← Back to the Joshua index

On the Greek text. The Greek follows the standard critical text of the Septuagint (Rahlfs-Hanhart in its main wording, itself an ancient, public-domain text); the distinctively copyrighted critical apparatus is not reproduced. Versification follows the LXX.

The Book of Joshua (LXX) — Interlinear: Themes, Outlines & Translation Notes

A consolidated companion to the Joshua data set: every chapter of LXX Joshua (1–24) rendered as a six-tier Greek reverse-interlinear (Greek · gloss · parsing/case · syntax · semantic force · lexical note), with per-verse discourse analysis and a chapter argument-outline.

This document gathers the theme, the argument outline (the outline movements authored into each data file), and the translation / textual / exegetical notes (the text_note of each file, reproduced verbatim) — followed by a summary of the major translation and interpretive cruxes that were deliberately annotated rather than silently resolved. Joshua (ΙΗΣΟΥΣ ΝΑΥΗ), the first of the Former Prophets, carries the story across the Jordan into the land — the fall of Jericho, the campaigns of the south and north, the division of the inheritance by lot, and the covenant at Shechem; its LXX form is markedly shorter than the Hebrew in places (notably the cities of refuge, ch. 20) and shares the very name Ἰησοῦς that the church read as a type of Jesus (Heb 4:8), with Rahab the harlot taken up as an exemplar of faith and works (Heb 11:31; Jas 2:25). The Greek follows the standard critical text of the Septuagint (Rahlfs–Hanhart in its main wording, itself an ancient public-domain text); the distinctively copyrighted apparatus is not reproduced, and versification follows the LXX.

Scope

Chapter Verses Words annotated Outline movements
Joshua 1 18 441 4
Joshua 2 24 584 4
Joshua 3 17 441 3
Joshua 4 24 540 5
Joshua 5 15 384 4
Joshua 6 26 622 4
Joshua 7 26 650 6
Joshua 8 27 649 4
Joshua 9 27 849 5
Joshua 10 41 1086 6
Joshua 11 23 577 4
Joshua 12 24 320 3
Joshua 13 32 703 5
Joshua 14 15 387 4
Joshua 15 63 940 7
Joshua 16 10 238 3
Joshua 17 18 473 4
Joshua 18 28 570 5
Joshua 19 51 779 8
Joshua 20 6 159 3
Joshua 21 45 997 8
Joshua 22 34 1048 6
Joshua 23 16 448 5
Joshua 24 33 1010 4
Total 643 14,895 114

Each annotated word carries Greek, a working gloss, color-coded grammatical case, parsing (Tense·Voice·Mood·Person·Number + lemma), a Wallace-style syntactic-function label, an aspectual semantic-force label (verbal forms), and a condensed lexical note. As translation Greek, the annotation additionally flags Hebraisms and the underlying Hebrew idiom where it illuminates the rendering.


The argument of the book

The macro-structure of the whole book — its major movements — under which the chapter-by-chapter detail below unfolds. LXX Joshua is a generally literal rendering whose Old Greek often reflects a shorter Hebrew Vorlage (the abridged asylum-law of ch. 20, divergences in the allotment lists, and the expansions at the book's close in 24:31,33) which the annotation flags throughout. (Section divisions are interpretive; the more common analysis is generally followed.)


Chapter-by-chapter

Joshua 1 — ΙΗΣΟΥΣ Α′

Theme. The Lord commissions Joshua to cross the Jordan, keep the law, and lead Israel into the promised land.

Outline.

Translation & textual notes. The Greek text of Joshua 1 follows the standard critical text of the Septuagint as established in the Rahlfs–Hanhart edition (Septuaginta, rev. ed. 2006), an ancient and public-domain text; the critical apparatus is not reproduced. In the LXX the book is titled ΙΗΣΟΥΣ (Iēsous), 'Joshua,' the Greek form of Hebrew יְהוֹשֻׁעַ; the protagonist is Ἰησοῦς υἱὸς Ναυη, Joshua son of Nun, Moses' ὑπουργός ('minister,' v. 1) — a name fully declined in the LXX (dat. Ἰησοῖ, nom. Ἰησοῦς) and identical to that later borne by Jesus, a typological link early Christian readers exploited. The chapter opens with the narrative formula καὶ ἐγένετο (rendering וַיְהִי), joining Joshua seamlessly to the close of Deuteronomy. The death-notice is doubled by the cognate τελευτή / τετελεύτηκεν (vv. 1–2), and the perfect τετελεύτηκεν frames Moses' death as a standing fact. The commission proper is structured by the threefold refrain ἴσχυε καὶ ἀνδρίζου (vv. 6, 7, 9), the LXX's rendering of חֲזַק וֶאֱמָץ; the present imperatives urge sustained, not momentary, resolve, and the refrain is sharpened at v. 9 by the prohibition of fear (μὴ δειλιάσῃς μηδὲ φοβηθῇς), δειλία being the precise antonym of the ἀνδρεία the refrain commands. At v. 5 the assurances οὐκ ἀντιστήσεται ἄνθρωπος κατενώπιον ὑμῶν and the double-negative οὐκ ἐγκαταλείψω σε οὐδὲ ὑπερόψομαί σε ('I will not forsake you nor overlook you') supply the wording quoted at Heb 13:5. At v. 8 the law-charge deploys the imperatival future (οὐκ ἀποστήσεται … μελετήσεις) and a striking figura etymologica: εὐοδωθήσῃ / εὐοδώσεις τὰς ὁδούς ('you will be good-roaded / you will good-road your roads') promises threefold success, with συνήσεις forming a σ-υν inclusio around the two purpose-subjunctives συνῇς (vv. 7–8); μελετήσεις … ἡμέρας καὶ νυκτός anticipates Ps 1:2. The administrative section (vv. 10–15) is threaded by ἐντέλλομαι ('command / charge,' vv. 7, 9, 10, 11, 13, 16, 18), tracing the descent of authoritative charge from YHWH through Moses and Joshua to the people. The Transjordan tribes are named with the article governing indeclinable forms (τῷ Ρουβην, τῷ Γαδ, τῷ ἡμίσει φυλῆς Μανασση, v. 12); their warriors must cross εὔζωνοι ('well-armed,' rendering חֲמֻשִׁים) and συμμαχήσετε ('fight as allies') for their brothers. The aspect of the land-verbs is theologically pointed: the Transjordan grant is aorist/perfect (κατέπαυσεν, ἔδωκεν, δέδωκεν — accomplished), the western grant present (δίδωσιν — being given even as it must be taken). The chapter closes (vv. 16–18) with the people's pledge built on the Moses-analogy (ἠκούσαμεν Μωυσῆ / ἀκουσόμεθα σοῦ), a death-sanction on the rebel (ἀπειθήσῃ … ἀποθανέτω), and the people's own return of the courage-refrain to Joshua — an inclusio binding divine commission and human pledge.

Joshua 2 — ΙΗΣΟΥΣ Β′

Theme. Rahab shelters the spies, confesses the Lord's gift of the land, and secures mercy for her house.

Outline.

Translation & textual notes. The Greek text of Joshua 2 follows the Rahlfs–Hanhart edition (Septuaginta, rev. ed. 2006), an ancient and public-domain text; the critical apparatus is not reproduced. The LXX of Joshua frequently runs shorter than the Masoretic Text, and chapter 2 is a clear instance: the Old Greek lacks several phrases present in MT (the fuller dialogue of vv. 4–7, the elaborated oath of vv. 17–20, the note that Rahab's house was built into the wall at v. 15, and the explicit cord-tying clause at v. 21), reflecting either a shorter Hebrew Vorlage or the translator's compression. The translation is consistently paratactic, mirroring the Hebraizing καί-strings and the quotation-marker λέγων/λέγουσα (= לֵאמֹר). Several koine features stand out: the Alexandrian third-plural aorist ending -οσαν (εἰσήλθοσαν v. 1; ἐξήλθοσαν v. 7; ἤλθοσαν, εὕροσαν v. 22) alongside classical forms (ἐξῆλθον v. 5); the Hellenistic first-aorist plural εἶπαν (vv. 14, 17, 24); and the future καταλήμψεσθε with intrusive nasal (v. 5). The narrative pivots on Rahab's ironic use of ἐπίσταμαι: she feigns ignorance to the king's men (οὐκ ἐπίσταμαι ποῦ πεπόρευνται, v. 5) and then opens her confession with the same verb (ἐπίσταμαι ὅτι δέδωκεν, v. 9). The creed of v. 11 (κύριος ὁ θεὸς ὑμῶν θεὸς ἐν οὐρανῷ ἄνω καὶ ἐπὶ τῆς γῆς κάτω) is verbally close to Deut 4:39, placed on the lips of a Canaanite prostitute. The oath-language ἔλεος καὶ ἀλήθεια (v. 14) renders the covenant pair חֶסֶד וֶאֱמֶת; the forensic refrain ἀθῷοι τῷ ὅρκῳ σου τούτῳ (vv. 17, 19, 20) structures the conditions; ἔνοχος ἑαυτῷ (v. 19) renders the Hebrew blood-guilt idiom 'his blood on his own head.' The whole inclusio is sealed by the lexical echo of δέδωκεν (v. 9) in παρέδωκεν (v. 24) and of ἐπιπέπτωκεν ... ὁ φόβος (v. 9) in κατέπτηκεν πᾶς ὁ κατοικῶν (v. 24): a prostitute's faith becomes the spies' verdict.

Joshua 3 — ΙΗΣΟΥΣ Γ′

Theme. The ark leads Israel through the Jordan on dry ground, proving that the living God is among them.

Outline.

Translation & textual notes. The Greek text of Joshua 3 follows the standard critical text of the Septuagint as established in the Rahlfs–Hanhart edition (Septuaginta, rev. ed. 2006), an ancient and public-domain text; the critical apparatus is not reproduced. The chapter is verb-heavy and tightly structured around the root ἵστημι ("stand"): the priests are to stand (στήσεσθε, v. 8), the descending water will stand (στήσεται, v. 13), the waters stand as one heap (ἔστη πῆγμα ἕν, v. 16), the people stand opposite Jericho (εἱστήκει, v. 16), and the priests stand firm in the midst of the Jordan (ἔστησαν, v. 17). The chapter's name for Joshua is Ἰησοῦς (Hebrew יְהוֹשֻׁעַ), a declinable contract noun, while Ισραηλ, Σαττιν, Καριαθιαριμ, Αραβα, and Ιεριχω remain indeclinable transliterations. The LXX exhibits several characteristic Koine forms: the Hellenistic aorists in -οσαν (ἤλθοσαν, v. 1; ἤροσαν, v. 14) and the middle imperfect ἤμην (v. 7). Three points are theologically load-bearing. First, the recognition-formula ἐν τούτῳ γνώσεσθε ὅτι θεὸς ζῶν ἐν ὑμῖν (v. 10) — "the living God" (אֵל חַי) — is the interpretive center: the heaped-waters miracle is the empirical proof that the present, acting God is alive, in pointed contrast to the lifeless idols of the seven nations he will dispossess by the cognate-emphatic ὀλεθρεύων ὀλεθρεύσει ("he will surely destroy"). Second, the πῆγμα ἕν of v. 16 — "one heap/congealed mass" — recalls the Red Sea, where the waters "were congealed" (ἐπάγη, Exod 15:8), and the repeated διὰ ξηρᾶς ("on dry ground," vv. 17) is verbatim the Exodus crossing-language (Exod 14:22, 29), framing the Jordan as a second Red Sea. Third, the divine-presence promise ἤμην μετὰ Μωυσῆ … ἔσομαι καὶ μετὰ σοῦ (v. 7) establishes Joshua as the new Moses, the miracle serving as his public credential. Note also the LXX's distinctive geography: where the MT names "Adam … beside Zarethan" as the place of the dammed waters, the LXX reads ἕως μέρους Καριαθιαριμ ("as far as the region of Kariathiarim," v. 16), a notable text-historical divergence.

Joshua 4 — ΙΗΣΟΥΣ Δ′

Theme. Twelve stones memorialize the crossing so Israel and the nations remember the Lord's mighty hand.

Outline.

Translation & textual notes. The Greek text of Joshua 4 follows the standard critical text of the Septuagint as established in the Rahlfs–Hanhart edition (Septuaginta, rev. ed. 2006), an ancient and public-domain text; the critical apparatus is not reproduced. The Old Greek of Joshua is appreciably shorter than the Masoretic text and often smooths the Hebrew's doublets, but it preserves the chapter's two-monument structure (camp-stones, vv. 3, 8, 20; riverbed-stones, v. 9) and its catechetical frame (vv. 6–7, 21–24). διαβαίνω ('cross over') is the chapter's leitmotif verb (vv. 1, 3, 7, 10, 11, 12, 13, 22, 23), and συντελέω ('complete', vv. 1, 10, 11) marks the orderly accomplishment of each divinely-ordained stage. The stones come ἐκ μέσου τοῦ Ιορδάνου ('from the midst of the Jordan', vv. 3, 5, 8), the miraculous standing-place of the priests, and are to be a σημεῖον (v. 6) and μνημόσυνον (v. 7), the LXX's renderings of אוֹת and זִכָּרוֹן. The catechetical question τί εἰσιν οἱ λίθοι οὗτοι; (vv. 6, 21) is answered by recounting how ὁ Ιορδάνης ποταμὸς … ἐξέλιπεν ('the Jordan river failed', v. 7) before the κιβωτὸς τῆς διαθήκης (expanded at v. 16 to τῆς διαθήκης τοῦ μαρτυρίου, 'of the covenant of the testimony'). The etiological formula καί εἰσιν ἐκεῖ ἕως τῆς σήμερον ἡμέρας ('and they are there to this day', v. 9) anchors the monument to the narrator's present. At v. 14 YHWH ηὔξησεν ('exalted') Joshua ὥσπερ Μωυσῆν, fulfilling 3:7 and establishing the succession. The waters' return is dramatized by ὥρμησεν … κατὰ χώραν ('rushed back into their place', v. 18) over δι᾿ ὅλης τῆς κρηπῖδος ('over its whole bank'), with the Hebraism καθὰ ἐχθὲς καὶ τρίτην ἡμέραν ('as yesterday and the third day' = 'as before'). The dating δεκάτῃ τοῦ μηνὸς τοῦ πρώτου (v. 19) coincides with the selection of the Passover lamb (Exod 12:3). The crossing is explicitly typed to the Red Sea at v. 23 (καθάπερ … τὴν ἐρυθρὰν θάλασσαν, with the same verb ἀποξηραίνω used of both and the shift to the confessing first person, παρήλθομεν), and the chapter closes (v. 24) with the universal recognition-formula (ὅπως γνῶσιν πάντα τὰ ἔθνη) and the inward call to perpetual reverence (ἵνα … σέβησθε … ἐν παντὶ χρόνῳ).

Joshua 5 — ΙΗΣΟΥΣ Ε′

Theme. Circumcision, Passover, and the commander of the Lord's army mark Israel's consecrated entry into the land.

Outline.

Translation & textual notes. The Greek text of Joshua 5 follows the standard critical text of the Septuagint as established in the Rahlfs–Hanhart edition (Septuaginta, rev. ed. 2006), an ancient and public-domain text; the critical apparatus is not reproduced. Greek Joshua (Ἰησοῦς) diverges markedly from the Masoretic Text throughout this chapter: it is generally shorter and rearranges clauses, and carries distinctive renderings absent from the Hebrew. At v. 1 the western kings are named those τῆς Φοινίκης ("of Phoenicia") rather than "kings of the Canaanites," a recurring LXX equivalence (Φοινίκη/Φοίνικες for כְּנַעַן/כְּנַעֲנִי; cf. v. 12, τὴν χώραν τῶν Φοινίκων). At v. 2 the instruction is to make μαχαίρας πετρίνας ἐκ πέτρας ἀκροτόμου ("stone knives of sharp/flinty rock"); v. 3 locates the rite ἐπὶ τοῦ καλουμένου τόπου Βουνὸς τῶν ἀκροβυστιῶν ("at the place called Hill of the Foreskins"), translating the Hebrew place-name Gibeath-haaraloth into Greek. The LXX chooses the purification verb περιεκάθαρεν (v. 4) for the circumcision, casting the rite theologically as a cleansing. Verses 4–6 form an explanatory excursus reworked from the Hebrew; the LXX uniquely glosses the wilderness as τῇ ἐρήμῳ τῇ Μαδβαρίτιδι (a grecized Semitic מַדְבְּרָא, "of the wilderness") and reckons τεσσαράκοντα καὶ δύο ἔτη ("forty-two years"). The first-person ἡμῖν ("to us," v. 6) is retained from the quoted oath-speech. The theological climax is v. 9: ἐν τῇ σήμερον ἡμέρᾳ ἀφεῖλον τὸν ὀνειδισμὸν Αἰγύπτου ἀφ᾽ ὑμῶν, with the etiology of Γαλγαλα (Gilgal), punning on the Hebrew root גלל ("roll [away]"). Verses 10–12 record the first land-Passover (τὸ πασχα) and the eating of ἄζυμα καὶ νέα ("unleavened bread and new grain"); the manna ceases (ἐξέλιπεν τὸ μαννα), and the LXX adds ἐκαρπίσαντο δὲ τὴν χώραν τῶν Φοινίκων ("they harvested the territory of the Phoenicians"), a clause absent from the Hebrew. The vernacular aorist ἐφάγοσαν (-οσαν, v. 11) is characteristic Koine. Verses 13–15 narrate the theophany: Joshua sees ἄνθρωπον … καὶ ἡ ῥομφαία ἐσπασμένη ("a man with drawn sword"), who declares himself ἀρχιστράτηγος δυνάμεως κυρίου; the command λῦσαι τὸ ὑπόδημα ἐκ τῶν ποδῶν σου, ὁ γὰρ τόπος … ἅγιός ἐστιν reprises Exod 3:5 almost verbatim (with plural ποδῶν against the Hebrew singular), binding Joshua's commission to Moses' and grounding the patristic christological reading.

Joshua 6 — ΙΗΣΟΥΣ Ϛ′

Theme. Jericho falls by the Lord's command, while Rahab's house is spared within the doomed city.

Outline.

