern text critics generally regard the LXX's addition as a secondary harmonization, but the question is not settled.
1:26 ποιήσωμεν ἄνθρωπον κατ᾿ εἰκόνα ἡμετέραν καὶ καθ᾿ ὁμοίωσιν The plural cohortative ('let us make') and the emphatic first-person plural possessive ἡμετέραν ('our image') together constitute the most theologically contested verse in the creation account. The LXX renders the Hebrew faithfully (נַעֲשֶׂה … בְּצַלְמֵנוּ כִּדְמוּתֵנוּ), preserving the full image-likeness pair as εἰκών and ὁμοίωσις. Irenaeus (Adversus Haereses 5.6.1) distinguished the two: εἰκών as the rational, bodily capacity for relationship with God (not lost in the fall), and ὁμοίωσις as the Spirit-given moral conformity (lost and restored in Christ). Crucially, the execution in v.27 uses only εἰκόνα (not ὁμοίωσιν), a micro-divergence the LXX inherits from the Hebrew and that Irenaeus built on. The plural of the deliberation generated the patristic trinitarian reading (Justin, Theophilus), the 'royal plural of majesty' reading, and the 'divine council' reading — still debated.
1:31 καλὰ λίαν The climactic evaluation uniquely intensifies the chapter's refrain from the singular καλόν ('good') of six day-specific approvals to the plural καλὰ λίαν ('very good things'). The plural καλά encompasses the totality of creation; λίαν ('exceedingly / very') renders מְאֹד (mĕʾōḏ) and upgrades the quality judgment. No earlier refrain uses λίαν; the escalation is reserved for the comprehensive view of all that God has made (τὰ πάντα ὅσα ἐποίησεν, v.31). Theologically, the verse declares that the fallen world of Genesis 3 has its foundation in something the Creator himself pronounced superlatively good — a baseline for creation theology, the doctrine of creation's essential goodness, and the possibility of redemption and new creation.
2:2 ἐν τῇ ἡμέρᾳ τῇ ἕκτῃ — 'on the sixth day' (MT: seventh) The single most discussed LXX–MT divergence in Genesis 2. The MT reads בַּיּוֹם הַשְּׁבִיעִי ('on the seventh day'), meaning God finished his work on the day he also rested. The LXX and Samaritan Pentateuch both read 'sixth day,' apparently to avoid the implication that God was still 'finishing' work on the very Sabbath he immediately proceeds to sanctify. The change is a single consonant in the Hebrew numeral; Philo (de opificio mundi 89) reads the LXX text without comment, suggesting it was well established in his milieu. Modern text critics regard MT as original and the LXX as a harmonising revision, though the LXX reading has liturgical coherence.
2:4 αὕτη ἡ βίβλος γενέσεως — 'this is the book of genesis' The LXX renders Hebrew תּוֹלְדֹת (toledoth, 'generations/genealogy') with γένεσις ('origin, genesis') — the word that gives the whole book its title. Matthew 1:1 opens βίβλος γενέσεως Ἰησοῦ Χριστοῦ, a deliberate echo placing Christ's genealogy in the line of the creation-genesis. The phrase simultaneously closes the first account (retrospective toledoth heading) and opens the second, functioning as a literary seam.
2:7 ἐγένετο ὁ ἄνθρωπος εἰς ψυχὴν ζῶσαν — 'became a living soul' Paul quotes this exact LXX phrase in 1 Cor 15:45 (ἐγένετο ὁ πρῶτος ἄνθρωπος Ἀδὰμ εἰς ψυχὴν ζῶσαν) as the basis for his Adam-Christ typology: the first Adam became a 'living soul' (ψυχή), the last Adam a 'life-giving spirit' (πνεῦμα). The LXX rendering of Hebrew נֶפֶשׁ חַיָּה as ψυχὴν ζῶσαν gives Paul his anthropological vocabulary and his whole argument structure in 1 Cor 15:44–49. The εἰς + accusative predicate is a Hebraism (calquing לְ + noun).
2:8 παράδεισος — 'paradise' The LXX's choice of παράδεισος (a Persian loanword for a royal walled park) to render Hebrew גַּן ('garden') is one of the most consequential translation decisions in the whole Bible. The word entered Greek via Xenophon (Anabasis, 401 BC) for the royal estates of Persia. Applied to the garden of Eden, it loaded the word with eschatological associations: Luke 23:43 (Jesus to the thief: 'today you shall be with me in paradise'), 2 Cor 12:4 (Paul caught up to 'paradise'), Rev 2:7 ('the tree of life which is in the paradise of God') all depend on this LXX coinage. 'Paradise' in every modern European language is a direct linguistic descendant.
2:15 τοῦ παραδείσου τῆς τρυφῆς — 'the paradise of delight' The LXX adds the genitive τῆς τρυφῆς ('of delight/luxury') where MT simply has 'the garden of Eden.' The LXX appears to translate the name Εδεμ (עֵדֶן) as τρυφή ('delight/luxury/indulgence'), giving the garden an explicitly hedonistic quality of bountiful pleasure. This interpretive addition enriches the picture of paradise as a place of divine abundance, but also slightly colours the word παράδεισος toward sensuous luxury.
2:17 θανάτῳ ἀποθανεῖσθε — 'dying you shall die' The cognate dative (θανάτῳ + ἀποθανεῖσθε) calques the Hebrew infinitive absolute מוֹת תָּמוּת, the most emphatic mode of assertion available in Biblical Hebrew: 'you shall certainly die.' The construction is a Hebraism with no natural Greek parallel; the LXX preserves it faithfully. The penalty-formula is the ground for Paul's declaration in Rom 5:12 that death spread to all humans through Adam. The temporal clause 'on whatever day you eat' (ᾗ ἂν ἡμέρᾳ φάγητε) creates a narrative tension: when the humans eat in ch.3 they do not die immediately, a tension the tradition resolved in various ways (spiritual death immediately, physical death eventually).
2:18 βοηθὸν κατ᾿ αὐτόν — 'a helper corresponding to him' The LXX renders Hebrew עֵזֶר כְּנֶגְדּוֹ with βοηθόν ('helper') + the spatial preposition κατά ('according to, corresponding to, face-to-face with'). βοηθός is theologically freighted — it is used of God as Israel's helper throughout the Psalms (e.g. Ps 9:10; 53:6 LXX), so the woman's role is described in language normally reserved for divine assistance. κατ᾿ αὐτόν expresses not mere subordination but correspondence and complementarity — she is his face-to-face counterpart.
2:23–24 ἔσονται οἱ δύο εἰς σάρκα μίαν — 'the two shall be one flesh' The LXX addition of οἱ δύο ('the two') — not explicit in the MT consonantal text — is the form Jesus cites (Matt 19:5; Mark 10:8: οἱ δύο εἰς σάρκα μίαν) and Paul cites (1 Cor 6:16; Eph 5:31). The 'two' emphasizes the union of two distinct persons rather than absorption, and Paul's application of the formula to Christ and the church in Eph 5:31–32 calls it a μυστήριον μέγα. The bone-and-flesh recognition formula of v.23 also appears in 2 Sam 5:1 LXX as a covenant-kinship formula, suggesting that the ἓν σάρξ institution is framed in covenantal rather than merely biological terms.
2:1 πᾶς ὁ κόσμος αὐτῶν — 'all their order/array' The LXX renders the Hebrew צְבָאָם ('their host/army') with κόσμος — importing a Hellenistic term of ordered arrangement into the completion formula: heaven and earth are finished together with all their ordered array. The word's philosophical resonance ('cosmos') gave the verse a long career in Greek patristic cosmology, and the choice quietly interprets the 'host' not as angelic armies but as the well-ordered furniture of creation.
3:1 φρονιμώτατος The superlative of φρόνιμος renders Hebrew עָרוּם ('crafty/shrewd'); the choice imports an ironic wisdom-vocabulary — the creature most resembling human φρόνησις is the agent of its destruction. Hebrew 3:1 also paronomastically echoes 2:25 (עֲרוּמִּים, 'naked'), a wordplay the LXX cannot reproduce (γυμνός / φρόνιμος).
3:6 ὡραῖόν ἐστιν τοῦ κατανοῆσαι The LXX renders Hebrew לְהַשְׂכִּיל ('to make wise/give insight') as τοῦ κατανοῆσαι ('for contemplating/understanding'), sharpening the intellectual dimension of the temptation beyond the MT's 'desirable for gaining wisdom.'
3:8 τὸ δειλινόν The LXX renders Hebrew לְרוּחַ הַיּוֹם ('in the wind/spirit of the day') as τὸ δειλινόν ('the cool of the evening / afternoon time'), interpreting the expression as a temporal marker for the evening breeze rather than translating לְרוּחַ literally; this aligns with Aramaic tradition and gives God's walk a specific temporal and atmospheric setting.
3:15 αὐτός σου τηρήσει κεφαλήν The protevangelium crux: (a) the masculine αὐτός has a neuter antecedent σπέρμα, creating a grammatical mismatch that the church fathers exploited as pointing to a specific male deliverer (Justin, Irenaeus, Tertullian); (b) τηρήσει ('will watch/guard') renders Hebrew יְשׁוּפֶנּוּ (from שׁוּף, 'strike/crush'), a verb the LXX translates with a term whose primary sense is 'watch/guard' not 'crush' — some witnesses read τειρήσει ('wear down'), also attested; the exact verbal symmetry (same verb for both head-crush and heel-strike) is distinctive and exegetically potent. NT echoes: Rom 16:20; Rev 12:1–17.
3:15 τηρήσει / τειρήσει Manuscript tradition divides between τηρήσει (fut. of τηρέω, 'watch, keep') and τειρήσει (fut. of τείρω, 'wear down, bruise'); the near-homophony created patristic debate; Origen and Jerome discussed the reading. The standard critical text (Rahlfs–Hanhart) reads τηρήσει.
3:16 ἡ ἀποστροφή σου The LXX renders Hebrew תְּשׁוּקָה ('desire/longing') as ἀποστροφή ('turning/return'), apparently deriving from שׁוּב ('turn') rather than שׁוּק ('desire'); the Vetus Latina ('sub potestate uiri eris') follows the LXX toward a meaning of subjugation or dependence; the MT 'desire' and LXX 'turning' produce different but coherent readings of the post-Fall gender dynamic.
3:20 Ζωή The LXX translates Hebrew חַוָּה (Ḥawwāh, 'Eve') as Ζωή ('Life'), making the theological meaning of the name explicit; the NT uses the transliteration Εὔα (2 Cor 11:3; 1 Tim 2:13), following a later convention; the LXX translation enables the woman's name to resonate with the tree of ζωῆς ('life') and with Johannine ζωή-theology.
3:22 ὡς εἷς ἐξ ἡμῶν The divine plural 'as one of us' (= Hebrew כְּאַחַד מִמֶּנּוּ) partially validates the serpent's promise of 3:5; patristic exegesis read it as a Trinitarian reference; Jewish tradition reads it as address to the divine council; the LXX preserves the ambiguity unchanged.
3:24 φλογίνην ῥομφαίαν τὴν στρεφομένην The LXX's φλογίνη ῥομφαία ('flaming sword') renders Hebrew לַהַט הַחֶרֶב; ῥομφαία is the large apocalyptic sword (Rev 1:16; 6:8; 19:21; Luke 2:35), distinct from the everyday μάχαιρα; the participial στρεφομένη ('revolving/turning') renders הַמִּתְהַפֶּכֶת (hithpael, 'turning itself about'), conveying ceaseless omnidirectional vigilance — no approach to the tree of life is possible from any angle.
4:1 ἐκτησάμην ἄνθρωπον διὰ τοῦ θεοῦ LXX reads διά ('through') where MT has the particle אֶת before יְהוָה, which could be read as 'I have acquired a man, namely YHWH' (messianic reading used by some church fathers) or simply 'I have acquired a man with/through the help of YHWH.' The LXX's instrumental διά avoids both the messianic and the transactional readings and frames God as the enabling agent of new life; the choice of ἄνθρωπον (rather than the expected ἄνδρα for MT's אִישׁ) also elevates the theological register.
4:7 ὀρθῶς δὲ μὴ διέλῃς The most radical LXX–MT divergence in the chapter. The MT's 'sin crouches at the door; its desire is toward you but you must rule over it' — one of the most discussed verses in biblical scholarship — is entirely absent from the LXX. The LXX instead reads a conditional question about 'dividing rightly' (διέλῃς from διαιρέω), possibly referring to correct partition of a sacrifice (cf. Lev 1:6, 12 LXX: the sacrificial cutting procedure). The imperative ἡσύχασον ('be still / calm yourself') redirects Cain toward self-mastery rather than naming an external tempter; and ἡ ἀποστροφὴ αὐτοῦ ('his turning') applies — ambiguously — to Abel's desire toward his brother (a relational claim) or to sin's desire. Patristic tradition (Chrysostom, Philo) worked extensively with this LXX reading rather than the MT's.
4:8 Διέλθωμεν εἰς τὸ πεδίον The LXX supplies Cain's speech — 'let us go out into the field' — where the MT records only the bare statement 'Cain spoke to Abel his brother' with no content. This gap in the MT is universally recognized as either a textual lacuna or a deliberate silence; the LXX (with the Samaritan Pentateuch, Peshitta, and Vulgate) fills it with the premeditated lure, making the murder explicitly a trap rather than a sudden explosion of rage. The weight of the external versional evidence suggests the LXX represents an early Hebrew tradition.
4:15 σημεῖον τῷ Καιν The σημεῖον ('sign/mark') set upon Cain is never described in either the MT or the LXX; it functions as a divine mark of protection and custody, not of disgrace. The word σημεῖον in the LXX typically denotes a divine sign of covenant (Gen 17:11 — circumcision; Exod 4:8 — miracle-signs); its use here implies that Cain, though cursed and exiled, remains within the sphere of divine care and governance — a theologically charged paradox that the text does not resolve.
4:26 ἤλπισεν ἐπικαλεῖσθαι The LXX's translation of MT's הוּחַל (Hophal, 'it was begun') with ἤλπισεν ('he hoped') is one of the chapter's most significant theological divergences. Where the MT speaks of a public beginning — the general inauguration of the practice of calling on YHWH's name — the LXX personalizes it in Enos and frames it as hope (ἐλπίζω), a forward-looking, eschatologically charged disposition. This reading shaped early Jewish and patristic interpretation and connects to the NT formula ἐπικαλεῖσθαι τὸ ὄνομα κυρίου (Joel 2:32 LXX = Acts 2:21; Rom 10:13), where 'calling upon the name' is the act of saving faith — making Enos's 'hope' a pre-figuration of the entire tradition of invocatory prayer.
5:3 διακόσια καὶ τριάκοντα ἔτη (LXX) vs. 130 years (MT) The systematic LXX/MT chronological divergence: for the first six begetting ages in Gen 5 the LXX is consistently +100 years above the MT (Adam 230/130, Seth 205/105, Enosh 190/90, Kenan 170/70, Mahalalel 165/65, Jared 162/162). The post-begetting spans are correspondingly reduced so that many total lifespans agree between LXX and MT. Three explanations are debated: (a) the LXX translator worked from a divergent Hebrew Vorlage that already had the higher figures; (b) the LXX numbers were deliberately inflated to extend the primeval chronology and harmonise with other ancient traditions (Josephus' figures, Jubilees); (c) the MT was secondarily shortened. Most current text-critics favour a divergent Vorlage hypothesis. The Samaritan Pentateuch presents a third set of figures, intermediate between LXX and MT for some entries. All figures in this file follow Rahlfs–Hanhart.
5:24 καὶ εὐηρέστησεν Ενωχ τῷ θεῷ, καὶ οὐχ ηὑρίσκετο, ὅτι μετέθηκεν αὐτὸν ὁ θεός Two distinct cruxes converge here. (1) Lexical: εὐαρεστέω renders Hebrew הִתְהַלֵּךְ ('walked with'), a substitution that shifts the idiom from the intimate 'walking alongside God' to the Greek concept of divine approval (εὐαρεστεῖν). The LXX thus produces a different theological nuance: not the companionship of walking but the moral quality of being pleasing. Heb 11:5 cites this LXX wording explicitly (ὅτι μεμαρτύρηται εὐαρεστηκέναι τῷ θεῷ) as the basis for Enoch's faith-exemplar status. (2) Syntactic: οὐχ ηὑρίσκετο is a passive imperfect — 'he was not being found' — which implies ongoing unsuccessful searching rather than a simple statement of absence. The causal ὅτι clause names God as the agent of the translation (μετατίθημι), pre-empting any suggestion of disappearance for other reasons. The verse is the theological apex of the chapter and the strongest exception to the formula.
5:29 διαναπαύσει ἡμᾶς οὗτος ἀπὸ τῶν ἔργων ἡμῶν The LXX renders Hebrew יְנַחֲמֵנוּ ('will comfort us', from נחם) as διαναπαύσει ('will give us rest', from ἀναπαύω), assimilating the name-etymology to נוּחַ ('rest') rather than נחם ('comfort'). This is either an intentional exegetical interpretation connecting Noah's name to rest (matching the narrative of Gen 8:4, where the ark rests), or a reflection of a variant Hebrew reading. The mention of κύριος ὁ θεός (the Eden divine-name pair) and the cursed ground (ἧς κατηράσατο) explicitly back-references Gen 3:17–19, making Lamech's prophecy a redemptive-historical claim: Noah will provide relief from the Adamic curse. The LXX phrase διαναπαύσει also echoes the creation-rest motif (καταπαύω in Gen 2:2–3), which gives the Flood narrative a re-creation typological resonance that becomes significant in NT use (1 Pet 3:20–21; Heb 4).
5:32 καὶ ἐγέννησεν Νωε τὸν Σημ, τὸν Χαμ, τὸν Ιαφεθ Noah's entry is the only one in Gen 5 that (a) names multiple sons rather than one heir, (b) omits the post-begetting lifespan, the 'sons and daughters' formula, and the death-notice. The truncation is deliberate narrative suspension: the chapter refuses to close Noah's story because his story is not yet over — it will consume Gen 6–9. The three sons are named in birth-order in Gen 5:32 and 6:10, but Shem is theologically pre-eminent (Gen 9:26; 11:10–26). The LXX name-forms Σημ, Χαμ, Ιαφεθ are the exact forms cited in the table of nations (Gen 10) and reappear in Luke 3:36 (Σήμ). All three are indeclinable in the LXX.
6:2 οἱ υἱοὶ τοῦ θεοῦ vs. ἄγγελοι τοῦ θεοῦ The Rahlfs–Hanhart critical text reads υἱοὶ τοῦ θεοῦ ('sons of God'), following the leading uncials; but a substantial stream of LXX manuscripts, Justin Martyr, Clement of Alexandria, and the tradition behind 1 Enoch reads ἄγγελοι τοῦ θεοῦ ('angels of God'). The angelic reading is presupposed by Jude 6 ('angels who did not keep their own domain') and 2 Pet 2:4 ('angels who sinned'), and drives the entire Watcher mythology of Second Temple Judaism. The 'sons of Seth' interpretation (favored by later patristic writers resisting the angelic cosmology) has no LXX textual support; it is an exegetical move within the Hebrew/Rabbinic tradition. The critical text reads υἱοί, but the exegetical history of the passage is decisively shaped by the ἄγγελοι variant.
6:3 οὐ μὴ καταμείνῃ τὸ πνεῦμά μου The Hebrew יָדוֹן is hapax and its root uncertain — variously read as 'strive/contend' (from דִּין), 'abide/dwell' (from דּוּר), or 'be low/humbled' (from דָּה). The LXX translates with καταμένω ('remain, abide') — 'my spirit shall by no means remain in these humans forever' — making the verse a declaration of the withdrawal of the life-giving divine breath, not a striving or judging. The double negative οὐ μή + subjunctive is the strongest negation in Greek. The Vulgate (non permanebit spiritus meus in homine in aeternum) and the Peshitta support 'remain/dwell.' Modern translations that render 'my spirit shall not strive' (e.g. KJV, NASB) follow a different interpretation of the Hebrew root. The 120-year limit has been interpreted as either the remaining time before the flood or a new cap on human lifespan; the LXX's wording does not decide between them.
6:4 οἱ γίγαντες The LXX renders נְפִילִים (Nephilim) as γίγαντες ('giants') — one of the most consequential translation decisions in the entire LXX Pentateuch. The Hebrew Nephilim (from נָפַל, 'fall') may connote 'the fallen ones' or simply 'the mighty ones'; the LXX translator equated them with the giants of Greek mythology (the Titans, the giant-races), lending the pre-diluvian tradition a Hellenistic mythological coloring that profoundly shaped 1 Enoch, the Book of Jubilees, and ultimately the NT texts that cite the Watcher tradition (Jude 6; 2 Pet 2:4). The same rendering appears at Num 13:33 (where the spies report seeing 'the sons of Anak from the Nephilim' — there too, γίγαντες). The identification of the antediluvian mighty ones with physical giants became the standard reading in the Hellenistic Jewish and early Christian world.
6:6 ἐνεθυμήθη ὁ θεός The Hebrew נִחָם (Niphal of נחם, 'to be sorry, repent, grieve') is one of the most daring anthropomorphic statements in the Torah. The LXX renders with ἐνθυμέομαι ('reflect deeply, be troubled in mind'), a softer verb than μεταμέλομαι ('regret') — it emphasizes inner deliberation rather than change of intention, consistent with the LXX's generally muted anthropomorphism. The same root נחם is used of God at 1 Sam 15:11, 35 ('I regret that I made Saul king') and at Jer 18:8, 10 — passages that generated extensive theological debate about divine impassibility and genuine divine responsiveness. The LXX also diverges at v.7, rendering כִּי נִחַמְתִּי ('for I was sorry') as ὅτι ἐθυμώθην ('for I was angered') — a shift from grief to wrath in the motivation clause.
6:14 ξύλων τετραγώνων The Hebrew material עֲצֵי גֹפֶר ('gopher wood') contains the hapax legomenon גֹפֶר, whose exact identification remains completely unknown — no cognate language provides a clear equivalent, and ancient versions diverge. The LXX renders with ξύλων τετραγώνων ('squared timbers') — apparently deriving from or freely substituting a term for hewn, squared-off timber (τετράγωνος, 'four-cornered/square'). The Vulgate uses 'ligna laevigata' ('smoothed/planed timbers'). The LXX's choice may reflect a translator's attempt to render an obscure technical term with a practical Greek equivalent. The word τετράγωνος appears elsewhere in LXX architectural contexts. This is one of the clearest examples of the LXX translator improvising a plausible equivalent for an unknown Hebrew technical term.
6:18 διαθήκην μου The first occurrence of διαθήκη ('covenant') in the entire LXX — rendering בְּרִית, which itself appears here in its earliest undisputed technical sense in the biblical text. The Greek word's primary semantic range is 'disposition, arrangement, will/testament' (legal sense: a binding unilateral arrangement by one party), which is somewhat different from the bilateral treaty sense of בְּרִית; this tension between 'covenant-as-treaty' and 'covenant-as-testament/will' becomes theologically crucial in Gal 3:15–17 and Heb 9:16–17. The idiomatic difference between the Hebrew and Greek senses allowed Paul to argue that the Abrahamic διαθήκη is a unilateral divine testament that cannot be annulled — an argument that depends specifically on the Greek term's testamentary sense. The full theological weight of Heb 8–9's new covenant theology, of Luke 22:20 ('the new covenant in my blood'), of 2 Cor 3:6 and 14 ('ministers of a new covenant'), flows from this first occurrence of the word.
7:11 ἑβδόμῃ καὶ εἰκάδι — the 27th (MT: 17th) The LXX reads the twenty-seventh day of the second month where the MT reads the seventeenth. The most probable explanation is a graphical confusion in the Hebrew Vorlage: the letters כז (kaf-zayin = 27) and יז (yod-zayin = 17) differ by a single letter that looks similar in some script traditions. The discrepancy is ancient and was noticed by the early church (Origen, Julius Africanus) in their attempts to harmonise flood chronologies; it affects the total duration calculations that patristic writers derived from the flood narrative.
7:2–3 ἑπτὰ ἑπτά — seven by seven (distributive doubling) The LXX renders the Hebrew distributive שִׁבְעָה שִׁבְעָה by simple numeral reduplication — ἑπτὰ ἑπτά — rather than the more natural Greek distributive ἀνὰ ἑπτά or ἑπτὰ ἑκάστου. This is a Hebraism; the same distributive reduplication appears in δύο δύο throughout the chapter. The construction is not idiomatic Greek but preserves the idiom of the source, characteristic of the LXX translator's approach in Genesis.
7:16 ἔξωθεν αὐτοῦ — 'from outside him' The Hebrew אַחֲרָיו ('behind him / after him') is rendered ἔξωθεν αὐτοῦ, which may mean 'from outside him' (Noah enclosed within) or 'from outside it' (the ark sealed from outside). The ambiguity is unresolvable from the Greek alone; both readings emphasise God as the agent of enclosure. Patristic interpreters (e.g. Chrysostom) read this as God sealing Noah in protectively, reading αὐτοῦ as referring to Noah rather than to the ark.
7:4 ἀνάστημα — 'living thing / creature' The LXX uses ἀνάστημα to render Hebrew הַיְקוּם ('all living substance / everything that exists'). This is an unusual choice; the word normally means 'stature' or 'upright form.' It recurs in v.23, creating a verbal ring around the annihilation notice. Some scholars suggest the translator was rendering a variant Vorlage, or understood הַיְקוּם etymologically as 'that which stands upright.'
7:18 ἐπεφέρετο ἐπάνω τοῦ ὕδατος — the ark carried upon the water The imperfect ἐπεφέρετο precisely echoes Gen 1:2 LXX (πνεῦμα θεοῦ ἐπεφέρετο ἐπάνω τοῦ ὕδατος, 'the Spirit of God was hovering over the water'). The verbal and syntactic identity is too close to be coincidental; whether the LXX translator made the allusion deliberately or the identical formula simply translates an identical Hebrew construction (וְרוּחַ / וַתֵּלֶךְ both rendered by ἐπιφέρω + ἐπάνω + ὕδωρ), the reader of Greek Genesis encounters the flood narrative in sustained dialogue with the creation narrative.
8:1 ἐμνήσθη ὁ θεός The covenant-remembrance verb μιμνῄσκομαι (rendering זָכַר) denotes active, faithful intervention rather than passive recollection; the same verb inaugurates the Exodus at Exod 2:24 and Israel's restoration at Luke 1:54. Its placement as the chapter's first word makes it the theological hinge of the entire flood account: the flood ends not because the waters naturally recede but because God acts covenantally.
8:1 πνεῦμα ἐπὶ τὴν γῆν The LXX's choice of πνεῦμα for רוּחַ ('wind / spirit') deliberately echoes Gen 1:2 (πνεῦμα θεοῦ ἐπεφέρετο ἐπάνω τοῦ ὕδατος), casting the receding of the flood as a new-creation act; the ambiguity between 'wind' and 'spirit' is irreducible in both Hebrew and Greek and may be intentional.
8:4 ἑβδόμῃ καὶ εἰκάδι (LXX) vs. seventeenth (MT) The LXX reads the twenty-seventh day of the seventh month for the ark's grounding, while the MT reads the seventeenth. The divergence arises from a probable scribal misreading of Hebrew כז ('27') for יז ('17') — or vice versa — in the Vorlage; the discrepancy affects flood-chronology harmonization across traditions.
8:11 φύλλον ἐλαίας κάρφος The LXX renders Hebrew עֲלֵה זַיִת טָרָף ('a freshly-plucked olive leaf') with φύλλον ἐλαίας κάρφος; κάρφος normally means a dry chip or fragment (cf. Matt 7:3 — the speck in one's eye), yet the context (the leaf is freshly plucked as a sign of living vegetation) requires the sense of a fresh twig or shoot; the LXX's word-choice is slightly paradoxical and may indicate the translator's choice of a term for 'small piece' applied to a living plant-fragment.
8:21 ὀσμὴν εὐωδίας The cultic formula ὀσμὴ εὐωδίας occurs over forty times in LXX Leviticus–Numbers as the standard description of a sacrifice well-pleasing to God; its appearance here — at the first sacrifice in Scripture, before the Levitical code exists — establishes Noah's offering as the prototype of all Israel's later sacrifice; the NT deliberately reuses the formula: Eph 5:2 (Christ's self-offering), Phil 4:18 (the Philippians' gift), 2 Cor 2:15 (the fragrance of Christ himself).