Translation & textual notes. The Greek text of Joshua 6 follows the standard critical text of the Septuagint as established in the Rahlfs–Hanhart edition (Septuaginta, rev. ed. 2006), an ancient and public-domain text; the critical apparatus is not reproduced. The Old Greek of Joshua is markedly shorter than the Masoretic Text throughout this chapter, and the versification reflects this: the LXX has NO verse 4 — the numbering runs 1–3 and then jumps directly to 5–27, yielding 26 verses in all. The elaborate trumpet-and-circuit rubric the MT spreads across vv. 3–4 is compressed in the OG, so what the Hebrew counts as v. 4 has no separate Greek counterpart; the present interlinear preserves the LXX numbering exactly (no invented or renumbered v. 4). The opening nominal clause uses two perfect passive participles, συγκεκλεισμένη καὶ ὠχυρωμένη ("shut up and fortified," v. 1), to fix Jericho as humanly impregnable. The promise of v. 5, πεσεῖται αὐτόματα τὰ τείχη ("the walls will fall of themselves"), uses αὐτόματος to stress that the collapse is by no human force — the same theological point Heb 11:30 makes with πίστει. The chapter is saturated with the sacred number seven (seven priests, seven trumpets, the seventh day, seven circuits, vv. 8, 13, 15, 16). The ban is named ἀνάθεμα (vv. 17, 18), the LXX's standard rendering of Hebrew חֵרֶם (herem), and executed by the cognate verb ἀνεθεμάτισεν (v. 21); the metals alone are exempt, consecrated εἰς θησαυρὸν κυρίου ("to the treasury of the LORD," vv. 19, 24). κύριος σαβαωθ ("the LORD of hosts," v. 17) carries the untranslated Hebraism σαβαωθ (cf. Rom 9:29; Jas 5:4). The climactic v. 20, ἔπεσεν ἅπαν τὸ τεῖχος κύκλῳ, with its cognate-dative shout ἠλάλαξεν … ἀλαλαγμῷ μεγάλῳ, is the very wall-fall Heb 11:30 celebrates. Rahab the prostitute (Ρααβ τὴν πόρνην — the epithet retained, as in Heb 11:31; Jas 2:25) is "kept alive" (ἐζώγρησεν, v. 25) and "dwells in Israel to this day." Verse 26 contains a unique OG expansion absent from the MT: after the oath-curse (ἐπικατάρατος ὁ ἄνθρωπος ὃς οἰκοδομήσει), the Greek adds a fulfilment-notice naming the rebuilder "Hozan of Bethel," who founded the city at the cost of "Abiron his firstborn" and set its gates at the cost of his youngest "who survived" — anticipating and matching the historical fulfilment in Hiel of Bethel at 1 Kgs 16:34 (3 Kgdms 16:34 LXX). Indeclinable transliterated names — Ιεριχω, Ρααβ, Ισραηλ, Ναυη, Βαιθηλ, Αβιρων, Οζαν, and the Hebraism σαβαωθ — are tagged kind "x" with empty case; the declinable name Ἰησοῦς (gen. Ἰησοῦ, acc. Ἰησοῦν) is tagged "n" with its case. κύριος throughout renders the Tetragrammaton.

Joshua 7 — ΙΗΣΟΥΣ Ζ′

Theme. Achan's trespass brings defeat at Ai until hidden sin is exposed and purged from Israel.

Outline.

Translation & textual notes. The Greek text of Joshua 7 follows the standard critical text of the Septuagint as established in the Rahlfs–Hanhart edition (Septuaginta, rev. ed. 2006), an ancient and public-domain text; the critical apparatus is not reproduced. The chapter is built on the keyword ἀνάθεμα (the LXX rendering of Hebrew חֵרֶם, the devotion-to-destruction of Jericho's spoil, 6:17–18), which recurs as both the stolen object and the contagion of guilt that clings to the whole community (vv. 1, 11, 12, 13, 15). The corporate-solidarity logic is pointed: the plural verbs ἐπλημμέλησαν / ἐνοσφίσαντο and the collective subject οἱ υἱοὶ Ισραηλ (v. 1) make the sin of one man the sin of all — the principle Paul invokes with 'a little leaven leavens the whole lump' (1 Cor 5:6) and that surfaces in the Ananias-and-Sapphira judgment of Acts 5, where the same rare verb νοσφίζομαι ('purloin') is deliberately reused (Acts 5:2–3). The offender is named Αχαρ in the LXX (MT עָכָן 'Achan'), assimilated to the etiology of the Valley of Achor (Αχωρ, עָכוֹר 'trouble'; cf. 1 Chr 2:7, where MT itself reads עָכָר 'the troubler of Israel'). The defeat at Ai is rendered with the heart 'becoming as water' (ἐγένετο ὥσπερ ὕδωρ, v. 5), the very image Rahab used of the Canaanites' terror (2:11), now turned against Israel. Joshua's lament (vv. 7–9) follows the Mosaic intercessory pattern (ἵνα τί …; cf. Exod 5:22; 32:11–12), even voicing the unrealizable wish that Israel had stayed beyond the Jordan (καὶ εἰ κατεμείναμεν), and stakes everything on the LORD's 'great name.' The divine answer (vv. 10–15) is diagnosis and prescription: ἡμάρτηκεν ὁ λαός (perfect of abiding guilt), the verdict that Israel has itself ἐγενήθησαν ἀνάθεμα, the threat of withdrawn presence (οὐ προσθήσω … εἶναι μεθ᾽ ὑμῶν — a Hebraizing auxiliary use of προστίθημι), and the Deuteronomic purge-formula ἐξάρητε τὸ ἀνάθεμα (cf. Deut 13:5; 17:7). The lot-casting (vv. 14, 16–18) is presented as divine detection, not chance: at each stage 'the LORD indicates' (δείξῃ κύριος) and the unit 'is pointed out' (passive ἐνεδείχθη). Achar's confession (v. 21) reproduces the classic temptation-anatomy εἶδον … ἐνθυμηθεὶς … ἔλαβον (cf. Gen 3:6; 2 Sam 11) and inventories the spoil: the LXX reads ψιλὴν ποικίλην καλὴν ('a fine multicolored cloak') for MT's 'mantle of Shinar,' two hundred didrachmas of silver (= shekels), and γλῶσσαν … χρυσῆν ('a tongue/wedge of gold') of fifty didrachmas; the perfects ἐγκέκρυπται / κέκρυπται stress the persisting concealment that Joshua's μὴ κρύψῃς (v. 19) had forbidden. The execution (vv. 24–26) enacts the full corporate liability (πάντα ὅσα ἐστὶν αὐτῷ, v. 15), names the place twice (φάραγγα Αχωρ and the transliterated Εμεκαχωρ), and turns on the paronomasia ὠλέθρευσας / ἐξολεθρεύσαι (v. 25), the Greek mirror of the Hebrew play on עָכַר / עָכוֹר. The closing ἐπαύσατο κύριος τοῦ θυμοῦ τῆς ὀργῆς (v. 26) forms a wrath-inclusio with v. 1's ἐθυμώθη ὀργῇ κύριος, and the etiological tag ἕως τῆς ἡμέρας ταύτης ('to this day') anchors the tradition in the audience's geography (cf. 4:9; 5:9; 8:28–29).

Joshua 8 — ΙΗΣΟΥΣ Η′

Theme. The Lord gives Ai to Israel by ambush, then Joshua renews the law on the mountain.

Outline.

Translation & textual notes. The Greek follows the Rahlfs–Hanhart critical text (Septuaginta, rev. ed. 2006); the apparatus is not reproduced. The LXX of Joshua is markedly shorter than the MT, and its versification differs: this chapter has 27 verses but NO verse 13 and NO verse 26 (the numbering runs 1–12, 14–25, 27–29). The shorter Greek lacks the MT's military doublets — the fuller second-detachment notice and recapitulation of MT 8:12–13 (the source of the absent v.13) and a redundant line corresponding to the absent v.26. A further major structural divergence: the Ebal covenant-renewal pericope (MT Josh 8:30–35 — Joshua's altar of unhewn stones on Mount Gebal/Ebal, the writing of a copy of the law, τὸ δευτερονόμιον, on the stones, and the public reading of the blessing and the curse before all Israel, the sojourner included, with the ark between Gerizim and Ebal, fulfilling Deut 27) does not stand here in Rahlfs; it is transposed to follow 9:2 (printed as 9:2a–f). Hence Joshua 8 in the LXX closes not with covenant worship but with the king's burial. Key renderings: the ambush vocabulary clusters around ἔνεδρον / ἐνεδρεύω / ἐνέδρα (vv.2, 4, 7, 9, 12, 14, 18, 19, 21); the feigned-retreat idiom φεύγω ... ἀπὸ προσώπου (vv.5–6, 15) renders נוּס מִפְּנֵי; the directional Hebraisms ἀπὸ θαλάσσης ('to the west', v.9, 12) and ἀπ᾽ ἀνατολῶν ('from the east', v.11) reflect יָם and מִזְרָח. The javelin γαῖσος (v.18, a Gallic loanword for כִּידוֹן) is held out as the battle-signal, the gesture recalling Moses' outstretched hand at the sea (Exod 14:16, 26). The slaughter is told in ban-language — ἕως τοῦ μὴ καταλειφθῆναι ... σεσωσμένον καὶ διαπεφευγότα (v.22), ἐν στόματι ῥομφαίας (v.24), ἀπὸ ἀνδρὸς καὶ ἕως γυναικός (v.25). The spoil-exception (πλήν, v.27) is framed by a double obedience-formula (κατὰ πρόσταγμα κυρίου ... ὃν τρόπον συνέταξεν κύριος), marking Israel's plundering as obedient — the deliberate foil to Achan (ch. 7). The city's reduction to a χῶμα ἀοίκητον (v.28) fulfils the irony of the name Ai (הָעַי, 'the ruin/heap'). Two aetiological ἕως τῆς ἡμέρας ταύτης formulae close vv.28 and 29.

Joshua 9 — ΙΗΣΟΥΣ Θ′

Theme. Gibeon's deception secures peace because Israel judges by appearance without inquiring of the Lord.

Outline.

Translation & textual notes. The Greek text of Joshua 9 follows the Rahlfs–Hanhart edition (Septuaginta, rev. ed. 2006), an ancient and public-domain text; the critical apparatus is not reproduced. Two features dominate. First, the arrangement differs from the Masoretic Text: the Mount Ebal altar-and-law pericope which the MT places at 8:30–35 appears in the LXX as an expansion within 9:2 (marked here [a]–[f]), so that the hostile muster of the kings is immediately juxtaposed with Israel's covenant renewal in obedience to Moses — Joshua builds the altar of whole, unhewn stones (θυσιαστήριον λίθων ὁλοκλήρων ἐφ᾿ οὓς οὐκ ἐπεβλήθη σίδηρος), offers sacrifices, writes 'the Deuteronomy' (τὸ δευτερονόμιον, the LXX's term for the copy of the law, whence the book's name) on the stones, and reads aloud all the εὐλογίαι and κατάραι (cf. Deut 27). Second is the Gibeonite deception itself. The defining term πανουργία ('cunning, guile', v. 4) shares its root with the serpent of Gen 3:1 — morally negative shrewdness; the disguise is itemized in vivid rare vocabulary (καταπεπελματωμένα, 'patched/re-soled', v. 5; εὐρωτιῶν, 'growing mold', v. 5; κατερρωγότας ... ἀποδεδεμένους, 'burst ... bound up', v. 4). The keyword διατίθεμαι/διαθήκη ('cut a covenant') recurs throughout (vv. 6, 7, 11, 15, 16). The hinge is v. 14: ἐπερωτάω is the technical term for seeking a divine oracle (cf. Num 27:21; 1 Sam 28:6), and its omission, set in bare καί-parataxis after 'the leaders took of their provision', indicts judgment κατὰ ὄψιν over recourse to God. The oath sworn κύριον τὸν θεὸν Ισραηλ (vv. 18, 19) is binding precisely because it invokes the divine name, so that οὐ δυνησόμεθα ἅψασθαι αὐτῶν ('we cannot touch them', v. 19) is a moral, not physical, impossibility; breaking it would bring ὀργή (v. 20) — realized historically in the famine of 2 Sam 21. Joshua's curse (ἐπικατάρατοι, v. 23, cognate with the κατάραι of v. 2[e]) imposes not death but perpetual servitude, defined by the pair ξυλοκόποι καὶ ὑδροφόροι (vv. 21, 23, 27; the phrase of Deut 29:11), extended in v. 27 to the altar of God and the place the LORD will choose (Deut 12:5). Note the LXX's Χορραῖον ('Horite', v. 7) where the MT reads 'Hivite', and the transliterated names Γαβαων, Γαλγαλα, Κεφιρα, Βηρωθ, πόλις Ιαριν (Kiriath-Jearim), Σηων, Εσεβων, Ωγ, Βασαν, Ασταρωθ, Εδραϊν, Γαιβαλ (Ebal), and Γαριζιν (Gerizim). The closing inclusio οἱ κατοικοῦντες Γαβαων (vv. 3, 27) and the etiological διὰ τοῦτο ... ἕως τῆς σήμερον ἡμέρας frame the whole as the origin of an enduring custom (cf. the later temple servants).

Joshua 10 — ΙΗΣΟΥΣ Ι′

Theme. The Lord routs the southern kings with hail and a halted sun as Joshua secures victory for Israel.

Outline.

Translation & textual notes. The Greek text of Joshua 10 follows the Rahlfs–Hanhart critical text (Septuaginta, rev. ed. 2006), an ancient and public-domain text; the apparatus is not reproduced. Versification: the chapter has 41 verses with NO verse 15 — the numbering runs 1–14 and then 16–42, so the verse-object count (41) is one fewer than the highest verse-number (42). The material the MT places in a separate v. 15 (Joshua's return to Gilgal) is absent from the Greek transmission represented by Rahlfs; this edition follows the reference numbering exactly and does not interpolate a v. 15. A related text-critical point bears on the long-day passage: the citation of the Book of the Upright (βιβλίον τοῦ εὐθοῦς, the Book of Jashar) found in the MT and some Greek witnesses is absent from the Rahlfs text annotated here, so the words tier does not include it (the connection is noted in the discourse-notes of vv. 12–13). The personal name Ἰησοῦς ('Joshua', = יְהוֹשֻׁעַ) is declined as a second-declension noun (gen./dat. Ἰησοῦ, acc. Ἰησοῦν) and tagged as a declinable noun; the transliterated, uninflected names (Αδωνιβεζεκ, Ιερουσαλημ, Γαι, Ιεριχω, Γαβαων, Χεβρων, Λαχις, Μακηδα, Ισραηλ, etc.) are indeclinable (kind "x"), with case shown by an accompanying article where present (e.g. τῇ Λαχις, τῷ Ισραηλ). κύριος throughout renders the Tetragrammaton יהוה; the chapter alternates κύριος, ὁ θεός, and the full title κύριος ὁ θεὸς Ισραηλ for the one divine warrior. Several Greek names diverge from the MT: Αδωνιβεζεκ (MT Adoni-zedek), Αιλαμ (MT Hoham, v. 3; Horam, v. 33), Φιδων (Piram), Ιεφθα (Japhia), and Οδολλαμ (MT Eglon); Δαβιρ serves both as the personal name of Eglon's king (v. 3) and as the city Debir (vv. 38–39). The LXX-Hellenistic third-plural aorist ending -οσαν appears at ἐξηγάγοσαν (v. 23), ἐλάβοσαν (v. 28), and κατεφύγοσαν (v. 27). Cognate-accusative Hebraisms intensify the slaughter: συνέτριψεν … σύντριψιν μεγάλην (v. 10), κόπτοντες … κοπὴν μεγάλην (v. 20). The recurring conquest-formula (capture → ἐν στόματι ξίφους → ἐξωλέθρευσαν πᾶν ἐμπνέον → 'no survivor' → comparison to Jericho/the previous city) governs vv. 28–39, and the διασεσῳσμένος / διαπεφευγώς ('survivor / fugitive') merism marks total ḥērem. Verses 38–39 form a single syntactic unit, the participle περικαθίσαντες (v. 38) finding its finite verb only in ἔλαβον (v. 39).

Joshua 11 — ΙΗΣΟΥΣ ΙΑ′

Theme. Hazor and the northern coalition fall before Joshua, and the land begins to rest from war.

Outline.

Translation & textual notes. The Greek follows the Rahlfs–Hanhart critical text (Septuaginta, rev. ed. 2006); the apparatus is not reproduced. Joshua (Ἰησοῦς) in the LXX is textually complex: the Old Greek is often shorter than the MT and its toponymy is heavily transliterated and divergent — MT Madon appears as Μαρρων, Shimron as Συμοων, Achshaph as Αζιφ, and the "waters of Merom" become τὸ ὕδωρ Μαρρων (vv. 5, 7). The chapter's distinctive vocabulary repays attention: νευροκοπέω ("to hamstring / hough," lit. "cut the sinew," νεῦρον + κόπτω; vv. 6, 9), the LXX rendering of Hebrew עִקֵּר, neutralizes the coalition's chariot-cavalry advantage in keeping with Deut 17:16's ban on multiplying horses; the perfect participle τετροπωμένους ("routed," v. 6) presents the still-future victory as already accomplished. The ḥērem-root חרם is rendered throughout by ἐξολεθρεύω, the chapter's leitwort (vv. 11, 12, 14, 20 ×2, 21 ×2), reinforced by the total-destruction formula οὐ κατελείφθη … ἐμπνέον ("no breathing thing was left," vv. 8, 11, 14, 22). The obedience-refrain recurs in three forms — ὃν τρόπον (vv. 9, 12, 15), and finally καθότι ἐνετείλατο κύριος τῷ Μωυσῇ (v. 23) — with Moses styled ὁ παῖς κυρίου ("the servant of the LORD," v. 12). The theological heart is v. 20: διὰ κυρίου ἐγένετο κατισχῦσαι αὐτῶν τὴν καρδίαν ("it was from the LORD that their heart was hardened"); the LXX uses κατισχύω ("strengthen / harden") where Exodus uses σκληρύνω, both rendering Hebrew חִזֵּק — the same root as Pharaoh's hardening, placing this verse in the same theological family as Exod 4–14 and Paul's reflection on divine hardening at Rom 9:17–18. The chapter closes with the Deuteronomistic rest-formula καὶ ἡ γῆ κατέπαυσεν πολεμουμένη (v. 23): the verb καταπαύω and its cognate noun κατάπαυσις ("rest") become the key terms of the divine-rest theology developed in Heb 3–4. Note also the unusual αἱ πόλεις αἱ κεχωματισμέναι ("the cities built on mounds," v. 13), a technical rendering of Hebrew הֶעָרִים הָעֹמְדוֹת עַל־תִּלָּם, and the Hellenistic third-plural ἐλάβοσαν (-οσαν ending, v. 19).

Joshua 12 — ΙΗΣΟΥΣ ΙΒ′

Theme. The conquered kings east and west of the Jordan stand as a memorial to the Lord's victory.

Outline.

Translation & textual notes. The Greek text of Joshua 12 follows the standard critical text of the Septuagint as established in the Rahlfs–Hanhart edition (Septuaginta, rev. ed. 2006), an ancient and public-domain text; the critical apparatus is not reproduced. The chapter is a register in two movements joined by a deliberate structural parallel: the cataloguing formula καὶ οὗτοι οἱ βασιλεῖς … οὓς ἀνεῖλον/ἀνεῖλεν opens both the eastern frame (v. 1) and the western frame (v. 7), and the allotment-clause ἔδωκεν αὐτὴν Μωυσῆς … ἐν κληρονομίᾳ (v. 6) is exactly mirrored by ἔδωκεν αὐτὴν Ἰησοῦς … κληρονομεῖν (v. 7), binding the Transjordanian conquest under Moses to the Cisjordanian conquest under Joshua. The verb ἀνεῖλεν of v. 7 grammatically governs the entire list of vv. 9–24, where each entry is a bare accusative τὸν βασιλέα / βασιλέα + indeclinable city-name. The chapter is markedly transliterative: nearly every toponym (Εσεβων, Βασαν, Ασταρωθ, Ιεριχω, Χεβρων, Λαχις, Ασωρ, etc.) is an uninflected Hebrew name. Theologically weighted is v. 4, where Og is ὑπελείφθη ἐκ τῶν γιγάντων ('was left over from the giants'), the LXX rendering רְפָאִים by γίγαντες and presenting the conquered Og as the last of a legendary giant-race (cf. Deut 3:11). The closing total of v. 24, βασιλεῖς εἴκοσι ἐννέα ('twenty-nine kings'), diverges from the Masoretic thirty-one, reflecting a shorter and differently-summed list in the Greek tradition; and at v. 23 the LXX reads Γωιμ τῆς Γαλιλαίας ('Goiim of Galilee') where the MT has 'Goiim in Gilgal.'

Joshua 13 — ΙΗΣΟΥΣ ΙΓ′

Theme. Though much land remains, Joshua begins allotting the inheritance and recounts the Transjordan grants.

Outline.

Translation & textual notes. The Greek text of Joshua 13 follows the standard critical text of the Septuagint as established in the Rahlfs–Hanhart edition (Septuaginta, rev. ed. 2006), an ancient and public-domain text; the critical apparatus is not reproduced. The chapter is dense with transliterated Palestinian toponyms and tribal gentilics whose orthography fluctuates across the manuscript tradition (Γεσιρι, Μαχατι, Μισωρ, Δαιβων/Δαιβαν). It opens the land-distribution section with the divine refrain that Joshua is πρεσβύτερος προβεβηκὼς τῶν ἡμερῶν while ἡ γῆ ὑπολέλειπται πολλή (v. 1). The LXX renders the Philistine lords' cities as αἱ πέντε σατραπεῖαι τῶν Φυλιστιιμ (v. 3), using a Persian-administrative loanword for the Hebrew סְרָנִים. The Greek distinguishes declinable names (Ἰησοῦς, Μωυσῆς, Λίβανος, Ιορδάνης, the Greek-formed regional gentilics Γαλααδῖτις/Βασανῖτις and the satrapy-gentilics Γαζαῖος, Ἀζώτιος, etc.) from the mass of indeclinable transliterations (Φυλιστιιμ, Σηων, Ωγ, Αερμων, Αραβωθ Μωαβ). Og is described as κατελείφθη ἀπὸ τῶν γιγάντων (v. 12), γίγας being the LXX's standard rendering of רְפָאִים. The Balaam-notice (v. 22) labels him ὁ μάντις ('the diviner', rendering קֹסֵם), a pejorative associating him with forbidden divination (Deut 18:10), and records his death ἐν τῇ ῥοπῇ ('in the rout / by the decisive turn of battle'). The theological centre is the Levite refrain of v. 14 — κύριος ὁ θεὸς Ισραηλ οὗτος αὐτῶν κληρονομία — an inversion of the κληρονομία keyword that dominates the chapter: Levi's "inheritance" is YHWH himself, not territory (cf. Num 18:20; Deut 18:2). The chapter's verbal frame is the cognate cluster κλῆρος / κληρονομία / καταμερισμός / κατακληρονομέω, and it closes (v. 32) by echoing v. 14's locative ἐν Αραβωθ Μωαβ … κατὰ Ιεριχω, sealing the Transjordan distribution before the western allotment of chs. 14ff. (Note: the Rahlfs text of Joshua 13 ends at v. 32; the second Levite-inheritance doublet that appears as MT v. 33 is not present as a separate verse here, so the refrain stands once, at v. 14.)

Joshua 14 — ΙΗΣΟΥΣ ΙΔ′

Theme. Caleb claims Hebron in old age because he followed the Lord wholeheartedly.

Outline.

Translation & textual notes. The Greek text of Joshua 14 follows the standard critical text of the Septuagint as established in the Rahlfs–Hanhart edition (Septuaginta, rev. ed. 2006), an ancient and public-domain text; the critical apparatus is not reproduced. The Greek Joshua (Ἰησοῦς) is among the more freely rendered books of the LXX, and chapter 14 opens the great Cisjordan land-distribution (chs. 14–19): the inheritance west of the Jordan is apportioned by lot (κατὰ κλήρους) through Eleazar the priest and Joshua son of Naue, together with the tribal heads, 'as the LORD commanded by the hand of Moses' (vv. 1–5). The arithmetic of the tribes is carefully glossed: two-and-a-half tribes had already received their portion east of the Jordan, Levi receives no κλῆρος but only cities to dwell in with their pasture-lands (τὰ ἀφωρισμένα … τοῖς κτήνεσιν), and the doubling of Joseph into Manasseh and Ephraim keeps the count of inheriting tribes whole (vv. 3–4). The chapter's dramatic centre is Caleb son of Jephunneh the Kenizzite — a clan of Edomite/Kenizzite stock incorporated into Judah, which makes his exemplary faith the more striking — who comes with the sons of Judah to Joshua at Gilgal and recalls the events of forty-five years earlier (vv. 6–12): at forty he was sent by Moses from Kadesh-Barnea to spy out the land and brought back a faithful report 'according to his (Moses') mind' (κατὰ τὸν νοῦν αὐτοῦ), while his fellow-spies 'turned aside the heart of the people' (μετέστησαν τὴν καρδίαν τοῦ λαοῦ). Twice the text marks Caleb's wholehearted faith with προσετέθην / προσετέθης ἐπακολουθῆσαι (ὀπίσω) κυρίου ('I wholly devoted myself to follow after the LORD', vv. 8–9; cf. Num 14:24; 32:11–12; Deut 1:36), the verb προστίθημι ('to add oneself wholly to') rendering the Hebrew מִלֵּא אַחֲרֵי ('fully follow after'). Now eighty-five (40 + 45) and still vigorous for war (ἰσχύων … ἐξελθεῖν καὶ εἰσελθεῖν, a Hebraism for the full conduct of life), Caleb claims 'this mountain' — Hebron, with its fortified cities and the giant Anakim (οἱ Ενακιμ) — confident that 'if the LORD is with me I will utterly destroy them' (ἐξολεθρεύσω). Joshua blesses him and gives him Hebron as an inheritance 'to this day,' because he followed the command of the LORD God of Israel (vv. 13–14). The chapter closes with an antiquarian note (v. 15): Hebron's former name was the city Arbok (Kiriath-Arba), mother-city of the Anakim — 'and the land had rest from war' (ἡ γῆ ἐκόπασεν τοῦ πολέμου), the formulaic refrain (cf. 11:23) that frames the whole distribution as covenant fulfilment.

Joshua 15 — ΙΗΣΟΥΣ ΙΕ′

Theme. Judah receives its broad inheritance, with Caleb's household and Jerusalem's unfinished conquest in view.

Outline.

Translation & textual notes. The Greek text of Joshua 15 follows the standard critical text of the Septuagint as established in the Rahlfs–Hanhart edition (Septuaginta, rev. ed. 2006), an ancient and public-domain text; the critical apparatus is not reproduced. The boundary-survey of vv. 1–12 is written in a vivid sustained present tense: the border-line "goes up" (ἀναβαίνει), "goes down" (καταβαίνει), "passes through / goes out" (διεκβάλλει / διεκβαλεῖ, future and present alternating freely), "passes alongside" (παραπορεύεται / παρελεύσεται), and "goes around" (περιπορεύεται / περιελεύσεται) — a personification of the line that renders the Hebrew imperfect-narrative of the survey, fixing the boundary by topographical verbs rather than coordinates. The technical vocabulary is consistent: ὅριον / ὅρια ("border," גְּבוּל), διέξοδος ("the outgoing / terminus of the border," תֹּצְאוֹת), and the directional nouns λίψ / λιβός ("south / the Negeb," נֶגֶב), βορρᾶς ("north"), ἀνατολαί ("east"), δυσμαί ("west"). The Salt Sea (ἡ θάλασσα ἡ ἁλυκή) is the Dead Sea; ἡ θάλασσα ἡ μεγάλη ("the Great Sea") is the Mediterranean and the western boundary (v. 12). The LXX frequently translates rather than transliterates name-elements — πηγὴ ἡλίου for En-shemesh (v. 7), Πόλις ἡλίου for Beth-shemesh (v. 10), Πόλις γραμμάτων for Kiriath-sepher (vv. 15–16, 49) — and glosses old names with current ones via the formula αὕτη ἐστίν ("this is …": Jerusalem v. 8, Kiriath-jearim v. 9, Hebron vv. 13/54, Bethlehem v. 59). In the city-catalogue (vv. 20–62) the toponyms are heavily transliterated and often diverge sharply from the Masoretic forms, and the Greek numeral-tallies do not always match the listed names — a recognized feature of the Old Greek of Joshua, which preserves a textually distinct and frequently shorter tradition than MT. Most strikingly, the Greek of v. 59 carries an eleven-town district anchored on Ephratah/Bethlehem (Tekoa, Peor, Etam, Karem, Gallim, Bether, etc.) that has dropped out of the Masoretic Text by homoeoteleuton; it is marked here with the siglum [a]. The Caleb episode (vv. 13–19) parallels Judg 1:11–15; the closing Jebusite note (v. 63) parallels Judg 1:21 and is fulfilled at 2 Sam 5:6–9. κύριος, where it occurs, renders the Tetragrammaton.

Joshua 16 — ΙΗΣΟΥΣ ΙϚ′

Theme. Ephraim receives its allotment, yet Gezer's Canaanites remain within the land.

Outline.

Translation & textual notes. The Greek text of Joshua 16 follows the standard critical text of the Septuagint as established in the Rahlfs–Hanhart edition (Septuaginta, rev. ed. 2006), an ancient and public-domain text; the critical apparatus is not reproduced. The chapter belongs to the tribal-allotment cycle (chs. 13–21) and is dominated by toponyms transliterated from a Hebrew Vorlage that frequently diverges from the Masoretic Text: several names (Χαταρωθι, Απταλιμ for 'the Japhletite', Εροκ, Ικασμων for MT Michmethath, Θερμα, Θηνασα, Σελλησα, Μαχω, Χελκανα for the brook Kanah) resist secure alignment with MT, reflecting both textual fluidity in the boundary-lists and mechanical transliteration of obscure names. The border is described by a chain of future-tense 'itinerary' verbs (ἀναβήσεται, ἐξελεύσεται, παρελεύσεται, διελεύσεται, περιελεύσεται, πορεύσεται, ἐλεύσεται, διεκβαλεῖ) that personify the boundary as a moving line, the LXX's standard rendering of the Hebrew weqatal boundary-formulae of גְּבוּל (Greek ὅριον). The recurring noun ἡ διέξοδος ('the outgoing / terminus', vv. 3, 8) marks the seaward end-point; the compass seams ἀπὸ ἀνατολῶν ('from the east') and ἐπὶ τὴν θάλασσαν ('to the sea/west') orient the survey on its east–west axis. Gezer appears under two transliterations — Γαζαρα (v. 5) and Γαζερ (v. 10). The chapter closes with the incomplete-conquest motif paralleled at Judg 1:29: Ephraim's failure to dispossess (οὐκ ἀπώλεσεν) the Canaanite, and the etiological tag ἕως τῆς ἡμέρας ταύτης. Notably, this Rahlfs form of v. 10 carries a substantial plus over MT: in place of the familiar tributary-labour clause (MT 'and became a servant subject to forced labour'; cf. ὑπόφορος / εἰς φόρον δουλεύων elsewhere), it appends a notice harmonized with 3 Kgdms (1 Kgs) 9:16 — that the Canaanite remained until Pharaoh king of Egypt took and burned the city, slew (ἐξεκέντησαν) its Canaanite and Perizzite inhabitants, and gave it as a dowry (ἐν φερνῇ) to his daughter, Solomon's Egyptian wife. The φόρος/forced-labour tradition is thus absent from this textual form, replaced by the Gezer-dowry tradition; both are variant resolutions of the same unconquered-city tension.

Joshua 17 — ΙΗΣΟΥΣ ΙΖ′

Theme. Manasseh's inheritance is settled, and Joseph's tribes are told to clear the hill country and press the Canaanites.

Outline.

Translation & textual notes. The Greek text of Joshua 17 follows the standard critical text of the Septuagint as established in the Rahlfs–Hanhart edition (Septuaginta, rev. ed. 2006), an ancient and public-domain text; the critical apparatus is not reproduced. The chapter is the second western Joseph-allotment, structured in four movements (lot of Machir/clans, vv. 1–2; daughters of Zelophehad, vv. 3–6; boundary-survey and Canaanite enclaves, vv. 7–13; Joseph's complaint and Joshua's charge, vv. 14–18). The fronted dative τῷ Σαλπααδ (v. 3) is a Hebraizing pendent-topic construction resumed by αὐτῷ ("he had no sons"). The daughters' petition (v. 4) reproduces the tribunal of Num 27:2 (Eleazar / Joshua / the rulers) and grounds the claim in prior command διὰ χειρὸς Μωυσῆ ("through the hand of Moses"), reporting its grant with the divine-passive ἐδόθη and the key phrase διὰ προστάγματος κυρίου. The boundary-survey (vv. 7–10) uses the technical verbs of the genre — πορεύεται, καταβήσεται, συνάψουσιν — and the terminus-word διέξοδος ("outgoing"); it is dense with heavily transliterated and partly garbled toponyms (Ανασσα, Λαβεκ, Δηλαναθ, Θαφθωθ, Καρανα, Ιαριηλ, Ναφετα) reflecting the translator's difficulty with the Hebrew Vorlage of the Codex-B tradition Rahlfs follows. The conquest-failure formula οὐκ ἠδυνάσθησαν … ἐξολεθρεῦσαι (v. 12) and the forced-labour resolution ἐποίησαν τοὺς Χαναναίους ὑπηκόους (v. 13) parallel Judg 1:27–28; v. 13 closes with the emphatic fronted-infinitive Hebraism ἐξολεθρεῦσαι … οὐκ ἐξωλέθρευσαν ("to destroy them, they did not destroy"). In the complaint-dialogue the Joseph-tribes personify themselves in the singular (ἐγὼ … λαὸς πολύς εἰμι, v. 14) and appeal to divine blessing; Joshua turns their own premise into a challenge, and the chapter climaxes on ὑπερισχύεις ("you are stronger than he", v. 18), grounding conquest in divinely-given superiority rather than recording its completion. κύριος renders the Tetragrammaton; the declinable Ἰησοῦς (Joshua son of Nun) is treated as a noun throughout.

Joshua 18 — ΙΗΣΟΥΣ ΙΗ′

Theme. At Shiloh Joshua surveys and divides the remaining land, and Benjamin receives its lot.

Outline.

Translation & textual notes. The Greek follows the Rahlfs–Hanhart critical text (Septuaginta, rev. ed. 2006), an ancient and public-domain text; the apparatus is not reproduced. Joshua 18 stands at the center of the land-distribution section (chs. 13–21). Its theological pivot is the relocation to Shiloh (Σηλω): the tent of meeting is pitched (ἔπηξαν … τὴν σκηνὴν τοῦ μαρτυρίου, v. 1), and the lot is cast ἔναντι κυρίου three times over (vv. 6, 8, 10), grounding the allotment in sacral procedure at the new sanctuary. The chapter introduces the technical surveying verb χωροβατέω ('traverse/survey land on foot', vv. 8–9), distinctive to LXX-Joshua, and renders the survey-document concretely as a scroll (εἰς βιβλίον, v. 9). The boundary-description (vv. 11–20) is built on a chain of future verbs (προσαναβήσεται, ἀναβήσεται, καταβήσεται, διελεύσεται, περιελεύσεται) translating Hebrew waw-consecutive perfects, producing a traveling-eye account of the line's course; topographical Hebrew terms are calqued (κατὰ νώτου = כֶּתֶף 'shoulder/ridge'; ἡ διέξοδος = תּוֹצָאוֹת 'outgoings/terminus'; λοφιά for לָשׁוֹן 'tongue/bay' of the Salt Sea, v. 19). The Old Greek is notably free with the dense toponymy: place-names are transliterated idiosyncratically (Βαιθηλ, Καριαθιαριν, Γαβαων), and the city-list of vv. 21–28 diverges from the MT in both spelling and the alignment of individual names, with several Hebrew compound names run together in Greek (Εμεκραφαϊν for עֵמֶק רְפָאִים, v. 16; Γαβαωθιαριμ for גִּבְעַת קִרְיַת, v. 28). Two editorial identification-glosses orient the reader: αὕτη ἐστὶν Βαιθηλ for Luz (v. 13) and the climactic Ιεβους αὕτη ἐστὶν Ιερουσαλημ (v. 28), placing the future capital on Benjamin's border. Note also Γαιεννα (v. 16) = גֵּיא הִנֹּם, the valley of Hinnom whose name yields NT γέεννα ('Gehenna').

Joshua 19 — ΙΗΣΟΥΣ ΝΑΥΗ ΙΘ′

Theme. The final tribal allotments are cast at Shiloh, and Joshua receives his own inheritance.

Outline.

Translation & textual notes. The Greek text of Joshua 19 follows the standard critical text of the Septuagint as established in the Rahlfs–Hanhart edition (Septuaginta, rev. ed. 2006), an ancient and public-domain text; the critical apparatus is not reproduced. Joshua 19 concludes the second great land-division section of the book (chs. 13–19), recording the sixth through twelfth allotments cast 'by lot' (κλῆρος, rendering Hebrew גּוֹרָל) at Shiloh: Simeon, whose inheritance lies inside the over-large portion of Judah (vv. 1–9); Zebulun (vv. 10–16); Issachar (vv. 17–23); Asher (vv. 24–31); Naphtali (vv. 32–39); and Dan (vv. 40–48), followed by Joshua's own inheritance at Timnath-Serah (Θαμνασαραχ) in the hill country of Ephraim (vv. 49–50) and the colophon closing the whole distribution (v. 51). The chapter is dominated by boundary-and-city lists, and the Old Greek of Joshua frequently transliterates the Hebrew toponyms rather than rendering them, often diverging markedly from the Masoretic forms (e.g. Βηρσαβεε for Beersheba, Σικελακ for Ziklag, Λασενδακ at v. 48 conflating Leshem/Dan). Because Greek lacks a fixed declension for these borrowed names, the overwhelming majority stand as indeclinable forms, while genuinely Hellenised names — ὁ Ιορδάνης ('the Jordan', vv. 22, 33, 34), Σιδῶνος ('of Sidon', v. 28), οἱ Τύριοι ('the Tyrians', vv. 29, 35), ὁ Κάρμηλος (v. 26), Ἰόππη (v. 46), Ἰησοῦς (vv. 49, 51), and the gentilic ὁ Αμορραῖος ('the Amorite', vv. 47–48) — are fully declined. The recurring formula ἐξῆλθεν ὁ κλῆρος ('the lot came out') presents the allotment as the sovereign act of YHWH working through the sacred lot (cf. Prov 16:33); the closing colophon (v. 51) names Eleazar the priest, Joshua son of Nun, and the heads of the fathers' houses as the human officiants 'before the LORD' (ἐναντίον κυρίου) at the door of the tent of witness in Shiloh, binding the entire land-division to the cultic centre.