8:21 διανοηθεὶς ὁ θεός The LXX renders MT וַיֹּאמֶר אֶל-לִבּוֹ ('said in his heart') with the participle διανοηθεὶς ('reflecting / considering'), converting the Hebrew internalized-speech anthropomorphism into a Greek inward-deliberation formula; this is a consistent LXX tendency to soften direct anthropomorphisms, and anticipates the apophatic theological tradition. The shift from 'saying to himself' to 'reflecting' is minor in effect but significant in theological register.
8:22 θέρος καὶ ἔαρ (LXX) vs. summer and winter (MT) The MT has קַיִץ וָחֹרֶף ('summer and winter'), but the LXX reads θέρος καὶ ἔαρ ('summer and spring'); חֹרֶף normally means 'winter' in biblical Hebrew, but the LXX translator rendered it as ἔαρ ('spring') — either reading חֹרֶף in a different semantic frame, or choosing a more rhetorically positive seasonal pairing; this is one of the chapter's clearest LXX/MT divergences in content rather than merely date.
8:22 οὐ καταπαύσουσιν The verb καταπαύω ('cease / rest') shares its root with σαββατισμός and the LXX's rendering of God's Sabbath rest at Gen 2:2–3; the cosmic promise that day and night shall not 'cease/rest' is thus linguistically anchored in the same root as Sabbath — the ongoing rhythm of creation is itself a form of God's covenant faithfulness parallel to the divine Sabbath-rest. The unconditional future (no 'if' clause) sets this apart from later conditional covenants.
9:13 τὸ τόξον μου τίθημι ἐν τῇ νεφέλῃ The bow (τόξον) is the standard Greek word for a war-bow, not a rainbow — Greek has no distinct word for the meteorological phenomenon. The LXX renders Hebrew קַשְׁתִּי ('my bow') as τόξον μου, so the reader must interpret from context. The present tense τίθημι (rather than MT's perfect 'I have set / נָתַתִּי') gives the declaration an immediate performative force. Patristic tradition (Ambrose, Chrysostom, Augustine) read this as a warrior hanging up his weapon of wrath — a ceasefire declaration. The τόξον in the cloud thus functions as a de-weaponised bow: God's martial capacity directed against humanity is symbolically suspended.
9:4 κρέας ἐν αἵματι ψυχῆς — flesh in the blood of its life The blood-prohibition phrase κρέας ἐν αἵματι ψυχῆς locates the ψυχή (life) in the blood, making the consumption of undrained blood an act that violates the life-principle belonging to God alone. This Noachic prohibition — applying to all humanity, not merely to Israel — is almost certainly the source of the blood restriction in the Apostolic Decree of Acts 15:20, 29, where abstention from αἵματος is one of the four requirements placed on Gentile believers. The LXX's rendering preserves the theologically dense Hebrew idiom rather than paraphrasing it.
9:6 ἐν εἰκόνι θεοῦ ἐποίησα τὸν ἄνθρωπον The lex talionis on homicide is grounded in the divine image (εἰκών), the first occurrence of this term since Gen 1:26–27. The LXX uses εἰκών (not ὁμοίωσις, which rendered דְּמוּת at 1:26) for the image here, establishing εἰκών as the primary LXX term for imago Dei. The theological claim is that murder is not merely a social crime but an ontological offence against the Creator, since every human person is God's image-bearer. This verse is the ground of Paul's anthropology in 1 Cor 11:7 and Col 3:10.
9:22 εἶδεν Χαμ τὴν γύμνωσιν τοῦ πατρὸς αὐτοῦ The text says only that Ham 'saw' — it does not specify further. The Levitical code uses 'uncover the nakedness of' (ἀποκαλύψαι τὴν ἀσχημοσύνην) as a euphemism for sexual violation (Lev 18:6–19), and some interpreters read Ham's act as a sexual transgression. The LXX preserves the narrative's studied ambiguity — neither confirming nor denying the more serious interpretation. The deliberate contrast with Shem and Japheth's ὀπισθοφανῶς (backward-facing, v.23) highlights that looking at the nakedness is the moral failure, whatever its precise nature.
9:25 παῖς οἰκέτης — household slave The curse falls on Χανααν, not on Χαμ the transgressor. The LXX renders the single Hebrew עֶבֶד ('slave') with the double term παῖς οἰκέτης in v.25, emphasising both the servile and the domestic-household dimension of the cursed status. Verses 25, 26, and 27 each end with a Canaan-servitude clause, creating a threefold curse pattern. The theological and political use of this text to justify the domination and displacement of Canaanite peoples is well documented in both Jewish and Christian tradition; the LXX, by preserving the MT's focus on Canaan rather than Ham, participates in and reinforces that tradition.
9:27 πλατύναι ὁ θεὸς τῷ Ιαφεθ — the lost Hebrew wordplay The Hebrew blessing יַפְתְּ אֱלֹהִים לְיֶפֶת ('may God enlarge Japheth') is a paronomasia on the name יֶפֶת (Japheth): the verb יַפְתְּ ('enlarge') sounds like the name. The LXX renders with πλατύναι ὁ θεὸς τῷ Ιαφεθ ('may God broaden for Japheth'), using πλατύνω ('to broaden / make wide') for the semantic content of expansion. However, πλατύνω bears no phonological resemblance to Ιαφεθ; the Greek reader receives no hint of the pun. This is a case where the LXX translator chose meaning over sound — a legitimate and common choice, but the result is that the literary artistry of the Hebrew source is invisible in the Greek. Additionally, κατοικησάτω ἐν τοῖς οἴκοις τοῦ Σημ ('let him dwell in the houses of Shem', v.27) is ambiguous: the subject could be Japheth (his peoples will dwell among Shem's descendants) or God (patristic reading: God will dwell in the tents of Shem — a prophecy of the Incarnation among the Semitic peoples, exploited by Justin Martyr and Irenaeus).
10:8–9 γίγας κυνηγός ἐναντίον κυρίου The LXX renders Hebrew גִּבֹּר ('mighty warrior') as γίγας ('giant') — the same word used for the Nephilim at 6:4. This is an interpretive amplification, not a translation of a different Hebrew Vorlage: the LXX translator(s) chose γίγας deliberately, linking Nimrod to the antediluvian giant-tradition and suggesting the γίγαντες-problem survived the flood through Noah's Hamite line. The phrase ἐναντίον κυρίου ('before the LORD') is also ambiguous — it can be a superlative ('mighty before God' = extraordinarily mighty) or adversarial ('against the LORD'); the LXX adds τοῦ θεοῦ in v.9a, making the divine name doubly explicit, while the proverbial form in v.9b retains the concise κυρίου alone. Rabbinic and patristic tradition generally read the phrase adversarially, connecting Nimrod to the Babel rebellion.
10:10 Βαβυλών (= בָּבֶל) The LXX uses Βαβυλών as the standard rendering of both בָּבֶל and בָּבִיל throughout. This anticipates ch.11 where the same city is named aetiologically (11:9: 'therefore its name was called Babel'); the verbal link establishes Nimrod as the founder of the Babel project — a connection made explicit in later Jewish tradition (Josephus, Ant. 1.4.2–3; Pseudo-Philo; rabbinic midrash) though left implicit in the text itself.
10:22–24 Καιναν (LXX addition) The MT of Gen 10:22 lists five sons of Shem; the LXX adds Καιναν as a sixth son and then (at 10:24) inserts him as a generation between Arphaxad and Shelah. This extra Cainan is the LXX's most significant divergence from the MT in this chapter. It reappears in Gen 11:12–13 LXX (where Arphaxad begets Cainan, who begets Shelah) and is followed by Luke 3:36 in the genealogy of Jesus (Luke alone among NT genealogies includes 'son of Cainan, son of Arphaxad' — absent from Matt 1). The origin of this LXX Cainan is uncertain: it may derive from a Hebrew variant, from confusion with the antediluvian Cainan of Gen 5:9–14, or from a deliberate genealogical harmonization.
10:25 Φαλεκ / διεμερίσθη ἡ γῆ The name-etymology for Peleg is the chapter's only explicit word-play: Φαλεκ (= פֶּלֶג, 'division') because διεμερίσθη ἡ γῆ ('the earth was divided'). The LXX renders the pun accurately with διαμερίζω. The 'division of the earth' most naturally refers to the Babel event of ch.11, making Peleg a chronological anchor for that narrative. The divine-passive (διεμερίσθη — the earth was divided by God) anticipates the theological framing of both the diaspora-formula (v.32) and the Babel account. Notably, the same verb (διαμερίζω) appears in Acts 2:3 for the divided tongues of fire at Pentecost — the reversal of Babel — making the Φαλεκ wordplay a deep intertextual node.
10:19 Σοδομα καὶ Γομορρα The cities of the plain appear here in a neutral boundary-description of Canaan's territory, before their destruction in ch.19. The LXX makes no comment; the reader familiar with the rest of Genesis feels the anticipatory irony. The couplet Σοδομα καὶ Γομορρα becomes the fixed LXX formula for paradigmatic divine judgment (cited in Isa 1:9 LXX = Rom 9:29; Amos 4:11; and developed throughout NT and patristic literature).
11:1 χεῖλος ἕν The LXX renders Hebrew שָׂפָה ('lip') as χεῖλος ('lip/edge') rather than the natural Greek γλῶσσα ('tongue') or διάλεκτος, preserving the physiological Hebraism intact; the word recurs at vv.6, 7, 9, creating a lexical ring around the episode. The choice is significant: it foregrounds the body-language connection and marks the translation as deliberately literal in its register.
11:7 δεῦτε … συγχέωμεν The divine plural cohortative ('come, let us confound') mirrors the builders' own δεῦτε … πλινθεύσωμεν (v.3) and δεῦτε … οἰκοδομήσωμεν (v.4) structurally; the three δεῦτε calls (two human, one divine) form the chapter's rhetorical spine. The divine plural raises the question of God's interlocutors — Jewish tradition reads the divine council, Christian tradition has traditionally read a Trinitarian hint; the LXX (like the MT) leaves the question open.
11:9 Σύγχυσις The LXX translates rather than transliterates the city's name: MT has בָּבֶל (Babel), left as a Semitic loanword in all known Hebrew texts and related to Babylon; the LXX renders it Σύγχυσις ('Confusion') from συγχέω (used in the same verse: συνέχεεν), creating a Greek etymology. The effect is that (a) the explicit Babel/Babylon connection is severed in the LXX tradition; (b) the pun is now internal to the Greek (Σύγχυσις / συνέχεεν) rather than dependent on Hebrew phonology; (c) readers of the LXX who encounter Babylon in the prophets or Revelation will not automatically connect it with this city named 'Confusion.' This is one of the most discussed translation choices in LXX Genesis.
11:12–13 The second Kainan MAJOR CRUX: The LXX inserts a second Kainan (Καιναν) as the son of Arphaxad, absent from the MT (which has Shelah as Arphaxad's direct son) and absent from the Samaritan Pentateuch. Arphaxad begets Kainan at age 135; Kainan lives 130 years and begets Sala; Kainan lives a further 330 years, begets other children, and dies. This second Kainan (entirely post-flood, son of Arphaxad) is the figure Luke 3:36 includes in his genealogy of Jesus: 'the son of Kainan, the son of Arphaxad, the son of Shem' — one of the clearest demonstrations that Luke was using the LXX tradition rather than the MT. His origin is debated: a genuine variant Vorlage? Early scribal addition influenced by the pre-flood Kainan of Gen 5? A deliberate LXX harmonizing move to make post-flood lifespans parallel pre-flood ones? The question remains open; his full genealogical entry (age at fathering, remaining years, death notice) in the LXX is an LXX-only feature of the canonical text.
11:28 / 11:31 χώρα τῶν Χαλδαίων The LXX renders Hebrew אוּר כַּשְׂדִּים ('Ur of the Chaldeans') as ἐν τῇ χώρᾳ τῶν Χαλδαίων ('in the land of the Chaldeans'), omitting the city-name Ur entirely and replacing it with a regional designation. This rendering occurs three times in the chapter (vv.28, 31 ×2). Stephen's speech in Acts 7:2–4 apparently knows the tradition of departure from Ur and frames it theologically, but uses a slightly different account; the LXX's rendering makes the homeland a region rather than a specific city, which may reflect uncertainty about the location of Ur or a deliberate generalizing tendency in the translation.
11:30 στεῖρα / οὐκ ἐτεκνοποίει The double barrenness notice for Sarai (predicate adjective στεῖρα plus the negative imperfect οὐκ ἐτεκνοποίει) is emphatic beyond the MT; the LXX's added second clause foregrounds the theological problem that will dominate the Abraham cycle. στεῖρα echoes Isa 54:1 LXX (εὐφράνθητι στεῖρα), which Paul deploys in Gal 4:27 in his allegory of the two sons of Abraham — giving this Genesis verse an NT trajectory through the Isaianic text.
12:3 ἐνευλογηθήσονται ἐν σοί The niphal וְנִבְרְכוּ ('shall be blessed' or 'shall bless themselves') is rendered by the LXX with the passive future ἐνευλογηθήσονται, effectively choosing the passive reading over the reflexive-reciprocal. This is the LXX's most consequential lexical decision in Genesis 12: Paul cites the passive directly in Gal 3:8 (ἐνευλογηθήσονται ἐν σοί πάντα τὰ ἔθνη) as scriptural proof that God always intended to justify the Gentiles by faith, and Peter quotes it in Acts 3:25. The further shift from LXX φυλαί ('tribes/clans') to Paul's ἔθνη ('nations/Gentiles') extends the universal scope to the full Gentile world.
12:1 Ἔξελθε / לֶךְ-לְךָ The Hebrew לֶךְ-לְךָ carries a reflexive-emphatic dimension ('go for yourself / go to your benefit') that the LXX's aorist imperative Ἔξελθε does not reproduce. Hebrews 11:8 cites the departure as the exemplar of faith (ὑπήκουσεν ἐξελθεῖν), emphasizing the non-knowledge of the destination (μὴ ἐπιστάμενος ποῦ ἔρχεται) — a dimension the LXX preserves in δείξω ('I will show you') of v.1. Acts 7:2–4 quotes the call narrative with ἐκ τῆς γῆς σου, closely following LXX wording.
12:7 τῷ σπέρματί σου (singular) The land promise is addressed to the singular σπέρμα ('seed') rather than a plural form. This is the grammatical crux that Paul exploits in Gal 3:16: 'He does not say "seeds," as of many, but "seed," as of one, who is Christ.' The singular was already in the LXX and the Hebrew (זֶרַע is grammatically collective); Paul's argument is that the singular number is not incidental but christologically significant. The promise recurs in identical form at Gen 13:15; 15:18; 17:8.
12:17 ἐτασμοῖς μεγάλοις καὶ πονηροῖς The figura etymologica ἤτασεν … ἐτασμοῖς ('afflicted with afflictions') renders Hebrew נֶגַע / נָגַע, the standard plague vocabulary. The same root reappears throughout the Exodus plague narratives (Exod 11:1; 12:13 LXX), making this verse a deliberate verbal type of the Exodus: Pharaoh struck by divine plagues on account of an Israelite woman anticipates Pharaoh struck by divine plagues on account of the people of Israel. The literary connection between the Abraham-Egypt episode and the Exodus is widely recognised in both Jewish and early Christian exegesis.
12:20 συμπροπέμψαι The rare double compound σύν-προ-πέμπω ('escort together, convoy') is richer than the Hebrew וַיְשַׁלְּחוּ ('they sent away'). The LXX's choice elevates the expulsion to a formal military escort — Abram leaves Egypt not as a fugitive but with a guard of honour. The verb contributes to the ironic reversal that closes the chapter: Abram entered Egypt in fear of death, and exits enriched, wife restored, and ceremonially escorted.
13:10 ὡς ὁ παράδεισος τοῦ θεοῦ The LXX's rendering of the Jordan plain as 'like the paradise of God' (παράδεισος τοῦ θεοῦ) is the chapter's most significant literary-theological crux. παράδεισος is the same word used in Gen 2–3 LXX for the Garden of Eden; by applying it to the Jordan plain Lot sees, the narrator creates an ironic intertextual echo: Lot's visual survey and choice (εἶδεν … ἐξελέξατο, vv.10–11) mirrors Eve's survey and choice (εἶδεν … ἔλαβεν, Gen 3:6) of what appeared καλόν. The parenthetical 'before God overthrew Sodom and Gomorrah' (πρὸ τοῦ καταστρέψαι τὸν θεὸν Σοδομα καὶ Γομορρα) makes the tragic irony explicit from the narrator's post-destruction vantage point. The MT has כְּגַן יְהוָה כְּאֶרֶץ מִצְרַיִם ('like the garden of the LORD, like the land of Egypt'), using גַּן (garden) rather than the LXX's specific paradise/Eden term.
13:13 πονηροὶ καὶ ἁμαρτωλοὶ ἐναντίον τοῦ θεοῦ σφόδρα The verbless sentence rendering the Sodomites' moral character is more emphatic in the LXX than the MT. The double predicate πονηροί ('evil') + ἁμαρτωλοί ('sinners') translates the Hebrew pair רָעִים וְחַטָּאִים but the intensifier σφόδρα ('exceedingly') and the addition ἐναντίον τοῦ θεοῦ ('before God') gives the verdict a directly theological character absent from a flat moral description. The phrase 'before God' (לַיהוָה in MT) is translated with θεοῦ rather than κυρίου here — one of several switches between the divine names in this chapter reflecting the underlying Hebrew source text's alternation between יְהוָה and אֱלֹהִים.
13:15 σοὶ δώσω αὐτὴν καὶ τῷ σπέρματί σου ἕως τοῦ αἰῶνος The seed-promise of 13:15 uses the singular collective σπέρμα ('seed/offspring'), which in Greek can be read either as a true collective ('all your descendants') or as a singular individual referent. Paul exploits this ambiguity in Gal 3:16, arguing that the promise was made 'to Abraham and to his seed (σπέρματι) — it does not say to seeds (σπέρμασιν), as of many, but as of one — and to your seed, who is Christ.' Whether or not this is the original intent of the LXX, Paul's argument depends on the LXX wording; the Greek σπέρμα here is the word on which the entire Galatian argument about the Abrahamic covenant and Christ turns.
13:16 ὡς τὴν ἄμμον τῆς γῆς The LXX renders the MT's עֲפַר הָאָרֶץ ('dust of the earth') with ἄμμον τῆς γῆς ('sand of the earth'), substituting sand for dust. The Hebrew dust-simile (כַּעֲפַר) is unique to Gen 13:16 in the Abrahamic promises; the parallel promises use stars (15:5; 22:17) and sand (22:17; 32:12). The LXX choice of ἄμμος may reflect a harmonising impulse toward the sand-simile of 22:17 and 32:12, or may reflect a different Hebrew Vorlage; it is not a translation error but a deliberate lexical decision.
13:18 παρὰ τὴν δρῦν τὴν Μαμβρη The most discussed text-critical issue of the chapter: the LXX reads singular ἡ δρῦς ἡ Μαμβρη ('the oak of Mamre') throughout Gen 13:18 and 14:13, while the MT has the plural construct בְּאֵלֹנֵי מַמְרֵא ('at the oaks/terebinths of Mamre'). The Hebrew אֵלוֹן can mean 'large tree / oak / terebinth' and its plural may denote a sacred grove. The LXX's singular δρῦς ('oak-tree') implies either a different Hebrew Vorlage (singular בְּאֵלוֹן or בְּאֵלָה), a deliberate interpretation, or a stylistic preference for a single landmark. The distinction matters topographically and theologically: the MT tradition may preserve memory of a sacred grove (cf. the 'oaks of Moreh' at 12:6), while the LXX focuses the geography on a single identifiable tree. Josephus (Ant. 1.186) also locates the narrative at 'the oak of Mambre.'
14:18 Μελχισεδεκ βασιλεὺς Σαλήμ, ἱερεὺς τοῦ θεοῦ τοῦ ὑψίστου Melchizedek appears without genealogy, birth, or death notice — a narrative gap that Hebrews 7:3 exploits ('without father, without mother, without genealogy, having neither beginning of days nor end of life, but resembling the Son of God'). His dual role as both βασιλεύς and ἱερεύς is unique in the OT priestly system, which separates the offices. Salem is universally read as Jerusalem (Josephus, Ant. 1.180; Ps 75:3 LXX). The bread and wine (ἄρτους καὶ οἶνον) attracted eucharistic typology from Cyprian of Carthage onward (Ep. 63.4). The entire pericope (vv.18–20) is the exegetical engine of Hebrews 5–7 and undergirds Ps 109:4 LXX as the messianic oracle ('you are a priest forever according to the order of Melchizedek').
14:13 τῷ περάτῃ The LXX renders Hebrew הָעִבְרִי ('the Hebrew') as τῷ περάτῃ — 'the one who crossed over' — an etymological translation unique in the Pentateuch. עִבְרִי derives from עָבַר ('to cross / pass over'), and the LXX has chosen interpretation over transliteration, making Abram's ethnic/national designation into a typological description of his identity as the Euphrates-crosser (cf. Josh 24:2: 'your ancestors lived beyond the River'). The title is never used again in the LXX for Abram or the Hebrews and does not reappear in the NT.
14:19–20 ὃς ἔκτισεν τὸν οὐρανὸν καὶ τὴν γῆν The LXX renders Hebrew קֹנֵה שָׁמַיִם וָאָרֶץ with κτίζω ('create') rather than with κτάομαι ('possess/acquire'). The Hebrew root קנה can mean both, and the LXX's choice here — one of the earliest creation-theology uses of κτίζω — shapes the Greek understanding of El Elyon as creator of all things, not merely their possessor. The formula ὃς ἔκτισεν τὸν οὐρανὸν καὶ τὴν γῆν is repeated verbatim in Abram's oath (v.22), sealing the theological identification.
14:14 ἠρίθμησεν … τριακοσίους δέκα καὶ ὀκτώ The LXX renders Hebrew וַיָּרֶק ('drew out / armed') as ἠρίθμησεν ('numbered'), creating a formal muster-count of 318. The patristic numerological tradition (Barnabas 9:7–8; Clement of Alexandria, Strom. 6.11) reads ΤΙΗ as the cross (τ = 300) and the name of Jesus (ΙΗ = 18 = Ἰησοῦς), making Abram's fighting force a christological cipher. The number 318 also attracted Pythagorean and Stoic commentary.
14:22 κύριος ὁ θεὸς ὁ ὕψιστος (LXX addition of κύριος) The Hebrew of v.22 reads only אֵל עֶלְיוֹן (El Elyon / God Most High), without the divine name YHWH. The LXX adds κύριος before τὸν θεὸν τὸν ὕψιστον, explicitly identifying the covenant God with Melchizedek's God — a theological interpretive move that resolves any potential ambiguity about whether Abram and Melchizedek serve the same deity. This addition may reflect a theological tradition rather than a variant Hebrew Vorlage.
14:11 ἵππον for רְכֻשׁ ('property') The LXX uses ἵππος ('horse') three times in the chapter (vv.11, 16, 21) to render Hebrew רְכֻשׁ ('movable property / possessions'). This is a striking semantic extension — ἵππος normally means 'horse' — possibly reflecting a military-register use of ἵππος for 'mounted equipment / gear,' or a translation error. The same unusual use appears at Gen 12:16 LXX. The translational oddity is consistent across all three occurrences, suggesting a deliberate or consistent choice rather than a scribal error.
14:23 εἰ ἀπὸ σπαρτίου ἕως σφαιρωτῆρος ὑποδήματος The oath form εἰ + future indicative is the LXX negative oath formula: 'if I take [may God punish me]' = 'I swear I will not take.' The aposiopesis (the curse-apodosis is left unexpressed) is a standard ancient Near Eastern oath convention. The merism 'from a thread to a sandal-strap' parallels the sandal imagery of John 1:27 (the strap of whose sandal I am not worthy to loose), though the NT connection is implicit rather than explicit.
15:6 ἐλογίσθη αὐτῷ εἰς δικαιοσύνην The LXX passive ἐλογίσθη ('it was reckoned / credited') renders the MT active וַיַּחְשְׁבֶהָ ('[YHWH] reckoned it to him'), shifting the grammatical subject into a divine passive and positioning God as the gracious agent of imputation; τῷ θεῷ renders בַּיהוָה ('in YHWH'), and εἰς δικαιοσύνην renders לִצְדָקָה ('as / for righteousness'). All three NT citations (Rom 4:3; Gal 3:6; Jas 2:23) quote the LXX form exactly; Paul's entire argument in Romans 4 exploits the passive voice and the chronological sequence (Abram reckoned righteous while still uncircumcised, before Gen 17). James uses the same verse to argue that Abraham's faith was demonstrated genuine by his action in Gen 22 — a complementary rather than contradictory reading.
15:2 υἱὸς Μασεκ τῆς οἰκογενοῦς μου, οὗτος Δαμασκὸς Ελιεζερ The LXX renders the notoriously obscure Hebrew וּבֶן־מֶשֶׁק בֵּיתִי הוּא דַּמֶּשֶׂק אֱלִיעֶזֶר by reading the hapax מֶשֶׁק as a proper name Μασεκ — unique in the Greek Bible. The Hebrew מֶשֶׁק (possibly 'possession / management' or a personal name) is uncertain; Targum Onkelos, Peshitta, Aquila, Symmachus, and Jerome all differ. The LXX's choice to read Μασεκ as a named person (possibly a mother or household manager whose son Eliezer has become heir-presumptive) is an interpretive decision without textual parallel elsewhere; the theological point is clear: the default heir is a foreign-born slave — the very situation God's promise of v.4 overrides.
15:13 τετρακόσια ἔτη The prophecy of 400 years of sojourn and affliction is quoted (with minor adjustment) at Acts 7:6 in Stephen's speech, making it a pivot of the NT retelling of Israelite history. The LXX figure of 400 years differs from the 430 years of Exod 12:40 (the duration of the Egyptian stay alone), probably because Gen 15:13 measures the full period of sojourning in a foreign land beginning from Abraham's arrival in Canaan (Gen 12); Paul's 430 years at Gal 3:17 follows Exod 12:40 LXX and counts only the Egyptian period — the discrepancy reflects different starting points rather than a textual error.
15:17 κλίβανος καπνιζόμενος καὶ λαμπάδες πυρός The smoking furnace and torches of fire are the sole divine party to pass between the covenant-halves (αἳ διῆλθον ἀνὰ μέσον τῶν διχοτομημάτων), making this a unilateral divine self-commitment rather than a bilateral oath — God binds himself alone, invoking the fate of the divided animals upon himself if he breaks the covenant. The imagery anticipates the Sinai smoke and fire (Exod 19:18 LXX) and the wilderness pillar of cloud and fire (Exod 13:21); Paul's argument in Gal 3:15–18 that the Abrahamic covenant cannot be annulled by the Law given 430 years later implicitly depends on this unilateral structure.
15:18 διέθετο κύριος τῷ Αβραμ διαθήκην The covenant-making formula uses the LXX's standard verb for covenant-cutting (διατίθημι rendering כָּרַת בְּרִית) and introduces the word διαθήκη — rendered 'covenant' in its primary OT sense but exploited in the NT as 'testament / will' (Heb 9:15–17; Gal 3:15). The LXX's choice of διαθήκη over συνθήκη ('bilateral agreement') consistently represents the Hebrew בְּרִית when God is the covenanting party, preserving the unilateral-grant character; the land-boundary formula from the river of Egypt to the Euphrates represents the maximum idealized extent of Israelite territory, achieved under Solomon (1 Kgs 4:21) and carried forward as eschatological promise.
16:7 εὗρεν δὲ αὐτὴν ἄγγελος κυρίου The first appearance of the ἄγγελος κυρίου in the LXX is here at Gen 16:7 — a figure who speaks in the divine first person ('I will multiply your seed,' 16:10) and whom Hagar names as God himself (16:13). The identity of the angel has generated continuous debate: Justin Martyr (Dial. 56–60) and Philo (De Somn. 1.232) identified him as the pre-incarnate Logos; Origen distinguished him as a created intermediary; rabbinic tradition varied. The NT never cites this verse directly but the pattern of divine-angelic identification underlies the christophany tradition (cf. 1 Cor 10:4; Jude 5). The theological weight rests on the fact that one who is described as an angel (ἄγγελος) speaks and acts as the LORD himself — the same ambiguity that runs through all the ἄγγελος κυρίου appearances in the Pentateuch.