Joshua 20 — ΙΗΣΟΥΣ Κ′

Theme. Cities of refuge are set apart so the manslayer can flee from vengeance and receive judgment.

Outline.

Translation & textual notes. The Greek text of Joshua 20 follows the standard critical text of the Septuagint as established in the Rahlfs–Hanhart edition (Septuaginta, rev. ed. 2006), an ancient and public-domain text; the critical apparatus is not reproduced. Joshua 20 in the LXX is markedly shorter than the Masoretic text: the Old Greek lacks the equivalent of MT vv. 4–6 (the detailed procedure by which the manslayer presents his case at the city gate, the elders' reception of him, the stipulation that he remain until the death of the high priest, and his subsequent return home). As a result, the LXX verse numbering preserved here jumps directly from v. 3 to v. 7 — there are NO verses 4, 5, or 6 in the Greek — and the chapter contains only six verses, numbered 1, 2, 3, 7, 8, and 9. The chapter records the appointment of the cities of refuge (αἱ πόλεις τῶν φυγαδευτηρίων) for the unintentional manslayer (ὁ φονεὺς ὁ πατάξας ψυχὴν ἀκουσίως). The asylum-law is framed by the recurring threat of the blood-avenger, ὁ ἀγχιστεύων τὸ αἷμα — the LXX's rendering of גֹּאֵל הַדָּם ('the redeemer of blood'), the kinsman charged with avenging a slain relative — from whose hand the unintentional killer is protected ἕως ἂν καταστῇ … εἰς κρίσιν ('until he stands … for judgment'). The six cities are distributed three west of the Jordan — Kadesh in Galilee in the hill country of Naphtali, Shechem in the hill country of Ephraim, and Kiriath-Arba (Αρβοκ), that is Hebron, in the hill country of Judah (v. 7) — and three east of the Jordan — Bezer (Βοσορ) in the wilderness plain of Reuben, Ramoth (Αρημωθ) in Gilead of Gad, and Golan (Γαυλων) in Bashan of Manasseh (v. 8). The closing summary (v. 9) extends the asylum-provision both to the sons of Israel and to the resident alien (ὁ προσήλυτος ὁ προσκείμενος), realising the cultic principle of one law for native and sojourner alike (cf. Num 35:15). The toponyms are largely transliterated and indeclinable (Καδης, Συχεμ, Αρβοκ, Χεβρων, Βοσορ, Αρημωθ, Γαυλων), while a few place- and region-names are declined as ordinary Greek nouns (Γαλιλαίᾳ, Ιορδάνου, Βασανίτιδι).

Joshua 21 — ΙΗΣΟΥΣ ΝΑΥΗ ΚΑ′

Theme. The Levites receive their cities, and the Lord fulfills every good word spoken to Israel.

Outline.

Translation & textual notes. The Greek text of Joshua 21 follows the standard critical text of the Septuagint as established in the Rahlfs–Hanhart edition (Septuaginta, rev. ed. 2006), an ancient and public-domain text; the critical apparatus is not reproduced. Joshua 21 narrates the allotment of the forty-eight Levitical cities with their pasturelands assigned by lot from within the inheritances of the other tribes — the structural conclusion of the land-distribution that began in ch. 13. The Aaronic priests (the Kohathite line of Aaron) receive thirteen cities from Judah, Simeon, and Benjamin (vv. 9–19); the remaining Kohathites ten (vv. 20–26); the Gershonites thirteen (vv. 27–33); the Merarites twelve (vv. 34–40), for a total of forty-eight (vv. 41–42). The LXX of Joshua employs two different renderings for the Levitical 'pasturelands': περισπόρια ('surrounding sown-lands / grazing-grounds', renders Hebrew מִגְרָשׁ; vv. 2, 3, 8, 11, 34–41) and the substantivized participle τὰ ἀφωρισμένα ('the set-apart lands'; vv. 13–32), the latter formed from ἀφορίζω; the alternation reflects the composite character of the Greek translation. The recurring designation πόλις φυγαδευτήριον / φυγαδευτήριον τῷ φονεύσαντι ('city of refuge for the one who has killed') links this chapter to the cities of asylum of ch. 20 (cf. Num 35). At v. 42 the LXX preserves a substantial plus (marked [a]–[d] in critical editions, integrated here without the apparatus sigla) narrating that Joshua finished dividing the land, received his own inheritance at Thamnasarach in the hill-country of Ephraim, rebuilt and dwelt in the city, and deposited there the flint knives of the circumcision at Gilgal (cf. 5:2–3; 24:30 LXX) — material absent from the Masoretic Text. The chapter culminates in the great fulfillment summary of vv. 43–45: κύριος gave Israel all the land he swore to the fathers, gave them rest on every side (κατέπαυσεν … κυκλόθεν), and οὐ διέπεσεν ἀπὸ πάντων τῶν ῥημάτων τῶν καλῶν … πάντα παρεγένετο — 'not one of all the good words failed; all came to pass' — the theological capstone of the entire conquest narrative and a touchstone of biblical covenant-faithfulness (cf. 23:14; 1 Kgs 8:56).

Joshua 22 — ΙΗΣΟΥΣ ΚΒ′

Theme. The eastern tribes build a witness altar, and covenant crisis turns into renewed unity before the Lord.

Outline.

Translation & textual notes. The Greek text of Joshua 22 follows the standard critical text of the Septuagint as established in the Rahlfs–Hanhart edition (Septuaginta, rev. ed. 2006), an ancient and public-domain text; the critical apparatus is not reproduced. The chapter's pivotal theological device is the LXX's consistent lexical distinction between βωμός (the disputed/illegitimate altar — vv. 10, 11, 16, 19, 23, 26, 34) and θυσιαστήριον (the one legitimate altar of the LORD — vv. 19, 28, 29), encoding the Deuteronomic theology of a single sanctioned place of sacrifice. The Shema-charge of v. 5 (ἀγαπᾶν κύριον … ἐξ ὅλης τῆς διανοίας … καὶ ἐξ ὅλης τῆς ψυχῆς) reproduces Deut 6:5 LXX, using διάνοια for Hebrew לֵבָב. Two precedents of corporate guilt structure the accusation: τὸ ἁμάρτημα Φογωρ (Peor, Num 25) at v. 17, and Αχαρ ὁ τοῦ Ζαρα with the ἀνάθεμα (Achan, Josh 7) at v. 20, the latter with the cognate-dative Hebraism πλημμελείᾳ ἐπλημμέλησεν. The defense opens with the solemn doubled triple-name ὁ θεὸς θεὸς … κύριος (v. 22), rendering Hebrew אֵל אֱלֹהִים יְהוָה, and a self-imprecatory oath (μὴ ῥύσαιτο ἡμᾶς). The chapter's keyword μαρτύριον ("witness," vv. 27, 28, 34) defines the altar's true function, climaxing in the etiological naming of v. 34 (Hebrew עֵד, "Witness"). Notable renderings include the futuristic/peace-offering terminology θυσία σωτηρίου (vv. 23, 27, 29) alongside the bare transliteration σαλαμιν (= שְׁלָמִים) at v. 29, a sign of close formal dependence on the Hebrew; the verb ἀποστρέφω is used with calculated irony, meaning "return home" (vv. 4, 32) and "turn away / apostatize" (vv. 16, 18, 23, 29).

Joshua 23 — ΙΗΣΟΥΣ ΝΑΥΗ ΚΓ′

Theme. Joshua's farewell warns Israel to cling to the Lord and not turn toward the nations left in the land.

Outline.

Translation & textual notes. The Greek text of Joshua 23 follows the standard critical text of the Septuagint as established in the Rahlfs–Hanhart edition (Septuaginta, rev. ed. 2006), an ancient and public-domain text; the critical apparatus is not reproduced. Joshua 23 is the first of Joshua's two farewell discourses (the second is the Shechem covenant of ch. 24). The opening idiom πρεσβύτερος προβεβηκὼς ταῖς ἡμέραις ('old, advanced in days', v. 1) recurs from Josh 13:1 and Gen 24:1. The chapter is thoroughly Deuteronomic: κατισχύσατε … φυλάσσειν καὶ ποιεῖν πάντα τὰ γεγραμμένα ἐν τῷ βιβλίῳ τοῦ νόμου Μωυσῆ (v. 6) echoes Josh 1:7–8 and Deut 5:32 (the 'turn neither right nor left' idiom); the prohibitions of v. 7 against naming, bowing to, and serving the nations' gods restate Exod 23:13 and Deut 7:16. The verb προσκολλάομαι ('cling', v. 8) is the LXX's signature rendering of דָּבַק, the covenant-loyalty term (Deut 10:20; 11:22; 30:20), used also of marital union at Gen 2:24. The military theology peaks at v. 10 (εἷς ὑμῶν ἐδίωξεν χιλίους, cf. Lev 26:8; Deut 32:30), with the imperfect ἐξεπολέμει ('kept fighting') depicting the LORD's sustained warfare. The protasis of vv. 12–13 employs the rare double-compound συγκαταμίγνυμι ('mix thoroughly together') and the expanded snare-catalogue (παγίδας … σκάνδαλα … ἥλους ἐν ταῖς πτέρναις … βολίδας ἐν τοῖς ὀφθαλμοῖς), a vivid rendering of the thorn-and-snare imagery of Exod 23:33; 34:12; Num 33:55. The fulfilment-formula of v. 14 — οὐ διέπεσεν εἷς λόγος … οὐ διεφώνησεν ἐξ αὐτῶν — renders לֹא נָפַל דָּבָר אֶחָד (cf. Josh 21:45; 1 Kgs 8:56), with διαφωνέω used in its LXX sense 'be lacking / go missing.' The blessing-curse symmetry of v. 15 (ὃν τρόπον … οὕτως) turns the keyword ἐξολεθρεύω — used of the doomed nations throughout (vv. 4, 5, 9) — back against a covenant-breaking Israel, a sobering inclusio. The closing pair λατρεύσητε … προσκυνήσητε (v. 16) inverts the order of v. 7, framing the whole exhortation with the idolatry-prohibition.

Joshua 24 — ΙΗΣΟΥΣ ΚΔ′

Theme. Joshua renews the covenant, calls Israel to choose the Lord, and closes with burial and witness.

Outline.

Translation & textual notes. The Greek text of Joshua 24 follows the standard critical text of the Septuagint as established in the Rahlfs–Hanhart edition (Septuaginta, rev. ed. 2006), an ancient and public-domain text; the critical apparatus is not reproduced. Joshua 24 is the closing chapter of the book: the covenant assembly (the LXX reads εἰς Σηλω, 'at Shelo/Shiloh', vv. 1, 25, where the MT has שְׁכֶמָה, 'to Shechem'). Joshua delivers, in the LORD's own voice (τάδε λέγει κύριος, v. 2), a sweeping historical recital from Terah and Abraham (vv. 2–3) through Isaac, Jacob and Esau (v. 4), the Exodus (vv. 5–7), the Transjordan conquest (v. 8), the Balak/Balaam episode (vv. 9–10), and the taking of Jericho with its seven nations (vv. 11–13). The recital is dominated by first-person divine verbs (ἔλαβον, ὡδήγησα, ἐπλήθυνα, ἔδωκα) and climaxes in the disclaimer οὐκ ἐν τῇ ῥομφαίᾳ σου οὐδὲ ἐν τῷ τόξῳ σου ('not by your sword nor by your bow', v. 12) and the gift of a land for which Israel did not labor, build, or plant (v. 13). On this basis Joshua issues the summons φοβήθητε κύριον καὶ λατρεύσατε αὐτῷ (v. 14) and the confession ἐγὼ δὲ καὶ ἡ οἰκία μου λατρεύσομεν κυρίῳ (v. 15). The people make a threefold pledge (vv. 16–18, 21, 24), sealed by the optative of repudiation μὴ γένοιτο (v. 16). Joshua's warning that the LORD is θεὸς ἅγιος … ζηλώσας (v. 19) and that οὐ μὴ δύνησθε λατρεύειν κυρίῳ is a deliberate intensification of the covenant's gravity, and he makes the people μάρτυρες … καθ᾽ ὑμῶν, witnesses against themselves (v. 22). The covenant is cut with the cognate construction διέθετο … διαθήκην (v. 25), inscribed in the book of the law (v. 26), and memorialized in the great stone personified as having 'heard' (ἀκήκοεν) the LORD's words (v. 27). The closing burial-cluster (vv. 28–33) carries two notable LXX divergences from the MT: at v. 31 the flint knives (αἱ μάχαιραι αἱ πέτριναι) of the Gilgal circumcision are said to be buried with Joshua and to remain 'to this day'; and v. 33 carries a long plus — the carrying of the ark, Phinehas' succession to the priesthood, and Israel's apostasy to Astarte and the Astaroth, for which the LORD gave them into the hand of Eglom (Eglon) king of Moab for eighteen years (cf. Judg 3:12–14) — making the LXX end of Joshua a deliberate bridge into the book of Judges.


Major translation & exegetical cruxes

Where the Greek legitimately admits more than one rendering or reading — or where the LXX diverges from the Hebrew — the point was flagged in the lexical notes and chapter text_notes rather than decided silently; the more common analysis was generally taken and the alternative noted. The principal cruxes in LXX Joshua:

Reference Crux Discussion
1:5 οὐκ ἐγκαταλείψω σε οὐδὲ ὑπερόψομαί σε The LXX pairs ἐγκαταλείπω ('forsake') with ὑπεροράω ('overlook / neglect') as a double assurance of YHWH's unbroken presence with Joshua, both rendering forms of עָזַב; the promise (with its Deuteronomic parallels at Deut 31:6, 8) is the source of the citation at Heb 13:5 (οὐ μή σε ἀνῶ οὐδ᾽ οὐ μή σε ἐγκαταλίπω), where the personal assurance to Joshua is generalized to every believer as the ground for freedom from the love of money and from fear.
1:6 ἴσχυε καὶ ἀνδρίζου The LXX's standard couplet for Hebrew חֲזַק וֶאֱמָץ ('be strong and resolute'); ἀνδρίζομαι, built on ἀνήρ ('man'), connotes manly courage in war; sounded three times by God (vv. 6, 7, 9) and a fourth by the people (v. 18), it is the rhetorical backbone of the chapter, binding martial valor (v. 6), covenant-fidelity (v. 7), and freedom from fear (v. 9) into a single charge.
1:7 οὐκ ἐκκλινεῖς … εἰς δεξιὰ οὐδὲ εἰς ἀριστερά The merism 'turn aside neither right nor left' (rendering Deuteronomic idiom, Deut 5:32; 17:11, 20) makes total fidelity to the law the content of Joshua's courage; the imperatival future ἐκκλινεῖς (future for command) and the purpose-clause ἵνα συνῇς ('that you may act wisely / prosper,' rendering שָׂכַל Hiphil) fuse cognitive understanding and practical success in the one verb συνίημι.
1:8 τότε εὐοδωθήσῃ καὶ εὐοδώσεις τὰς ὁδούς σου A figura etymologica: εὐοδόω (εὖ + ὁδός, 'make a good road') is used first passively ('you will be prospered') then actively with its cognate object ὁδούς ('you will make your ways prosperous'), so 'you will good-road your roads'; the double τότε and the closing συνήσεις present meditation on the written Torah (μελετήσεις … ἡμέρας καὶ νυκτός, cf. Ps 1:2) as the precondition of all success — the OT charter of meditative law-keeping.
1:13–15 κατέπαυσεν / καταπαύσῃ (rest) The aspectual contrast frames the Transjordan charge: YHWH has already given the eastern tribes rest (aorist κατέπαυσεν, v. 13), but the warriors must fight on 'until' (ἕως ἄν) he gives their brothers rest too (subjunctive καταπαύσῃ, v. 15); the noun-and-verb theme of κατάπαυσις ('rest') and its conditioning on obedience is taken up and universalized in Heb 3–4, where Joshua's rest is read as a type of the unattained sabbath-rest of God.
1:18 ὁ δὲ ἄνθρωπος ὃς ἐὰν ἀπειθήσῃ σοι … ἀποθανέτω A Hebraizing casus pendens (ὁ ἄνθρωπος fronted, resumed by the third-person imperative ἀποθανέτω) makes disobedience to Joshua a capital matter; ἀπειθέω ('be un-persuaded / rebel') is the exact negative counterpart of the people's ἀκουσόμεθα (v. 17), so that the same verb-pair (ἀκούω / ἀπειθέω) defines both covenant loyalty and capital rebellion, and the chapter's final words return the divine refrain ἴσχυε καὶ ἀνδρίζου to Joshua from the people's own lips.
2:1 γυναικὸς πόρνης ᾗ ὄνομα Ρααβ The LXX, like MT, names Rahab's trade plainly (πόρνη = זוֹנָה), without euphemism; the NT preserves the epithet (Ῥαὰβ ἡ πόρνη, Heb 11:31; Jas 2:25), so that her faith and justification are thrown into sharp relief against her status. The naming idiom ᾗ ὄνομα ('to whom [was] the name') is a dative-of-possession Hebraism rendering וּשְׁמָהּ.
2:6 ἐν τῇ λινοκαλάμῃ τῇ ἐστοιβασμένῃ The rare compound λινοκαλάμη ('flax-stalks', λίνον + καλάμη) renders פִּשְׁתֵּי הָעֵץ; with the technical perfect participle ἐστοιβασμένῃ ('heaped/stacked in layers', from στοιβάζω) it gives a vivid domestic-realist detail: flax laid out to dry on the flat roof, under which the spies are buried. The note fixes both season (the spring flax harvest) and locale (the Jericho plain, known for flax) and supplies the concrete content of the summary ἔκρυψεν of v. 4.
2:9–11 ἐπίσταμαι ὅτι δέδωκεν ... κύριος ὁ θεὸς ὑμῶν θεὸς ἐν οὐρανῷ ἄνω καὶ ἐπὶ τῆς γῆς κάτω Rahab's confession is the chapter's theological centre and the substance of the faith credited to her at Heb 11:31. The perfect δέδωκεν treats the conquest as an accomplished divine fact; the heaven-above/earth-beneath merism (near-verbatim Deut 4:39) is a full monotheistic creed — remarkable on Gentile, female, and socially marginal lips. Her ἐπίσταμαι deliberately reverses the feigned οὐκ ἐπίσταμαι of v. 5: false ignorance gives way to true, saving knowledge.
2:18 τὸ σημεῖον τὸ σπαρτίον τὸ κόκκινον The scarlet cord tied in the window is the appointed σημεῖον of deliverance, structurally parallel to the Passover blood-sign (Exod 12:13, ἔσται τὸ αἷμα ὑμῖν ἐν σημείῳ): both mark the one safe house, and in both safety is bounded by the threshold (v. 19, whoever goes ἔξω is ἔνοχος ἑαυτῷ). The Fathers read the κόκκινον typologically as the blood of Christ — 1 Clem. 12:7 ('by the scarlet thread it was made manifest that through the blood of the Lord redemption shall come to all who believe and hope in God'); Justin, Dial. 111.
2:21 καὶ ἐξαπέστειλεν αὐτούς (OG shorter than MT) The Old Greek omits MT's clause 'and she bound the scarlet cord in the window,' an example of the consistently briefer Greek text of Joshua (whether a shorter Vorlage or translator's compression); the cord-instruction stands in v. 18. Rahab's ἐξαπέστειλεν ('sent off') is the chapter's third 'sending' (cf. Joshua, v. 1; the king, v. 3) and is precisely the act James names as her justifying work — ἐξ ἔργων ἐδικαιώθη ... ἑτέρᾳ ὁδῷ ἐκβαλοῦσα (Jas 2:25).
Rahab in the NT Heb 11:31 / Jas 2:25 / Matt 1:5 The three NT receptions are complementary, not contradictory: Hebrews credits her faith (πίστει Ῥαὰβ ἡ πόρνη οὐ συναπώλετο τοῖς ἀπειθήσασιν, 'she did not perish with the disobedient', cf. her ἐξελεῖσθε τὴν ψυχήν μου ἐκ θανάτου, v. 13); James her works (receiving the messengers and sending them out another way, vv. 4–6, 21); Matthew gives her (Ῥαχάβ) a place in the Davidic-messianic genealogy (Matt 1:5), making the Gentile prostitute an ancestress of the Christ whose name (Ἰησοῦς) she shares with the Joshua who sent the spies.
3:10 θεὸς ζῶν ἐν ὑμῖν A verbless nominal clause (no copula, rendering the Hebrew), "[the] living God [is] among you"; ζῶν renders חַי. The phrase is the theological hinge of the chapter: the heaped-waters sign is the empirical demonstration that the God present in Israel's midst is the living, acting God — not a dead idol like those of the nations he is about to dispossess. It echoes ἐν ὑμῖν of v. 5 and grounds the recognition-formula ἐν τούτῳ γνώσεσθε.
3:10 ὀλεθρεύων ὀλεθρεύσει A cognate participle + finite-verb construction (figura etymologica) rendering the Hebrew infinitive-absolute + finite verb — "destroying he will destroy" = "he will surely/utterly destroy." The LXX's standard device for the emphatic Hebrew construction (cf. ἐκβαλεῖ ὑμᾶς ἐκβολῇ, Exod 11:1); it expresses the certainty and totality of the promised dispossession of the canonical seven nations.
3:16 ἔστη πῆγμα ἓν … ἐπλήρου καθ᾽ ὅλην τὴν κρηπῖδα πῆγμα ("a congealed/solid mass, heap"; from πήγνυμι "make fast") renders Hebrew נֵד and vividly recalls the Red Sea, where the waters "were congealed" (ἐπάγη τὰ ὕδατα, Exod 15:8). The doubled ἔστη … ἔστη and the pleonastic intensifier σφόδρα σφοδρῶς dramatize the abrupt miracle; the parenthetical that the Jordan ἐπλήρου ("was overflowing") along its whole bank in the wheat-harvest season (spring snowmelt) heightens the wonder — God acts at the river's flood-stage maximum, not its low ebb.
3:16 ἕως μέρους Καριαθιαριμ A text-historical divergence: the LXX places the dammed waters "as far as the region of Kariathiarim" (קִרְיַת יְעָרִים, Kiriath-jearim), whereas the MT reads אָדָם ("Adam") beside Zarethan. The variant reflects a different Vorlage or an inner-Greek place-name substitution; the LXX's locale lies west of the Jordan, raising geographical questions distinct from the MT's account of an upstream blockage.
3:17 ἐπὶ ξηρᾶς … διὰ ξηρᾶς ἐν μέσῳ τοῦ Ιορδάνου The repeated "dry ground" phrase is the deliberate Red Sea echo: διὰ ξηρᾶς is verbatim the Exodus crossing-language (Exod 14:22, 29 LXX). The priests stand "in the midst of the Jordan" (ἐν μέσῳ) on dry footing while all Israel passes — casting the Jordan-crossing as a new Exodus and the entry into the inheritance as the counterpart of the deliverance from Egypt. The closing συνετέλεσεν … διαβαίνων consummates the διαβῆναι withheld since v. 1, closing the chapter's inclusio.
4:6–7 σημεῖον … μνημόσυνον / τί εἰσιν οἱ λίθοι οὗτοι; The twin terms σημεῖον ('sign', אוֹת) and μνημόσυνον ('memorial', זִכָּרוֹן) define the stones' function, and the child's question τί εἰσιν οἱ λίθοι οὗτοι; is the catechetical engine of the chapter (repeated at v. 21). The pedagogy of remembrance — the parent answering the inquiring child with the story of salvation — directly parallels the Passover catechesis (Exod 12:26; 13:14; Deut 6:20–21), making the Jordan-monument a perpetual teaching device for generations that did not witness the wonder.
4:7 ἐξέλιπεν ὁ Ιορδάνης ποταμὸς ἀπὸ προσώπου κιβωτοῦ The LXX's ἐκλείπω ('fail / give out / be cut off') renders the Niphal of כָּרַת for the waters; the river 'failed before the face of the ark,' i.e., recoiled before the LORD's enthroned presence (ἀπὸ προσώπου = מִפְּנֵי). The title κύριος πάσης τῆς γῆς ('the LORD of all the earth', from 3:11, 13) grounds the local wonder in YHWH's universal lordship, anticipating the global recognition of v. 24.
4:9 ἔστησεν δὲ Ἰησοῦς καὶ ἄλλους δώδεκα λίθους … καί εἰσιν ἐκεῖ ἕως τῆς σήμερον ἡμέρας The chapter records two distinct sets of twelve stones — the camp/Gilgal stones (vv. 3, 8, 20) and Joshua's own stones set up in the riverbed itself (ἐν αὐτῷ τῷ Ιορδάνῃ). The etiological formula 'and they are there to this very day' (rendering עַד הַיּוֹם הַזֶּה) attests the monument's endurance to the narrator's time, a hallmark of the conquest etiologies (cf. 7:26; 8:28–29); the riverbed stones, hidden beneath the returned waters, form a counterpart to the visible Gilgal memorial.
4:14 ηὔξησεν κύριος τὸν Ἰησοῦν … ἐφοβοῦντο αὐτὸν ὥσπερ Μωυσῆν The transitive aorist ηὔξησεν ('magnified / exalted', renders גִּדַּל) fulfills YHWH's promise at 3:7 to begin exalting Joshua 'in the sight of all Israel.' The comparison ὥσπερ Μωυσῆν establishes the Mosaic succession: the reverence (φοβέομαι) once given Moses is now Joshua's. The imperfects ἐφοβοῦντο … ἔζη give this a lifelong, durative scope, narrated retrospectively over Joshua's whole career.
4:18 ὥρμησεν τὸ ὕδωρ … κατὰ χώραν … καθὰ ἐχθὲς καὶ τρίτην ἡμέραν The vivid ὁρμάω ('rush / surge') dramatizes the suddenness of the waters' return the instant the ark leaves the riverbed, confirming that the parting was bound to the LORD's presence. κατὰ χώραν ('into its place') and the Hebraism καθὰ ἐχθὲς καὶ τρίτην ἡμέραν (כִּתְמוֹל שִׁלְשׁוֹם, 'as previously') mark the river's full restoration; δι᾿ ὅλης τῆς κρηπῖδος ('over its whole bank') recalls that the Jordan was in flood at harvest (3:15).
4:23 καθάπερ … τὴν ἐρυθρὰν θάλασσαν … ἕως παρήλθομεν The explicit Red Sea typology welds the two founding water-crossings: the same verb ἀποξηραίνω ('dry up completely') is used of both Jordan and Red Sea, and the threefold κύριος ὁ θεὸς ἡμῶν makes the wonder the act of Israel's own covenant God. The striking shift to the first-person plural (ἔμπροσθεν ἡμῶν … ἕως παρήλθομεν, 'before us … until we passed through') draws the confessing community into the exodus generation's experience — a liturgical actualization of the past anticipating the catechetical 'we' of later Passover tradition.
5:1 οἱ βασιλεῖς τῆς Φοινίκης Greek Joshua regularly renders the Canaanites of the coast as "kings of Phoenicia," reflecting Hellenistic Levantine geography; the same equivalence recurs at v. 12 (τὴν χώραν τῶν Φοινίκων). The kings' reaction — ἐτάκησαν αὐτῶν αἱ διάνοιαι ("their minds melted") and κατεπλάγησαν — is the classic holy-war topos of enemy courage dissolving before YHWH's acts (cf. Josh 2:11; Exod 15:15), here motivating the safe timing of the circumcision.
5:4 περιεκάθαρεν Ἰησοῦς The LXX's choice of περικαθαίρω ("purify all around") rather than a simple verb of circumcision casts the rite as a ritual cleansing; the περι- prefix echoes περιτέμνω ("cut around"), assimilating the removal of the foreskin to the removal of impurity — a distinctive Greek theological accent on the excursus that explains the uncircumcised wilderness generation.
5:6 τεσσαράκοντα … καὶ δύο ἔτη … τῇ Μαδβαρίτιδι The LXX reckons "forty-two" years (against the Hebrew's forty) and doubles the Greek ἐρήμῳ with the transliterated Semitic Μαδβαρίτιδι (מַדְבְּרָא, "wilderness"), effectively treating the common noun as a place-name — a redundant calque preserving the underlying word. The jarring first-person ἡμῖν ("the land … sworn to give us") is retained from the quoted communal oath-confession.
5:9 ἀφεῖλον τὸν ὀνειδισμὸν Αἰγύπτου The performative first-person aorist ("I have removed the reproach of Egypt") interprets circumcision as YHWH's lifting of the stigma of the bondage-era (the uncircumcised, servile condition); the etiology of Γαλγαλα puns on the Hebrew root גלל ("roll away"), which the LXX captures by sense (ἀφαιρέω, "remove") rather than reproducing the wordplay. ὀνειδισμός reappears in messianic contexts (Ps 68:10 LXX; cited Rom 15:3).
5:12 ἐξέλιπεν τὸ μαννα … ἐκαρπίσαντο τὴν χώραν τῶν Φοινίκων The asyndetic, fronted ἐξέλιπεν gives the cessation of the manna epoch-ending finality; the doubled assertion (it ceased; there was no longer any) seals the end of the wilderness provision (Exod 16). The LXX-only clause ἐκαρπίσαντο ("they harvested/enjoyed the produce of") the Phoenicians' land is its positive correlate: Israel now lives off Canaan itself, the oath-promised inheritance of v. 6 entered upon.
5:14–15 ἀρχιστράτηγος δυνάμεως κυρίου / λῦσαι τὸ ὑπόδημα … ἅγιός ἐστιν The figure answers Joshua's "friend or foe?" neither way: he is "commander of the army of the LORD," leader of the heavenly host (δύναμις = צָבָא, "hosts"); the title later attaches to Michael (Dan 8:11 LXX; Jude 9). But that he accepts Joshua's prostration (unlike the angel of Rev 19:10; 22:9) and issues the holy-ground command of Exod 3:5 (λῦσαι τὸ ὑπόδημα … ὁ γὰρ τόπος … ἅγιός ἐστιν) led much of the patristic tradition to read him as a christophany — a manifestation of the pre-incarnate Word — framing the conquest as YHWH's own holy war begun on sacred ground.
6:1 συγκεκλεισμένη καὶ ὠχυρωμένη Periphrastic perfect of two passive participles ("shut up and fortified") rendering the Hebrew figura etymologica סֹגֶרֶת וּמְסֻגֶּרֶת; the doubled state-description establishes Jericho as humanly impregnable, so that its fall can only be God's act — the theological setup for "conquest by faith."
6:4 (absent) The LXX has no verse 4: the numbering runs 1–3, 5–27 (26 verses). The OG of Joshua is shorter than the MT and does not separately versify the MT's trumpet-and-circuit rubric (MT v. 4); readers must not invent or renumber a v. 4. The instructions the MT distributes across vv. 3–4 are compressed, and v. 5 follows directly on v. 3.
6:5 πεσεῖται αὐτόματα τὰ τείχη The walls will fall "of themselves" (αὐτόματος, "spontaneously, without external cause"): the OG's anticipatory statement of the divine, non-military collapse; the same πίπτω used in the fulfilment (ἔπεσεν, v. 20) and in Heb 11:30 (ἔπεσαν), framing the whole chapter as a miracle of God's doing, not Israel's siegecraft.
6:17 ἡ πόλις ἀνάθεμα … πλὴν Ρααβ τὴν πόρνην ἀνάθεμα renders חֵרֶם (herem), the irrevocable devotion-to-destruction; the city and all in it are given to κύριος σαβαωθ, the "LORD of hosts." The single exception (πλήν) is Rahab the prostitute and her house — total judgment punctuated by particular mercy, the salvation-by-faith of the Canaanite harlot (Heb 11:31; Jas 2:25; Matt 1:5). The same noun ἀνάθεμα stands behind Paul's curse-language (Rom 9:3; Gal 1:8–9; 1 Cor 16:22).
6:20 ἠλάλαξεν … ἀλαλαγμῷ μεγάλῳ … ἔπεσεν ἅπαν τὸ τεῖχος κύκλωι The climactic fall: a cognate-dative shout (Hebraism, "shouted with a shout") and the collapse of the whole wall "all around" (κύκλῳ — the encircling answered by the all-around fall). This is precisely the event Heb 11:30 names as faith's triumph: "by faith the walls of Jericho fell down (ἔπεσαν), after they had been encircled (κυκλωθέντα) for seven days." The fall comes not by ram or ramp but by trumpet and obedient shout — the LORD's gift (παρέδωκεν, v. 16).
6:26 ἐπικατάρατος ὁ ἄνθρωπος ὃς οἰκοδομήσει … οὕτως ἐποίησεν Οζαν ὁ ἐκ Βαιθηλ Joshua's oath-curse uses the standard LXX curse-adjective ἐπικατάρατος (rendering אָרוּר; cf. Gal 3:10, 13): rebuilding Jericho will cost the builder his firstborn and youngest sons. The OG appends a unique fulfilment-notice (no MT equivalent) naming "Hozan of Bethel," who lost "Abiron his firstborn" at the founding and his youngest "who survived" at the gates — anticipating the historical fulfilment in Hiel of Bethel at 1 Kgs 16:34, so the Greek text supplies its own cross-reference to the curse's discharge.
7:1 ἐνοσφίσαντο ἀπὸ τοῦ ἀναθέματος The rare verb νοσφίζομαι ('set apart for oneself, purloin, embezzle') renders the secret misappropriation of sacred property (מָעַל). Its deliberate reuse at Acts 5:2–3 (ἐνοσφίσατο) frames Ananias and Sapphira as a NT Achar — secret theft from what is devoted to God, judged by death, defiling the new covenant community — making this verse the lexical root of the corporate-holiness theme (cf. 1 Cor 5:6).