16:10 Πληθύνων πληθυνῶ τὸ σπέρμα σου The cognate-participle construction Πληθύνων πληθυνῶ is a direct LXX Hebraism of the Hebrew infinitive-absolute intensification formula (רַבָּה אַרְבֶּה — 'multiplying I will multiply'). The LXX consistently calques this Hebrew idiom rather than rendering it idiomatically (e.g., 'I will certainly multiply'), preserving the rhythmic emphasis of the Hebrew at the cost of natural Greek idiom. The promise formula is structurally identical to the Abrahamic seed-promises at 22:17 (πληθύνων πληθυνῶ τὸ σπέρμα σου) — a deliberate theological equivalence: the slave woman Hagar receives the same formal promise-speech as Abraham.
16:11 ἐπήκουσεν κύριος τῇ ταπεινώσει σου The etymological explanation of the name Ισμαηλ ('God has heard') focuses on ταπείνωσις — 'humiliation / affliction / lowliness' — rather than on mere distress or pain. The LXX's choice of ταπείνωσις (rendering Hebrew עֳנִי) is theologically pointed: it designates Hagar's social status as a subjected slave, not merely her emotional state. The root ταπειν- is also the virtue-language of the NT (Phil 2:3, 8 — Christ ἐταπείνωσεν ἑαυτόν; Luke 1:48 — the Magnificat's ταπείνωσιν τῆς δούλης αὐτοῦ, in deliberate allusion to Hagar's condition).
16:12 ἄγροικος ἄνθρωπος The Hebrew פֶּרֶא אָדָם ('wild-ass of a man') is a striking zoological metaphor for undomesticated independence; the LXX renders it as ἄγροικος ἄνθρωπος — 'a wild / rustic man,' one who lives in the open field (ἀγρός). The LXX has replaced the animal metaphor with a social one, softening the image but also interpreting it: Ishmael is not a beast but a man who lives outside civilization. The shift has exegetical consequences — it removes the dehumanizing implication of the Hebrew while preserving the oracle's force as a prophecy of hostile independence.
16:13 Σύ ὁ θεὸς ὁ ἐπιδών με Hagar's name for God — 'You are the God who looked upon me' — is theologically remarkable on multiple levels. First, a woman names God — unique in the OT. Second, the slave woman who was seen by no one (she fled unnoticed) confesses that God saw her: the one who was ἐναντίον ('before') no one (v.4) is ἐνώπιον ('before the face of') God (v.13). Third, the LXX's rendering of the theophanic name uses ἐπιδών (aorist participle of ἐπιοράω), 'who looked down upon me,' which in the LXX can denote divine attention to human suffering (cf. ἐπεῖδεν at Exod 2:25; 1 Sam 1:11). The crux is the Hebrew behind the name: בְּאֵר לַחַי רֹאִי ('well of the living one who sees me') is the etiology of 16:14; at 16:13 the LXX renders differently, producing two distinct explanations of the same theological encounter.
16:14 Φρέαρ οὗ ἐνώπιον εἶδον The LXX's well-name 'the well of him whom I saw face to face' is an interpretive rendering of Hebrew בְּאֵר לַחַי רֹאִי ('well of the living one who sees me'). The Hebrew name evokes the divine epithet 'the living one who sees' (לַחַי רֹאִי); the LXX's version focuses instead on Hagar's act of seeing (εἶδον) — 'of him whom I saw' — making her the active beholder rather than the passive object of divine vision. This is one of the most notable LXX/MT divergences in the chapter and reflects the LXX translator's consistent interest in the mutuality of seeing (ἐπιδών / εἶδον / ὁρῶντος) that threads through vv.13–14.
17:1 εὐαρέστει ἐναντίον ἐμοῦ The LXX renders MT הִתְהַלֵּךְ לְפָנַי ('walk before me') as 'be well-pleasing before me,' replacing the spatial-locomotion idiom with the relational-moral εὐαρεστέω and suppressing the divine title El Shaddai (שַׁדַּי), substituting ὁ θεός σου. Crucially, εὐαρεστέω is the verb used of Enoch (5:22, 24: εὐηρέστησεν Ενωχ τῷ θεῷ) and Noah (6:9 LXX), placing Abraham in the lineage of antediluvian exemplars of divine acceptance; Heb 11:5–6 exploits the Enoch connection.
17:5 πατέρα πολλῶν ἐθνῶν τέθεικά σε Quoted verbatim at Rom 4:17 and alluded to at Gal 3:8 as the scriptural warrant for Gentile inclusion. The perfect τέθεικά ('I have set') frames the appointment as an already-accomplished divine act of irrevocable force — God speaks of the covenant grant as done, before a single Gentile has believed. This is the exegetical premise of Paul's entire argument in Rom 4 that Abraham is 'father of us all' (Rom 4:16).
17:7 εἶναί σου θεός The covenant-relationship formula ('to be your God') renders Hebrew לִהְיוֹת לְךָ לֵאלֹהִים; the LXX's articular infinitive makes the covenant content explicit — the covenant IS defined as God's being Abraham's God. The fuller form (I will be their God / they will be my people) runs through Jeremiah, Ezekiel, and is fulfilled in Rev 21:3; the LXX of Gen 17:7 is its first full articulation.
17:11 σημεῖον διαθήκης Paul cites the semiotic status of circumcision at Rom 4:11 (σημεῖον ἔλαβεν περιτομῆς σφραγῖδα τῆς δικαιοσύνης — 'he received the sign of circumcision as a seal of righteousness'), arguing that the sign confirms faith already received, not its basis. The LXX's σημεῖον language is Paul's precise exegetical resource; the sign-logic parallels the rainbow covenant (Gen 9:12–13).
17:12 παιδίον ὀκτὼ ἡμερῶν The eighth-day rule is cited at Luke 2:21 (Jesus circumcised ὅτε ἐπλήσθησαν ἡμέραι ὀκτώ — 'when eight days were fulfilled') and at Phil 3:5 (Paul: περιτομῇ ὀκταήμερος — 'circumcised on the eighth day') as the mark of full covenant standing. The number eight carried no explicit meaning in the text itself, but later Christian tradition associated it with new creation (the eighth day beyond the week of creation), an interpretation already implicit in Paul's contrast of circumcision-in-flesh with circumcision-of-the-heart.
17:14 ἐξολεθρευθήσεται ἡ ψυχὴ ἐκείνη The LXX renders the karet formula (כָּרַת Niphal, 'be cut off') with the stronger ἐξολεθρεύω ('utterly destroy'), intensifying the penalty beyond the Hebrew; the resulting phrase ἡ ψυχὴ ἐκείνη ἐκ τοῦ γένους αὐτῆς became the standard LXX formula for covenantal excision (cf. Acts 3:23 allusion). The precise nature of karet — divine death penalty, premature death, communal exclusion, or eschatological annihilation — was debated in Second Temple Judaism; the LXX's ἐξολεθρεύω ('destroy utterly') pushes toward the most severe end.
17:17 ἐγέλασεν Abraham's interior laughter (εἶπεν ἐν τῇ καρδίᾳ αὐτοῦ — 'said in his heart') is not censured by God, unlike Sarah's laughter at 18:12–15 where she is rebuked for denying it. The different treatment has generated extensive comment: some interpreters read both as faith-laughter (astonished joy); others read both as doubt but note that only Sarah's is publicly denied. The LXX narrates Abraham's laughter without evaluation, making it the uncomplicated etymological foundation of the name Ισαακ (v.19); γελάω (LXX) renders צחק (Hebrew), the root of יִצְחָק (Isaac).
17:19 Ισαακ ... διαθήκην αἰώνιον The simultaneous naming of Isaac and designation of the covenant as αἰώνιος ('everlasting') exclusively with him (not Ishmael, who receives blessings in v.20 but not the covenant) is the exegetical crux of Paul's argument in Rom 9:7–9: 'not all who are descended from Israel are Israel ... it is not the children of the flesh who are the children of God, but the children of the promise.' The LXX's vocabulary here (αἰώνιον, σπέρματι αὐτοῦ μετ᾿ αὐτόν) is the premise of Gal 3:16's claim that 'seed' points to one descendant (Christ), and of Paul's whole distinction between promise and law.
18:2 τρεῖς ἄνδρες / singular–plural alternation The narrative introduces three men (τρεῖς ἄνδρες) but addresses them in the singular as Κύριε (v.3) and identifies the speaker as κύριος throughout (vv.10, 13, 17, 22), while using plural verbs and pronouns at other points (v.2 εἱστήκεισαν; v.5 εἶπαν; v.8 ἔφαγον; v.9 εἶπαν). The grammatical alternation is constitutive of the narrative and is without a simple naturalizing explanation. The patristic reading — Justin Martyr (Dial. 56), Origen (Hom. Gen. 4), Ambrose (De Abr. 1.5), Augustine (De Trin. 2.10–11) — takes the three as a prefiguration of the Trinity, with the singular address indicating one divine person within the three. This exegesis was crystallized visually by Andrei Rublev's icon (c.1425), in which the three angels of Mamre are the standard iconographic representation of the triune God in Eastern Orthodox theology.
18:14 μὴ ἀδυνατεῖ παρὰ τῷ θεῷ ῥῆμα; The rhetorical question expecting denial — 'Surely it is not impossible with God?' — is the chapter's theological pivot, asserting divine omnipotence over biological impossibility (Sarrha's post-menopause, v.11). The LXX rendering — μὴ ἀδυνατεῖ παρὰ τῷ θεῷ ῥῆμα; — is echoed nearly verbatim at Luke 1:37 (οὐκ ἀδυνατήσει παρὰ τοῦ θεοῦ πᾶν ῥῆμα), where Gabriel applies it to the virginal conception of Jesus. The typological link is deliberate: Luke's annunciation narrative is structured as a second fulfillment of the Sarrha-promise, placing Mary in the position of Sarrha (cf. Luke 1:36, where Elizabeth's miraculous pregnancy in old age is noted as a sign). The Greek ῥῆμα (= Hebrew דָּבָר) carries both 'word' and 'thing / matter' — 'Is any word / matter impossible with God?' — and Luke exploits both senses. The promise formula κατὰ τὸν καιρὸν τοῦτον εἰς ὥρας is cited at Rom 9:9.
18:18 ἐνευλογηθήσονται ἐν αὐτῷ πάντα τὰ ἔθνη τῆς γῆς The universal blessing formula reiterates 12:3 and 22:18. Paul cites this passage at Gal 3:8 (ἐνευλογηθήσονται ἐν σοί πάντα τὰ ἔθνη) as 'the gospel preached in advance to Abraam,' making the Gen 18:18 formula the OT foundation for his argument that the Gentiles were always within the scope of the Abraamic covenant. The compound ἐνευλογέω (= 'blessed in / through') is theologically significant: the nations are blessed not separately but ἐν αὐτῷ ('in him' / 'in connection with him'), making Abraam the mediating nexus. In Gen 18, this formula appears within the divine soliloquy on disclosure — κύριος reveals his plan to Abraam because Abraam's universal role makes him a necessary stakeholder in the divine action.
18:25 ὁ κρίνων πᾶσαν τὴν γῆν, οὐ ποιήσεις κρίσιν; 'Shall not the Judge of all the earth do right?' is the foundational OT theodicy text, used throughout later Jewish and Christian reflection on divine justice and evil. The Greek formulation is notable: Abraam uses κύριος's own judicial identity (ὁ κρίνων) as the argument — a Judge cannot by definition act unjustly; and the universal scope (πᾶσαν τὴν γῆν) makes the moral claim absolute, not merely local. The verse is cited or echoed in virtually every major theodicy discussion in the Western tradition. The irony of the intercession's outcome — Sodom is destroyed because even ten righteous could not be found (19:24–25) — does not undermine the principle; it demonstrates that κύριος acted only when the condition was definitively unmet.
19:24 καὶ κύριος ἔβρεξεν … παρὰ κυρίου — the double κύριος The verse contains two distinct κύριος subjects within a single clause: one κύριος rains (κύριος ἔβρεξεν), and the source is a second κύριος (παρὰ κυρίου ἐκ τοῦ οὐρανοῦ). Justin Martyr (Dial. 56) argues that the κύριος who rained from heaven must be the pre-incarnate Son, distinct from the κύριος who appeared to Abraham on earth; Irenaeus (A.H. 3.6.1) cites the verse as proof that two persons share the divine name; Tertullian (Prax. 13) uses it to distinguish the Father who sends from the Son who acts; Origen (Hom. Gen. 4.5) reads the two κύριοι as Father and Son in coordinated action. The Hebrew MT has the same double-יהוה structure — this is a genuine grammatical feature of the Hebrew text, not a LXX interpretive choice, making the patristic reading of the Greek exegetically warranted. The crux is the most contested verse of Genesis 19 in pre-Nicene theology.
19:26 ἐγένετο στήλη ἁλός — Lot's wife becomes a pillar of salt The nine-word verse is one of the most famous in Genesis. The command μὴ περιβλέψῃς εἰς τὰ ὀπίσω (v.17) establishes the prohibition; verse 26 records its violation with devastating brevity — she looked and became. Jesus cites her explicitly at Luke 17:32 (μνημονεύετε τῆς γυναικὸς Λώτ) as an eschatological warning: attachment to the condemned order of this age — looking back — costs the soul. Wisdom 10:7 calls the pillar 'a monument to an unbelieving soul' (μνημεῖον ψυχῆς ἀπίστου). Josephus (Ant. 1.203) claims to have seen the salt pillar himself. The Dead Sea region's salt formations (the Lisan Peninsula) have provided candidates for identification in every era of pilgrimage and exploration.
19:17 σῴζου τὴν σεαυτοῦ ψυχήν — the soul-salvation imperative The present middle imperative σῴζου ('keep saving yourself / be saved') of σῴζω deploys the LXX and NT's primary salvation word in the context of physical rescue. The collocation with ψυχήν ('save your soul / life') anticipates the NT's use of σῴζω for eschatological salvation. Luke 17:33, in the same pericope that cites Lot's wife, inverts the formula: ὃς ἐὰν ζητήσῃ τὴν ψυχὴν αὐτοῦ σῴσαι ἀπολέσει αὐτήν. The urgency pair σπεύδω / σῴζω governs the flight episode — σῴζου (19:17) and σπεῦσον (19:22) establish the eschatological-rescue register that Luke's Son-of-Man discourse will adopt wholesale.
19:20–22 Σηγωρ / μικρά — the Zoar wordplay The LXX preserves the Hebrew etymology: Lot describes the city as μικρά ('small', 19:20 — 'is she not small?'); the angel confirms it (μικρά ἐστιν, 19:21 — 'she is indeed small'); the city then receives the name Σηγωρ (19:22), transliterating Hebrew צֹעַר ('small/little'). Lot's plea for a small concession becomes the city's permanent name. The irony is complete: having negotiated so strenuously to avoid the mountain, Lot ends up there anyway (19:30) — his concession was wasted, and divine providence overrules human negotiation.
19:37–38 Μωαβ / Αμμαν — aetiological naming speeches The elder daughter's naming speech Ἐκ τοῦ πατρός μου ('from my father', v.37) derives Μωαβ from Hebrew מֵאָב; the younger's Υἱὸς τοῦ γένους μου ('son of my people', v.38) derives Αμμαν from Hebrew עַמִּי ('my people'). Both naming speeches are simultaneously etymologies and confessions — the names broadcast their incestuous origin to every subsequent reader. The aetiological formula ἕως τῆς σήμερον ἡμέρας closes both and stakes the origin narrative as explanation for two existing peoples. The Moab genealogy runs directly to Ruth (Ruth 1:4; 4:17–22) and thence to David and the line of the Messiah (Matt 1:5) — one of the NT's most pointed inversions of national stigma.
20:7 προφήτης The LXX's rendering of Hebrew נָבִיא with προφήτης marks the first occurrence of the word in the entire Septuagint — and therefore the first occurrence in the canonical Bible as the church received it. The debut is not lexically neutral: the verse simultaneously defines the prophetic office as intercessory ('he is a prophet and will PRAY for you,' καὶ προσεύξεται περὶ σοῦ). Prophecy enters Scripture not as proclamation but as intercession; the prophet's role is mediatorial prayer. This foundational definition echoes through later prophetic tradition (Moses as intercessor: Exod 32:11–13; Samuel: 1 Sam 7:5; Jeremiah: Jer 7:16) and into the NT (Rom 8:34; Heb 7:25 — Christ's perpetual intercession). Abraham's fulfillment of this role in v.17 (προσηύξατο) validates the title assigned here.
20:4 ἔθνος ἀγνοοῦν καὶ δίκαιον Abimelech's plea is one of the most theologically arresting phrases in Genesis 20 LXX. The paired attributives ἀγνοοῦν ('unknowing / acting in ignorance') and δίκαιον ('righteous / just') frame a claim to moral innocence grounded in two complementary categories: objective just conduct and subjectively innocent intention. The chapter's profound irony is that the Philistine king invokes a moral standard more consistent with genuine θεοσέβεια than Abraham himself demonstrated; God confirms both components in v.6 (ἐν καθαρᾷ καρδίᾳ … ἐφεισάμην σου). The plea echoes Abraham's own intercession for Sodom (Gen 18:23–25: 'will you destroy the righteous with the wicked?') — now inverted, with a Gentile appealing the same principle to God.
20:12 ἐκ πατρός, ἀλλ᾿ οὐκ ἐκ μητρός Abraham's disclosure that Sarah is his half-sister — same father, different mother — is the chapter's ethical crux. It supplies the legal-technical underpinning of his defense: the claim 'she is my sister' was not a lie in the strict sense. The specification raises immediate legal-ethical complications: patriarchal norms apparently permitted half-sibling marriage (cf. Gen 11:29 with traditional identifications), but the Mosaic law later prohibited it explicitly (Lev 18:9: 'the daughter of your father or the daughter of your mother, whether born at home or abroad'). Jubilees 12 attempts to resolve the tension by giving Sarah a different lineage entirely. The LXX renders the Hebrew straightforwardly without softening the disclosure.
20:16 χίλια δίδραχμα The LXX renders Hebrew אֶלֶף כֶּסֶף ('a thousand silver [pieces]') as χίλια δίδραχμα — a thousand didrachms. The didrachm (= 2 drachmas) was a standard Greek silver coin; the Hebrew shekel was a weight-unit of approximately 11.4g silver. The substitution is a transparent coinage modernization: the LXX translator replaces an archaic Semitic measurement with the Greek denomination familiar to Hellenistic readers, exactly as modern translations might render 'shekels' as 'silver coins.' The same modernizing instinct is visible elsewhere in the LXX Pentateuch. NT readers would recognize the δίδραχμον as the two-drachma temple tax (Matt 17:24).
20:18 συνέκλεισεν κύριος ἔξωθεν πᾶσαν μήτραν The closing verse deploys two striking lexical choices. First, συνέκλεισεν (compound of σύν + κλείω: 'shut together / seal completely') renders the simple Hebrew סָגַר ('close/shut') with an intensive compound that conveys total, irreversible closure — every reproductive avenue sealed shut. The same root appears in a different key in Gal 3:22–23 (συνέκλεισεν ἡ γραφὴ τὰ πάντα ὑπὸ ἁμαρτίαν). Second, ἔξωθεν ('from without / from outside') is a LXX addition with no direct Hebrew counterpart: it specifies that the closure was imposed externally by divine agency, not merely a natural condition of barrenness. Together, the two words declare the sterility to be total, God-imposed, and therefore reversible only by God — which is exactly what v.17 records. The single shift from ὁ θεός (throughout the chapter) to κύριος here is also significant: the narrator uses the covenant name to signal that the womb-closure was covenantally motivated, in defense of the woman who carries the promise-lineage.
21:1 ἐπεσκέψατο The LXX visitation verb ἐπισκέπτομαι renders Hebrew פקד (pāqad), which can mean 'visit, attend to, muster, punish'; in 21:1 the meaning is positive — divine attendance producing the promised birth. The same form governs Luke 1:68 (the Benedictus: εὐλόγητος κύριος ὁ θεὸς τοῦ Ἰσραήλ, ὅτι ἐπεσκέψατο καὶ ἐποίησεν λύτρωσιν τῷ λαῷ αὐτοῦ) and Luke 7:16 (ἐπεσκέψατο ὁ θεὸς τὸν λαὸν αὐτοῦ), indicating that the Lucan infancy narrative deliberately frames the birth of John and the ministry of Jesus in vocabulary borrowed from Genesis 21:1 LXX; NT echo: Luke 1:68; 7:16.
21:6 γέλωτά μοι ἐποίησεν κύριος The statement 'the LORD has made laughter for me' renders Hebrew שחק עשה לי and contains the etymological key to the name Isaac (יצחק = 'he laughs' from the root צחק / שחק). The LXX transliteration Ισαακ encodes the same root. Sarah's laughter has moved from incredulous denial (18:12–15) to joyful proclamation, and the child's name marks the transformation. Paul alludes to the Isaanic birth in Gal 4:28–29 (κατὰ Ισαακ ἐπαγγελίας τέκνα ἐσμέν).
21:9 παίζοντα The participial form of παίζω ('play') renders Hebrew מצחק (piʿel of צחק), the same root as the name Isaac (יצחק). The LXX adds μετὰ Ισαακ τοῦ υἱοῦ αὐτῆς (absent from MT), clarifying the scene as Ishmael playing with Isaac and heightening the possessive tension that triggers Sarah's demand. Whether the Hebrew piʿel here means merely 'playing' or 'mocking / sporting' is debated; the LXX παίζω takes the neutral sense. The name-pun is a narrative crux: Ishmael 'laughing/playing' — the very act named in Isaac — is what provokes his expulsion.
21:10 Ἔκβαλε τὴν παιδίσκην ταύτην καὶ τὸν υἱὸν αὐτῆς Paul quotes this command verbatim at Gal 4:30 (λέγει γὰρ ἡ γραφή, Ἔκβαλε τὴν παιδίσκην καὶ τὸν υἱὸν αὐτῆς) in his allegory of the two covenants: Hagar = Sinai = slavery = the present Jerusalem; Sarah = the new covenant = freedom = the Jerusalem above. Paul's application reads the LXX typologically, identifying the heirs of promise (κατὰ Ισαακ) as those born of the free woman, and the Mosaic Torah-keepers as those who must be cast out. The LXX text is the exegetical engine of Gal 4:21–31.
21:12 ἐν Ισαακ κληθήσεταί σοι σπέρμα God's restriction of the seed-promise to the Isaanic line is cited at Rom 9:7 (οὐδ᾿ ὅτι εἰσὶν σπέρμα Ἀβραάμ, πάντες τέκνα, ἀλλ᾿ ἐν Ισαακ κληθήσεταί σοι σπέρμα) and Heb 11:18 (πρὸς ὃν ἐλαλήθη ὅτι ἐν Ισαακ κληθήσεταί σοι σπέρμα). Paul's argument in Rom 9 depends on this LXX text to establish that 'not all of Abraham' is Israel — election runs through the promise to Isaac, not through natural descent. The divine passive κληθήσεταί ('will be called') is a passive of divine agency: God names the legitimate seed-line.
21:17 εἰσήκουσεν ὁ θεὸς τῆς φωνῆς τοῦ παιδίου The divine hearing of the child's voice enacts the etymology of the name ישמעאל (Yišmāʿēʾl = 'God hears'), given by the angel at 16:11 (ὅτι ἐπήκουσεν κύριος τῇ ταπεινώσει σου). The same root εἰσακούω / ἐπακούω marks both the naming (16:11) and the fulfillment (21:17). The child is never named in the wilderness scene; the unnamed boy's name is the narrative's implicit pun throughout vv.15–19. The angel's assurance μὴ φοβοῦ ('do not fear') uses the standard theophanic comfort formula (cf. Luke 1:30; 2:10; Rev 1:17).
21:31 Φρέαρ ὁρκισμοῦ The LXX translates rather than transliterates the place-name Beersheba (Hebrew באר שבע = 'well of the seven' or 'well of the oath'). The Hebrew root שבע can mean both 'seven' and 'swear/oath' — the seven ewe-lambs of vv.28–30 play on the 'seven' sense, and the covenant oath plays on the 'oath' sense. The LXX chooses Φρέαρ ὁρκισμοῦ ('Well of the Oath'), foregrounding the oath-etymology and suppressing the number-seven pun. This interpretive choice makes the etymology immediately legible to Greek readers but loses the dual meaning. Contrast Gen 26:33 LXX where some manuscript traditions transliterate as Βηρσαβεε alongside the translation.
21:33 ἄρουραν / θεὸς αἰώνιος Two lexical cruxes in the closing verse. (1) ἄρουρα normally means 'ploughed field / arable land' but here renders Hebrew אֵשֶׁל (ʾēšel), almost certainly a tamarisk tree (Tamarix aphylla), a large shade tree planted as a permanent landmark in the Negev; the LXX rendering ἄρουραν is widely regarded as a mistranslation or alternative interpretation, and most modern versions translate 'tamarisk.' (2) θεὸς αἰώνιος renders El Olam (אֵל עֹולָם = 'God of eternity / the Everlasting God'); this divine title occurs only here in Genesis LXX; it pairs the eternal character of God with the covenant enacted at this permanent site; cf. Rom 16:26 (τῷ δὲ δυναμένῳ ὑμᾶς στηρίξαι ... μόνῳ σοφῷ θεῷ ... ᾧ ἡ δόξα εἰς τοὺς αἰῶνας, ἀμήν), where Paul uses αἰώνιος-register language in his doxological close.
22:2 τὸν υἱόν σου τὸν ἀγαπητόν, ὃν ἠγάπησας The LXX renders the Hebrew יְחִידְךָ ('your only / unique son') not as μονογενής ('only-begotten') but as τὸν ἀγαπητόν ('your beloved'), reinforcing the choice with the explanatory relative ὃν ἠγάπησας ('whom you have loved'). The word ἀγαπητός is the precise term of the heavenly voice at Jesus' baptism (Mark 1:11; Matt 3:17; Luke 3:22: ὁ υἱός μου ὁ ἀγαπητός) and Transfiguration (Matt 17:5), making this LXX rendering the scriptural background for the Father's declaration over the Son. Heb 11:17 reverts to μονογενής, reflecting the Hebrew semantic, but the synoptic baptismal tradition preserves the LXX ἀγαπητός register.
22:2 εἰς τὴν γῆν τὴν ὑψηλήν The LXX translates the obscure toponym מֹרִיָּה (Moriah) as 'the high land' rather than transliterating it. The rendering suppresses the MT identification with the future temple mount (2 Chr 3:1) while foregrounding the physical ascent that is thematically important throughout the chapter (the mountain of sacrifice, the mountain of theophany). The etymology chosen — ὑψηλή, 'high / lofty' — may reflect a reading of the root מרה / מרום ('height') or a desire to make the setting geographically impressive without locking it to a specific site.
22:13 ἐν φυτῷ σαβεκ The Hebrew בַּסְּבַךְ (baśśᵉḇaḵ, 'in the thicket') is transliterated as σαβεκ — creating the appearance of a proper name ('Sabek plant') rather than a common noun. This is one of the most discussed LXX oddities in the Genesis text: it produced an extensive patristic allegorical tradition in which 'Sabeq' was identified with the Syriac word for 'forgiveness' (שְׁבַק), so that the ram caught 'in Forgiveness' became a type of Christ caught in the thicket of human sin — the ram forgiven into the bush, Christ forgiven into the cross. Theodoret (Quaest. in Gen. 68) and Cyril of Alexandria both exploit the pun.
22:14 Ἐν τῷ ὄρει κύριος ὤφθη The LXX renders the etiological saying with the theological passive ὤφθη ('was seen / appeared') — the standard theophany verb of the patriarchal narratives (Gen 17:1; 18:1; 26:2; 35:9). The MT reads יֵרָאֶה ('he is seen / he appears'), the same passive stem; but the LXX's ὤφθη makes explicit the passive-of-divine-agency register: the LORD makes himself seen. The formula Ἐν τῷ ὄρει κύριος ὤφθη becomes the chapter's permanent theological legend — 'In the mountain the LORD appeared' — placing the Akedah site among the great theophany locations of the Hexateuch.
22:16 κατ᾿ ἐμαυτοῦ ὤμοσα The divine self-oath is the highest possible speech-act guaranty: God swears by his own name because there is no greater authority by which to swear (Heb 6:13: ἐπεὶ κατ᾿ οὐδενὸς εἶχεν μείζονος ὀμόσαι, ὤμοσεν καθ᾿ ἑαυτοῦ). Heb 6:13–18 cites this verse verbatim (ἦ μήν εὐλογῶν εὐλογήσω σε, v.17) to argue that God's promise to Abraham is doubly secured — by the promise and by the oath — and thus provides an 'anchor for the soul.' The oath grounds the entire NT theology of Abrahamic promise-fulfilment.
22:18 ἐνευλογηθήσονται ἐν τῷ σπέρματί σου πάντα τὰ ἔθνη τῆς γῆς This is the Akedah's universal blessing formula and the most NT-loaded verse in the chapter. Cited at Acts 3:25 (Peter's temple speech) as the Abrahamic promise now fulfilled in Christ. Paul quotes the related Gen 12:3 LXX formula at Gal 3:8 (προευηγγελίσατο τῷ Ἀβραάμ: ἐνευλογηθήσονται ἐν σοί πάντα τὰ ἔθνη) and at Gal 3:16 exegetes the singular σπέρμα of Gen 22:18 to argue that the collective seed is not the nation but the one messianic descendant — 'who is Christ' (ὅς ἐστιν Χριστός). The LXX singular σπέρμα is the hinge of Paul's entire argument in Galatians 3.
22:12 / 22:16 οὐκ ἐφείσω τοῦ υἱοῦ σου τοῦ ἀγαπητοῦ The phrase appears verbatim at both the verdict (v.12) and the oath-ground (v.16), creating a deliberate verbal inclusion. Paul echoes it at Rom 8:32 (ὅς γε τοῦ ἰδίου υἱοῦ οὐκ ἐφείσατο, ἀλλ᾿ ὑπὲρ ἡμῶν πάντων παρέδωκεν αὐτόν) — the Father's not-sparing his Son mirrors Abraham's not-sparing Isaac; the lexical echo is exact (ἐφείσατο / ἐφείσω + genitive of the son), making Gen 22:12, 16 LXX the direct scriptural background for the Pauline Gethsemane theology of Romans 8.
23:4 πάροικος καὶ παρεπίδημος Abraham's double self-designation is the chapter's theological masterword. πάροικος ('resident alien,' one who dwells παρά — alongside — a community without belonging to it) and παρεπίδημος ('stranger passing through,' an even more transient foreigner) together render the Hebrew גֵּר וְתוֹשָׁב (ger wetōšāb, 'sojourner and settler'). The LXX renders the second term with a Greek compound that stacks three prefixes of foreignness (παρ-επί-δημος). The exact word-pair is inherited verbatim at 1 Pet 2:11 (παρεπιδήμους καὶ παροίκους παρακαλῶ) as the defining metaphor for the believer's stance in the world, and Heb 11:13 applies the same register (ξένοι καὶ παρεπίδημοί εἰσιν ἐπὶ τῆς γῆς) to the whole catalogue of patriarchal faith. Gen 23:4 LXX is therefore the scriptural seed-text for the NT's pilgrim theology. NT echoes: 1 Pet 2:11; Heb 11:13; cf. Heb 11:9 (παρῴκησεν on Abraham's sojourning); Eph 2:19 (contrast: οὐκέτι … πάροικοι).
23:9 τὸ σπήλαιον τὸ διπλοῦν The LXX translates rather than transliterates the Hebrew place-name Machpelah (מַּכְפֵּלָה, from the root כָּפַל, 'to fold / double'). The result — τὸ σπήλαιον τὸ διπλοῦν, 'the double cave' — makes the name's etymology legible in Greek while dissolving the proper name itself; a Greek reader learns the cave is double but does not know it is called Machpelah. This choice is applied consistently throughout the chapter (vv.9, 17, 19), and at v.19 even the field is called τοῦ ἀγροῦ τοῦ διπλοῦ ('the double field'). The interpretive decision is unusual: most LXX proper names are transliterated, not translated; the Machpelah rendering is a deliberate exegetical intervention.
23:16 τετρακόσια δίδραχμα ἀργυρίου δόκιμον ἐμπόρῳ Three commercial cruxes in one clause. (1) The LXX renders the Hebrew שֶׁקֶל (shekel, a weight-unit of silver) with δίδραχμον (a two-drachma coin of the Ptolemaic monetary system), explicitly modernizing the commercial register for Greek readers; 400 didrachmas = 800 drachmas, a substantial but not exceptional commercial sum. (2) δόκιμον (from δόκιμος, 'tested / proven / of certified quality') renders Hebrew עֹבֵר ('passing' = current/circulating currency); the phrase δόκιμον ἐμπόρῳ ('acceptable to the merchant / current with the merchant') is a commercial certification formula attested in Greek papyri for coin that passes commercial inspection, distinguishing certified tender from debased metal. (3) The Hebrew verb used for payment — שָׁקַל (šāqal, 'weigh out') — is rendered by ἀπεκατέστησεν (v.16, 'paid / settled'), replacing the weighing metaphor with a payment verb, reflecting that Greek commerce used coined rather than weighed money. NT echo: δόκιμος is used in the NT for tested/proven character (Rom 14:18; 2 Cor 10:18; 2 Tim 2:15; Jas 1:12).
23:17–20 ἐκυρώθη The aorist passive of κυρόω ('to confirm / ratify / make legally valid') is the chapter's legal ratification vocabulary. Its root κύρ- / κύριος ('lord / owner / one with authority') gives the verb the sense 'was made authoritative / was legally confirmed'; ἐκυρώθη is the LXX's equivalent of a deed being stamped. The verb appears twice in the chapter (vv.17, 20), bracketing the conveyance deed (v.17–18) and the closing summary (v.20) — the double occurrence mimics the legal practice of a deed being confirmed twice (in the transaction and in the summary). The same root appears in legal papyri for property conveyances; the term is cognate with NT κύριος ('Lord') through the authority-root.
23:2 Χεβρων / Acts 7:16 The chapter locates Sarah's burial at Hebron (Χεβρων), identified as the site opposite Mamre (vv.17, 19) — a consistent geographical description. However, Acts 7:16 (Stephen's speech) locates the burial ground 'at Shechem' (ἐν Συχέμ), conflating Gen 23 (Abraham's Hebron purchase from the sons of Heth) with Gen 33:19 / Josh 24:32 (Jacob's Shechem purchase from the sons of Hamor). This is one of the most discussed textual cruxes in Acts: whether Stephen made the conflation, whether the LXX manuscript tradition he used differed, or whether Luke preserves a known variant tradition, remains disputed; the MT and all major LXX witnesses for Gen 23 are unanimous that the site is Hebron.
24:2, 9 ὑπὸ τὸν μηρόν The most solemn oath formula in the ancestral narratives: the servant places his hand 'under the thigh' (ὑπὸ τὸν μηρόν) of Abraham. The gesture — invoking the patriarch's generative power as the ultimate guarantor of the oath — occurs only twice in Genesis LXX: here (24:2, 9) and at Gen 47:29 when Jacob charges Joseph to carry his bones out of Egypt. The Hebrew תַּחַת יְרֵכִי (taḥat yĕrēḵî) is rendered literally by the LXX; the thigh represents both the generative source of the family line and the seat of its covenantal continuity. Swearing by what is most sacred and irreplaceable to the oath-giver, the formula makes Isaac's lineage the ultimate stake of the servant's commission.
24:12–56 εὐοδόω (seven occurrences) The verb εὐοδόω ('cause to prosper / make the way straight / succeed') is the providential leitmotif of the chapter, occurring seven times: as petition (24:12, εὐόδωσόν μοι), as uncertain observation (24:21, εἰ εὐώδωκεν), as confirmed praise (24:27, εὐώδωκεν κύριος), as future promise in the retelling (24:40, εὐοδώσει), as present optative prayer (24:42, εὐοδοῖς), as retrospective acknowledgment (24:48, εὐώδωσεν), and as the final basis for the servant's departure (24:56, εὐόδωσεν). The sevenfold structure gives the chapter a providential architecture: every turning point is marked by the same verb, from the initial petition to the completed mission. The same verb appears at Rom 1:10 (Paul praying to be εὐοδωθήσομαι to Rome) and 3 John 2 (εὐοδοῦσθαί σε, 'I pray that you may prosper').
24:16 παρθένος · ἀνὴρ οὐκ ἔγνω αὐτήν The narrator introduces Rebekah with a double assertion: she is παρθένος ('virgin'), and an explanatory gloss follows — ἀνὴρ οὐκ ἔγνω αὐτήν ('a man had not known her'). The gloss defines the narrator's understanding of παρθένος: sexual intactness. This is the first of three occurrences of παρθένος in the chapter (also 24:43 and 24:55, where the family urges Μεινάτω ἡ παρθένος). The narrator's use here is the baseline definition; the servant's use at 24:43 is the theologically loaded one.
24:43 παρθένος rendering Hebrew עַלְמָה (almah) KEY CRUX. The servant's retelling (vv.34–49) recounts the prayer-test, and at v.43 he says: ἰδοὺ ἐγὼ ἐφέστηκα ἐπὶ τῆς πηγῆς τοῦ ὕδατος, καὶ ἡ παρθένος ἡ ἐκπορευομένη ἀντλῆσαι. The Hebrew at this point has הָעַלְמָה (hā-ʿalmâ, 'the young woman'), from the root עַלְמָה (almah), which denotes a young woman of marriageable age without necessarily specifying virginity. The LXX translator renders almah with παρθένος here — the same choice made at Isa 7:14 (LXX: ἰδοὺ ἡ παρθένος ἐν γαστρὶ ἕξει), which Matthew quotes at 1:23. Genesis 24:43 is therefore an earlier instance of the same translator tradition understanding almah as within the semantic range of παρθένος, and constitutes a direct lexical precedent for the Isaianic and Matthean uses. This is one of the most exegetically significant translation choices in the entire Pentateuch. NT echo: Matt 1:23 citing LXX Isa 7:14.
24:63 ἀδολεσχῆσαι The LXX renders the Hebrew לָשׂוּחַ (lāsûaḥ, 'to walk about, roam, muse') with ἀδολεσχῆσαι — 'to converse at length, to hold discourse with oneself, to meditate.' The verb ἀδολεσχέω carries philosophically colored overtones in Greek usage: ἀδολεσχία (its cognate noun) appears in Stoic discussions of private discursive thought, and in Ps 118(119):97 LXX the cognate is used for meditative engagement with Torah ('ὅλην τὴν ἡμέραν μελέτη μού ἐστιν'). By choosing ἀδολεσχῆσαι rather than a simple walking verb, the LXX translator gives Isaac's evening field-walk a contemplative, inward-discourse character that the Hebrew לָשׂוּחַ only gestures toward. This is the translator's most philosophically distinctive rendering in the chapter. The Vulgate (deambulare, 'to walk about') followed a different tradition.
24:65 θέριστρον The Hebrew צָעִיף (ṣāʿîp, 'veil, wrap') is rendered θέριστρον by the LXX — a word derived from θέρος ('summer') that originally denoted a 'light summer garment / wrap.' The same word renders the same Hebrew term at Gen 38:14, 19, where Tamar veils herself before Judah. In its narrative function here, the θέριστρον is not merely modest dress but a betrothal gesture: Rebekah covers herself upon learning that the man walking in the field is her husband-to-be. The middle voice of περιεβάλετο ('she covered herself') makes the gesture deliberate and self-directed — a physical enactment of the transition from unmarried woman to promised bride at the moment of first sight.
24:67 ἠγάπησεν αὐτήν KEY CRUX: the first use of ἀγαπάω for conjugal love in Genesis LXX. The verb ἀγαπάω has appeared earlier in Genesis for Abraham's love of Isaac (Gen 22:2, τὸν υἱόν σου τὸν ἀγαπητόν), but ἠγάπησεν αὐτήν ('he loved her') at 24:67 is its debut for a husband's love of his wife in Genesis, and the first in a series that defines the Genesis theme of conjugal ἀγάπη: Isaac–Rebekah here; Jacob–Rachel at Gen 29:18, 20, 30. The declaration comes after the formal marriage acts (εἰσήγαγεν, ἔλαβεν, ἐγένετο αὐτοῦ γυνή) as the personal, interior crowning of the external covenant — the Providence-guided (εὐοδόω) mission ends in love. The verse closes with παρεκλήθη Ισαακ περὶ Σαρρας τῆς μητρὸς αὐτοῦ: the grief of Gen 23 (Sarah's death) is explicitly resolved by the love of Gen 24 (Rebekah received). NT resonance: the consolation vocabulary παρακαλέω/παράκλησις that follows grief is a major LXX/NT theme (Isa 40:1 LXX; 2 Cor 1:3–4).
25:22 ἐσκίρτων τὰ παιδία ἐν αὐτῇ The verb σκιρτάω ('leap / spring') renders Hebrew וַיִּתְרֹצְצוּ (wayyitrōṣeṣû), which means 'they struggled / crushed against each other' — a more violent image than the LXX's 'leaping.' The LXX choice of σκιρτάω becomes exegetically significant through Luke 1:41 (ἐσκίρτησεν τὸ βρέφος ἐν τῇ κοιλίᾳ αὐτῆς), where John the Baptist leaps at Mary's greeting — Luke's word is the same verb, and the echo is almost certainly deliberate: the prophetic recognition of the greater by the lesser (John leaping for Jesus) is framed as a new Rebekah-womb event. The motif thus runs: Gen 25:22 LXX → Luke 1:41 → the theological point that the Spirit-recognizing child-in-womb is a prophetic witness.
25:23 ὁ μείζων δουλεύσει τῷ ἐλάσσονι The oracle's climactic reversal — 'the greater shall serve the lesser' — is the chapter's most consequential text for Christian theology. Paul cites this clause verbatim at Romans 9:12 (ὁ μείζων δουλεύσει τῷ ἐλάσσονι), as part of his three-text proof of unconditioned election (Rom 9:7 citing Gen 21:12; 9:12 citing Gen 25:23; 9:13 citing Mal 1:2–3). Paul's argument is that the oracle was given 'before the children had done anything good or evil' (μήπω γὰρ γεννηθέντων μηδέ τι πραξάντων ἀγαθὸν ἢ φαῦλον, Rom 9:11), making it a pure declaration of divine purpose (κατ᾿ ἐκλογὴν πρόθεσιν τοῦ θεοῦ) not contingent on works. The LXX's comparative adjectives (μείζων / ἐλάσσων) render Hebrew גָּדֹל / קָטֹן ('greater / lesser' = older / younger) and refer specifically to Esau and Jacob, but Paul applies them typologically to the principle of election itself. The reversal is structurally the third instance of the 'younger-over-older' pattern in Genesis election theology: Abel/Cain (implied), Isaac/Ishmael, Jacob/Esau.
25:25 πυρράκης / δορὰ δασεῖα / Ησαυ Esau's birth description establishes two name-anchors. (1) πυρράκης ('ruddy / reddish') derives from πῦρ ('fire') and sets up the Εδωμ / ʾādôm ('red') etymology at v.30. (2) δορὰ δασεῖα ('hairy skin') sets up the name Ησαυ (related to עֵשָׂו, possibly 'hairy' or 'rough') and provides the props for the deception of ch.27 (Jacob wearing goat skins, 27:16). The LXX's ὡσεὶ δορὰ δασεῖα ('like a hairy skin') renders Hebrew כְּאַדֶּרֶת שֵׂעָר ('like a hairy cloak'), a simile for a complete body covering. The dual anchor — red and hairy — are the two characteristics that define Esau narratively (color → Edom; hair → Esau-name and the deception).
25:26 ἡ χεὶρ αὐτοῦ ἐπειλημμένη τῆς πτέρνης Ησαυ The heel-grasping is the physical basis of the name Ιακωβ (יַעֲקֹב from עָקֵב, 'heel'). LXX uses πτέρνη ('heel') rather than a Greek interpretation. The name-pun functions as biography: Jacob enters the world already seizing what is his brother's. The LXX perfect participle ἐπειλημμένη ('having grasped and holding') emphasizes the sustained grip. Hos 12:4 LXX interprets: ἐν τῇ κοιλίᾳ ἐπτέρνισεν τὸν ἀδελφὸν αὐτοῦ ('in the womb he tripped his brother by the heel'), using the denominative verb πτερνίζω. Gen 27:36 LXX has Esau acknowledge the pun: εὐλόγως ἐκλήθη τὸ ὄνομα αὐτοῦ Ιακωβ ('rightly is his name called Jacob').
25:30 τοῦ ἑψήματος τοῦ πυρροῦ τούτου / Εδωμ The Edom name-etymology runs: Esau born πυρράκης (v.25) → demands τοῦ πυρροῦ ('the red one', v.30) → named Εδωμ ('red', v.30). The Hebrew doubled adjective הָאָדֹם הָאָדֹם הַזֶּה ('this very red thing') — an intensive construction — is rendered by the single πυρροῦ in the LXX, which loses the Hebrew emphasis. The Edom-etymology is the narrator's explanation for the name of the nation that will be Israel's paradigmatic antagonist in the prophetic tradition (Isa 34; Obad; Mal 1:2–4). Paul in Rom 9:13 immediately follows his Gen 25:23 citation with Mal 1:2–3 ('Jacob I loved but Esau I hated'), completing the election contrast.
25:31–34 τὰ πρωτοτόκια / ἐφαύλισεν The πρωτοτόκια ('birthright / firstborn rights') appears four times in vv.31–34, creating a verbal frame around the transaction. The word πρωτοτόκια (plural) is the LXX's legal term for the bundle of firstborn privileges: double inheritance share, family headship, and covenantal standing. The climactic ἐφαύλισεν ('he despised / treated as worthless') renders Hebrew וַיִּבֶז (wayyiḇez, 'he despised'); the verb φαυλίζω means to treat something as φαῦλον ('worthless / trivial / morally low') — a word that falls in the same semantic field as βέβηλος ('profane / unholy'). Heb 12:16 names Esau explicitly: μή τις πόρνος ἢ βέβηλος ὡς Ησαυ, ὃς ἀντὶ βρώσεως μιᾶς ἀπέδετο τὰ πρωτοτόκια ἑαυτοῦ ('lest anyone be sexually immoral or profane like Esau, who for a single meal sold his own birthright'); the passage in Hebrews draws on Gen 25:33–34 LXX verbally (ἀπέδετο τὰ πρωτοτόκια = ἀπέδοτο Ησαυ τὰ πρωτοτόκια, v.33) and theologically on ἐφαύλισεν (v.34). The narrator's final word is thus the chapter's moral: not that Jacob was blameless, but that Esau forfeited the sacred — and knew it.
26:4 ἐνευλογηθήσονται ἐν τῷ σπέρματί σου πάντα τὰ ἔθνη τῆς γῆς The passive future ἐνευλογηθήσονται ('all the nations of the earth shall be blessed in your seed') renders Hebrew וְהִתְבָּרֲכוּ ('and they shall bless themselves') — a reflexive Hitpael that the LXX consistently renders as a divine passive. The choice is theologically decisive: the LXX makes the nations the recipients of God's blessing through the Abrahamic seed, not merely citing Abraham's name in self-blessing formulas. Paul at Galatians 3:8 cites exactly this clause (ἐνευλογηθήσονται ἐν σοὶ πάντα τὰ ἔθνη, combining 12:3 and 26:4) and identifies it as the 'gospel preached in advance' (προευηγγελίσατο) — the Abrahamic covenant as the charter of Gentile inclusion. Acts 3:25 cites the 22:18 / 26:4 wording in Peter's temple sermon, applying it to the resurrection mission. The LXX passive is essential to Paul's argument: it grounds the Gentiles' blessing in God's act, not human initiative.
26:5 προστάγματα / ἐντολάς / δικαιώματα / νόμους The fourfold legal vocabulary in 26:5 — 'ordinances, commandments, statutes, laws' — is the most striking Hebraism in the chapter. The Hebrew reads מִשְׁמַרְתִּי / מִצְוֹתַי / חֻקֹּתַי / תּוֹרֹתָי, a combination that in the Deuteronomic/Mosaic tradition designates the full Sinai legislation. The LXX renders each term with a cognate Greek legal word, making the list even more distinctively Mosaic. No other patriarchal text uses this four-term formula; it appears as a Deuteronomic insertion into the narrative, projecting Sinai backward onto Abraham to ground the covenant's conditional continuity. Rabbinic tradition (Yoma 28b) interpreted it as evidence that Abraham kept the entire oral Torah before Sinai; patristic readers (Justin, Clement of Alexandria) saw it as evidence that the Mosaic law was anticipated in the patriarchal moral order. For Paul, it creates a tension: the law-vocabulary here is in a subordinate causal clause (because Abraham obeyed) placed after the unconditional promise of 26:3–4 — the order of promise-before-law that grounds his Galatians 3:17 argument (the law, coming 430 years after the promise, cannot annul it).
26:8 παίζοντα μετὰ Ρεβεκκας τῆς γυναικὸς αὐτοῦ The verb παίζω ('play / sport') renders Hebrew מְצַחֵק (mĕṣaḥēq, Piel of צָחַק), which is the denominative verb of the name יִצְחַק ('Isaac' = 'he laughs'). The LXX chose παίζω ('play') rather than γελάω ('laugh'), preserving the playful character of the act but losing the overt name-pun. The Hebrew pun is unmistakable: Isaac (yiṣḥāq) was seen yiṣḥāq-ing — the name is the act. The scene is ambiguous — παίζω can denote intimate affectionate play (a marital idiom) or simple playfulness, but in context Abimelech immediately infers they are married. The verb recurs in the same Piel form at 39:14, 17 (the Potiphar's wife accusation against Joseph — 'he came in to us to play / to lie with us'), where the sexual connotation is overt; the ambiguity of παίζω here may be the LXX's way of preserving that lexical range.
26:20–22 Ἀδικία / Ἐχθρία / Εὐρυχωρία The three translated well-names are the chapter's most characteristic LXX rendering decision. Hebrew Esek (עֵשֶׂק = 'contention / dispute'), Sitnah (שִׂטְנָה = 'accusation / enmity'), and Rehoboth (רְחֹבוֹת = 'broad places') become Greek Ἀδικία ('Injustice'), Ἐχθρία ('Enmity'), and Εὐρυχωρία ('Broad-place'). The LXX translator could have transliterated (as is done for Beer-sheba, Beersheba → φρέαρ ὅρκου at 26:33), but chose to translate these three names, making the theological trajectory of the sequence explicit in Greek. The movement Ἀδικία → Ἐχθρία → Εὐρυχωρία reads as a theological diagram: first unjust seizure, then active enmity, then the divine gift of room. The Εὐρυχωρία speech (26:22b) — ὅτι νῦν ἐπλάτυνεν κύριος ἡμῖν καὶ ηὔξησεν ἡμᾶς ἐπὶ τῆς γῆς — is the key exegetical payoff: the wide place is explicitly attributed to the LORD's enlarging action. Ps 4:2 LXX and Ps 18:19 LXX use the same πλατύνω / εὐρυχωρία field for divine deliverance.
26:28 Ἰδόντες ἑωράκαμεν ὅτι ἦν κύριος μετὰ σοῦ The construction Ἰδόντες ἑωράκαμεν ('seeing we have seen') renders Hebrew רָאֹה רָאִינוּ (infinitive absolute + finite verb), the standard Hebrew intensifying idiom. The LXX renders this as a participial + finite pair (Hebraizing cognate absolute), a construction that appears elsewhere in the LXX (Exod 3:7: ἰδὼν εἶδον — 'I have surely seen') and in the NT (Luke 22:15: ἐπιθυμίᾳ ἐπεθύμησα — 'I have earnestly desired'). The semantic force is emphatic certainty: 'we have clearly, unmistakably seen.' The sight in question — κύριος ἦν μετὰ σοῦ ('the LORD was with you') — is the theological conclusion drawn from observing Isaac's prosperity. The 'God-with-you' formula (μετὰ σοῦ) runs through the chapter (26:3, 24, 28) as the covenant-presence refrain; here it is paradoxically the pagan king who names it correctly. The Philistines' recognition parallels Rahab's confession (Josh 2:9–11) and Jethro's acknowledgment (Exod 18:10–11) — pagan recognition of the covenant God as the necessary precondition for treaty.
26:33 ἐκάλεσεν αὐτὸ Ὅρκος … Φρέαρ ὅρκου The well-name Ὅρκος ('Oath') renders Hebrew שֶׁבַע (šeḇaʿ) and generates the Greek Beersheba etymology: φρέαρ ὅρκου = 'well of oath.' In Hebrew, Beersheba (בְּאֵר שֶׁבַע) is ambiguous: שֶׁבַע could derive from שֶׁבַע ('seven', referring to the seven ewes of Gen 21:28–32) or from שְׁבֻעָה ('oath'). The LXX follows the oath etymology in both accounts (21:31 and 26:33), establishing a consistent hermeneutical tradition. The etiological formula ἕως τῆς σήμερον ἡμέρας ('until this present day') anchors the name in the reader's contemporaneous geography. The ὅρκος word-field connects back to the covenant proposal of v.28 (Γενέσθω ὅρκος ἀνὰ μέσον ἡμῶν) and the oath of v.31 (ὤμοσαν), making the well's name the physical monument of the covenantal act. Etymological naming at the chapter's close is the standard LXX completion-pattern for a place-narrative (compare 21:31; 28:19; 32:31).
26:35 ἦσαν ἐρίζουσαι τῷ Ισαακ καὶ τῇ Ρεβεκκᾳ The periphrastic construction ἦσαν ἐρίζουσαι (imperfect εἰμί + present participle) renders Hebrew מֹרַת רוּחַ ('bitterness of spirit') — an abstract noun phrase — as an active, continuous verbal state: 'they were quarreling / being contentious.' The LXX interprets the Hebrew 'bitterness' as habitual, relational contention rather than inward grief. The verb ἐρίζω ('quarrel / strive') shares its root with Ἔρις, the personification of strife in Greek mythology, and with the well-name Ἐχθρία (v.21) — embedding the household strife within the chapter's well-naming leitmotif: the strife of the wells reappears in the strife of the household. The progressive imperfect is emphatic: this is not a single conflict but a settled condition. Rebekah's complaint at 27:46 — 'I am weary of my life because of the daughters of Heth' — is the consequence of this ἦσαν ἐρίζουσαι, and it triggers her decision to orchestrate Jacob's blessing. Paul lists ἔρις ('strife / quarreling') among the works of the flesh (Gal 5:20) and the marks of godlessness (Rom 1:29), placing the same vocabulary in the ethical inventory of the Gentile condition — the anti-type of the peace (εἰρήνη, vv.29, 31) sealed at Beersheba.
27:1 ἠμβλύνθησαν The aorist passive of ἀμβλύνω ('make blunt / dim') renders Hebrew כָּהָה ('grow faint / dim'). The ingressive aorist captures the onset of blindness — the condition that makes the deception physically possible and theologically ironic: the patriarch who must bless cannot see. The same root is used medically of dulled senses; here it drives the entire plot. Isaac's blindness is never healed; it functions as a permanent theological given throughout the chapter.
27:27 ὀσμὴ ἀγροῦ πλήρους The blessing is triggered by the scent of the field: 'the smell of a full field' (ὀσμὴ ἀγροῦ πλήρους) is the most sensory moment in the chapter. Isaac blesses Jacob because he smells like Esau's garments — the olfactory channel has overridden the auditory suspicion of v.22. The imagery connects to Song of Songs' field-and-vineyard erotics and to the ancient blessing-lore in which the patriarch breathes in the identity of the one he blesses; here the identity is fabricated, yet the blessing is real.
27:28 ἀπὸ τῆς δρόσου τοῦ οὐρανοῦ καὶ ἀπὸ τῆς πιότητος τῆς γῆς The dew-and-fatness formula is the chapter's central blessing text: 'from the dew of heaven and from the fatness of the earth.' The phrase renders Hebrew מִטַּל הַשָּׁמַיִם וּמִשְׁמַנֵּי הָאָרֶץ; δρόσος ('dew') is the standard LXX word for the morning moisture that represents divine benediction on the land; πιότης ('fatness / richness') renders the Hebrew fat/oil root שׁמן. At vv.39–40 the same formula is inverted for Esau with privative ἀπό — 'away from / without the fatness of the earth, away from / without the dew of heaven' — a liturgical anti-blessing that makes the chapter's structural irony explicit.
27:34 ἀνεβόησεν φωνὴν μεγάλην καὶ πικράν Esau's great bitter cry is the chapter's emotional climax. The phrase renders Hebrew וַיִּצְעַק צְעָקָה גְּדֹלָה וּמָרָה — a cognate-accusative construction (crying a cry) that LXX renders as ἀνεβόησεν + accusative object (φωνήν) in a figura etymologica pattern. The cry's failure to secure blessing is cited at Heb 12:17 (μετανοίας γὰρ τόπον οὐχ εὗρεν, καίπερ μετὰ δακρύων ἐκζητήσας αὐτήν): Paul uses it as a type of the irrevocable. The weeping of both Isaac and Esau in v.38 (ἔκλαυσεν δὲ Ησαυ φωνῇ μεγάλῃ καὶ ἔκλαυσεν) underlines the tragedy — the father shares the grief he cannot undo.