7:1 / 7:24 Αχαρ … Αχωρ / Εμεκαχωρ The LXX names the offender Αχαρ (MT עָכָן 'Achan'), assimilating his name to the Valley of Αχωρ (עָכוֹר 'trouble') and to the verb עָכַר ('bring disaster'). The chapter is thus an extended onomastic etiology: the 'troubler' is destroyed in the 'Valley of Trouble.' 1 Chr 2:7 confirms the wordplay in Hebrew (עָכָר 'the troubler of Israel'); Hos 2:15 later transforms the Valley of Achor into 'a door of hope.'
7:12 ἐγενήθησαν ἀνάθεμα The most ominous turn of the keyword: by harboring stolen herem, Israel itself 'has become a devoted/accursed thing,' now liable to the very destruction decreed for Jericho's spoil (cf. Deut 7:26). The contagion of the ban makes corporate solidarity lethal and underlies Paul's ἀνάθεμα-language (Rom 9:3; 1 Cor 16:22; Gal 1:8–9); the only remedy is excision (ἐξάρητε, the Deuteronomic purge-formula).
7:21 ψιλὴν ποικίλην καλὴν … γλῶσσαν μίαν χρυσῆν The LXX interprets the stolen goods distinctively: where MT has 'a mantle of Shinar' (a Babylonian garment), the Greek reads ψιλὴν ποικίλην καλήν ('a fine multicolored cloak/rug'); and it preserves the Hebrew idiom לְשׁוֹן זָהָב literally as γλῶσσαν … χρυσῆν ('a tongue of gold') for the gold ingot/wedge. The confession's see–covet–take sequence (εἶδον … ἐνθυμηθεὶς … ἔλαβον) consciously replays Gen 3:6 and 2 Sam 11, making Achar's sin the archetype of covetous transgression.
7:25 τί ὠλέθρευσας ἡμᾶς; ἐξολεθρεύσαι σε κύριος The verdict's paronomasia on the ὀλεθρ-/ἐξολεθρ- root renders the Hebrew play on עָכַר ('trouble') that names the valley. The optative ἐξολεθρεύσαι is a curse-wish handing the offender over to divine destruction (lex talionis: the destroyer destroyed); the compound ἐξολεθρεύω is the LXX's standard herem-verb (cf. Deut 7), and the execution is framed throughout as the LORD's act, not mere human vengeance.
7:26 ἐπαύσατο κύριος τοῦ θυμοῦ τῆς ὀργῆς The Hebraizing doubling θυμοῦ τῆς ὀργῆς ('the fury of the anger,' for חֲרוֹן אַף) closes the wrath-inclusio opened by ἐθυμώθη ὀργῇ κύριος (v. 1). The middle ἐπαύσατο + genitive ('ceased from') signals that the purge has lifted the ban: with the devoted thing removed, the divine anger abates and the conquest can resume (ch. 8) — the theological resolution of the corporate-solidarity crisis.
8:1, 18 δέδωκα / παραδέδωκα εἰς τὰς χεῖράς σου The divine gift-formula brackets the battle: the perfect tense (δέδωκα v.1, παραδέδωκα v.18) presents the conquest as already accomplished in YHWH's will before it is enacted, rendering the 'give into the hand' idiom נָתַן בְּיַד. The victory is theologically a gift received, not a feat achieved — the same logic that framed Jericho (6:2).
8:14 αὐτὸς οὐκ ᾔδει ὅτι ἔνεδρα αὐτῷ ἐστιν The narrator's parenthetical (stative pluperfect ᾔδει) is the dramatic-ironic hinge of the chapter: the king of Ai rushes ἐπ᾽ εὐθείας ('straight on') to battle, his confidence built on the earlier rout of Israel (καθάπερ καὶ πρῴην, v.5), precisely the misjudgment the ambush exploits. The numbering jumps 12→14 here (no v.13 in the LXX).
8:18 ἔκτεινον τὴν χεῖρά σου ἐν τῷ γαίσῳ Joshua's outstretched javelin-hand is the prearranged signal to the ambush; the gesture deliberately echoes Moses' outstretched hand/staff over the Red Sea (Exod 14:16, 26), casting the conquest of the land as a continuation of the Exodus deliverance. γαῖσος is a Gallic loanword (heavy throwing-spear) used for Hebrew כִּידוֹן.
8:27 πλὴν τῶν κτηνῶν ... κατὰ πρόσταγμα κυρίου The lawful plunder of Ai's livestock and spoil, sanctioned by YHWH (v.2) and taken 'according to the command of the LORD,' is the deliberate counter-image to Achan's unlawful seizure of devoted spoil from Jericho (ch. 7), whose sin had caused the earlier defeat. The double obedience-formula recasts plundering as obedience. The numbering jumps 25→27 here (no v.26 in the LXX).
8:29 ἐκρέμασεν ἐπὶ ξύλου ... ἐπιδύνοντος τοῦ ἡλίου ... καθείλοσαν The king's execution scrupulously enacts Deut 21:22–23: a body hanged on a tree (ἐπὶ ξύλου, the very phrase of Deut 21:22 LXX) must not remain overnight but be taken down 'as the sun was setting' (genitive absolute ἐπιδύνοντος τοῦ ἡλίου). The LXX's ξύλον δίδυμον ('double/forked tree') is a Greek peculiarity absent from the MT. The ξύλον / κρεμάννυμι / καθαιρέω cluster is later read christologically (Gal 3:13; Acts 5:30; Mark 15:46).
8:30–35 (absent) the Ebal altar / τὸ δευτερονόμιον / Deut 27 The covenant-renewal ceremony on Mount Ebal (Gebal) — altar of unhewn stones, burnt and peace offerings, the copy of the law inscribed on the stones, and the reading of the blessing and the curse before all Israel, fulfilling Deut 27 — does not appear in Joshua 8 in Rahlfs. The Greek transposes it to after 9:2 (as 9:2a–f), so the chapter ends with the king's burial rather than covenant worship; the displacement is one of the clearest structural divergences between the LXX and MT in Joshua.
9:2 [a]–[f] τότε ᾠκοδόμησεν Ἰησοῦς θυσιαστήριον ... ἐν ὄρει Γαιβαλ The LXX carries the Mount Ebal/Gebal altar-and-law pericope here, within 9:2, where the MT places it at 8:30–35. The transposition sets Israel's covenant renewal (altar of unhewn stones, the inscribed δευτερονόμιον, the recited blessings and curses, Deut 27) directly beside the kings' hostile muster — obedience answered by opposition — and supplies the κατάραι whose cognate ἐπικατάρατος Joshua later pronounces over the Gibeonites (v. 23).
9:4 μετὰ πανουργίας ... ἀσκοὺς ... κατερρωγότας ἀποδεδεμένους πανουργία ('cunning, all-working guile') labels the whole scheme; the same root describes the serpent at Gen 3:1, marking the morally negative quality of the deception. The staged props are rendered in vivid, rare perfect participles — wineskins 'burst and bound up' (v. 4), sandals 'patched/re-soled' (καταπεπελματωμένα, v. 5), bread 'growing mold' (εὐρωτιῶν, v. 5) — physical 'evidence' engineered to corroborate the lie ἐκ γῆς μακρόθεν.
9:14 καὶ ἔλαβον οἱ ἄρχοντες τοῦ ἐπισιτισμοῦ αὐτῶν καὶ κύριον οὐκ ἐπηρώτησαν The theological hinge of the chapter. ἐπερωτάω is the technical term for consulting a divine oracle (cf. the Urim, Num 27:21; 1 Sam 28:6); its omission — stated in flat καί-parataxis right after the leaders inspect the staged provisions — indicts the substitution of sensory 'evidence' (the moldy bread) and human reasoning for recourse to God. The fronted κύριον throws all weight on the One not consulted, the very God whose deeds the Gibeonites had just recited (vv. 9–10).
9:18–20 ὅτι ὤμοσαν αὐτοῖς ... κύριον τὸν θεὸν Ισραηλ ... οὐ δυνησόμεθα ἅψασθαι αὐτῶν The oath sworn by (κύριον, accusative of the one sworn by) the LORD is irrevocable because it invokes the divine name; οὐ δυνησόμεθα is moral inability, not lack of force. To break it would bring ὀργή 'against us' (v. 20) — the precise rationale vindicated when Saul's later violation of this covenant brings a three-year famine (2 Sam 21:1–9). The covenant is honoured even though fraudulently obtained: the sanctity of the sworn name outweighs the deceit that procured it.
9:21, 27 ξυλοκόποι καὶ ὑδροφόροι ... τῷ θυσιαστηρίῳ τοῦ θεοῦ The fixed pair 'hewers of wood and drawers of water' (cf. Deut 29:11) defines the Gibeonites' perpetual lot. In v. 21 it serves 'all the congregation'; in v. 27 Joshua extends it to 'the altar of God' and 'the place the LORD will choose' (the Deuteronomic central-sanctuary formula, Deut 12:5). Thus the curse (ἐπικατάρατοι, v. 23) is paradoxically consecrated into sanctuary-service, fulfilling Joshua's 'for me and for my God' (v. 23) and anticipating later temple-servant traditions.
9:7 πρὸς τὸν Χορραῖον The LXX reads 'the Horite' (Χορραῖος, חֹרִי) where the MT has 'the Hivite' (חִוִּי) — a frequent interchange of these two gentilics; the singular is collective for the deceptive embassy. The same chapter lists the Ευαῖοι ('Hivites') among the seven nations at v. 1, so the variant in v. 7 is a witness-level confusion of the two similar Hebrew terms rather than a theological move.
10:11 κύριος ἐπέρριψεν αὐτοῖς λίθους χαλάζης ἐκ τοῦ οὐρανοῦ The LORD casts down 'stones of hail' (λίθοι χαλάζης, rendering אַבְנֵי הַבָּרָד) from heaven, and the narrator states that the hail-deaths outnumbered the sword-deaths — making YHWH, not Israel, the decisive killer. The motif deliberately recalls the seventh Egyptian plague (Exod 9:18–25), framing the conquest as YHWH's continued war. The word λίθοι recurs pointedly of the stones Joshua rolls over the cave (vv. 18, 27).
10:12–13 στήτω ὁ ἥλιος κατὰ Γαβαων … καὶ ἔστη ὁ ἥλιος κατὰ μέσον τοῦ οὐρανοῦ THE LONG DAY — the chapter's headline crux and the most celebrated cosmic miracle in the OT. Joshua's elevated, quasi-poetic address (introduced by τότε, the marker of the Songs of Moses and Deborah) commands sun and moon to halt; the imperative στήτω is answered by the indicative ἔστη. The sun stands at mid-heaven and 'does not hasten' toward setting (οὐ προεπορεύετο εἰς δυσμάς) for 'about a whole day' (εἰς τέλος ἡμέρας μιᾶς). TEXT-CRITICAL: the Rahlfs text annotated here lacks the citation of the Book of the Upright (βιβλίον τοῦ εὐθοῦς / Book of Jashar) that the MT and some Greek witnesses include at this point.
10:14 ὥστε ἐπακοῦσαι θεὸν ἀνθρώπου … ὅτι κύριος συνεπολέμησεν τῷ Ισραηλ The theological climax: the day's uniqueness lies in the staggering claim that God 'heeded the voice of a man' (ἐπακοῦσαι θεὸν ἀνθρώπου) — the cosmos bending to Joshua's word — and the grounding thesis that the LORD himself was Israel's fellow-combatant (συμπολεμέω). The verb returns in durative form (συνεπολέμει) as the chapter's closing thesis at v. 42.
10:21 οὐκ ἔγρυξεν οὐθεὶς τῶν υἱῶν Ισραηλ τῇ γλώσσῃ αὐτοῦ The army returns ὑγιεῖς ('safe and sound', the holy-war ideal of victory without loss), and 'no one growled with his tongue' — the very Hebraism of Exod 11:7 (οὐ γρύξει κύων τῇ γλώσσῃ αὐτοῦ), there of Egypt's silent dogs, here transferred to Israel: an image of total, untroubled security under divine protection.
10:24–27 ἐπίθετε τοὺς πόδας ὑμῶν ἐπὶ τοὺς τραχήλους αὐτῶν … ἐκρέμασεν αὐτοὺς ἐπὶ πέντε ξύλων The ANE victory-gesture of feet-on-necks (cf. Ps 110:1) dramatizes the oracle 'none shall stand before you' (v. 8); the post-mortem hanging on trees (ξύλον) and the taking-down by evening enact the Deuteronomic law of the cursed hanged man (Deut 21:22–23) — the same law and word (ξύλον) Paul invokes at Gal 3:13. The kings' cave-refuge becomes their sealed tomb 'to this very day' (an etiological notice).
10:33 τότε ἀνέβη Αιλαμ βασιλεὺς Γαζερ βοηθήσων τῇ Λαχις An interlude breaking the city-by-city pattern: a sixth king (Horam of Gezer) comes 'to help' Lachish (the future participle βοηθήσων marks purpose) and is annihilated with his army — the would-be rescuer destroyed, underscoring that no aid can withstand the LORD's war. Note the same Greek name Αιλαμ designates the king of Hebron in v. 3.
11:6 νευροκοπήσεις … τετροπωμένους The command to "hamstring" (νευροκοπέω, lit. cut the leg-sinew) the war-horses, paired with the order to burn the chariots, is the LORD's deliberate destruction of the enemy's superior military technology — Israel is to win without acquiring the means of self-reliant power (cf. Deut 17:16; Ps 20:7). The perfect-passive participle τετροπωμένους ("already routed") delivered before the battle frames the still-future victory as a settled fact, the rhetorical signature of the divine-warrior oracle.
11:13 τὰς πόλεις τὰς κεχωματισμένας The perfect-passive participle of χωματίζω ("heap up with earth / build on a mound, χῶμα") renders Hebrew הֶעָרִים הָעֹמְדוֹת עַל־תִּלָּם ("the cities standing on their tell"), a striking near-archaeological description of Canaanite cities perched on accumulated occupation-mounds; these were spared from burning (only Hazor, head of the kingdoms, was burned) so as to be inhabited by Israel (cf. Deut 6:10–11) — the verse cleanly distinguishes the ḥērem on persons from the preservation of usable cities.
11:15 οὐ παρέβη οὐδὲν ἀπὸ πάντων ὧν συνέταξεν αὐτῷ Μωυσῆς The chapter's fullest obedience-statement: a three-link command-chain (LORD → Moses → Joshua) crowned by the emphatic double-negative "he transgressed nothing of all that Moses commanded." παραβαίνω ("step aside / transgress") renders עָבַר/סוּר; the verse presents Joshua as the model of perfect Deuteronomic obedience (cf. Deut 17:20; Josh 1:7), the counter-image to the disobedience that will later mar Israel.
11:20 ὅτι διὰ κυρίου ἐγένετο κατισχῦσαι αὐτῶν τὴν καρδίαν … ἵνα ἐξολεθρευθῶσιν The theological hinge and the chapter's most loaded crux: the reason no city sought peace is that "it was from the LORD" (διὰ κυρίου) that the enemies' heart was hardened to fight Israel — explicitly so that they might be devoted to destruction (the doubled ἵνα ἐξολεθρευθῶσιν, with ὅπως μὴ … ἔλεος, "that no mercy be given them"). κατισχύω here parallels Exodus' σκληρύνω (both render חִזֵּק), placing the hardening-for-ḥērem in the same frame as Pharaoh (Exod 4–14) and feeding directly into Paul's argument that God "hardens whom he wills" (Rom 9:17–18). The hardening fulfills, rather than frustrates, the LORD's prior word to Moses (ὃν τρόπον εἶπεν κύριος πρὸς Μωυσῆν).
11:21–22 ἐξωλέθρευσεν τοὺς Ενακιμ … πλὴν ἐν Γάζῃ καὶ ἐν Γεθ καὶ ἐν Ασεδωθ Joshua cuts off the Anakim — the giant clans whose stature had broken the spies' nerve a generation earlier (Num 13:28–33; Deut 9:2, "Who can stand before the sons of Anak?") — from Hebron, Debir, Anab, and all the hill country of Judah, the ban-verb ἐξωλέθρευσεν bracketing v. 21 as an inclusio. The qualifying note that they survived "only in Gaza, Gath, and Ashdod" both confirms the completeness of the highland-conquest and quietly seeds the later Philistine threat (Goliath of Gath, 1 Sam 17).
11:23 καὶ ἡ γῆ κατέπαυσεν πολεμουμένη The Deuteronomistic rest-formula closing the conquest: the present-passive participle πολεμουμένη ("being-warred-upon") names the state from which the land now rests, and καταπαύω (Hebrew שָׁקַט/נוּחַ) with its cognate noun κατάπαυσις becomes the technical term for the divine "rest" (cf. Deut 12:9–10; Josh 21:44; Ps 95:11). The motif is taken up by Heb 3–4 as a type of the eschatological rest that "remains for the people of God," making this quiet closing clause a seed of NT rest-theology.
12:4 ὑπελείφθη ἐκ τῶν γιγάντων Og king of Bashan is described as the surviving remnant 'of the giants'; the LXX renders the Hebrew רְפָאִים (Rephaim) by γίγαντες, the same word it uses for the antediluvian נְפִילִים of Gen 6:4. The note frames Israel's victory as the overthrow of a legendary giant-race (cf. Deut 3:11, Og's iron bedstead) and magnifies the divine power behind the Transjordanian conquest. Note also the syntactic shift: Sihon stood in the accusative (apposition to οὕς, v. 2), but Og is cast in the nominative as subject of ὑπελείφθη, singling him out.
12:6 / 12:7 ἔδωκεν αὐτὴν Μωυσῆς … / ἔδωκεν αὐτὴν Ἰησοῦς … The two allotment-clauses are deliberately parallel, structuring the whole chapter around the Moses/Joshua succession: Moses (ὁ παῖς κυρίου) grants the eastern land to the two-and-a-half tribes, Joshua grants the western land to the remaining tribes 'to inherit by their allotment' (κληρονομεῖν κατὰ κλῆρον αὐτῶν). The repetition presents the conquest as one continuous, divinely-mandated dispossession across two leaders, and the infinitive of purpose anticipates the detailed tribal land-distribution of chs. 13–21.
12:7 καὶ οὗτοι οἱ βασιλεῖς … οὓς ἀνεῖλεν Ἰησοῦς The cataloguing formula repeats v. 1 verbatim but substitutes Joshua for Moses and shifts ἀνεῖλον (3 pl.) to ἀνεῖλεν (3 sg.), foregrounding Joshua as the single agent. Grammatically this lone finite verb governs the entire roster of vv. 9–24: the bare accusatives βασιλέα Ιεριχω, βασιλέα Χεβρων, etc., have no verb of their own but hang on ἀνεῖλεν — 'whom Joshua killed: the king of Jericho, the king of Hebron …'.
12:9–24 βασιλέα + indeclinable toponym The roster's syntax is radically compressed: each king is reduced to βασιλέα ('the king of …') plus an uninflected Hebrew place-name in the role of a genitive of subordination. Of the dozens of names, virtually all are kind 'x' (indeclinable transliterations); only the appositional regional qualifiers that the LXX inflects (τῆς Σαρων, τῆς Γαλιλαίας) and the article-noun βασιλέα itself decline. The relentless paratactic list enacts the totality of the conquest by sheer accumulation.
12:23 Γωιμ τῆς Γαλιλαίας Where the Masoretic text reads גּוֹיִם לְגִלְגָּל ('Goiim belonging to Gilgal'), the LXX reads 'Goiim of Galilee,' apparently reading the consonants as a reference to the northern region rather than to Gilgal. 'Goiim' (גּוֹיִם, 'nations') is itself an unusual entity-name, perhaps a coalition of mixed peoples; the variant illustrates the kind of toponymic divergence pervasive in the Greek roster.