27:36 ἐπτέρνικεν γάρ με ἤδη δεύτερον Esau's bitter pun activates the name-etymology: the verb πτερνίζω ('supplant by the heel / trip up') is a denominative from πτέρνα ('heel'), rendering Hebrew וַיַּעְקְבֵנִי from the root עקב — the same root underlying the name יַעֲקֹב (Jacob). The LXX transliteration Ιακωβ preserves the Hebrew phonology that makes the pun audible to bilingual readers. The pun at birth (25:26, the heel-grasping) and the pun here (the second 'supplanting') bracket the twins' rivalry with etymology: Jacob's character as deceiver is written into his name from before birth. Paul reads the twins as types of election and rejection (Rom 9:11–13), grounding the argument in the pre-birth oracle rather than the name-pun, but the name-pun is the narrative's own self-interpretation of the election.
27:41 ἐνεκότει The imperfect of ἐγκοτέω ('bear a grudge / harbor resentment') renders Hebrew וַיִּשְׂטֹם, the root שׂטם used elsewhere of the adversarial hatred associated with the Satan-concept. The imperfect tense is crucial: this is not a momentary flash of anger but a settled, ongoing, harbored hatred — a state Esau maintains as his defining disposition toward Jacob. The same root appears in Gen 49:23 and 50:15, framing the Joseph story's anxiety about concealed hatred. The internal death-plan (ἐν τῇ διανοίᾳ αὐτοῦ, v.41) echoes the Cain-and-Abel pattern of Gen 4:8 (fratricide as the shadow of the election).
27:46 Προσώχθικα τῇ ζωῇ μου / τῶν υἱῶν τοῦ Χετ Two cruxes in the closing verse. (1) Προσώχθικα (perfect of προσοχθίζω, 'be vexed / loathe') renders Hebrew קַצְתִּי ('I loathe / am weary of'); the perfect tense expresses a deeply-felt present state arising from accumulated experience. The same verb appears at Num 21:5 and Ps 95:10 LXX (of God's weariness with the wilderness generation), placing Rebekah's speech in the register of existential exhaustion. (2) τῶν υἱῶν τοῦ Χετ (daughters of the sons of Heth) are the Hittite women already registered as grief in 26:35; Rebekah weaponizes Isaac's own stated pain to win permission for Jacob's flight without revealing the murder-threat. The double-voiced speech is the chapter's final irony: the truth (grief over Hittite intermarriage) serves a concealment (Jacob's mortal danger). The rhetorical question ἵνατί μοι ζῆν ('what is life to me?') echoes Elijah's despair (1 Kgs 19:4) and prefigures the chapter's tragic close — Rebekah never calls Jacob back.
28:12 κλίμαξ ἐστηριγμένη … οἱ ἄγγελοι ἀνέβαινον καὶ κατέβαινον ἐπ' αὐτῆς The prepositional phrase ἐπ' αὐτῆς is grammatically unambiguous in the LXX — αὐτῆς is feminine, referring to κλίμαξ ('upon the ladder') — yet the Hebrew cognate at 28:12 is absent from MT (the angels ascend and descend בּוֹ = 'on it,' masculine, with no clear antecedent); the LXX resolves toward the ladder. At 28:13 the same ἐπ' αὐτῆς describes the LORD's position, reopening the ambiguity (does the LORD stand upon the ladder or over Jacob?). John 1:51 collapses both into the Son of Man: Jesus as the ladder through whom heaven is opened, the locus of angelic ascent and descent.
28:13 ὁ δὲ κύριος ἐπεστήρικτο ἐπ' αὐτῆς The exact same ἐπ' αὐτῆς as 28:12: 'upon it' (the ladder, feminine κλίμαξ) or 'over him' (Jacob)? The Hebrew MT has עָלָיו = masculine, which could mean 'over him' (Jacob) or 'upon it' (the ladder, masculine in Hebrew?); the LXX's αὐτῆς (feminine) consistently assigns the referent to κλίμαξ. But the christological tradition (John 1:51) synthesizes: the LORD stands where the Son of Man stands — at the top of the heaven-earth axis. The ambiguity is not resolved in the LXX but is deliberately open for theological use.
28:14 ἐνευλογηθήσονται ἐν σοὶ πᾶσαι αἱ φυλαὶ τῆς γῆς καὶ ἐν τῷ σπέρματί σου The LXX's compound ἐνευλογέω ('be blessed in') uses an ἐν-mediation rather than simple εὐλογέω, giving the passive a mediatorial force: the nations will be blessed through (= in) Jacob and his seed. Paul cites the LXX text at Gal 3:8 (ἐνευλογηθήσονται ἐν σοὶ πάντα τὰ ἔθνη) and identifies it as the Scripture pre-proclaiming the gospel — the promise that God would justify the Gentiles by faith. The double formula 'in you AND in your seed' allows Paul at Gal 3:16 to press the singular σπέρμα christologically.
28:17 Ὡς φοβερὸς ὁ τόπος οὗτος· οὐκ ἔστιν τοῦτο ἀλλ' ἢ οἶκος θεοῦ, καὶ αὕτη ἡ πύλη τοῦ οὐρανοῦ Jacob's double identification of the place as 'house of God' and 'gate of heaven' is the theological climax of the dream narrative. The exclamatory Ὡς φοβερὸς renders Hebrew מַה-נּוֹרָא (how awesome/terrible) — the classic theophanic awe-response. The two identifications map the cosmology of the ladder: οἶκος θεοῦ = the earthly terminal of the heaven-earth axis; πύλη τοῦ οὐρανοῦ = the threshold through which the divine realm is accessed. John 1:51 echoes this by promising the disciples they will see 'the heaven opened' (τὸν οὐρανὸν ἀνεῳγότα).
28:19 ἐκάλεσεν … τὸ ὄνομα τοῦ τόπου ἐκείνου Οἶκος θεοῦ The LXX here translates Hebrew בֵּית אֵל as Οἶκος θεοῦ rather than transliterating as Βαιθηλ (which the LXX does use elsewhere, e.g., Gen 35:1). The choice in Rahlfs–Hanhart at 28:19 is to render the name semantically, making the etymology transparent and creating a continuous theological thread with the οἶκος θεοῦ of v.17 and the vow-pledge of v.22 (ἔσται μοι οἶκος θεοῦ). The parenthetical note that the place was 'previously called Luz' (Λουζα ἦν τὸ ὄνομα τῇ πόλει τὸ πρότερον) records the displacement of the Canaanite identity by the theophanic naming.
28:22 δεκάτην ἀποδεκατώσω σοι The cognate-accusative construction δεκάτην ἀποδεκατώσω ('a tenth I will tithe') mirrors the Hebrew emphatic infinitive-absolute עַשֵּׂר אֲעַשְּׂרֶנּוּ — the most intense form of vow-language in Hebrew. This is the first tithe-pledge in Scripture (anticipating the Levitical tithe of Num 18:21–24 and the challenge of Mal 3:10). The tithe is directed explicitly 'to you' (σοί), making it a personal reciprocal act: what God gives, Jacob returns a tenth of. The future indicative ἀποδεκατώσω encodes the solemn pledge.
29:1 ἐξάρας δὲ Ιακωβ τοὺς πόδας The idiom ἐξάρας τοὺς πόδας ('having lifted his feet') is unparalleled in the LXX — found nowhere else in the entire corpus. It calques the Hebrew וַיִּשָּׂא יַעֲקֹב רַגְלָיו with unusual literalism; Greek more naturally says ἀναστὰς ἐπορεύθη or ἀπῆλθεν. The choice preserves a bodily, kinetic quality: Jacob's whole physical self is in motion, propelled by the Bethel theophany. Some commentators propose the idiom connotes cheerful, energized departure — the lightness of a man walking toward what he loves.
29:17 οἱ δὲ ὀφθαλμοὶ Λειας ἀσθενεῖς The Hebrew רַכּוֹת (rakkot) is the crux: the root רָכַךְ means 'to be soft, tender.' Ancient Jewish interpretation divided: the eyes were 'tender' (beautiful, gentle — a compliment, perhaps suggesting Leah's eyes were luminous); or 'weak' (poor-sighted, or lacking the sparkle of Rachel's eyes — a deficiency). The LXX reads ἀσθενεῖς ('weak, without strength, dim'), taking the less flattering option and setting the eyes in explicit contrast to Rachel's superlative beauty in the following phrase. The Vulgate similarly has lippis oculis ('bleary-eyed'). The choice shapes the reader's assessment of Leah's position in the narrative.
29:20 ὡς ἡμέραι ὀλίγαι παρὰ τὸ ἀγαπᾶν αὐτὸν αὐτήν The sentence is among the most admired in biblical narrative. The construction παρὰ τὸ ἀγαπᾶν αὐτὸν αὐτήν ('because of his love for her') is a causal παρά + articular infinitive — a Hebraizing construction (LXX calquing מֵאַהֲבָתוֹ אֹתָהּ). The clause as a whole says: seven years seemed like a few days to Jacob because he loved her. The psychological compression of time through eros is stated without sentimentality — ὡς ἡμέραι ὀλίγαι ('as a few days') stands against ἑπτὰ ἔτη ('seven years') — and the verse leaves entirely unstated whether the seven years seemed short because they passed happily in Rachel's proximity or because desire made them feel brief precisely through their length.
29:25 ἵνα τί παρελογίσω με Jacob's accusation against Laban — παρελογίσω με ('you have deceived me, you have dealt treacherously with me') — is the moral epicenter of the deceiver-deceived theme. The verb παραλογίζομαι ('to reason falsely against, to cheat, to outwit') is chosen precisely; it describes rational manipulation rather than brute force. Jacob, who deceived his blind father through a calculated impersonation (Gen 27:1–29), now uses the same vocabulary of being deceived. The structural irony is measure-for-measure: darkness hid his identity then; darkness hid Leah's now. Laban's pretext (v.26 — local custom forbids giving the younger before the elder) adds theological resonance: Jacob himself violated this convention of primogeniture in Gen 25:23; 27.
29:35 ἐξομολογήσομαι κυρίῳ / Ιουδα The naming of the fourth son is the chapter's doxological climax and its most consequential moment of onomastics. The verb ἐξομολογέω ('confess, acknowledge, praise') is the great Psalter-verb of lament-turned-praise (Pss 6:6; 9:2; 17:50; 29:13; 106:1 LXX); Leah deploys it in the future — ἐξομολογήσομαι κυρίῳ — as a vow, not merely a statement. The Hebrew root יָדָה (hiphil: to give thanks, praise) undergirds both the name יְהוּדָה (Yehudah / Judah) and the noun תּוֹדָה (thanksgiving, confession); the LXX renders the name Ιουδα without fully making the etymology transparent, but the surrounding speech makes it unmistakable. From this name in turn derive יְהוּדִי ('Judahite, Jew'), Ἰουδαῖος, Ἰουδαία, and Ἰουδαϊσμός — the entire nomenclature of the covenant people and their religion flows from Leah's praise-vow. The NT messianic title 'Lion of the tribe of Judah' (Rev 5:5) and the genealogy of Jesus through Judah (Matt 1:2–3; Heb 7:14) make this verse one of the most generative in the Pentateuch.
30:1 ἐζήλωσεν δὲ Ραχηλ τὴν ἀδελφὴν αὐτῆς ζηλόω: 'be jealous of, envy, zealously desire'; the same root as God's own covenant-zeal (θεὸς ζηλωτής, Exod 20:5) and Paul's apostolic jealousy (ζηλῶ γὰρ ὑμᾶς θεοῦ ζήλῳ, 2 Cor 11:2). The LXX does not distinguish envy (sinful) from holy zeal (virtuous) at the lexical level — both are ζηλόω. Rachel's ζήλος is presented without direct authorial condemnation; the immediately following ὠργίσθη δὲ Ιακωβ ('Jacob was angry') is the chapter's one moral comment — and it is directed at Jacob's anger, not Rachel's jealousy.
30:6 ἔκρινέν μοι ὁ θεὸς καὶ εἰσήκουσεν τῆς φωνῆς μου The naming of Δαν: the Hebrew דָּן ('judge') is rendered as a perfect-tense declaration — ἔκρινέν ('God has judged / vindicated me'). The compound is significant: κρίνω in LXX usage carries the sense of forensic vindication (God rules in favor of the plaintiff) as often as condemnation; ἔκρινέν μοι = 'God judged in my favor.' The verb also anticipates the judge-deliverer role of the tribe of Dan in the book of Judges.
30:8 συνελάβετό μοι ὁ θεὸς καὶ συνανεστράφην μετὰ τῆς ἀδελφῆς μου The naming of Νεφθαλι from Hebrew נַפְתּוּלֵי ('wrestlings, contests'); the LXX renders as συνελάβετό μοι ὁ θεός ('God grasped together with me') using συλλαμβάνω — the same root as 'conceive' (vv.5, 7, 38) — to describe divine co-participation in Rachel's struggle with Leah. The verse thus maps Rachel's birth-contest onto the language of divine assistance; the verbal echo anticipates Jacob's actual wrestling with God at the Jabbok (Gen 32:25–32, LXX: ἐπάλαιεν).
30:11 Ἐν τύχῃ — ΤΥΧΗ AS GREEK GODDESS: the rendering of Hebrew גָּד ('fortune/luck') as τύχη is the chapter's most theologically charged translation decision. Τύχη was the personified goddess of fortune in Hellenistic religion, widely worshipped and frequently depicted as a divine figure; by rendering גָּד as ἐν τύχῃ, the LXX translator has introduced the name of a Hellenistic deity into a naming-speech about Leah's joy. The choice likely reflects the translator's awareness that גָּד (Fortune) was also a pagan deity in the ancient Near East (cf. Isa 65:11, where the LXX translates גָּד as δαίμων — a 'demon'), and deploys the Greek divine name either to signal the same pagan resonance or simply as the most accurate semantic equivalent. Either way, it stands as a theologically jarring moment in the LXX text and is deliberately flagged here.
30:13 μακαρία ἐγώ, ὅτι μακαριοῦσίν με αἱ γυναῖκες The naming of Ασηρ from Hebrew אָשֵׁר ('happy, blessed'): Leah's exclamation μακαρία ἐγώ and the future μακαριοῦσίν με ('women will call me blessed') deploy the μακαρ- root that underlies the Beatitudes (Matt 5:3–11, μακάριοι οἱ …) and the Magnificat (Luke 1:48: ἰδοὺ γὰρ ἀπὸ τοῦ νῦν μακαριοῦσίν με πᾶσαι αἱ γενεαί). The LXX's rendering of the naming-speech in the identical vocabulary that Luke will use for Mary's blessedness creates a deep intertextual resonance: the anonymous Leah and the named Mary each receive the same divine μακαρισμός for bearing sons in circumstances of marginalization and divine intervention.
30:14–16 μανδραγόραι The mandrakes (Hebrew דּוּדָאִים, Greek μανδραγόραι) function narratively as the catalyst for the bargain that secures Leah another night with Jacob and ultimately produces three more children (Issachar, Zebulun, Dinah). The plant Mandragora officinarum was believed in antiquity to promote fertility and was associated with love (Song 7:13); its root resembles a human body. The LXX correctly renders דּוּדָאִים as μανδραγόραι (a borrowing of the Semitic root). The episode is the only scene in the chapter where Rachel and Leah negotiate directly and Rachel acquiesces to Leah's terms — a reversal of the power dynamic.
30:22 ἐμνήσθη δὲ ὁ θεὸς τῆς Ραχηλ The covenant-remembrance formula: ζκr (Hebrew 'remember') with God as subject is a technical marker of covenant-intervention — God 'remembers' Noah (Gen 8:1), Abraham's covenant (Exod 2:24), and here Rachel. The LXX's ἐμνήσθη ('remembered') carries the full covenantal weight of divine faithfulness to promise; the verb is followed immediately by εἰσήκουσεν ('heard') and ἀνέῳξεν ('opened') — the triad of covenant-response. The formula echoes structurally at Luke 1:54–55 (ἐμνήσθη ἐλέους … Ἀβραὰμ) and Luke 1:72 (μνησθῆναι διαθήκης ἁγίας).
30:23 ἀφεῖλεν ὁ θεός μου τὸ ὄνειδός μου The naming-speech for Joseph begins with ἀφαίρεω + ὄνειδος — verbatim echoed at Luke 1:25 (ἀφεῖλεν … τὸ ὄνειδός μου), Elizabeth's declaration after conceiving John the Baptist: 'The Lord has taken away my reproach.' The two women, separated by centuries, share the same Greek formula: divine removal of the reproach of barrenness. ὄνειδος ('reproach, disgrace') is a social-shame term — the stigma of a barren woman in an honor-shame culture; its removal by God is an act of covenant restoration.
30:24 Προσθέτω μοι κύριος υἱὸν ἕτερον The second naming-speech for Joseph: προστίθημι ('add, increase') etymologizes the name יוֹסֵף as 'God adds.' The same verb is used in Acts 2:47 (κύριος προσετίθει τοὺς σῳζομένους — 'the Lord was adding those being saved to the church') and in Gal 3:19 (τί οὖν ὁ νόμος; τῶν παραβάσεων χάριν προσετέθη — the Law was 'added'). Joseph's name thus encodes the theological category of divine supplementation — God's action of adding abundance beyond what already exists.
30:33 ἐπακούσεταί μου ἡ δικαιοσύνη Jacob's δικαιοσύνη ('righteousness, integrity') is personified as a legal witness that will 'answer for him' (ἐπακούσεταί μου) on the day of reckoning. The phrase is the LXX's rendering of a difficult Hebrew idiom; the result is the chapter's most striking theological concept in the economic section: moral integrity as a personified advocate. δικαιοσύνη as both ethical integrity and covenantal right-standing anticipates the full Pauline theology of δικαιοσύνη θεοῦ (Rom 1:17; 3:21–26).
30:39 ῥαντὰ καὶ ποικίλα καὶ σποδοειδῆ The chapter's four flock-color terms — φαιός ('dark/dusky'), ῥαντός ('speckled/sprinkled'), ποικίλος ('variegated/spotted'), and σποδοειδής ('ash-colored') — constitute a technical vocabulary for flock genetics. ποικίλος is also the word used of Joseph's famous coat (χιτῶνα ποικίλον, Gen 37:3): the speckled offspring of Jacob's scheme foreshadow the variegated coat of his most favored son. σποδοειδής ('ashen') appears only here in the LXX; its root σποδός ('ash') recurs at Heb 9:13 (σποδὸς δαμάλεως) in the purification theology of the red heifer.
30:42 τὰ ἄσημα τοῦ Λαβαν, τὰ δὲ ἐπίσημα τοῦ Ιακωβ ἄσημος ('without mark, undistinguished') vs. ἐπίσημος ('bearing a mark, notable, distinguished'): the settlement of the flock is summarized in a theological antithesis. ἐπίσημος is the word used at Rom 16:7 of Andronicus and Junia as 'notable among the apostles' (ἐπίσημοι ἐν τοῖς ἀποστόλοις) and at Matt 27:16 of Barabbas as the 'notable prisoner.' The marked animals — those bearing the divine σῆμα ('sign') — accrue to Jacob; the unmarked to Laban. The economic settlement maps onto the chapter's broader theological movement: God's chosen bear the mark.
30:43 ἐπλούτησεν ὁ ἄνθρωπος σφόδρα σφόδρα The double adverb σφόδρα σφόδρα ('exceedingly exceedingly') is the LXX's rendering of מְאֹד מְאֹד, used in Gen 17:2 and 17:20 for the Abrahamic multiplication-promises. Its appearance here at the chapter's close embeds Jacob's wealth in the Abrahamic covenant trajectory: the man who left home with nothing but his staff (Gen 28:10–11) and who demanded in 30:30 'when shall I also provide for my own house?' has now become ἄνθρωπος πλούσιος σφόδρα σφόδρα. The six-item wealth inventory (κτήνη, βόες, παῖδες, παιδίσκαι, κάμηλοι, ὄνοι) mirrors the patriarchal wealth-lists of Gen 12:16 (Abraham) and Gen 26:14 (Isaac), completing the patriarchal prosperity pattern.
32:3 Παρεμβολαί — LXX translates Mahanaim Hebrew מַחֲנַיִם ('two camps') is rendered Παρεμβολαί ('Camps') rather than transliterated; the LXX choice makes the dual-camp etymology transparent in Greek and structurally ties the theophanic site-name to Jacob's defensive division of his camp (δύο παρεμβολάς, 32:8) — the divine double-camp anticipates the human double-camp.
32:11 ἱκανοῦμαί σοι — 'I am unworthy / too small' The LXX renders Hebrew קָטֹנְתִּי ('I am too small') with ἱκανοῦμαί σοι — a rare verb (ἱκανόω, 'be sufficient') used in a self-deflating sense: 'I fall short of / I am insufficient before all your mercies.' The same root appears in 2 Cor 3:6 for God 'making us sufficient' — the LXX's word for Jacob's unworthiness becomes Paul's word for ministerial adequacy.
32:11 δικαιοσύνης — rendering Hebrew חֲסָדִים The LXX renders the plural ḥasadim ('acts of loyal love, covenant mercies') with δικαιοσύνη ('righteousness, righteous acts') rather than the more expected ἔλεος; this translation choice gives Jacob's prayer a legal-covenantal register — God's faithful acts are framed as righteous acts (δικαιοσύνη), anticipating Pauline usage where δικαιοσύνη becomes the word for covenant righteousness (Rom 3:21–26).
32:21 Ἐξιλάσομαι τὸ πρόσωπον — the appeasement vocabulary Hebrew אֲכַפְּרָה פָּנָיו uses the root כִּפֶּר (the Day of Atonement root — kippurim); the LXX renders with ἐξιλάσομαι, the same root as ἱλαστήριον ('mercy seat / propitiation,' Rom 3:25; Heb 9:5) and ἐξιλασμός (1 John 2:2; 4:10). Jacob's diplomatic 'propitiation' of Esau uses cultic atonement vocabulary — the LXX translation makes the human appeasement linguistically identical to cultic expiation.
32:25 ἄνθρωπος / ἐπάλαιεν — the unnamed wrestler The combatant is called only ἄνθρωπος ('a man') throughout the wrestling narrative, never named. The LXX's ἐπάλαιεν (παλαίω, 'wrestle') is unique in the LXX canon — athletic vocabulary applied to theophanic encounter. The identity oscillates: ἄνθρωπος (human form) ↔ θεοῦ (divine, in the name-etymology, v.29) ↔ ἄγγελος (Hos 12:4 LXX). John 1:14 (the Word becoming σάρξ) and the NT theology of divine incarnation resolve the ambiguity the narrative leaves open.
32:29 Ισραηλ — ἐνίσχυσας μετὰ θεοῦ The LXX reads the etymology of Israel as ἐνίσχυσας μετὰ θεοῦ καὶ μετὰ ἀνθρώπων δυνατός ('you prevailed with God and are mighty with men'), making the patriarch the active agent: Israel = 'the one who strove powerfully with God.' Hebrew יִשְׂרָאֵל is rendered in the active-triumph sense (from שָׂרָה, 'to strive/rule'). This LXX etymology is distinctive: other ancient interpreters read El as the subject ('God rules / God strives'), but the LXX insists on Jacob's active prevailing — a more triumphalist and, paradoxically, more humbling reading (God allowed himself to be held). Hos 12:4–5 LXX confirms: ἐνίσχυσεν πρὸς ἄγγελον.
32:31 Εἶδος θεοῦ — Peniel as 'Form of God' Hebrew פְּנִיאֵל ('face of God') is rendered not as πρόσωπον θεοῦ ('face of God') but as Εἶδος θεοῦ ('Form/Appearance of God') — εἶδος connotes visible shape or form more broadly than πρόσωπον (face). The choice has massive theological freight: εἶδος is the word Jesus uses in John 5:37 ('you have never seen his εἶδος') and Paul in 2 Cor 5:7 ('we walk by faith, not by εἶδος'). The site where Jacob claims to have seen God face to face is named for the divine form (εἶδος) that was visible — yet the broader canonical tradition insists divine εἶδος cannot be seen (Exod 33:20; John 1:18). The LXX's translation creates the very tension the NT navigates.
32:33 τὸ νεῦρον ὃ ἐνάρκησεν — the numbed sinew The dietary prohibition against eating the hip sinew (גִּיד הַנָּשֶׁה, rendered νεῦρον, 'sinew/tendon') is grounded in the aetiological verb ἐνάρκησεν ('was numbed') from v.26. The verb ναρκάω ('be numb') is unique in the LXX for this encounter — the choice of 'numbing' rather than 'dislocation' (the MT's root נקע, 'put out of joint') softens the injury while preserving its permanence. The sinew prohibition is not found in the Mosaic codes (Lev, Deut) but is attested in Mishnah Hullin 7:1 as an ancient oral law; the LXX grounds it in narrative aetiology rather than legislative mandate, making the bodily memory of the theophany the law's sole warrant.
33:4 ἐπέπεσεν ἐπὶ τὸν τράχηλον αὐτοῦ The phrase is the chapter's most consequential textual echo. The LXX reads: καὶ προσέδραμεν Ησαυ εἰς συνάντησιν αὐτῷ … καὶ ἐπέπεσεν ἐπὶ τὸν τράχηλον αὐτοῦ καὶ ἐφίλησεν αὐτόν. Luke 15:20 reads: ἔδραμεν καὶ ἐπέπεσεν ἐπὶ τὸν τράχηλον αὐτοῦ καὶ κατεφίλησεν αὐτόν. The verbal match is exact: the running (δραμ-), the falling upon the neck (ἐπέπεσεν ἐπὶ τὸν τράχηλον), the kiss. The MT has the same sequence. This is a deliberate LXX allusion in Luke's parable of the prodigal son, anchoring the father's reception of the returning son in the Esau–Jacob type-scene of gracious reception after estrangement — making Esau, of all people, the proto-type of the father of the parable.
33:10 εἶδον τὸ πρόσωπόν σου, ὡς ἄν τις ἴδοι πρόσωπον θεοῦ Jacob's theological comparison — seeing Esau's face is like seeing the face of God — creates a deliberate Peniel echo. At 32:30 Jacob had declared εἶδον γὰρ θεὸν πρόσωπον πρὸς πρόσωπον ('I have seen God face to face and my life was preserved'). Now he tells Esau that seeing his face carries the same quality of terrifying grace and survival. The potential optative ὡς ἄν τις ἴδοι ('as one would see') marks the comparison as hypothetical and generalizing — any survivor of a divine encounter would feel as Jacob does; Esau's mercy is divine mercy in human form.
33:11 λάβε τὰς εὐλογίας μου Jacob calls his gift τὰς εὐλογίας μου ('my blessings'), using the same noun employed for Isaac's covenant blessing stolen in Gen 27 (εὐλογία at 27:12, 35, 36, 38, 41; 28:4). The Hebrew at this point reads בִּרְכָתִי ('my blessing'), the same word used throughout the blessing-theft narrative. By describing his material gift as 'blessings' and urging Esau to λάβε ('take') them — the inverse of the original theft — Jacob performs an act of symbolic restitution. The irony is deliberate and is encoded in the LXX's word-choice.
33:17 εἰς Σκηνάς … ἐκάλεσεν τὸ ὄνομα τοῦ τόπου ἐκείνου Σκηναί The LXX's translation of Hebrew סֻכּוֹת (sukkôṯ, 'booths / shelters') as Σκηναί rather than a transliteration such as Σοκχώθ is a deliberate interpretive choice. The LXX does transliterate Succoth elsewhere (e.g., Num 33:5 LXX reads Σοκχώθ); here, uniquely, it translates, making the aetiology — 'therefore he called the place Booths' — immediately transparent. The word Σκηναί is also the LXX term for booths in the Feast of Tabernacles (Σκηνοπηγία, Lev 23:34), creating a faint liturgical resonance.
33:18 Σαλημ πόλιν Σικιμων The Hebrew שָׁלֵם (šālēm) at this point is text-critically ambiguous: it can be parsed as the proper noun 'Salem' (a place-name, read by the LXX and reflected in Rahlfs–Hanhart: Σαλημ) or as the adverb 'safely / in peace' (giving the translation 'Jacob arrived safely at the city of Shechem'). The Syriac, Vulgate, and many modern translations follow the adverbial reading; the LXX treats it as a toponym, possibly connecting it to Melchizedek's Σαλημ (Gen 14:18). The Rahlfs text's Σαλημ πόλιν Σικιμων yields a geographical identification otherwise unattested.
33:19 ἑκατὸν ἀμνάδων The Hebrew price-term קְשִׂיטָה (qesitah) appears only three times in the Hebrew Bible (Gen 33:19; Josh 24:32; Job 42:11) and its meaning is uncertain — a monetary unit of unknown weight or value. The LXX renders it as ἑκατὸν ἀμνάδων ('a hundred she-lambs') in all three cases, choosing a concrete livestock value that may reflect a traditional understanding or a guess based on the word's possible etymology. Acts 7:16 (Stephen's speech) mentions a purchase at Shechem attributed to Abraham rather than Jacob, a telescoping that creates a well-known historical crux; the field itself reappears at Josh 24:32 as Joseph's burial site.
33:20 ἐπεκαλέσατο τὸν θεὸν Ισραηλ The MT reads וַיִּקְרָא-לוֹ אֵל אֱלֹהֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל ('and he called it El-Elohe-Israel' — the altar-name 'God, the God of Israel'). The LXX converts this into a verbal phrase: ἐπεκαλέσατο τὸν θεὸν Ισραηλ ('he called upon the God of Israel'), substituting a cultic act of invocation for the MT's inscription of a proper name. The theological gain in the LXX is significant: where the MT names the altar, the LXX records a prayer. Additionally, the phrase τὸν θεὸν Ισραηλ represents the first occurrence in the Septuagint of the formula 'the God of Israel' that will pervade the rest of Scripture — the covenant name Ισραηλ, given to Jacob at 32:28, now for the first time defines the identity of the divine.
34:2 ἐταπείνωσεν αὐτήν The LXX renders the Hebrew pi'el of עָנָה (ʿinnâh, 'humiliate / afflict') as ταπεινόω ('humble / bring low'), its standard translation for sexual violation throughout the Scriptures (2 Sam 13:12, 14, 22, 32 [Amnon and Tamar]; Deut 22:24, 29 LXX). The choice of 'humble' rather than an explicit term for rape is both euphemistic and theologically pointed: the crime is named as a radical act of power-violence and social diminishment rather than a purely physical act. The verb appears as the third in the crime-sequence εἶδεν … ἐκοιμήθη … ἐταπείνωσεν, lending the whole sequence a climactic juridical weight.
34:3 προσέσχεν τῇ ψυχῇ Δινας The LXX renders the Hebrew וַתִּדְבַּק נַפְשׁוֹ בְּדִינָה ('his soul clung to Dinah') with προσέχω + dative of ψυχή rather than the expected κολλάω, slightly muting the covenantal-bonding resonance of דָּבַק (used in Gen 2:24 and Ruth 1:14). The soul-language (ψυχή) is preserved and conveys the totality of Shechem's attachment; that the language of the deepest bonding is applied to a violator's post-crime obsession is one of the chapter's most disturbing literary dissonances.
34:7 ἄσχημον ἐποίησεν ἐν Ισραηλ The first occurrence in the LXX of the juridical formula 'he wrought an unseemly/disgraceful thing in Israel,' which will recur as a proscriptive verdict on violations of communal norms (2 Sam 13:12: οὐ ποιηθήσεται οὕτως ἐν Ισραηλ; Judg 20:6, 10 LXX). The LXX uses ἄσχημον ('unseemly / shameful') to render Hebrew נְבָלָה (nᵉḇālāh, 'outrage / folly'), a term for serious breaches of the social-moral order. The use of Ισραηλ is chronologically anachronistic (Jacob has only just been renamed; the people Israel does not yet exist), but theologically programmatic: the violation is retrospectively inscribed as an offence against the community God is constituting. The closing καὶ οὐχ οὕτως ἔσται ('and it shall not be so') is the proscriptive formula that completes the verdict.
34:13 μετὰ δόλου The narrator's front-loaded moral label on the brothers' reply — 'with deceit' — is placed before the speech content is given, so the reader evaluates every subsequent word through its lens. The δόλος ('guile / treachery') renders Hebrew מִרְמָה (mirmāh); the same root is used of Jacob's deception of Isaac (Gen 27:35 LXX: μετὰ δόλου) and Laban's deception of Jacob (Gen 29:25 LXX). The narrator does not suppress the judgment; nor does he condemn the brothers in explicit terms. The text lives in the moral ambiguity it creates. The question of whether the brothers' deceit is justified by the prior crime or condemned by the narrator's label is one the text refuses to resolve.
34:19 ἐνδοξότατος πάντων τῶν ἐν τῷ οἴκῳ τοῦ πατρὸς αὐτοῦ The superlative ἐνδοξότατος ('most honoured of all in his father's house') explains why Shechem's appeal to the city succeeds: his social authority converts a difficult personal request (mass circumcision) into a civic decision. The tragic irony — the most honoured man of the city leads his people into the fatal vulnerability — is a deliberate narrative choice: the very quality that makes him attractive to Dinah's family (wealth, status, the ability to promise things) is what destroys his community.
34:30 μισητόν με πεποιήκατε The perfect tense πεποιήκατε (state-of-affairs perfect: 'you have made me [into an odious person] and I remain so') is the chapter's most carefully chosen verbal form. Jacob's rebuke contains no moral evaluation of the killing; it is entirely pragmatic — reputation and survival. The word μισητόν ('odious / hated') renders Hebrew עֲכַרְתֶּם ('you have brought trouble upon me'): the LXX interprets the trouble as social enmity rather than mere disruption, giving Jacob's fear a relational texture. The speech's conspicuous silence on the morality of the massacre has generated extensive interpretive controversy; Gen 49:5–7 supplies the deferred moral verdict.
34:31 ὡσεὶ πόρνῃ χρήσωνται τῇ ἀδελφῇ ἡμῶν; The deliberative subjunctive χρήσωνται ('shall they treat?') in a rhetorical question is the LXX's rendering of the Hebrew הֲכְזוֹנָה יַעֲשֶׂה אֶת־אֲחוֹתֵנוּ ('shall he treat our sister as a harlot?'). The LXX shifts from the singular Hebrew subject (Shechem alone) to a 3rd plural — 'they' — broadening the indictment to the Shechemites generally and retrospectively justifying the collective punishment. The word πόρνη ('prostitute / harlot') marks the violation's social meaning: Shechem treated Dinah as if she were commercially available for sexual use without negotiation, consent, or proper bridal arrangements. The chapter ends without Jacob's reply. The unanswerable quality of the question — it cannot be answered 'yes' within any conceivable honour framework — is the brothers' final, devastating rhetorical move.
35:5 φόβος θεοῦ ('terror of God') The anarthrous construct phrase renders Hebrew חִתַּת אֱלֹהִים — a divine panic that paralyzes enemies without human military action (Josh 2:9; Exod 15:16; 23:27). The LXX preserves the idiom exactly: the genitive θεοῦ is simultaneously subjective (God sends the terror) and qualitative (a God-scale terror). It protects Jacob's company as they ascend to Bethel, and the episode establishes divine-warfare protection as the frame for the covenantal renewal that follows.
35:8 Βάλανος πένθους ('oak of weeping') FLAGGED — the LXX TRANSLATES Hebrew אַלּוֹן בָּכוּת (Allon-bacuth, 'oak of weeping') rather than transliterating, making the grief-etymology explicit to Greek readers. The death of Deborah, Rebekah's nurse — named here for the only time in the narrative (Gen 24:59 records her departure with Rebekah without naming her) — is one of the most puzzling notices in Genesis. Her presence with Jacob's company is unexplained; her burial at the foot of Bethel is preserved only in this toponym. The LXX's translation-choice emphasizes communal grief at the threshold of the theophany.
35:11 ἐγὼ ὁ θεός σου ('I am your God') FLAGGED — the LXX reads ἐγὼ ὁ θεός σου where the Hebrew has אֵל שַׁדַּי (El Shaddai, 'God Almighty'). The LXX systematically substitutes the relational covenant formula ἐγώ εἰμι ὁ θεός σου for El Shaddai throughout Genesis (17:1; 28:3; 43:14; 48:3), rendering the divine name functionally rather than onomastically. The result is a shift from divine power-title to personal-covenant declaration. The NT ἐγώ εἰμι formulations (John 6:35; 8:12; 10:11) directly inherit this LXX Ich-bin tradition. The αὐξάνου καὶ πληθύνου that follows echoes Gen 1:28 and 9:1, locating Jacob's covenant in the primal sequence of divine fruitfulness-blessings.
35:18 Υἱὸς ὀδύνης μου / Βενιαμιν CENTRAL CRUX — the LXX TRANSLATES the dying Rachel's name for the child (בֶּן-אוֹנִי = 'son of my sorrow') as Υἱὸς ὀδύνης μου ('son of my pain'), making the grief-semantics fully available to Greek readers. But Jacob's renaming (בִּנְיָמִין = 'son of the right hand') is TRANSLITERATED as Βενιαμιν — the LXX deliberately translates the mother's name and transliterates the father's, preserving the translate/transliterate contrast of the source text. The contrast encodes the theological stakes: Rachel names from grief, Jacob names from hope; the father's name prevails. The canonical name Βενιαμιν then appears without comment at 35:24 and in all subsequent lists.
35:19 αὕτη ἐστὶν Βηθλεεμ ('this is Bethlehem') The LXX gloss identifying Ephratha with Bethlehem is the earliest such identification in the LXX (cf. Ruth 4:11; Micah 5:2 LXX where the two names appear together). The identification grounds Rachel's roadside tomb at the precise site that Jeremiah 31:15 LXX will later invoke — 'a voice was heard in Ramah, weeping and much mourning, Rachel weeping for her children' — and that Matthew 2:18 cites in response to the massacre of innocents near Bethlehem. The LXX's gloss αὕτη ἐστὶν Βηθλεεμ is thus the exegetical foundation on which Matt 2:18's geographic-typological argument rests.
35:22 καὶ ἤκουσεν Ισραηλ ('and Israel heard') The terseness of the clause — no verb of response, no speech, no punishment — is the most compressed verdict in the patriarchal narratives. The LXX follows the Hebrew exactly (וַיִּשְׁמַע יִשְׂרָאֵל). The silence is deliberate: Jacob hears of Reuben's violation of his concubine Bilhah and does nothing — at least nothing recorded. The deferred verdict comes only at Gen 49:4 ('you shall not excel, because you went up to your father's bed'). The use of the covenant name Ισραηλ (not Ιακωβ) at the moment of hearing adds a dimension of covenantal gravity — the patriarch who has just had his name confirmed by God now hears the news of his son's violation of the covenant-household.
36:24 εὗρεν τὸν Ιαμιν ἐν τῇ ἐρήμῳ The Hebrew הַיֵּמִם is an unresolved hapax: the Vulgate reads mulos ('mules'), suggesting a tradition that Ana discovered a way to breed mules or found a herd of them; most modern EVV render 'hot springs' based on Arabic cognates and Targum evidence. The LXX alone treats הַיֵּמִם as an indeclinable proper name — Ιαμιν — so that Ana 'found a person or entity called Iamin' in the desert. No other ancient version follows this reading. The LXX's choice may reflect a different Hebrew Vorlage, a scribal error, or a translator's decision to preserve an unfamiliar word as a name rather than guess at its meaning. The result is the most distinctive LXX divergence in the chapter and leaves Greek readers with a cryptic datum: Ana found 'IAMIN' — but what Iamin was, the text does not say.
36:31 πρὸ τοῦ βασιλεῦσαι βασιλέα ἐν Ισραηλ The formula 'before any king reigned in Israel' is a famous anachronism-flag in the Pentateuch. Written from the standpoint of Israelite monarchy, it presupposes a post-Saul (or post-David) vantage point in the document's present form, even while the narrative setting is patriarchal. The Talmud (Sanhedrin 20b) already noted the tension; modern source criticism treats the verse as evidence of late editing of the genealogical material. The LXX renders the Hebrew exactly — πρὸ τοῦ + genitive articular infinitive is its standard temporal construction — without attempting to harmonize the chronological problem. The verse sits in the tradition history of Edomite kingship before Davidic Israel, and its implicit comparative ('Edom had kings first') carries significant political and theological freight.
36:2 Ευαίου ('Hivite') vs. Χορραίου ('Horite') at 36:20 Elibema's grandfather Sebegeon is called 'the Hivite' (τοῦ Ευαίου) in v.2 but appears as a son of Seir 'the Horite' (τοῦ Χορραίου) in v.20 — making him simultaneously Hivite and Horite. The LXX inherits this discrepancy from the MT and does not resolve it. Commentators propose either a textual error (Ευαίου for Χορραίου, very similar in Hebrew and Greek), an ethnic overlap between the two groups, or the possibility that the two Sebegeon references are different individuals. The LXX's unresolved divergence is noted here.
36:32 Βαλακ vs. MT בֶּלַע (Bela) The LXX reads Βαλακ for the first Edomite king where the MT has בֶּלַע (Bela). Βαλακ is elsewhere the Moabite king who hired Balaam (Num 22:2 LXX), creating a potentially confusing overlap of names. The Hebrew consonants בֶּלַע and בָּלָק are distinct; the LXX reading Βαλακ may reflect a scribal confusion, a different Vorlage reading, or a phonetic rendering of an unfamiliar name toward a more familiar one. The MT בֶּלַע is confirmed by 1 Chr 1:43 LXX (Βαλεκ).
37:3 χιτὼν ποικίλος The LXX renders Hebrew כְּתֹנֶת פַּסִּים with χιτὼν ποικίλος ('variegated tunic'), choosing the adjective ποικίλος ('of varied/many colours, speckled') that it also uses for Laban's speckled and spotted animals in Gen 30 (LXX: ποικίλα καὶ λευκά / ῥαντά). The echo is deliberate: the same root that describes the contested livestock of Gen 30 now describes the contested garment of Gen 37, weaving the two cycles of Jacob's story together. The Hebrew פַּסִּים is a hapax (or near-hapax) whose meaning is uncertain; proposed renderings include 'long-sleeved' (Aramaic cognate pissīn), 'ornamented' (from a root for the palm of the hand or foot, hence fringed extremities), or 'multi-coloured.' The LXX's choice of ποικίλος shaped the entire subsequent tradition: the Vulgate (tunicam polymitam) and English 'coat of many colours' both depend on it.
37:28 εἴκοσι χρυσῶν A celebrated LXX–MT divergence. The MT reads כֶּסֶף ('silver') for the price of Joseph's sale; the LXX reads χρυσῶν ('gold pieces,' genitive plural of χρυσοῦς sc. στατήρ). The number twenty is the same in both. The LXX's gold raises the transaction's prestige and creates a clear distinction from the thirty pieces of silver in Zechariah 11:12 (LXX: τριάκοντα ἀργυροῦς) cited in Matthew 26:15 for the betrayal price of Jesus — the two narratives, often read typologically together, use different metals and different amounts in their respective source texts. The gold reading may reflect a variant Hebrew Vorlage, a translator's choice, or a scribal correction. Most critical scholars follow the MT's silver; the LXX's gold is marked in the apparatus and is the reading preserved by the Greek tradition down to Josephus and the Samaritan Pentateuch (which follows MT).
37:35 εἰς ᾅδου Jacob declares he will go down mourning 'to my son into Hades' (εἰς ᾅδου). The MT reads שְׁאֹלָה ('to Sheol'), the Hebrew underworld of the dead — a shadowy realm without clear moral differentiation between its inhabitants. The LXX systematically renders שְׁאוֹל / שְׁאֹל with ᾅδης, the Greek underworld (the realm of Hades), at every occurrence in the Pentateuch and Psalms. The substitution is theologically significant: Hades carries Greek cosmological weight (the realm of shades, reached by descending) that Sheol does not have in its original Hebrew register, and it opens the door to the much richer Greek-Jewish and then Christian speculation about the afterlife state. The same equation appears at Jonah 2:3 LXX (κοιλίᾳ ᾅδου), Ps 87:4 LXX, and is exploited christologically in Acts 2:27 (οὐκ ἐγκαταλείψεις τὴν ψυχήν μου εἰς ᾅδου, citing Ps 15:10 LXX).
37:36 ἀρχιμαγείρῳ The LXX renders Hebrew רַב-טַבָּחִים ('chief of the slaughterers/guard') with ἀρχιμάγειρος ('chief cook / chief butcher'). The Hebrew טַבָּח means 'slaughterer' and by extension 'member of the royal bodyguard / executioner' (cf. 2 Kings 25:8 MT, where רַב-טַבָּחִים is Nebuzaradan's title, clearly a military commander). The LXX preserves the literal culinary register of the root (μάγειρος = 'cook, butcher') rather than the extended military meaning, so that in the LXX Potiphar is identified as a high royal chef rather than a captain of the guard. The same title ἀρχιμάγειρος recurs at Gen 39:1; 40:3–4; 41:10–12 LXX. Later Greek readers, who knew μάγειρος as a cook, would understand Potiphar as head of the royal kitchen — a plausible Egyptian court title — rather than a military official. The divergence from the MT's military register has been noted since Jerome (who rendered praepositus militum, 'commander of soldiers').
38:7 πονηρὸς ἐναντίον κυρίου FLAGGED — the divine judgment formula for Er uses κυρίου ('Lord'), while the parallel formula for Onan at v.10 uses τοῦ θεοῦ ('God'). The variation is present in the LXX and reflects the Greek translators' handling of distinct divine names in the Hebrew; the LXX renders both deaths with the same idiomatic phrase (πονηρὸς / πονηρὸν ἐναντίον κυρίου/θεοῦ = 'wicked before the Lord/God') but switches the divine name — possibly reflecting textual variation in the Hebrew Vorlage, or a deliberate translational choice. The phrase ἐναντίον κυρίου is a regular LXX rendering of לִפְנֵי יְהוָה ('before the LORD') and carries strong covenantal-judgment resonance.
38:8 γαμβρεύθητι αὐτῇ FLAGGED — the LXX renders the Hebrew levirate command (יַבֵּם אֶת-אִשֶּׁת אָחִיךָ, 'perform the levirate duty for your brother's wife') with the single imperative γαμβρεύθητι αὐτῇ — the passive/middle of γαμβρεύω, 'act as a kinsman by marriage / fulfill the brother-in-law obligation.' This is a specialized legal-kinship term; the cognate law at Deut 25:5 LXX uses the same vocabulary (ἐπιγαμβρεύσει αὐτήν). The choice of the rare γαμβρεύω (rather than the more common λαμβάνω or ἄγω) reflects the LXX's careful legal-terminological precision for levirate institutions; the failure of Onan to perform this obligation makes the LXX's technical vocabulary morally loaded.
38:9 ἐξέχεεν ἐπὶ τὴν γῆν … ἵνα μὴ δῷ σπέρμα Onan's deliberate frustration of the levirate duty is described with two imperfect verbs: ἐγίνετο ('it would come about') and ἐξέχεεν ('he would pour out') — both iterative imperfects indicating habitual, repeated action. The LXX's use of iterative imperfects rather than an aorist makes the offense not a single incident but a systematic, ongoing defiance of the levirate obligation; the clause ἵνα μὴ δῷ σπέρμα τῷ ἀδελφῷ αὐτοῦ ('lest he give seed to his brother') states the explicit motive — the continuation of the dead brother's line was the legal purpose of the levirate, and Onan subverted it deliberately and repeatedly.
38:14 θέριστρον ('veil / shawl') FLAGGED — the word θέριστρον (a summer garment / veil / shawl) is used here for Tamar's disguise, and the same word appears at Gen 24:65 for Rebekah's veil when she sees Isaac for the first time. The verbal echo is deliberate: in both scenes a woman dons a θέριστρον in an act with profound marital-legal consequences; in Gen 24 the veil signals Rebekah's readiness to enter Isaac's household; in Gen 38 it is the instrument of Tamar's stratagem to obtain the levirate right denied to her. The LXX's precise lexical repetition links the two scenes and situates Tamar's action in the same female-agency tradition as the patriarchal brides.
38:15 πόρνη ('prostitute') / 38:21 CENTRAL LXX–MT DIVERGENCE — the MT at 38:15 uses זוֹנָה (zonah, 'prostitute') for Judah's assumption about Tamar; the MT at 38:21–22 shifts to קְדֵשָׁה (qedeshah, 'consecrated woman / cult-prostitute'), a distinct term. The LXX flattens both with πόρνη throughout, erasing any distinction between commercial prostitution and possible cultic dedication. The effect is to eliminate the MT's ambiguity about whether Judah sought a cult-prostitute — a significant difference: the MT's use of qedeshah opens the possibility of a Canaanite religious context for the encounter, while the LXX's consistent πόρνη renders the scene as straightforwardly commercial. This harmonization may reflect the LXX translators' theological discomfort with the qedeshah institution or their reading of a Vorlage that already had only zonah.
38:18 ἀρραβών ('pledge / earnest') The word ἀρραβών (transliterating Semitic ʿarrābôn / Hebrew עֵרָבוֹן) is a loan-word in Greek for a down-payment, pledge, or earnest — the first installment guaranteeing a subsequent payment. Its appearance here as Tamar's demanded guarantee (before the kid is sent) is the earliest occurrence of ἀρραβών in Greek literature; the same word enters the NT vocabulary at 2 Cor 1:22; 5:5; Eph 1:14 for the Holy Spirit as God's ἀρραβών (guarantee/down-payment) of the promised inheritance — a striking semantic trajectory from Tamar's pledge-tokens to Pauline pneumatology. The three items (ring, cord, staff) chosen by Tamar are the most identifying personal effects a man could carry; their reappearance verbatim at v.25 structures the plot's reversal.
38:26 Δεδικαίωται Θαμαρ ἢ ἐγώ MOST PROMINENT CRUX — the perfect passive of δικαιόω: 'Tamar has been justified / stands in the right rather than I.' This is the verb of Pauline justification (Rom 3:24, 3:28; 4:2; Gal 2:16; 3:11; cf. also the cognate δικαίωσις at Rom 4:25; 5:18) deployed here in a patriarchal confession about a Gentile widow who secured justice by deception. The perfect tense Δεδικαίωται gives the verdict a settled, irreversible quality: Tamar's righteous standing is a present, established fact, not merely a past event. The comparator ἢ ἐγώ ('rather than I / more than I') turns the statement into a complete moral inversion — the one who condemned is now declared the wrongdoer, the one condemned stands vindicated. Judah does not receive absolution; the text records his acknowledgment and closes with his sexual withdrawal from Tamar — the chapter's moral account is settled but not expiated. The LXX's use of δικαιόω in this forensic-personal sense is the richest precursor to the verb's later theological loading.
38:28–30 κόκκινον ('scarlet'); Φαρες / Ζαρα / Matt 1:3 The κόκκινον (scarlet thread) of vv.28–30 is a narrative device whose reversal — the thread marks the expected firstborn but ends up on the second-born — completes the chapter's pattern of reversed primogeniture. The same word κόκκινον reappears at Josh 2:18, 21 for Rahab's scarlet cord (κόκκινον σπαρτίον), prompting patristic comparisons (Justin Martyr, Dial. 111; Origen, Hom. Josh. 3) with the blood-sign of Passover and later with the blood of Christ. The naming of Φαρες ('breach,' from פָּרַץ) via the etymological exclamation Τί διεκόπη διὰ σοῦ φραγμός ('Why was a breach broken through because of you?') uses φραγμός — the cognate of which appears at Eph 2:14 for 'the dividing wall' broken down by Christ. The Matthean genealogy (Matt 1:3: Φαρὲς δὲ καὶ Ζαρά, ἐκ τῆς Θάμαρ) names both twins and their mother — one of only four women in the genealogy (with Rahab, Ruth, and Bathsheba), all Gentiles or women with irregular sexual histories, a pattern scholars read as Matthew's signal that the messianic line runs through grace operating at the margins of legal propriety.
39:2 ἀνὴρ ἐπιτυγχάνων The participial phrase renders Hebrew אִישׁ מַצְלִיחַ ('a man who succeeds / prospers'). ἐπιτυγχάνω is rarely used in the LXX in this prosperity-sense; the combination ἀνὴρ ἐπιτυγχάνων is a LXX hapax. The participle functions predicatively ('Joseph was a man who was succeeding') and picks up the narrative of divine causation: the LORD's presence produces Joseph's observed success, and the success is visible to his Egyptian master.
39:6 καλὸς τῷ εἴδει καὶ ὡραῖος τῇ ὄψει σφόδρα CRUX — the beauty description of Joseph at 39:6 echoes Rachel's at 29:17 (καλὴ τῷ εἴδει καὶ ὡραία τῇ ὄψει σφόδρα) with only the gender adjective changing (καλός/καλή). The echo is a deliberate narratological link — Rachel's beauty attracted Jacob's desire; Joseph's beauty attracts Potiphar's wife's desire. Mother and son are connected by the same formula, and the beauty that brought Rachel to Jacob now brings Joseph to the brink of disaster. The LXX preserves the connection precisely.
39:9 ἁμαρτήσομαι ἐναντίον τοῦ θεοῦ CRUX — 'I shall sin before God.' The future indicative ἁμαρτήσομαι carries deliberative-moral force: 'how could I / how shall I commit this evil and sin before God?' Notably, Joseph uses θεός rather than κύριος — the only place in the chapter where the explicit divine name shifts from the ambiguous κύριος (which throughout vv.1–6 applies simultaneously to Potiphar and to YHWH) to the unambiguous θεός. The refusal is grounded explicitly in the theological: this is not loyalty to Potiphar alone but orientation toward God. The formulation is the first sin-before-God language in the Joseph narrative and anticipates the NT theology of flight from sin (1 Cor 6:18; 2 Tim 2:22).
39:10 ἡμέραν ἐξ ἡμέρας CRUX — 'day from day'; the Hebraistic distributive/iterative idiom (יוֹם יוֹם in Hebrew) rendered literally in Greek. The accusative-of-extent construction ἡμέραν ἐξ ἡμέρας conveys the unrelenting, daily character of the wife's advances. The two imperfect verbs that follow — ἐλάλει (she spoke) / ὑπήκουεν (he did not listen) — confirm the iterative reading: this was the habitual pattern, day after day. The idiom also appears at 39:10 only in the LXX Joseph narrative and is rare in the Greek Bible, marking the verse as a Hebraism the translator preserved rather than normalizing.
39:12 ἱμάτιον The garment at 39:12 is the second garment-deception in the Jacob cycle. The first was the ornamented coat (χιτών) of Gen 37:31–33: Joseph's brothers dipped it in blood to deceive Jacob into thinking Joseph was dead. Now the cloak (ἱμάτιον) becomes false evidence of a crime that did not occur, wielded to deceive Potiphar. The two garment-incidents frame the Joseph narrative's opening arc (chs 37–39) with a clothing-as-false-witness motif. ἱμάτιον occurs six times in vv.12–18, the concentrated repetition serving as a literary thread tracking the accusation's construction.
39:20 ὀχύρωμα CRUX — 'stronghold, fortress'; the LXX's rendering of Hebrew מִשְׁמָר ('custody / place of confinement'). The ordinary term for a prison (δεσμωτήριον) is replaced by the militarized ὀχύρωμα, transforming the royal prison into a fortified installation. The word appears twice in v.20 (a small inclusion) and recurs in vv.21–23. The choice creates the ironic paradox of the following verses: the man thrown into a fortress ends up governing it, just as the man sold into slavery ended up governing a household. 2 Cor 10:4 uses ὀχύρωμα in a theological register (strongholds opposed to God), though the Genesis use is purely narrative.
39:21 κατέχεεν αὐτοῦ ἔλεος 'Poured steadfast love upon him'; the only occurrence of ἔλεος in Gen 39, and the only point at which the divine favor is described not merely as presence (ἦν μετ᾿ αὐτοῦ) but as active covenant-loyalty outpoured. ἔλεος renders Hebrew חֶסֶד (chesed), the central covenant-loyalty term of the Hebrew Bible. The pouring image (καταχέω) is unusual with ἔλεος; the effect is to portray divine mercy as an active, abundant bestowal on Joseph at the nadir of his descent — the prison-phase is governed by covenantal steadfast love, not merely providential oversight.
39:23 εὐώδου The LXX Koine form of εὐοδόω (third singular imperfect), rendered by the coordinator as εὐώδου to distinguish from the present εὐοδοῖ at v.3. The imperfect aspect marks the habitual, characteristic making-prosper: 'whatever he did, the LORD kept making it prosper in his hands.' The verb closes the chapter with the prosperity vocabulary as its final word, and ἐν ταῖς χερσὶν αὐτοῦ ('in his hands') is the ninth and final hand-reference in Gen 39 — the chapter that opened with Joseph delivered ἐκ χειρὸς τῶν Ισμαηλιτῶν ('from the hand of the Ishmaelites') ends with the LORD's prosperity ἐν ταῖς χερσὶν αὐτοῦ ('in his hands'): the hands of the enslaved have become the hands of the divinely prospered.