12:24 πάντες οὗτοι βασιλεῖς εἴκοσι ἐννέα The summary total of 'twenty-nine kings' is the chapter's most conspicuous LXX–MT divergence: the Masoretic text counts thirty-one. The shorter Greek figure reflects both a slightly shorter list and a different summation in the Greek tradition. The closing οὗτοι forms an inclusio with the heading-formula οὗτοι οἱ βασιλεῖς of vv. 1 and 7, sealing the chapter as a single, bounded victory-register.
13:1 ἡ γῆ ὑπολέλειπται πολλὴ εἰς κληρονομίαν The programmatic "land-remaining" theme. The resultative perfect ὑπολέλειπται (with the near-synonymous καταλελειμμένη, v. 2) renders Hebrew נִשְׁאֲרָה and stresses an abiding, unfinished state: even as the conquest leader ages, the inheritance is not yet possessed. This tension — Joshua's mortality against the unclaimed land — motivates the entire allotment section and is theologically resolved by the divine pledge ἐγὼ αὐτοὺς ἐξολεθρεύσω (v. 6): completion rests on YHWH, not on the human conqueror.
13:3 αἱ πέντε σατραπεῖαι τῶν Φυλιστιιμ The LXX renders the five Hebrew סְרָנִים ('Philistine lords/tyrants') with σατραπεία, a Persian-administrative loanword, anachronistically casting the Philistine city-rulers (Gazite, Azotian, Ashkelonite, Gittite, Ekronite) as provincial governors. The choice reflects the translator's Hellenistic-Persian administrative idiom and shows the LXX modernizing archaic political vocabulary; the appended τῷ Ευαίῳ ('the Hivite/Avvite') adds a sixth, non-Philistine remnant beyond the pentapolis.
13:12 οὗτος κατελείφθη ἀπὸ τῶν γιγάντων Og of Bashan is singled out as the last survivor "from the giants" (γίγαντες = LXX for רְפָאִים, the Rephaim; cf. Deut 3:11, the iron bedstead). The passive κατελείφθη frames him as a residual relic of a vanished giant race, and the doubled ἐπάταξεν … καὶ ἐξωλέθρευσεν marks his total destruction by Moses — the herem-verb ἐξολεθρεύω (also v. 6) signalling the complete extermination demanded of the Canaanite peoples.
13:14 κύριος ὁ θεὸς Ισραηλ οὗτος αὐτῶν κληρονομία The Levite-inheritance refrain and the chapter's theological hinge. The exceptive πλήν sets Levi apart from the territorial allotment, and the term κληρονομία is theologically inverted: Levi's "inheritance" is not land (נַחֲלָה) but YHWH himself, the resumptive οὗτος ('he himself') rendering the Hebrew pronominal emphasis הוּא (cf. Num 18:20; Deut 18:2; Ps 15[16]:5). The cultic privilege replaces territorial possession — a foundational statement of priestly identity carried into NT typology (Heb 7).
13:22 τὸν Βαλααμ … τὸν μάντιν ἀπέκτειναν ἐν τῇ ῥοπῇ The Balaam-notice, embedded in the Sihon/Midian casualty-list. The pejorative title ὁ μάντις ('diviner / soothsayer', rendering קֹסֵם) recasts the Numbers seer — whose oracles were unwillingly inspired (Num 22–24) — as a pagan practitioner of forbidden divination (Deut 18:10). His death ἐν τῇ ῥοπῇ (lit. 'in the downward swing / decisive turn') renders the Hebrew "by the sword" (Num 31:8 בַּחֶרֶב) with a vivid term for the sweep of slaughter, sealing the ironic end of the man who counseled the Baal-Peor seduction (Num 31:16).
13:30 πάσας τὰς κώμας Ιαϊρ … ἑξήκοντα πόλεις The "villages of Jair" (Havvoth-jair, Deut 3:14) are quantified as ἑξήκοντα πόλεις ('sixty cities'), the indeclinable numeral apposed to the accusative κώμας. The half-Manasseh grant illustrates the chapter's careful clan-level bookkeeping: the doubled Μαχιρ υἱοῦ Μανασση and the partitive τοῖς ἡμίσεσιν υἱοῖς (v. 31) register that only half the Machirite clans settled east of the Jordan, the others crossing west — a detail anchoring the tribe's later split inheritance (Josh 17).
14:8–9 προσετέθην / προσετέθης ἐπακολουθῆσαι (ὀπίσω) κυρίου The chapter's signature crux and theological heart. The LXX renders the rare Hebrew idiom מִלֵּא אַחֲרֵי ('fully follow after,' Num 14:24) with the striking passive προστίθημι ('add/attach oneself wholly') + the intensive ἐπακολουθέω ('follow closely after'); in v. 9 the directional ὀπίσω ('after, behind') is added, calquing הָלַךְ אַחֲרֵי יהוה, the classic idiom of undivided covenant discipleship. The construction expresses not mere obedience but total, persevering adherence — Caleb 'gave himself over wholly' to following the LORD, in sharp δέ … δέ antithesis to the brothers who 'turned aside the heart of the people' (μετέστησαν τὴν καρδίαν). The verb recurs a third time in the narrator's voice at v. 14, making wholehearted following the explicit ground of the perpetual inheritance: the inheritance-by-perseverance theme.
14:7 ἀπεκρίθην αὐτῷ λόγον κατὰ τὸν νοῦν αὐτοῦ The phrase 'I answered him a word according to his mind' renders a Hebrew idiom for a report given truthfully and in accord with the sender's true purpose. κατὰ τὸν νοῦν αὐτοῦ ('according to his mind,' i.e. Moses' / God's intent) characterizes Caleb's faithful minority report (Num 13:30; 14:6–9) over against the discouraging falsehood of the ten — he told the truth God intended, not what fear dictated. The cognate construction ἀπεκρίθην … λόγον ('answered a word') calques הֵשִׁיב דָּבָר ('bring back word').
14:11 ἰσχύω … ἐξελθεῖν καὶ εἰσελθεῖν εἰς τὸν πόλεμον The merism ἐξελθεῖν καὶ εἰσελθεῖν ('to go out and to come in') is a Hebraism (יָצָא וָבוֹא, cf. Deut 31:2; 1 Sam 18:13) for the full range of active life, here narrowed by εἰς τὸν πόλεμον to military campaigning. Caleb's claim of undiminished vigor (ἔτι … ὡσαύτως, 'still … in the same way') after forty-five years is not idle boast but the ground of a faith-laden request: he asks not for an easy portion but for the hardest fight, the Anakim stronghold itself.
14:12 ἐὰν … κύριος μετ᾿ ἐμοῦ ᾖ ἐξολεθρεύσω αὐτούς The conditional structure locates Caleb's confidence precisely: the protasis ἐὰν … κύριος μετ᾿ ἐμοῦ ᾖ ('if the LORD is with me') makes victory contingent on divine presence (cf. Josh 1:5, 9), not human strength, while the future ἐξολεθρεύσω ('I will utterly destroy,' a ḥerem-conquest leitwort rendering הוֹרִישׁ / הִשְׁמִיד) voices faith-grounded resolve. Caleb faces the Anakim — the very giants whose presence terrified the ten spies (Num 13:33) — with the confidence the others lacked, exemplifying the faith-vision that sees the obstacle and still trusts the promise.
14:15 πόλις Αρβοκ μητρόπολις τῶν Ενακιμ … ἡ γῆ ἐκόπασεν τοῦ πολέμου The antiquarian gloss identifies Hebron's former name as Αρβοκ (Hebrew אַרְבַּע, Arba = Kiriath-Arba, 'city of Arba,' the greatest of the Anakim, cf. 15:13) and dignifies it as μητρόπολις τῶν Ενακιμ ('mother-city of the Anakim') — underscoring that Caleb received the giants' very capital. The closing clause ἡ γῆ ἐκόπασεν τοῦ πολέμου ('the land rested from war'), with κοπάζω rendering שָׁקַט ('be quiet, have rest') and a genitive of separation, is the formulaic conquest-refrain (cf. 11:23; Judg 3:11) that frames the whole distribution as the fulfilment of God's promised rest in the land.
15:3 διαπορεύεται … ἀναβαίνει … διεκβαλεῖ The boundary-survey's chain of present- and future-tense motion-verbs personifies the border-line as a traveller that traverses, ascends, descends, and debouches from station to station; this is the LXX's calque of the Hebrew imperfect-narrative of the land-survey, where the gevul "goes out" (יָצָא) and "turns" (סָבַב). The same verbs recur across vv. 3–11 and are annotated once at first occurrence with cross-references.
15:8 ἐπὶ νώτου Ιεβους … αὕτη ἐστὶν Ιερουσαλημ The north line runs to the "shoulder" (νῶτον, rendering כָּתֵף, a mountain-flank) of the Jebusite, which the narrator glosses "this is Jerusalem." The aside identifies the pre-Israelite Jebus with Jerusalem and quietly sets up the chapter's closing admission (v. 63) that this very enclave on the boundary could not be absorbed — Jerusalem stands on Judah's border but outside its conquest.
15:13–15 πόλιν Αρβοκ μητρόπολιν Ενακ … Πόλις γραμμάτων Hebron is given its archaic name "city of Arba, mother-city (μητρόπολις, rendering אֲבִי) of Enak," tying Caleb's grant to the Anakim-conquest tradition (Num 13). Debir's old name Πόλις γραμμάτων ("City of Letters/Writings") translates קִרְיַת סֵפֶר, taking סֵפֶר as γράμματα and suggesting a scribal town — a detail that frames the conquest-contest of v. 16 and reappears in the catalogue at v. 49.
15:18–19 ἐβόησεν ἐκ τοῦ ὄνου … δός μοι εὐλογίαν … τὴν Γολαθμαιν Achsah's request is the chapter's narrative jewel. The Greek reads her gesture as a cry "from the donkey" (ἐβόησεν ἐκ τοῦ ὄνου, rendering the obscure Hebrew צָנַח, "dismount"). She asks for a "blessing" (εὐλογία) that is concretely water: since Caleb has settled her in the dry Negeb (εἰς γῆν Ναγεβ δέδωκάς με), she needs springs, and is granted "Golathmain the upper and the lower" — the LXX taking the Hebrew גֻּלֹּת ("basins/springs") as a place-name. Water-rights here are inheritance.
15:59[a] Θεκω … Εφραθα αὕτη ἐστὶν Βαιθλεεμ … πόλεις ἕνδεκα After "six cities" the Old Greek preserves a whole additional eleven-town district built around Ephratah/Bethlehem (Tekoa, Peor, Etam, Karem, Gallim, Bether, Manahath, etc.) that the Masoretic Text lacks at this point — almost certainly lost in the Hebrew by homoeoteleuton. Its inclusion means the LXX, alone, lists Bethlehem within Judah's allotment; the block is flagged with the editorial siglum [a].
15:63 οὐκ ἠδυνάσθησαν οἱ υἱοὶ Ιουδα ἀπολέσαι αὐτούς … ἕως τῆς ἡμέρας ἐκείνης The chapter's closing confession: Judah "could not destroy" (οὐκ ἠδυνάσθησαν … ἀπολέσαι, rendering the Hiphil of יָרַשׁ, "dispossess") the Jebusites, who go on dwelling in Jerusalem "to this day" (the standard etiological formula עַד הַיּוֹם הַזֶּה). The honest admission of incomplete conquest stands in pointed tension with the triumphant boundary-charter that precedes it, and looks forward to David's capture of the city (2 Sam 5:6–9).
16:2 τὰ ὅρια τοῦ Χαταρωθι The opaque toponym Χαταρωθι (with prefixed Χ- and final -ι) most likely transliterates MT Ataroth / Ataroth-addar (עַטְרוֹת אַדָּר); the related forms Αταρωθ (vv. 5, 7) and the city Γαζαρα/Γαζερ illustrate how the LXX boundary-list both varies its transliterations and diverges from the Masoretic names, a hallmark of the textually fluid allotment-tradition.
16:1–8 ἀναβήσεται … διεκβαλεῖ The boundary is narrated by a chain of future-tense 'itinerary' verbs that personify the border as a line that 'goes up', 'goes out', 'passes along', 'circles' and finally 'debouches' (διεκβάλλω, the technical terminus-verb). This calques the Hebrew weqatal boundary-formula; the seaward end-point is marked by ἡ διέξοδος ('the outgoing', vv. 3, 8), rendering תּוֹצָאוֹת.
16:9 αἱ πόλεις αἱ ἀφορισθεῖσαι … ἀνὰ μέσον τῆς κληρονομίας υἱῶν Μανασση A verbless note recognizing Ephraimite enclave-cities 'set apart' (aor. pass. ptcp. ἀφορισθεῖσαι) within Manasseh's territory; it registers the real intermingling of the two Joseph tribes and prepares for the Manasseh-allotment of ch. 17, while the idiom ἀνὰ μέσον (+ gen.) renders Hebrew בְּתוֹךְ ('in the midst of').
16:10a οὐκ ἀπώλεσεν Εφραιμ … καὶ κατῴκει ὁ Χαναναῖος … ἕως τῆς ἡμέρας ταύτης The incomplete-conquest formula: negated constative aorist (οὐκ ἀπώλεσεν, 'did not destroy') for the failure, durative imperfect (κατῴκει, 'kept dwelling') for the persisting Canaanite presence, and the etiological tag 'to this day' (עַד הַיּוֹם הַזֶּה). The same Gezer failure is reported at Judg 1:29; it is the leitmotif qualifying the conquest across the allotments.
16:10b ἕως ἀνέβη Φαραω … καὶ ἔδωκεν αὐτὴν Φαραω ἐν φερνῇ τῇ θυγατρὶ αὐτοῦ A substantial plus over MT, harmonized with 3 Kgdms (1 Kgs) 9:16: a second ἕως-clause carries the etiology forward to Pharaoh's capture, burning and slaughter (ἐξεκέντησαν) of Gezer and its gift as a dowry (φερνή) to his daughter, Solomon's wife. This Gezer-dowry resolution stands in this textual form in place of the φόρος/forced-labour clause flagged in the canonical motif — two competing traditions resolving the unconquered city.
17:4 διὰ προστάγματος κυρίου The pivot of the Zelophehad case: the daughters' inheritance is granted not by human concession but "by the command of the LORD," the divine-passive ἐδόθη marking the fulfilment of the standing ordinance given διὰ χειρὸς Μωυσῆ (Num 27:6–7; 36:2). The feminine participle λέγουσαι and feminine pronoun αὐταῖς keep the women grammatically and legally foregrounded — it is daughters who speak the claim and daughters to whom the κλῆρος is given.
17:6 θυγατέρες … ἐκληρονόμησαν κλῆρον The quasi-cognate construction ("the daughters inherited a lot") with θυγατέρες as the explicit subject of κληρονομέω is the striking legal innovation: females here perform the act of inheriting tribal land normally reserved to sons, the precedent that protects a sonless line's name and holding within the clan (the concern of Num 36).
17:11 τὸ τρίτον τῆς Ναφετα The LXX renders the obscure MT שְׁלֹשֶׁת הַנָּפֶת ("the three [regions] of Naphath / heights of Dor") as "the third part of Napheta," reading the numeral as an ordinal fraction; one of several places where the Greek Joshua's boundary-list reflects an uncertain or differently-vocalized Hebrew Vorlage, alongside the garbled enclave-toponymy (Βαιθσαν, Δωρ, Μαγεδδω) of the unconquered Jezreel-corridor cities.
17:13 ἐξολεθρεῦσαι δὲ αὐτοὺς οὐκ ἐξωλέθρευσαν A Hebraizing emphatic construction: the fronted infinitive ἐξολεθρεῦσαι resumed by the cognate finite verb οὐκ ἐξωλέθρευσαν renders the infinitive-absolute idiom (הוֹרֵשׁ לֹא הוֹרִישׁ), throwing stress on the verbal idea — extermination is precisely what Israel did NOT carry out. Subjugation to forced labour (ὑπηκόους = מַס) replaces herem, the programmatic note of the incomplete conquest (cf. Judg 1:28; 2:1–3).
17:15 ἀνάβηθι εἰς τὸν δρυμὸν καὶ ἐκκάθαρον σεαυτῷ Joshua's self-help charge turns the complaint's premise (λαὸς πολύς) into a command: if you are so numerous, win room by your own labour. ἐκκαθαίρω ("clear thoroughly", of felling forest, Hebrew בָּרָא) and the reflexive σεαυτῷ ("for yourself") throw responsibility back on the tribes; στενοχωρεῖ ("cramps / presses for room") vividly frames the grievance as one of mere space, solvable by expansion into the wooded highland.
17:18 σὺ γὰρ ὑπερισχύεις αὐτοῦ The theological climax of the chapter: the ὑπερ-compound (ὑπερισχύω, "be superior in strength", + genitive of comparison) asserts Israel's decisive superiority over the Canaanite despite his elite cavalry and iron chariotry (ἵππος ἐπίλεκτος, σίδηρος). What Manasseh failed to do (vv. 12–13, ἐξολεθρεῦσαι) is now laid on the Joseph-tribes as an achievable charge (ὅταν ἐξολεθρεύσῃς) — grounded not in superior technology but in numerical and divinely-blessed strength (vv. 14, 17). The chapter ends on a summons to faith-driven conquest, not its record.
18:1 ἔπηξαν … τὴν σκηνὴν τοῦ μαρτυρίου … ἡ γῆ ἐκρατήθη The verse compresses two epochal claims: the founding of Shiloh as the central sanctuary (the tent of meeting is fixed there, the cult-home of Israel until 1 Sam 4) and the formal completion of the conquest (ἡ γῆ ἐκρατήθη ὑπ᾿ αὐτῶν, κρατέω rendering כבשׁ 'subdue'). The LXX's μαρτύριον for Hebrew מוֹעֵד ('meeting') reinterprets the tent as the locus of divine testimony, not merely assembly.
18:7 ἱερατεία … κυρίου μερὶς αὐτοῦ The ground for counting only seven portions: Levi has no land because 'the priesthood of the LORD is its portion'. The LXX makes the priestly office itself (ἱερατεία, כְּהֻנָּה) the substitute inheritance, a theology stated across the Pentateuch (Num 18:20; Deut 10:9) and central to Joshua's distribution scheme; the two-and-a-half Transjordan tribes are likewise excluded as already settled by Moses (ὁ παῖς κυρίου).
18:8 χωροβατῆσαι τὴν γῆν The verb χωροβατέω (χῶρος 'land' + βαίνω 'walk') is a technical LXX-Joshua coinage for surveying land on foot, with no single Hebrew equivalent; it presents the allotment not as armchair partition but as a methodical, embodied walking-out of the territory, recorded κατὰ πόλεις … εἰς βιβλίον (v. 9) — a documentary land-register.
18:16 Γαιεννα … νώτου Ιεβουσαι The southern boundary runs through landmarks loaded with later significance: Γαιεννα transliterates גֵּיא הִנֹּם (the valley of Hinnom), the topographical source of NT γέεννα ('Gehenna'), while νῶτον Ιεβουσαι ('the ridge of the Jebusite') names pre-conquest Jerusalem. The LXX's κατὰ/ἐπὶ νώτου for Hebrew כֶּתֶף ('shoulder') is a consistent topographical calque for the flank or spur of a height.
18:19 ἐπὶ λοφιὰν τῆς θαλάσσης τῶν ἁλῶν The terminus of the southern border is rendered with λοφιά ('ridge/crest', properly an animal's mane), a striking calque for Hebrew לָשׁוֹן ('tongue, bay') — the northern bay of the Salt Sea (ἡ θάλασσα τῶν ἁλῶν = יָם הַמֶּלַח, the Dead Sea). The translator reaches for a vivid physical image where the Hebrew uses a body-part metaphor for a geographical feature.
18:28 καὶ Ιεβους αὕτη ἐστὶν Ιερουσαλημ The climactic identification-gloss assigns Jerusalem (under its pre-Israelite name Jebus) to Benjamin's city-list, on the tribe's southern border with Judah (cf. Josh 15:8, 63). The note is theologically weighty in retrospect: the future capital and temple-city is reckoned to Benjamin here, even as it remained unconquered in Joshua's day (Judg 1:21); the compressed Greek (πόλεις … Γαβαωθιαριμ) also illustrates the Old Greek's free handling of the Hebrew name-cluster גִּבְעַת קִרְיַת.