40:7 σκυθρωπά ('downcast-faced') FLAGGED — σκυθρωπός literally means 'Scythian-faced,' connoting a grim, dour expression; it is rare in the LXX and appears in the NT at Luke 24:17 where the two Emmaus disciples are described as σκυθρωποί — walking away from Jerusalem with the same downcast faces as the prisoners in Gen 40. The lexical echo may be deliberate: Joseph's question to the two troubled officials foreshadows the unrecognized stranger's question to two troubled disciples walking away from an execution they did not yet understand as a restoration.
40:8 διασάφησις ('clear explanation / interpretation') FLAGGED — a compound of διά ('through') + σαφής ('clear, plain'), rare in the LXX and chosen over the more common κρίσις or ἑρμηνεία to render Hebrew פִּתְרוֹן, the specialized dream-interpretation term used only in the Joseph cycle (Gen 40–41). The LXX's choice emphasizes clarity and completeness of divine exposition — not merely a verdict but a full illumination. Joseph's rhetorical question Οὐχὶ διὰ τοῦ θεοῦ ἡ διασάφησις αὐτῶν ἐστιν; ('is not the διασάφησις of them through God?') uses the same διά in the word itself — through God's clarity comes the clear explanation.
40:13 / 40:19 ἀφελεῖ τὴν κεφαλήν σου ἀπὸ σοῦ ('will take your head from you') FLAGGED — the grim wordplay on the Hebrew idiom נָשָׂא רֹאשׁ ('lift up the head'), which can mean either royal restoration (cf. 2 Kgs 25:27) or decapitation. The LXX preserves the split: 40:13 uses μνησθήσεται ... τῆς ἀρχῆς σου ('will remember your rank') with the cupbearer, while 40:19 uses ἀφελεῖ Φαραω τὴν κεφαλήν σου ἀπὸ σοῦ for the baker — 'will remove your head from you.' The explicit ἀπὸ σοῦ ('from you') makes the separation of head from body unmistakable, turning the royal idiom of favor into its polar opposite. The dream-imagery reinforces the wordplay: the basket on the baker's κεφαλή (head, vv.16–17) becomes the site of his decapitation (v.19).
40:14 μνήσθητί μου ('remember me') FLAGGED — NT ECHO. The aorist passive imperative μνήσθητί + genitive is the exact form that appears in Luke 23:42: μνήσθητί μου ὅταν ἔλθῃς εἰς τὴν βασιλείαν σου ('remember me when you come into your kingdom'). Joseph speaks from unjust imprisonment, pleading for intercession with a powerful interlocutor who alone can secure his release. The thief speaks from a cross, pleading for intercession with the condemned king beside him. Both use the same verb, the same mood, the same pronoun. One plea is forgotten (v.23: ἐπελάθετο αὐτοῦ); the other is answered immediately. The typological connection is the more pointed because Joseph is the great OT type of Christ — betrayed by his brothers, sold for silver, unjustly condemned, raised to a throne from which he feeds the world.
40:15 κλοπῇ ἐκλάπην ('I was stolen by theft') FLAGGED — HEBRAISM. The cognate dative κλοπῇ ἐκλάπην renders the Hebrew infinitive-absolute construction גָּנֹב גֻּנַּבְתִּי (literally 'stealing I was stolen'), a grammatical device in Biblical Hebrew for emphatic assertion of the verbal idea. The LXX captures this with a figura etymologica — the noun (κλοπή, 'theft') placed in the dative before the passive verb (ἐκλάπην, 'I was stolen') from the same root (κλέπτω), producing an emphatic idiomatic assertion: 'I was truly, completely stolen.' The passive voice is significant: Joseph does not say 'my brothers sold me' or 'I was transported' but 'I was stolen' — a victim's passive, asserting his innocence and his status as wronged person.
40:23 ἐπελάθετο αὐτοῦ ('forgot him') FLAGGED — the chapter closes with two memory-verbs, not one: οὐκ ἐμνήσθη ('did not remember') + ἐπελάθετο ('forgot'). The second verb, from ἐπιλανθάνομαι (compound ἐπί + λανθάνομαι, 'escape notice / be hidden'), intensifies the forgetting toward completeness — not merely a failure to recall but an active consignment to oblivion. The LXX's double formulation appears to go beyond the Hebrew (which has only one verb of non-remembrance); it is the LXX's own rhetorical thickening of the irony, closing a chapter dense with memory-language (μνήσθητί, μνησθήσεται, ἐμνήσθη) with a double thud. The same compound verb appears in Heb 13:2 (μὴ ἐπιλανθάνεσθε φιλοξενίας — 'do not forget hospitality') — the precise virtue that, had the cupbearer practiced it, would have ended Joseph's imprisonment two years sooner.
41:2 ἄχει ('reed-grass') FLAGGED — Egyptian loanword. The LXX transliterates Egyptian 3ḫ.t ('reed-swamp / marshy meadow') as ἄχι / ἄχει rather than substituting a standard Greek botanical or geographical term. The word appears only at Gen 41:2 and 41:18 in the entire LXX — both instances in Joseph's dream / Pharaoh's retelling, always in the Nile-margin context. The preservation of the Egyptian term gives the Joseph narrative a distinctive Egyptian local colour that the LXX otherwise tends to smooth over. Modern translators typically render 'reed-grass' or 'marshy meadow.'
41:16 ἄνευ τοῦ θεοῦ οὐκ ἀποκριθήσεται τὸ σωτήριον Φαραω ('without God an answer of salvation shall not be given to Pharaoh') FLAGGED — the LXX rendering of Hebrew בִּלְעָדַי אֱלֹהִים יַעֲנֶה אֶת-שְׁלוֹם פַּרְעֹה is more explicitly soteriological than any other ancient version. The Hebrew reads 'apart from me, God will answer the peace/welfare of Pharaoh.' The LXX renders with the noun τὸ σωτήριον ('salvation / saving answer') and the prepositional phrase ἄνευ τοῦ θεοῦ — shifting from 'God will answer' (Hebrew) to 'without God there will be no answer of salvation' (Greek). The word σωτήριον recurs throughout the LXX Psalter (Ps 3:8; 13:7; 17:51 etc.) as the standard term for God's saving act; its appearance here in Joseph's mouth before Pharaoh marks the chapter's first explicit theology of divine dependence.
41:32 ἀληθὲς ἔσται τὸ ῥῆμα τὸ παρὰ τοῦ θεοῦ ('the word that is from God will be true') The epistemological seal of the interpretation: the doubling of the dream (τὸ δὲ δευτερωθῆναι τὸ ἐνύπνιον Φαραω δίς) is given as evidence that the word from God is certain (ἀληθές). The LXX's τὸ ῥῆμα τὸ παρὰ τοῦ θεοῦ ('the word that is from God') is a striking phrase — παρά with genitive of origin ('from the side of God') intensifies the divine source claim. The same formula will echo in Gabriel's announcement at Luke 1:37 (οὐκ ἀδυνατήσει παρὰ τοῦ θεοῦ πᾶν ῥῆμα, 'nothing will be impossible with/from God') — a Lucan allusion to the LXX idiom of divinely certain speech.
41:38 πνεῦμα θεοῦ ἐν αὐτῷ ('spirit of God in him') FLAGGED — Pharaoh's question εὑρήσομεν ἄνθρωπον τοιοῦτον ὃς ἔχει πνεῦμα θεοῦ ἐν αὐτῷ ('shall we find a man like this who has the spirit of God in him?') is the earliest use of the phrase πνεῦμα θεοῦ applied to a specific person in a non-theophanic context in the LXX. The anarthrous πνεῦμα θεοῦ renders Hebrew רוּחַ אֱלֹהִים, which the LXX consistently renders with the anarthrous genitive construction. Patristic writers (Origen, Chrysostom) regularly cite this verse as OT evidence for the Spirit's indwelling of holy persons and as typology of Christ as the Spirit-bearer; the verse is also used in discussions of Joseph as a type of Christ (Hippolytus, De Benedicitionibus Jacobi).
41:42 στολὴν βυσσίνην ('robe of fine linen') The investiture garment βύσσινος / βύσσος ('fine/byssus linen') is the same term used for the tabernacle curtains (Exod 26:1, 31, 36) and for the high priest's linen vestments (Exod 28:6; Lev 16:4). The LXX's consistent use of βύσσινος for both Joseph's Egyptian court robe and the tabernacle/priestly linen is not coincidental: it marks the garment as the highest quality linen known to the ancient Mediterranean world (Egyptian byssus was a prestige export) and allows the LXX reader to associate Joseph's investiture clothing with the later priestly investiture. The term reappears in Revelation 19:8 (βύσσινον λαμπρὸν καθαρόν, 'fine linen, bright and pure') for the bride's clothing.
41:45 Ψονθομφανηχ / Ἡλίου πόλεως ('Zaphnath-Paaneah' / 'City of the Sun') FLAGGED — two contrasting translation strategies in a single verse. (1) Ψονθομφανηχ: the LXX TRANSLITERATES the Egyptian name (Hebrew צָפְנַת פַּעְנֵחַ, itself transliterating Egyptian Dd-p3-nTr-iw.f-ʿnḫ, 'God speaks and he lives') — preserving its opacity rather than explaining it. Aquila read it as 'revealer of hidden things'; Origen interpreted it allegorically. (2) Ἡλίου πόλεως: the LXX TRANSLATES Hebrew אֹן (On) as 'City of the Sun,' identifying it with the great solar cult-centre of Egypt (Egyptian Iunu; Greek Heliopolis) and making the solar-religious context explicit to Greek readers. The translate/transliterate contrast in a single verse exemplifies the LXX translators' inconsistent but theologically motivated approach to Egyptian proper names.
41:51–52 Μανασση / Εφραιμ etymologies FLAGGED — the two naming speeches carry contrasting theologies of exile. Μανασση (v.51): ἐπελάθετό μου ὁ θεὸς πάντων τῶν πόνων μου ('God has caused me to forget all my hardships') — from Hebrew נשׁה ('forget'); the forgetting of pain is presented as divine mercy. Εφραιμ (v.52): ηὔξησέν με ὁ θεὸς ἐν γῇ ταπεινώσεώς μου ('God has made me fruitful in the land of my humiliation') — from Hebrew פּרה ('be fruitful'); the LXX uses αὐξάνω, the exact verb of the creation-blessing (Gen 1:28: αὐξάνεσθε) and the patriarchal covenant-blessing (Gen 35:11: αὐξάνου), locating Ephraim's birth within the primal blessing-sequence. The word ταπείνωσις ('humiliation') recurs in LXX Isa 53:8 and in Mary's Magnificat (Luke 1:48: τὴν ταπείνωσιν τῆς δούλης αὐτοῦ), suggesting that Joseph's ταπείνωσις in Egypt is paradigmatic of the pattern Scripture traces.
42:1 ῥᾳθυμεῖτε ('you are idle') FLAGGED — the LXX renders MT הִתְרָאוּ ('you look at one another' — a Hithpael of ראה, implying mutual paralytic gazing) with ῥᾳθυμεῖτε ('you are idle / negligent'), a functional substitution. The change shifts the scene from shared helplessness to moral reproach: Jacob does not sympathize with his sons' paralysis but charges them with idleness. The LXX reading makes Jacob a more assertive patriarch and the chapter's opening command more urgent.
42:8 ἐπέγνω / οὐκ ἐπέγνωσαν ('he recognized / they did not recognize') CENTRAL CRUX — FLAGGED. The compound ἐπιγινώσκω ('recognize / come to know') appears twice in a single verse with opposite subjects and outcomes: ἐπέγνω δὲ Ιωσηφ τοὺς ἀδελφοὺς αὐτοῦ, αὐτοὶ δὲ οὐκ ἐπέγνωσαν αὐτόν. The recognition asymmetry is the narrative engine of Gen 42–45. Joseph possesses full knowledge (including the dream-memory of v.9) while the brothers remain in ignorance — their ignorance is the source of both their guilt (they must confess crimes they think unpunished) and Joseph's power to test them. The ἐπιγινώσκω word-group is theologically loaded: it recurs in the NT recognition scene at Luke 24 (Emmaus — the disciples' eyes were prevented from recognizing him) and in Paul's eschatological contrast of partial and full knowing (1 Cor 13:12 — ἐπιγνώσομαι καθὼς καὶ ἐπεγνώσθην).
42:9 ἐμνήσθη ('he remembered') FLAGGED. Joseph's remembrance of his dreams (ἐμνήσθη Ιωσηφ τῶν ἐνυπνίων) is the interpretive hinge between the dreams of Gen 37 and their fulfilment in the prostration of v.6. The aorist constative — 'he remembered' — is the moment of recognition colliding with the memory of prophetic anticipation. The dreams of Gen 37:5–9 specified that the brothers' sheaves would bow to Joseph's sheaf and that sun, moon, and stars would bow to him; the moment of prostration (προσεκύνησαν, 42:6) triggers the recall and thereby makes the entire test-narrative a deliberate outworking of divine providence.
42:15–16 νὴ τὴν ὑγίειαν Φαραω ('by the health of Pharaoh') FLAGGED — Egyptian oath. The LXX renders Hebrew בְּחֵי פַרְעֹה ('by the life of Pharaoh') with νὴ τὴν ὑγίειαν Φαραω ('by the health of Pharaoh') — a remarkable lexical substitution of ὑγίεια (health/wellness) for ζωή (life). The oath-formula νή + accusative is standard classical Greek oath-syntax; the substitution of ὑγίεια for ζωή may reflect LXX sensitivity to oath-by-life language (which borders on using divine life-force as surety) or may reflect a Greek idiom for royal well-being. The oath appears twice (vv.15, 16) and authenticates Joseph's test-demand as an Egyptian magistrate's formal commitment — not a casual threat but a sworn legal condition.
42:22 ἐκζητεῖται ('is required / is being sought') FLAGGED — blood-requital formula. Reuben's declaration τὸ αἷμα αὐτοῦ ἐκζητεῖται ('his blood is being required / sought') renders Hebrew דָּמוֹ נִדְרָשׁ, deploying the verb דרשׁ in its forensic-covenantal sense: God is the one who 'requires' / 'seeks' shed blood (cf. Gen 9:5 LXX: ἐκζητήσω). The divine passive (no explicit agent) implies God as the blood-requirer. The present ἐκζητεῖται — 'is being required' (not past) — indicates that the blood-debt is active, ongoing, and about to be collected. The formula is a compact expression of covenantal retributive justice: innocent blood must be answered for, and the reckoning has now arrived.
42:23 ὁ ἑρμηνευτής ('the interpreter') FLAGGED. The narrator's aside — οὐκ ᾔδεισαν δὲ ὅτι ἀκούει Ιωσηφ, ὁ γὰρ ἑρμηνευτὴς ἀνὰ μέσον αὐτῶν ἦν ('they did not know that Joseph understood, for the interpreter stood between them') — is unique in the Joseph narrative. The ἑρμηνευτής (interpreter/translator) is the diegetic device that explains why the brothers speak freely: they assume Joseph cannot understand Canaanite/Aramaic speech since his interpreter mediates between them. The aside is a masterpiece of narrative irony — the reader (and Joseph) hear and understand everything; the brothers are exposed by their assumption of linguistic concealment. The ἑρμηνευτής appears only here in the LXX Joseph narrative.
42:38 κατάξετέ μου τὸ γῆρας μετὰ λύπης εἰς ᾅδου ('you will bring my old age down with sorrow to Hades') FLAGGED — ᾅδης-clause. The chapter's closing anchor. The verb κατάγω ('bring down / lead down') picks up καταβήσεται earlier in the same verse ('my son shall not go down'), linking Benjamin's potential descent to Egypt with Jacob's feared descent into death through grief — a spatial metaphor of descent uniting the two movements. γῆρας ('old age') is a metonym for Jacob himself in his most mortal, vulnerable state. μετὰ λύπης ('with sorrow') renders Hebrew בְּרָעָה ('with evil / with misery') — the LXX's more interior, emotional rendering heightens the pathos. εἰς ᾅδου is the standard LXX idiom for Sheol (שְׁאֹל): the genitive of place suppresses the expected noun (εἰς [οἶκον] ᾅδου — 'to the house of Hades'). The formula is nearly verbatim at Gen 37:35 (where Jacob refused comfort after the coat of blood) and recurs at Gen 44:31 (Judah's plea for Benjamin), making it the defining lament of the Joseph cycle. NT resonance: ᾅδης appears at Matt 16:18 (πύλαι ᾅδου), Luke 16:23, Rev 1:18, 6:8, 20:13–14 — always the realm of the dead in contrast with the living God.
43:9 ἐκδέχομαι ('I will be surety') FLAGGED — Judah's surety declaration ἐγὼ δὲ ἐκδέχομαι αὐτόν renders Hebrew וְאָנֹכִי אֶעֶרְבֶנּוּ ('I will be surety for him'), where עָרַב is a commercial-legal term for personal guarantee; ἐκδέχομαι ('I receive, I take on, I await') is the LXX rendering emphasizing personal assumption of liability; Judah stakes his own soul permanently rather than offering Reuben's crude collateral of his sons' lives (42:37); the emergence of Judah as spokesman here anticipates the climactic surety-speech of Gen 44:18–34 and ultimately the Davidic royal line; NT resonance: Christ as ἔγγυος ('guarantor') of the better covenant (Heb 7:22).
43:14 ἠτέκνωμαι, ἠτέκνωμαι ('I am bereaved, I am bereaved') FLAGGED — the doubled formula renders Hebrew שָׁכֹלְתִּי שָׁכָלְתִּי, a Hebrew cognate-accusative construction (infinitive absolute reinforcing the finite verb) used for emphatic irreversible assertion; the LXX doubles the perfect passive ἠτέκνωμαι to reproduce the Hebrew emphasis; the formula echoes Esther's resolution (Esth 4:16 LXX — εἰ ἀπολοῦμαι, ἀπολοῦμαι, 'if I perish, I perish'), establishing it as the standard LXX formula for resigned acceptance of an unalterable fate; the doubled passive signals Jacob's shift from resistance to surrender of the outcome to God.
43:23 ἀπέχω ('I have received in full') FLAGGED — the steward's receipt-formula τὸ δὲ ἀργύριον ὑμῶν εὐδοκιμοῦν ἀπέχω deploys ἀπέχω in its technical commercial sense for a completed payment receipt, well attested in Egyptian papyri (Greek equivalent of Latin quietus est); cf. Matt 6:2 ἀπέχουσιν τὸν μισθὸν αὐτῶν ('they have their reward in full') — where Jesus uses the same commercial-receipt idiom for the Pharisees' completed reward; here the term dissolves the brothers' terror by formally closing the silver-account, while the steward simultaneously attributes the treasure to their God — a pagan official delivering an unrequested theological witness.
43:30 συνεστρέφετο τὰ ἔντερα αὐτοῦ ('his bowels were churning') FLAGGED — renders Hebrew וַיִּכְמְרוּ רַחֲמָיו ('his compassions/womb stirred, grew warm'), using the archaic verb כָּמַר for visceral compassion; the LXX compound συστρέφω ('twist together, churn') with ἔντερα ('intestines/bowels') replaces Hebrew רַחֲמָיו ('womb/compassions'); the imperfect συνεστρέφετο captures an ongoing, mounting physical sensation that Joseph can barely contain; the vocabulary anticipates NT σπλαγχνίζομαι (Matt 9:36; 14:14; 15:32; Luke 15:20) and σπλάγχνα as the seat of compassion (Phil 1:8; 1 John 3:17) — the entire NT vocabulary for Jesus's compassion stands in lexical continuity with this LXX bodily language.
43:32 βδέλυγμα ('abomination') FLAGGED — first occurrence of βδέλυγμα in Genesis; in the Pentateuch and prophets the term renders Hebrew תּוֹעֵבָה ('abomination, detestable thing'), most typically applied to idolatry (Deut 7:25–26), cult violations (Lev 18:22, 26–30), and moral transgression; its deployment here as an ethnic-social marker (Egyptians eating with Hebrews = an abomination) extends the term into the realm of ethnic purity practice; NT: βδέλυγμα in the 'abomination of desolation' (Matt 24:15; Mark 13:14; cf. Dan 9:27; 11:31 LXX) and for all that defiles before God (Rev 17:4–5; 21:27); the term's appearance here creates irony — Egyptian ethnic sensibility appropriates sacred-violation language for social preference.
43:34 ἐμεθύσθησαν ('were merry / drank freely') FLAGGED — Aor Pass 3 Pl of μεθύω, rendering Hebrew וַיִּשְׁכְּרוּ ('and they drank deeply / were satisfied with drink'); the semantic range of שָׁכַר spans festive abundance to intoxication, and LXX μεθύω carries the same range; in festive narrative contexts the LXX uses the verb for 'drink to satisfaction, be merry' without moral censure (cf. Song 5:1 — μεθύσθητε, 'drink deeply and be glad'; John 2:10 — where μεμεθυσμένοι describes satisfied wedding guests); the chapter closes on this note of shared festive ease — the first moment of unguarded joy between Joseph and his brothers since his sale into slavery; μετ᾿ αὐτοῦ ('with him') is the chapter's final cadence: Joseph and his brothers at table together for the first time.
44:2 τὸ κόνδυ μου τὸ ἀργυροῦν ('my silver cup') FLAGGED — κόνδυ is a Persian loanword for a large handled drinking goblet, entering Greek through Achaemenid cultural contact; it is otherwise vanishingly rare in classical and Koine Greek literature, and in the LXX occurs only in this chapter (vv.2, 5, 9, 12, 16, 17). The word's presence in a narrative set in Egypt almost certainly reflects the Hellenistic translator's lexical environment rather than an authentic Egyptian term — the translator reached for the nearest known luxury-vessel word. The cup is simultaneously the object of the test and the alleged instrument of divination (44:5), its dual function driving the plot.
44:5 οἰωνισμῷ οἰωνίζεται ('he surely divines') FLAGGED — cognate-dative Hebraism. The construction renders Hebrew נַחֵשׁ יְנַחֵשׁ (absolute infinitive + finite verb), a standard Hebrew intensifier ('he surely / certainly divines'). The LXX translates this with a cognate dative (the dative of the cognate noun + the finite verb) — a Hebraizing calque producing the same emphatic effect in Greek that the Hebrew absolute infinitive achieves. The construction recurs at 44:15 with the same formula (οἰωνισμῷ οἰωνίζεται ἄνθρωπος οἷος ἐγώ — 'a man such as I surely divines'). The theological question the formula raises — is Joseph genuinely claiming divinatory power, or is this performance? — is left unresolved by the narrative; Joseph's God-attribution elsewhere (41:16, 45:8) suggests the persona is dramatic, not confessional.
44:13 διέρρηξαν τὰ ἱμάτια αὐτῶν ('they tore their garments') FLAGGED — ring structure. The garment-tearing echoes 37:29 (Reuben's tearing on discovering Joseph gone from the pit) and 37:34 (Jacob's tearing on receiving the blood-dipped coat). In 37:29 and 37:34 the torn garments belong to individuals overwhelmed by reported or suspected death; here all eleven brothers tear their garments at the discovery of the cup. The same gesture in the same family in the same narrative cycle creates an unmistakable ring: the garment-tearing of ch.37 (grief at the beginning of the separation) is mirrored by the garment-tearing of 44:13 (grief at the apparent end of all hope of reunion). The LXX uses the identical verb (διαρρήσσω) at all three occurrences.
44:16 ὁ θεὸς εὗρεν τὴν ἀδικίαν τῶν παίδων σου ('God has found out the iniquity of your servants') FLAGGED — the confession beyond the charge. Judah's forensic surrender does not contest the cup-charge but reaches past it: ὁ θεὸς εὗρεν τὴν ἀδικίαν — God has found the iniquity. The definite article τὴν ἀδικίαν ('the iniquity,' not 'an iniquity') with no specified referent forces the reader to supply one. The obvious candidate is the sale of Joseph in Gen 37, which the brothers have not confessed aloud in this scene. The verb εὑρίσκω ('find') here anticipates its reappearance at the chapter's final verse (εὑρήσει, 44:34), where evil will 'find' Jacob — God's finding of iniquity (past) paired with evil's finding of the father (future).
44:30 ἡ ψυχὴ αὐτοῦ ἐκκρέμαται ἐκ τῆς ψυχῆς τούτου ('his soul hangs from the soul of this one') FLAGGED — unique soul-metaphor in the LXX. The expression is unparalleled in the LXX and in classical Greek. ψυχή here renders נֶפֶשׁ (life-force / animating soul); ἐκκρέμαται ('hangs suspended') depicts Jacob's life as literally suspended from Benjamin's — a single thread connecting an old man's will to live with his youngest son's survival. The dash-interruption in the verse's grammar (the protasis is suspended, the parenthetical soul-clause interposed) mirrors the structural suspense: the sentence, like Jacob's life, hangs. The metaphor's pathos works in Joseph's hearing — he listens to the declaration of his father's existential dependency on the brother beside him.
44:33 μεινάτω δὴ ὁ παῖς σου ἀντὶ τοῦ παιδίου ('let your servant remain instead of the child') FLAGGED — ἀντί of substitution; typological link to Mark 10:45. The preposition ἀντί ('instead of / in exchange for') here carries full substitutionary force: Judah for Benjamin, person for person, slavery for freedom. The offer reverses the moral trajectory of Gen 37:26–27 (where Judah proposed selling Joseph to avoid responsibility for his blood) — now he sells himself into slavery to bear responsibility for his brother. The NT resonance at Mark 10:45 (δοῦναι τὴν ψυχὴν αὐτοῦ λύτρον ἀντὶ πολλῶν — 'to give his soul a ransom instead of many') has led patristic interpreters (Origen, Chrysostom) to read Judah as a type of Christ's voluntary self-substitution. The verbal echo ἀντί + person is precise in both texts.
45:3–4 Ἐγώ εἰμι Ιωσηφ … ὁ ἀδελφὸς ὑμῶν, ὃν ἀπέδοσθε The disclosure formula Ἐγώ εἰμι occurs twice in two verses: bare in v.3 (identity alone), then elaborated in v.4 with the relational title ὁ ἀδελφὸς ὑμῶν and the historical specification ὃν ἀπέδοσθε ('whom you sold'). The formula itself resonates throughout LXX discourse: Exod 3:14 (ἐγώ εἰμι ὁ ὤν), Isa 43:10–11, and the NT Johannine Ἐγώ εἰμι sayings all operate within the same register of identity-revelation that undoes hiddenness. Joseph's double disclosure moves from ontological identity (v.3) to relational and historical specificity (v.4), refusing to allow the recognition to remain abstract.
45:5–8 ἀπέστειλέν με ὁ θεὸς ἔμπροσθεν ὑμῶν (three occurrences) The providence-claim is stated three times (vv.5, 7, 8) with escalating specificity: (1) 'God sent me before you for life' (v.5); (2) 'God sent me before you to preserve for you a remnant' (v.7, with κατάλειμμα); (3) 'not you sent me but God, and he made me father to Pharaoh' (v.8). The tripling of the divine-sending claim against the single human act of selling creates an overwhelming theological counter-narrative. Acts 7:13–14 (Stephen's speech) reads this chapter as a type of providential redemption fulfilled in the Messiah.
45:7 κατάλειμμα … κατάλειψιν Both substantive forms of καταλείπω appear in a single verse: κατάλειμμα ('remnant / residue remaining') and κατάλειψιν ('the act of leaving / preservation'). The vocabulary is prophetic: Isa 10:20–22 (LXX: τὸ κατάλειμμα Ισραηλ), Rom 9:27 (εἰ ἦν ὁ ἀριθμὸς τῶν υἱῶν Ισραηλ … τὸ κατάλειμμα σωθήσεται). The Joseph narrative here uses remnant-language to frame the patriarchal rescue as the original type of every subsequent preserve-a-remnant theology in prophetic and NT discourse.
45:18 τὸ μεδυλλίον τῆς γῆς A hapax legomenon in the LXX; μεδυλλίον (diminutive form, related to μεδύλλη or μεδύλη, 'marrow / pith') renders Hebrew חֵלֶב ('fat / best portion / richest part'). The LXX translator chose a rare anatomical metaphor — 'the marrow / richest inward part of the land' — rather than the more common Greek equivalents for 'best'. The hapax is a fingerprint of the translator's literary register in this section.
45:22 τριακοσίους χρυσοῦς The LXX reads 'three hundred gold pieces' (τριακοσίους χρυσοῦς) for Benjamin's gift, where MT has שְׁלֹשׁ מֵאוֹת כֶּסֶף ('three hundred silver pieces'). The variant — gold versus silver — is not a scribal error but reflects a known divergence between the Greek and Hebrew textual traditions; the LXX's gold elevates the honour of Benjamin's gift, consistent with the narrative's emphasis on his privileged status as Joseph's full brother.
45:24 μὴ ὀργίζεσθε ἐν τῇ ὁδῷ The Hebrew רגז (rgz) behind ὀργίζεσθε carries a semantic range from 'tremble / quake / be agitated' to 'be angry / quarrel'; both dimensions are plausible as Joseph's intended warning: (a) do not quarrel on the road over whose fault the old betrayal was; (b) do not be anxious / agitated during the journey. The LXX ὀργίζεσθε ('be angry') resolves toward the quarrel-reading, but the Hebrew ambiguity is not erased. Patristic interpreters (Chrysostom, Theodoret) generally read it as a warning against recrimination; modern commentators note the psychological realism of Joseph anticipating guilt-driven friction.
45:27 ἀνεζωπύρησεν τὸ πνεῦμα Ιακωβ The verb ἀναζωπυρέω ('rekindle a smouldering fire / fan back into flame') appears in the NT only at 2 Tim 1:6 (ἀναζωπυρεῖν τὸ χάρισμα τοῦ θεοῦ — 'to rekindle the gift of God'), where Paul uses it for the rekindling of Timothy's charism. The shared vocabulary makes Jacob's revived πνεῦμα the OT prototype of the NT pattern of grace rekindled from embers by a decisive encounter with reality (the wagons). The instrumentality — it is the wagons, the material proof from Pharaoh's bureaucracy, that does what the verbal report alone could not — is itself theologically significant: faith's revival comes through the tangible and public, not merely the auditory and private.
46:4 εἰς τέλος The LXX renders the Hebrew cognate-infinitive absolute עָלֹה יַעַלְךָ ('he will surely bring you up again') with ἀναβιβάσω σε εἰς τέλος, replacing the MT's rhetorical certainty-marker with εἰς τέλος — a phrase that means (a) 'at the end / finally' (temporal) or (b) 'completely / all the way through' (comprehensive). The LXX shifts the emphasis from rhetorical certainty to temporal-eschatological promise: God will bring Israel up 'in the end', pointing toward both the Exodus and the repatriation of Jacob's bones (Gen 50:25; Josh 24:32). The phrase recurs in eschatological contexts: Matt 10:22 (ὁ δὲ ὑπομείνας εἰς τέλος = 'the one who endures to the end'); 1 Thess 2:16.
46:27 ἑβδομήκοντα πέντε CENTRAL CRUX. The LXX gives the grand total of Jacob's household entering Egypt as seventy-five, against the MT's seventy (שִׁבְעִים at Gen 46:27 and Exod 1:5). The LXX achieves the higher count by appending in v.20 five additional descendants of Joseph not in the MT: Manasseh's son Machir, Machir's son Gilead (two), and Ephraim's sons Shuthelah and Taam plus Shuthelah's son Edom (three) — total five extra, raising the MT's seventy to LXX's seventy-five. Stephen quotes ἑβδομήκοντα πέντε verbatim at Acts 7:14 (μετεκαλέσατο Ιωσηφ τὸν πατέρα αὐτοῦ Ιακωβ καὶ πᾶσαν τὴν συγγένειαν ἐν ψυχαῖς ἑβδομήκοντα πέντε), aligning the NT directly with the LXX against the MT at a numerically specific, publicly verifiable point — confirming that the early church's scriptural text was the Septuagint.
46:29 ἐπέπεσεν ἐπὶ τὸν τράχηλον αὐτοῦ The reunion-embrace formula 'he fell upon his neck' is reproduced verbatim at Luke 15:20 (the father running to the prodigal son: ἐπέπεσεν ἐπὶ τὸν τράχηλον αὐτοῦ καὶ κατεφίλησεν αὐτόν) and Acts 20:37 (ἐπέπεσον ἐπὶ τὸν τράχηλον τοῦ Παύλου). The Lukan parable of the Prodigal Son is consciously echoing this LXX patriarchal reunion — the father's run and embrace cast him as a Joseph-figure receiving the son he counted lost. The phrase also echoes Gen 33:4 (Esau embracing Jacob) and Gen 45:14 (Joseph and Benjamin), forming a pattern of weeping neck-embraces that mark the reversal of family rupture.
46:30 ἀποθανοῦμαι ἀπὸ τοῦ νῦν Israel's declaration 'I can die from now on, since I have seen your face' is the Genesis antecedent of the Nunc Dimittis pattern. Simeon's canticle at Luke 2:29–30 (νῦν ἀπολύεις τὸν δοῦλόν σου ... ὅτι εἶδον οἱ ὀφθαλμοί μου τὸ σωτήριόν σου) deliberately echoes this structure: (a) temporal marker of the present moment (ἀπὸ τοῦ νῦν / νῦν); (b) the completed seeing (ἑώρακα τὸ πρόσωπόν σου / εἶδον οἱ ὀφθαλμοί μου); (c) death or release as the satisfied conclusion (ἀποθανοῦμαι / ἀπολύεις). In both cases an old man who has waited in grief or expectation sees the face of the promised one and considers his life's purpose achieved.
46:34 βδέλυγμα γάρ ἐστιν Αἰγυπτίοις πᾶς ποιμὴν προβάτων βδέλυγμα is the standard LXX term for תּוֹעֵבָה ('abomination') — used throughout Deuteronomy (7:25–26; 12:31; 18:12), Proverbs, Ezekiel, and Revelation (17:4–5; 21:27) for what is utterly repugnant to God or to a cultural group. Here the word marks an Egyptian cultural taboo — possibly rooted in memories of the Hyksos shepherd-king occupation (ca. 1650–1550 BC) or in the lower social status of herders in Egyptian society. Joseph's strategy exploits this taboo: by correctly identifying his brothers as shepherds, he ensures Pharaoh will want them settled in the peripheral delta region of Gesem, achieving geographic separation and covenantal cohesion. The word ποιμήν ('shepherd') that carries the βδέλυγμα label here will be redeemed by the tradition that culminates in the Good Shepherd (John 10:11–14; Heb 13:20; 1 Pet 2:25).
47:31 ἐπὶ τὸ ἄκρον τῆς ῥάβδου αὐτοῦ CENTRAL CRUX. The unpointed Hebrew מטה can be vocalized as (a) maṭṭeh ('staff') — the LXX and Samaritan Pentateuch reading — or (b) miṭṭāh ('bed') — the Masoretic vocalization, yielding 'he bowed at the head of the bed.' The LXX translators read 'staff' and rendered it ῥάβδος. Hebrews 11:21 quotes this LXX phrase verbatim — καὶ προσεκύνησεν ἐπὶ τὸ ἄκρον τῆς ῥάβδου αὐτοῦ — as the defining act of Jacob's faith ('by faith Jacob, while dying, blessed each of the sons of Joseph and bowed upon the top of his staff'). This is not a loose allusion but a verbatim citation of the LXX against the MT vocalization, confirming that the author of Hebrews worked from a Greek scriptural text and treated the LXX wording as authoritative. The staff-image carries additional covenantal weight: ῥάβδος is the symbol of patriarchal authority (Gen 38:18, 25 — Judah's pledge-staff; Gen 49:10 — the scepter from Judah); Aaron's rod inside the ark of the covenant (Heb 9:4); the rod of Jesse (Isa 11:1; Rev 19:15). Israel bowing upon his staff as his final act in the chapter merges physical frailty with covenant authority: the aged patriarch leans on his staff to stand, and bows his head upon its top in reverential gratitude that the burial oath is secured — death approaching, faith acting. This is one of the clearest NT-uses-LXX proofs in the entire Bible.
47:7, 10 ηὐλόγησεν Ιακωβ τὸν Φαραω Jacob blesses Pharaoh — twice, once at meeting (47:7) and once at parting (47:10). The verb εὐλογέω in the LXX renders the Hebrew בֵּרַךְ and carries full covenantal force: a blessing pronounced by the covenant heir is not merely a courtesy formula but a covenantal speech-act invoking divine favor upon the recipient. Hebrews 7:7 articulates the theological axiom latent here: 'without any dispute the lesser is blessed by the greater (ὁ ἥττων ὑπὸ τοῦ κρείττονος εὐλογεῖται).' The author of Hebrews uses this axiom to establish Melchizedek's superiority over Levi (Abraham tithed to Melchizedek; Melchizedek blessed Abraham), but the axiom applies directly in Gen 47: if the lesser is blessed by the greater, then the patriarch Jacob — a landless, aging, self-described sojourner — is the greater to whom the emperor Pharaoh is the lesser. The social hierarchy is inverted by the covenant hierarchy. The double blessing (vv.7, 10) is deliberate: it frames Jacob's age-lament (vv.8–9) and marks the patriarch as the covenant mediator in the most powerful court of the ancient world.
47:9 μικραὶ καὶ πονηραί Jacob's self-description of his life as 'few and evil' (μικραὶ καὶ πονηραὶ γεγόνασιν αἱ ἡμέραι τῶν ἐτῶν τῆς ζωῆς μου) at 130 years is among the most poignant autobiographical utterances in the patriarchal narratives. The two adjectives — μικρός ('small, few') and πονηρός ('evil, hard') — render the Hebrew מְעַט וְרָעִים. The 'few' are confirmed arithmetically: Jacob at 147 years falls short of Abraham (175, Gen 25:7) and Isaac (180, Gen 35:28) — he is the shortest-lived of the three patriarchs. The 'evil' refer to the tragedies of his life: the flight from Esau, the deception at Laban's house, the loss of Rachel in childbirth, the apparent death of Joseph, the rape of Dinah, the violence of Simeon and Levi. Yet the lament is spoken in the throne-room of Pharaoh while blessings flow from his lips — the patriarch's self-assessment and his covenantal authority coexist without contradiction. The verse anticipates the NT theology of weakness-in-strength (2 Cor 12:9–10).
47:11 Ραμεσση The settlement of Jacob's family in the 'land of Rameses' (ἐν γῇ Ραμεσση) is an anachronism pointing forward to the Exodus store-city. Exod 1:11 names the two store-cities that the enslaved Israelites will build: Πιθωμ and Ραμεσση. The LXX narrator uses the name Ραμεσση here in Genesis 47 (= the region of the Nile delta known by this name in a later period; the underlying Hebrew is also רַעְמְסֵס), linking the prosperous settlement of Jacob's family in the best pasture land directly with the site that will later become the locus of their forced labor — a narrative irony that the reader of both books is intended to feel. The anticipation of Exod 1:11 by Gen 47:11 is one of the compositional bridges that unifies the Pentateuch's Egypt-narrative.
48:1 ἐνοχλεῖται vs. MT חֹלֶה MT reports Jacob is 'ill' (חֹלֶה, clinically sick); LXX uses ἐνοχλεῖται ('is troubled / in distress'), a softer and more general term. The shift avoids a stark report of sickness and gives a slightly more ambiguous picture of the patriarch's condition. No text-critical difficulty; the LXX translator made a lexical choice toward a broader word.
48:7 ἱπποδρόμου Χαβραθα / Bethlehem gloss MT's כִּבְרַת-הָאָרֶץ ('a stretch of land / a short distance') becomes ἱπποδρόμου ('hippodrome / race-course distance') in LXX — a unique, puzzling rendering that some MSS correct. The place-name Χαβραθα (= כִּבְרַת transcribed) is glossed αὕτη ἐστὶν Βαιθλεεμ ('this is Bethlehem'), a geographical clarification consistent with Gen 35:19 LXX but not in MT here.
48:14 ἐναλλὰξ τὰς χεῖρας 'Crossing the hands' (ἐναλλάσσω = 'exchange / alternate') renders MT שִׂכֵּל אֶת-יָדָיו ('he crossed / guided his hands wisely'; שִׂכֵּל from שָׂכַל = 'act wisely / discern'). The LXX reads the gesture as physical crossing of the hands; MT carries the additional nuance that Jacob did this deliberately, with wisdom. The theological weight (elective reversal of primogeniture) is identical in both traditions.
48:15–16 ὁ ἄγγελος ὁ ῥυόμενός με / triple blessing The third invocation — 'the angel who delivers me from all evils' — is the earliest 'redeeming angel' text in Scripture. ῥύομαι (present participle: ongoing deliverance) is the verb of the Lord's Prayer doxology (Matt 6:13, ῥῦσαι ἡμᾶς ἀπὸ τοῦ πονηροῦ) and of Rom 7:24 (τίς με ῥύσεται). Patristic writers (Justin, Origen, Tertullian) identified the angel with the pre-incarnate Christ; later Jewish exegesis identified it as Michael.
48:19 πλῆθος ἐθνῶν ('fullness of nations') The phrase renders MT מְלֹא הַגּוֹיִם ('fullness of the nations'), unique in Genesis. Paul's argument in Rom 4:17–18 (Abraham as 'father of many nations') draws on the Gen 17/Gen 48 seed-of-nations tradition; the Ephraimite promise points beyond Israelite tribal identity to a universalist scope. The key contrast in the verse: Manasseh shall become a λαός ('people'); Ephraim's seed shall become εἰς πλῆθος ἐθνῶν — ἔθνος (nations/Gentiles) rather than λαός (covenant people).
48:20 Israel-blessing formula; Ποιήσαι The optative Ποιήσαι σε ὁ θεὸς ὡς Εφραιμ καὶ ὡς Μανασση ('May God make you as Ephraim and as Manasseh') becomes the standard Shabbat-eve blessing over sons in Jewish liturgy, where it still names Ephraim before Manasseh — permanently enshrining the reversal. ἔταξεν τὸν Εφραιμ ἔμπροσθεν τοῦ Μανασση ('he set Ephraim before Manasseh') explains why Ephraim consistently precedes Manasseh in Numbers, Joshua, and prophetic texts (Hos 5:3; Isa 7:2).
48:22 Σικιμα ἐξαίρετον; Amorite attribution; John 4:5 The Shechem bequest presents two cruxes: (1) MT's שְׁכֶם אֶחָד plays on 'Shechem' as both place-name and 'shoulder/portion'; LXX reads only the toponym plus ἐξαίρετον ('chosen/special portion'). (2) Jacob claims to have taken Shechem ἐν τῇ μαχαίρᾳ μου καὶ τόξῳ ('with my sword and bow') from Αμορραίων ('Amorites'), conflicting with Gen 34 (Simeon and Levi attacked; Jacob condemned them; Canaanites and Perizzites, not Amorites, are mentioned at 34:30). The claim is harmonized variously in the targums; the LXX preserves the tension without comment. NT echo: John 4:5 locates Jesus's encounter with the Samaritan woman near 'the plot of land which Jacob gave to Joseph his son.'
49:4 ἐξύβρισας ὡς ὕδωρ — 'you were insolent as water' The Hebrew MT reads עָז כַּמַּיִם ('impetuous as water'), using the root עָזַז ('be violent / turbulent'). The LXX chose ἐξύβρισας, from ὑβρίζω ('be insolent / commit ὕβρις'), which imports the Greek moral-philosophical concept of arrogant excess into the charge against Reuben. Where the MT pictures violent turbulence (water rushing beyond its banks), the LXX pictures deliberate moral transgression — the classic Greek sin of ὕβρις, the overstepping of boundaries with contempt for the divine order. This is not a mistranslation but a deliberate interpretive move: the LXX translator understood Reuben's sin not merely as passion (the MT's image) but as culpable hubris, making the loss of the birthright morally inevitable. The second half of the verse (μὴ ἐκζέσῃς — 'do not boil over') then adds a jussive warning alongside the descriptive charge, anticipating the continuing tendency that cost Reuben his place.
49:9 σκύμνος λέοντος Ιουδα — 'a lion's cub is Judah' / Rev 5:5 The lion imagery of the Judah oracle escalates: 49:9 opens with σκύμνος λέοντος ('a lion's cub'), escalates to λέων ('a lion'), and closes with the question τίς ἐγερεῖ αὐτόν ('who will rouse him?') — the reclining, inarousable lion-king. Rev 5:5 applies this text directly to Christ: ὁ λέων ὁ ἐκ τῆς φυλῆς Ιουδα, ἡ ῥίζα Δαυίδ ('the Lion from the tribe of Judah, the Root of David') — and then the seer turns and sees not a lion but a slaughtered Lamb (Arn 5:6), a deliberate reversal-fulfillment: the Lion of Judah is victorious precisely as the slaughtered Lamb. The LXX's σκύμνος ('cub') and λέων ('lion') are the exact vocabulary of Rev 5:5. The question τίς ἐγερεῖ αὐτόν is implicitly answered in the resurrection — no one rouses the lion of Judah because he rises on his own (cf. John 10:18).
49:10 ἕως ἂν ἔλθῃ τὰ ἀποκείμενα αὐτῷ — 'until the things stored up for him come' / προσδοκία ἐθνῶν — 'the expectation of the nations' This is the premier messianic crux of the Septuagint and one of the most contested texts in biblical interpretation. (1) The MT reads עַד כִּי-יָבֹא שִׁילֹה ('until Shiloh comes' or 'until he comes to Shiloh'), where שִׁילֹה is either a place-name (the sanctuary city), a personal Messianic title, or a verbal form meaning 'to whom it belongs' (so LXX). (2) The LXX renders with ἕως ἂν ἔλθῃ τὰ ἀποκείμενα αὐτῷ — 'until the things laid up/stored for him come' — treating the Hebrew as a reference to a person's reserved inheritance or destiny, not a place. The participle ἀποκείμενος ('stored up / laid in reserve') is the same word used in LXX Dan 7 and NT Col 1:5 (ἡ ἐλπὶς ἡ ἀποκειμένη ὑμῖν — 'the hope stored up for you') and 2 Tim 4:8 (ἀπόκειταί μοι ὁ τῆς δικαιοσύνης στέφανος — 'the crown of righteousness is stored up for me'). (3) The verse then makes the coming figure himself the προσδοκία ἐθνῶν ('expectation of the nations') — a title pregnant with messianic significance; Luke 2:25 applies the equivalent Hebrew גְּאֻלַּת / consolation-vocabulary to Simeon (προσδεχόμενος παράκλησιν τοῦ Ισραηλ), and the same προσδοκία-language of waiting for the promised one runs through Acts 1:4. (4) Patristic consensus: from Justin Martyr (Dial. 52–54) through Irenaeus, Tertullian, and Augustine, Gen 49:10 was read as the plain prediction of Christ: the scepter (ἄρχων) departing from Judah only when the Messiah comes, and the nations' hope fixed on him. (5) The Targums (Onkelos, Pseudo-Jonathan) independently render שִׁילֹה as 'until the Messiah comes, whose is the kingdom.' The LXX's τὰ ἀποκείμενα αὐτῷ is thus one branch of a multi-tradition convergence on the messianic interpretation of this verse.
49:11 δεσμεύων πρὸς ἄμπελον τὸν πῶλον αὐτοῦ … πλυνεῖ ἐν οἴνῳ τὴν στολὴν αὐτοῦ καὶ ἐν αἵματι σταφυλῆς τὴν περιβολὴν αὐτοῦ — patristic eucharistic and passion readings The verse describes impossible agricultural abundance: the Messiah-king ties his foal to a vine (as though vines were as common and sturdy as fence-posts) and washes his robe in wine, his cloak in the blood of grapes. The LXX's πῶλος ('foal' — the same word as in the triumphal entry, Matt 21:5 citing Zech 9:9: ἐπὶ πῶλον υἱὸν ὑποζυγίου) ties the oracle directly to the entry into Jerusalem. The wine-washing attracted two distinct patristic readings: (a) the eucharistic reading (Cyril of Alexandria, Irenaeus): the Messiah's garment washed in wine = the eucharistic wine, the blood of the grape that is the blood of Christ; (b) the passion reading (Hippolytus, Origen): the robe washed in αἷμα σταφυλῆς ('blood of the grape') = Christ's garment made red by his blood at the cross, echoing Isa 63:3 LXX (the treading of the winepress). Rev 19:13 (ὁ ἱματισμὸς αὐτοῦ βεβαμμένος αἵματι — 'his clothing dipped in blood') is the clearest NT reflection of this oracle-trajectory.
49:18 τὴν σωτηρίαν περιμένω κυρίου — 'I wait for the salvation of the Lord' This four-word verse is the theological pivot of the poem's middle section and the only first-person prayer in the entire blessing sequence. It interrupts the Dan oracle at a structurally unexpected point — after the serpent image of 49:17 (a snake biting the horse's heel, causing the rider to fall backward) and before Gad's oracle in 49:19 — like a sudden cry wrested from the poet by the snake's image of danger. The verb περιμένω ('wait around / await persistently') renders Hebrew קִוִּיתִי ('I have waited / hoped'); the LXX's περι- prefix intensifies the waiting as lingering, patient, sustained expectation. The NT equivalents: προσδοκάω (Simeon in Luke 2:25), ἀπεκδέχομαι (Rom 8:19, 23, 25 — the creation and the believer groaning and waiting), and περιμένω itself in Acts 1:4 (περιμένειν τὴν ἐπαγγελίαν τοῦ πατρός — 'wait for the promise of the Father'). In the context of Jacob's dying poem, the prayer functions as an admission that no tribal destiny, however blessed, is the ultimate salvation — that awaits the Lord alone.
49:33 ἐξέλιπεν — 'he failed / gave out' / Luke 23:45 The LXX's choice of ἐκλείπω for Jacob's death is distinctive. The MT uses וַיִּגְוַע ('he expired / breathed his last'), the standard verb for patriarchal death (Gen 25:8, 17; 35:29). The LXX rendering ἐξέλιπεν ('he failed / gave out / ran dry') carries a different semantic range: ἐκλείπω describes a lamp failing, a stream running dry, a voice ceasing — the quiet, inevitable cessation of what had been flowing. The word appears in the LXX for the failing of bread (Gen 47:15), of strength (Ps 70:9 LXX), of the eyes weeping (Lam 2:11). Most strikingly, Luke 23:45 uses the same ἐκλείπω for the sun's failure at the crucifixion: τοῦ ἡλίου ἐκλείποντος ('the sun failing') — creating a subliminal connection between the patriarch's expiration and the cosmic sign at Christ's death. The patriarchal death-formula then completes the verse: προσετέθη πρὸς τὸν λαὸν αὐτοῦ ('he was added to his people') — answering the present-tense anticipation of v.29 (προστίθεμαι) and joining Jacob to the company of Abraham, Isaac, and all the ancestral dead.
50:20 ὑμεῖς ἐβουλεύσασθε κατ' ἐμοῦ εἰς πονηρά, ὁ δὲ θεὸς ἐβουλεύσατο περὶ ἐμοῦ εἰς ἀγαθά The theological summit of the Joseph narrative and the theological heart of Genesis. The antithesis turns on the exact repetition of βουλεύομαι ('plan/deliberate') with contrasting subjects (ὑμεῖς / ὁ θεός), contrasting directional prepositions (κατ' ἐμοῦ 'against me' / περὶ ἐμοῦ 'concerning me'), and contrasting telic goals (εἰς πονηρά 'for evil' / εἰς ἀγαθά 'for good'). The final ἵνα-clause reveals the scope: a numerous people kept alive. NT resonance: Rom 8:28 (πάντα συνεργεῖ εἰς ἀγαθόν) is widely read as a theological distillation of this exact construction; the Joseph story is Paul's paradigm case for divine providential overriding of human malice. Acts 7:9–16 (Stephen's speech) and Heb 11:22 also draw on Joseph as the type of providential reversal.
50:19 τοῦ γὰρ θεοῦ εἰμι ἐγώ Major LXX/MT divergence. MT: הֲתַחַת אֱלֹהִים אָנֹכִי ('Am I in the place of God?') — a rhetorical question disclaiming the divine prerogative to punish. LXX: τοῦ γὰρ θεοῦ εἰμι ἐγώ ('for I belong to God') — a positive theological declaration of affiliation. The shift is profound: the MT Joseph declines the role of divine judge by denying that he occupies God's place; the LXX Joseph grounds his refusal to take vengeance in his positive identity as one who belongs to God. The genitive τοῦ θεοῦ with εἰμί ('I am of God') is a constructional parallel to John 8:47 (ὁ ὢν ἐκ τοῦ θεοῦ). The end-placed ἐγώ ('I') gives the declaration its maximum rhetorical force.
50:2 ἐνταφιάζω / οἱ ἐνταφιασταί The embalming vocabulary is derived from ἐν + τάφος ('in the tomb') and occurs three times in two verses (noun × 2, verb × 1). The same word-group appears in the Gospels for Jesus' burial-preparation: Matt 26:12 (εἰς τὸ ἐνταφιάσαι με, 'to prepare me for burial') and John 19:40 (καθὼς ἔθος ἐστὶν τοῖς Ἰουδαίοις ἐνταφιάζειν). The lexical bridge between Jacob's Egyptian embalming and Jesus' burial-preparation is theologically significant: the same family of words that marks the preparation of a body for interment in Gen 50 is used in the NT to describe the anointing of Jesus' body — in both cases it is the beginning of a story that does not end in the tomb.
50:11 Πένθος Αἰγύπτου The LXX translates rather than transliterates Hebrew אָבֵל מִצְרַיִם (Abel-mizraim). Hebrew אָבֵל is ambiguous — it can mean both 'meadow/water-course' and 'mourning' (from the root אָבַל); the LXX chooses the mourning sense and renders it with πένθος ('mourning / grief'), making the place-name transparent in Greek as 'Mourning of Egypt.' This is an interpretive choice with a theological dimension: the Canaanite observers witness the Egyptian mourning and give the place a name that canonises the grief permanently in the landscape, making this spot a memorial of the honour Egypt paid to an Israelite patriarch.
50:21 ἐλάλησεν αὐτῶν εἰς τὴν καρδίαν Hebraism flagged. The construction εἰς τὴν καρδίαν ('to/into the heart') calques Hebrew עַל־לֵב / אֶל־לֵב, the idiom for speaking with tender reassurance — 'speaking to the heart.' The phrase appears in LXX Isa 40:2 (λαλήσατε εἰς τὴν καρδίαν Ιερουσαλημ, 'speak to the heart of Jerusalem,' God's comfort-word to his people after judgment), Hos 2:16 LXX (the divine wooing of Israel), and Ruth 2:13 (Boaz's kindness to Ruth). In each case the phrase marks speech that goes beyond the transactional to address the deepest anxiety of the hearer. Joseph's final act toward his brothers is to speak to their innermost fear.
50:24–25 ἐπισκοπῇ ἐπισκέψεται (cognate construction) The cognate absolute ἐπισκοπῇ ἐπισκέψεται ('by visitation he will surely visit') calques the Hebrew infinitive absolute פָּקֹד יִפְקֹד, the most solemn rhetorical form of divine promise in the OT, conveying absolute certainty. The exact phrase recurs at Exod 3:16 (God's self-disclosure to Moses: ἐπισκοπῇ ἐπεσκέψαμαι ὑμᾶς, 'I have surely visited you') and Exod 13:19 (Moses remembers Joseph's oath). Heb 11:22 cites Joseph's deathbed act explicitly: 'by faith Joseph, dying, made mention of the exodus of the sons of Israel and gave orders concerning his bones' — the sole NT citation of this verse, presenting the bones-oath as the model of eschatological faith. The verb ἐπισκέπτομαι ('visit / come to the aid of') carries the full weight of divine salvific intervention; its NT cognate ἐπισκοπή/ἐπισκέπτομαι appears at Luke 1:68, 78 (Zechariah's Benedictus: God has 'visited' his people in the birth of Jesus).
50:26 ἡ σορός The final word of Genesis in the LXX (and MT: בָּאָרוֹן). σορός properly denotes an Egyptian sarcophagus or mummification-chest. Genesis opens with God creating heaven and earth (1:1) and closes with a coffin in Egypt — the trajectory from the garden to the grave, from life to death. Yet the sorrow-note of ἡ σορός is inseparable from the faith-note of v.25: the bones-oath has already made the coffin a vessel of promise. Jacob was buried in Canaan; Joseph's coffin stays in Egypt — not because Egypt is his home but because he is waiting. The coffin is a time capsule of the exodus, a physical pledge of the land-promise. Exod 13:19 records its eventual movement: Moses took the bones of Joseph with him. Josh 24:32 records the final interment at Shechem. The book ends with a symbol of deferred but certain homecoming.

How the data set is organized

The interpretive tiers (syntactic function, semantic force, discourse structure, and the proposed argument outlines) are interpretive by nature; where readings legitimately differ, the more common analysis was generally chosen, and the lexical notes are condensed orientation rather than a substitute for a lexicon (e.g. LEH / Muraoka) or a full commentary.