19:1, 9 ἀνὰ μέσον κλήρων υἱῶν Ιουδα · ἡ μερὶς υἱῶν Ιουδα μείζων Simeon receives no contiguous land but is embedded 'in the midst of' Judah's lot, because Judah's portion was 'larger' (μείζων) than the tribe needed (v. 9). The notice quietly fulfils Jacob's oracle that Simeon and Levi would be 'divided in Jacob and scattered in Israel' (Gen 49:7): of the lay tribes, only Simeon never holds an independent territory, and it is eventually absorbed into Judah.
19:11–34 συνάψει · διελεύσεται · περιελεύσεται · ἀναστρέψει · ἡ διέξοδος The boundary descriptions deploy a fixed technical vocabulary of LXX-Joshua: συνάπτω ('join / touch', for a border meeting a feature, רendering פָּגַע), διέρχομαι ('pass through', עָבַר), περιέρχομαι ('circle around', תָּאַר/סָבַב), ἀναστρέφω/ἐπιστρέφω ('turn back', שׁוּב), and the noun διέξοδος ('outgoing / extremity', for the terminus of a line, תֹּצְאוֹת). The alternation of aorist and future verbs reflects the Hebrew waw-consecutive / imperfect alternation of boundary lists, lending the survey a quasi-prescriptive cast.
19:27 διελεύσεται εἰς Χωβα μασομελ The Old Greek has mistaken the Hebrew directional מִשְּׂמֹאל ('on the left', i.e. to the north) for part of the toponym, transliterating it as μασομελ rather than rendering it — a classic example of the translator's reluctance, in this boundary material, to distinguish appellatives from proper names, producing agglutinated 'place-names' (cf. Σαφθαιβαιθμε for Beth-emek in the same verse).
19:47–48 οὐκ ἐξέθλιψαν … τὸν θλίβοντα … καὶ ἔθλιψαν · ἐβαρύνθη ἡ χεὶρ τοῦ Εφραιμ … εἰς φόρον The expanded Danite notice turns on a threefold play with the root θλίβω: the Amorite 'oppresses' (θλίβοντα) Dan, Dan cannot 'press out' (ἐξέθλιψαν) the Amorite, and the Amorite 'squeezes' (ἔθλιψαν) Dan's border — the territorial constriction that drives the Danite migration of Judges 18. The surviving Amorite is reduced to a corvée levy (εἰς φόρον, rendering מַס) under the 'heavy hand' (ἐβαρύνθη ἡ χείρ, a Hebraism for imposed dominion) of the house of Ephraim, the recurring Judges-era pattern of incomplete conquest (cf. Judg 1:34–35). The Old Greek's Λασενδακ conflates the MT's Leshem (renamed Dan) with Lachish.
19:49, 51 ἐμβατεῦσαι τὴν γῆν · ἐναντίον κυρίου παρὰ τὰς θύρας τῆς σκηνῆς τοῦ μαρτυρίου The verb ἐμβατεύω is the technical legal term for 'entering upon' an inheritance, framing both the people's possession (v. 49) and the section's close (v. 51). The grand colophon roots the whole land-division in three sacral coordinates — 'by lot' (κατὰ κλήρους), 'in Shiloh' (ἐν Σηλω), and 'before the LORD at the doors of the tent of witness' (σκηνὴ τοῦ μαρτυρίου, the standard LXX rendering of אֹהֶל מוֹעֵד) — naming priest, leader, and tribal heads as a single unified agency under YHWH's authority.
20:3–9 LXX lacks MT vv. 4–6 The Old Greek of Joshua 20 is considerably shorter than the MT, omitting the equivalent of MT vv. 4–6 — the gate-procedure, the elders' reception of the fugitive, the requirement that he remain until the high priest's death, and his return home. Consequently the preserved Greek verse numbering runs 1, 2, 3, 7, 8, 9, jumping straight from v. 3 to v. 7. This is one of the clearest examples in Joshua of the shorter, probably earlier, Hebrew Vorlage that the LXX translator rendered, before the expansions reflected in the MT.
20:2 τὰς πόλεις τῶν φυγαδευτηρίων φυγαδευτήριον ('place of refuge / asylum') is a distinctive LXX coinage from φυγαδεύω ('put to flight / banish'), rendering Hebrew מִקְלָט; the cities are not merely 'refuge-cities' but institutions formally consecrated for asylum. The relative clause ἃς εἶπα … διὰ Μωυσῆ explicitly grounds Joshua's act in the prior Mosaic legislation (Num 35; Deut 19), framing the appointment as obedient implementation rather than fresh revelation.
20:3 ὁ ἀγχιστεύων τὸ αἷμα The participial phrase ('the one who avenges the blood') renders גֹּאֵל הַדָּם, the kinsman-redeemer obligated to requite a slain relative's blood. The same root ἀγχιστεύω elsewhere renders the redemption-duties of the next-of-kin (cf. Ruth 3–4); here it names the agent of blood-vengeance whom the asylum-system is designed to restrain. The whole asylum-law turns on the single adverb ἀκουσίως ('unintentionally', rendering בִּשְׁגָגָה), which distinguishes accidental manslaughter from premeditated murder.
20:7 τὴν πόλιν Αρβοκ· αὕτη ἐστὶν Χεβρων The translator's identifying gloss equates the archaic name Αρβοκ (Hebrew קִרְיַת אַרְבַּע, Kiriath-Arba) with the familiar Χεβρων (Hebron). Such 'X, that is Y' name-equations are a recurring feature of LXX Joshua, updating obsolete toponyms for a later readership and reflecting the translator's concern to locate the refuge-cities precisely on the contemporary map.
20:9 τῷ προσηλύτῳ τῷ προσκειμένῳ ἐν αὐτοῖς The closing summary extends the right of asylum beyond the native Israelite to the προσήλυτος ('resident alien / sojourner', rendering גֵּר) who has 'attached himself' (προσκείμενος) to the community. This enacts the Pentateuchal principle of one law for native and sojourner (Num 35:15; cf. Lev 24:22), and the LXX term προσήλυτος — here still the foreign resident rather than the later technical 'convert' — anticipates the word's developed sense in Hellenistic-Jewish and NT usage (e.g. Acts 2:11).
21:2, 13 περισπόρια / τὰ ἀφωρισμένα The chapter uses two distinct Greek terms for the Levitical pasturelands. περισπόρια ('lands sown round about', a compound of περί + σπόρος) renders Hebrew מִגְרָשׁ and frames vv. 2–11 and 34–41; from v. 13 through v. 32 the translator switches to the substantivized perfect-passive participle τὰ ἀφωρισμένα ('the things set apart', from ἀφορίζω). The same root ἀφορίζω also describes the asylum-cities themselves (τὴν πόλιν τὴν ἀφωρισμένην, vv. 27, 32). The alternation is a classic marker of the composite, multi-hand character of Old Greek Joshua.
21:11 Καριαθαρβοκ … αὕτη ἐστὶν Χεβρων μητρόπολιν τῶν Ενακ The first priestly city is given by its archaic name Kiriath-Arba with the narratorial gloss αὕτη ἐστὶν Χεβρων ('this is Hebron'), a standard LXX device for equating old and current toponyms (cf. Gen 14:2–3). It is titled μητρόπολις τῶν Ενακ ('mother-city of the Anakim'), recalling the giant clans whom Caleb dispossessed (14:12–15); yet v. 12 carefully reserves the city's fields and villages to Caleb's house ἐν κατασχέσει, distinguishing the priests' cultic right to the town from Caleb's hereditary patrimony of its farmland.
21:29 Πηγὴν γραμμάτων Among the indeclinable transliterated toponyms the translator unexpectedly renders one place-name into Greek: Πηγὴ γραμμάτων ('Spring of Letters/Writings'). This reflects a reading of the Hebrew עֵין־גַּנִּים ('En-gannim', 'spring of gardens') as though from a root meaning 'documents/writings' — a translator's etymologizing gloss rather than a true place-name, and a window onto the Greek translator's interpretive method.
21:42 the LXX plus (Thamnasarach and the flint knives) After the layout-note, the Old Greek preserves a long plus absent from the MT: Joshua completes the division of the land, the people grant him his own inheritance — Timnath-serah (Θαμνασαραχ) in the hill-country of Ephraim, which he rebuilds and settles — and he deposits there τὰς μαχαίρας τὰς πετρίνας, the flint knives of the Gilgal circumcision (5:2–3). The plus harmonizes ch. 21 with 19:49–50 and 24:30 (LXX), rounding off the allotment by showing the leader himself, last of all, receiving his portion, and preserving a covenant-relic in his town.
21:45 οὐ διέπεσεν … πάντα παρεγένετο The theological summit of the book. The verb διαπίπτω ('fall through / fail', of a 'word' falling to the ground, cf. 1 Kgs 8:56; 4 Kgdms 10:10) with the partitive οὐ … ἀπὸ πάντων τῶν ῥημάτων τῶν καλῶν, capped by the absolute πάντα παρεγένετο ('everything came to pass'), makes the most comprehensive possible claim for divine faithfulness: not one of all God's good promises failed; all were realized. Restated nearly verbatim by Joshua at 23:14 and by Solomon at 1 Kgs 8:56, it becomes Scripture's standard measure of the reliability of God's word.
22:5 ἀγαπᾶν κύριον τὸν θεὸν ὑμῶν … ἐξ ὅλης τῆς διανοίας … καὶ ἐξ ὅλης τῆς ψυχῆς The Deuteronomic Shema (Deut 6:5 LXX) placed at the structural heart of Joshua's charge; the chain of infinitives (ἀγαπᾶν, πορεύεσθαι, φυλάξασθαι, προσκεῖσθαι, λατρεύειν) defines covenant fidelity as whole-personed love and service, the positive theological counterweight to the feared apostasy of the altar. διάνοια renders Hebrew לֵבָב ("heart"), as elsewhere in the LXX Shema-tradition.
22:10 βωμὸν … βωμὸν μέγαν τοῦ ἰδεῖν The pivotal building-act, marked by emphatic Hebraizing apposition stressing the altar's conspicuous size. The choice of βωμός (not θυσιαστήριον) signals from the outset a potentially illegitimate rival shrine; τοῦ ἰδεῖν ("to behold") frames it as a visible monument — which the eastern tribes will reinterpret as a witness-monument rather than a cult-site.
22:17 τὸ ἁμάρτημα Φογωρ … καὶ ἐγενήθη πληγὴ ἐν τῇ συναγωγῇ κυρίου The first precedent of corporate guilt: the apostasy at Baal-Peor (Num 25), whose plague struck the whole congregation, with Phinehas himself the agent of atonement — lending peculiar force to his presence in the delegation. The interrogative μή expects "no": the sin was not small, and its defilement still lingers (οὐκ ἐκαθαρίσθημεν).
22:20 Αχαρ ὁ τοῦ Ζαρα πλημμελείᾳ ἐπλημμέλησεν ἀπὸ τοῦ ἀναθέματος The clinching precedent (Josh 7): one man's trespass with the devoted thing (ἀνάθεμα = חֵרֶם) brought wrath on the whole congregation, and "he did not die alone." The cognate-dative πλημμελείᾳ ἐπλημμέλησεν renders the Hebrew infinitive-absolute construction (מָעֹל מָעַל), intensifying the gravity; the same verb πλημμελέω links the accusation (v. 16), the oath (v. 22), and the acquittal (v. 31).
22:22 ὁ θεὸς θεός ἐστιν κύριος καὶ ὁ θεὸς θεὸς κύριος The most solemn oath-formula in the chapter: a doubled triple-naming of God rendering אֵל אֱלֹהִים יְהוָה, calling the LORD himself as witness, followed by a self-imprecation (εἰ … ἐπλημμελήσαμεν … μὴ ῥύσαιτο ἡμᾶς). The piling of divine titles is liturgical solemnity, not redundancy — the strongest possible protestation of innocence.
22:27, 34 μαρτύριον … ἀνὰ μέσον ἡμῶν καὶ ὑμῶν The chapter's keyword: the altar is not a θυσιαστήριον for sacrifice but a μαρτύριον ("witness," rendering עֵד), a standing monument testifying that the eastern tribes share in the worship of the LORD — paralleling the witness-heap of Gen 31:48. Joshua's closing etiological naming (v. 34) ratifies this, declaring the witness's content: κύριος ὁ θεὸς αὐτῶν ἐστιν, the confession uniting all Israel under one God.
22:29 πλὴν τοῦ θυσιαστηρίου κυρίου ὅ ἐστιν ἐναντίον τῆς σκηνῆς αὐτοῦ The climax of the βωμός/θυσιαστήριον distinction and of the one-sanctuary theology: the eastern tribes utterly disavow (μὴ γένοιτο) any sacrificial altar "besides" (πλήν) the single legitimate θυσιαστήριον that stands before the tent of meeting. The juxtaposition of the transliterated σαλαμιν (שְׁלָמִים) with the Greek θυσία σωτηρίου in the same verse reflects the translator's close formal dependence on the Hebrew Vorlage.
23:3 ὁ ἐκπολεμήσας ὑμῖν The articular aorist participle turns 'the-one-who-fought-for-you' into a divine title and states the thesis of the whole discourse: Israel's victories are the LORD's warfare (cf. Exod 14:14, κύριος πολεμήσει). The intensive compound ἐκπολεμέω ('fight out to the end') renders the Niphal נִלְחָם; the dative ὑμῖν is a dative of advantage ('on your behalf'). The same root recurs in the imperfect ἐξεπολέμει at v. 10, framing the divine-warrior motif.
23:8 κυρίῳ τῷ θεῷ ὑμῶν προσκολληθήσεσθε The fronted dative and the verb προσκολλάομαι ('be glued to / cling') make exclusive covenant adhesion the positive counterpart of v. 7's prohibitions. The LXX's standard rendering of דָּבַק, the verb describes loyalty as an unbreakable bond (Deut 10:20; 11:22; 30:20) and is the same word used of marital union at Gen 2:24; the passive-deponent future has imperatival force. In v. 12 the apostate inversion appears: instead of cleaving to the LORD, Israel would 'attach itself' (προσθῆσθε) to the nations.
23:13 εἰς ἥλους ἐν ταῖς πτέρναις … καὶ εἰς βολίδας ἐν τοῖς ὀφθαλμοῖς ὑμῶν A vivid four-fold expansion of the snare-motif: snares (παγίδας), stumbling-blocks (σκάνδαλα), nails in the heels, and darts in the eyes. The imagery renders the thorns-and-pricks of Num 33:55 (שִׂכִּים בְּעֵינֵיכֶם), depicting the surviving nations as a constant, crippling affliction from heel to eye. The emphatic οὐ μὴ προσθῇ … τοῦ ἐξολεθρεῦσαι ('he will by no means continue to drive out') exactly reverses the promise of v. 5, and ἀπόλησθε ('you perish') turns the nations' doom (ἀπόλωνται, v. 5) against Israel.
23:14 οὐ διέπεσεν εἷς λόγος … οὐ διεφώνησεν ἐξ αὐτῶν The fulfilment-formula on which the chapter pivots. διαπίπτω ('fall through, fail') renders נָפַל; the doubled assertion with the LXX idiom διαφωνέω ('be lacking / go missing', cf. 1 Sam 30:19) insists that not a single divine word has failed of fulfilment (cf. Josh 21:45; 1 Kgs 8:56). This realized faithfulness is precisely what makes the threatened curse of v. 15 inescapable: the God who keeps his good words will keep his evil words too.
23:15 οὕτως ἐπάξει κύριος … πάντα τὰ ῥήματα τὰ πονηρά The correlative ὃν τρόπον … οὕτως builds the covenant's blessing-curse symmetry directly on the fulfilment-formula of v. 14. The verb ἐπάγω ('bring upon', the same used for the plagues at Exod 11:1) and the keyword ἐξολεθρεύω — applied throughout to the Canaanite nations (vv. 4, 5, 9) — are now turned against a covenant-breaking Israel, who would forfeit 'this good land' (ἡ γῆ ἡ ἀγαθή, Deut 1:35) the LORD freely gave. The logic anticipates the Deuteronomistic theology of exile and Paul's use of σκάνδαλον (v. 13) at Rom 9:33; 11:9.
24:1, 25 εἰς Σηλω / ἐν Σηλω The LXX locates the covenant assembly 'at Shelo' (Shiloh), where the MT reads שְׁכֶם (Shechem). The reference to the σκηνή ('tent') of the God of Israel (v. 25) suits the LXX's Shiloh, the sanctuary site of Josh 18:1, whereas the MT's Shechem connects the scene with the patriarchal covenant-tree of Gen 35:4 (the terebinth of v. 26). The two traditions thus anchor the same covenant in two different sacred geographies.
24:12 οὐκ ἐν τῇ ῥομφαίᾳ σου οὐδὲ ἐν τῷ τόξῳ σου The double disclaimer of human agency — the conquest accomplished by the LORD's σφηκιά ('hornet/dread') sent ahead, 'not by your sword nor by your bow' — is the theological summit of the recital (cf. Ps 44:3–6). It grounds the entire summons to exclusive loyalty: a land received as sheer grace, won by the divine warrior, demands undivided service of the Giver, not pride in human strength.
24:15 ἐγὼ δὲ καὶ ἡ οἰκία μου λατρεύσομεν κυρίῳ Joshua's confession, framed by the emphatic ἐγὼ δέ against the people's hypothetical wavering, models covenant leadership: the head of a household pledges his whole house to the LORD. Grounded in ὅτι ἅγιός ἐστιν, it became a classic statement of corporate, familial fidelity and the rhetorical fulcrum of the whole chapter.
24:19 οὐ μὴ δύνησθε λατρεύειν κυρίῳ … θεὸς ἅγιός ἐστιν καὶ ζηλώσας Joshua's startling rebuttal of the people's easy pledge — 'you will by no means be able to serve the LORD' (οὐ μή + subjunctive, the strongest Greek negation) — is no discouragement but a deliberate deepening of the covenant's seriousness. The LORD's holiness (ἅγιος) and jealousy (ζηλώσας, the 'jealous God' of the Decalogue) mean that apostasy cannot be casually forgiven; the covenant must be entered with eyes open.
24:27 ὁ λίθος οὗτος … αὐτὸς ἀκήκοεν The bold personification of the standing stone as a witness that 'has heard' (perfect ἀκήκοεν) all the LORD's words turns an inanimate monument into a competent legal witness against future faithlessness, framed as covenant-perjury (ἡνίκα ἐὰν ψεύσησθε κυρίῳ). The stone, like the people themselves (μάρτυρες … καθ᾽ ὑμῶν, v. 22), becomes a perpetual testimony to the sworn pledge.
24:31, 33 LXX pluses: αἱ μάχαιραι αἱ πέτριναι; Εγλωμ τῷ βασιλεῖ Μωαβ The LXX of Joshua 24 diverges sharply from the MT at the chapter's end. At v. 31 it adds that the flint knives of the Gilgal circumcision (Josh 5:2–3) were buried with Joshua and 'are there to this day' — an aetiological note linking his grave to the covenant-rite of entry into the land. The long plus at v. 33 — the carrying of the ark, Phinehas' priesthood, and Israel's apostasy to Astarte and the Astaroth, punished by subjugation to Eglom (Eglon) king of Moab for eighteen years — has no MT counterpart and reproduces the cyclical schema of Judges (apostasy → handing-over → oppression; cf. Judg 3:12–14), making the Greek close of Joshua a deliberate narrative bridge into the period of the Judges.

How the data set is organized

The interpretive tiers (syntactic function, semantic force, discourse structure, and the proposed argument outlines) are interpretive by nature; where readings legitimately differ, the more common analysis was generally chosen, and the lexical notes are condensed orientation rather than a substitute for a lexicon (e.g. LEH / Muraoka) or a full commentary.